Search results for 'B-theory' (try it on Scholar)

1000+ found
Sort by:
  1. Stephan Torre (2009). Truth-Conditions, Truth-Bearers and the New B-Theory of Time. Philosophical Studies 142 (3):325-344.score: 240.0
    In this paper I consider two strategies for providing tenseless truth-conditions for tensed sentences: the token-reflexive theory and the date theory. Both theories have faced a number of objections by prominent A-theorists such as Quentin Smith and William Lane Craig. Traditionally, these two theories have been viewed as rival methods for providing truth-conditions for tensed sentences. I argue that the debate over whether the token-reflexive theory or the date theory is true has arisen from a failure to distinguish between conditions (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Daniel M. Johnson (2013). B-Theory Old and New: On Ontological Commitment. Synthese 190 (17):3953-3970.score: 240.0
    The most important argument against the B-theory of time is the paraphrase argument. The major defense against that argument is the “new” tenseless theory of time, which is built on what I will call the “indexical reply” to the paraphrase argument. The move from the “old” tenseless theory of time to the new is most centrally a change of viewpoint about the nature and determiners of ontological commitment. Ironically, though, the new tenseless theorists have generally not paid enough sustained, (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Francesco Orilia & L. Nathan Oaklander (2013). Do We Really Need a New B-Theory of Time? Topoi:1-14.score: 240.0
    It is customary in current philosophy of time to distinguish between an A- (or tensed) and a B- (or tenseless) theory of time. It is also customary to distinguish between an old B-theory of time, and a new B-theory of time. We may say that the former holds both semantic atensionalism and ontological atensionalism, whereas the latter gives up semantic atensionalism and retains ontological atensionalism. It is typically assumed that the B-theorists have been induced by advances in the (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Natalja Deng (2013). Our Experience of Passage on the B-Theory. Erkenntnis 78 (4):713-726.score: 180.0
    Elsewhere I have suggested that the B-theory includes a notion of passage, by virtue of including succession. Here, I provide further support for that claim by showing that uncontroversial elements of the B-theory straightforwardly ground a veridical sense of passage. First, I argue that the B-theory predicts that subjects of experience have a sense of passivity with respect to time that they do not have with respect to space, which they are right to have, even according to (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Mikel Burley (2008). The B-Theory of Time and the Fear of Death. Polish Journal of Philosophy 2 (2):21-38.score: 180.0
    This paper discusses Robin Le Poidevin’s proposal that a commitment to the B-theory of time provides a reason to relinquish the fear of death. After outlining Le Poidevin’s views on time and death, I analyze the specific passages in which he makes his proposal, giving close attention to the claim that, for the B-theorist, one’s life is “eternally real.” I distinguish two possible interpretations of this claim, which I call alethic eternalism and ontic eternalism respectively, and argue, with reference (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Alexander Pruss, B-Theory, Language and Ethics.score: 180.0
    The A-theory of time states that there is an absolute fact of the matter about what events are, respectively, in the past, present and future. The B-theory says that all there is to temporality are the relations of earlier-than, later-than and simultaneous-with, and the past, present and future are merely relative.
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Dean W. Zimmerman (2005). The A-Theory of Time, the B-Theory of Time, and 'Taking Tense Seriously'. Dialectica 59 (4):401–457.score: 156.0
    The paper has two parts: First, I describe a relatively popular thesis in the philosophy of propositional attitudes, worthy of the name “taking tense seriously”; and I distinguish it from a family of views in the metaphysics of time, namely, the A-theories (or what are sometimes called “tensed theories of time”). Once the distinction is in focus, a skeptical worry arises. Some A-theorists maintain that the difference between past, present, and future, is to be drawn in terms of what exists: (...)
    Direct download (11 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Josh Parsons (2002). A-Theory for B-Theorists. Philosophical Quarterly 52 (206):1-20.score: 150.0
    The debate between A-theory and B-theory in the philosophy of time is a persistent one. It is not always clear, however, what the terms of this debate are. A-theorists are often lumped with a miscellaneous collection of heterodox doctrines: the view that only the present exists, that time flows relentlessly, or that presentness is a property (Williams 1996); that time passes, tense is unanalysable, or that earlier than and later than are defined in terms of pastness, presentness, and futurity (...)
    Direct download (10 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. Joseph Diekemper (2007). B-Theory, Fixity, and Fatalism. Noûs 41 (3):429–452.score: 150.0
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. William Lane Craig (1996). The New B-Theory's Tu Quoque Argument. Synthese 107 (2):249 - 269.score: 150.0
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. William Lane Craig (1996). Tense and the New B-Theory of Language. Philosophy 71 (275):5 - 26.score: 150.0
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. Dirck Vorenkamp (1995). B-Series Temporal Order in Dōgen's Theory of Time. Philosophy East and West 45 (3):387-408.score: 150.0
    Dōgen's views of time are descriptively compared to the modern western philosophical view called "B-theory" and found to contain elements of each of the four main tenets of the B-theory. Furthermore, a fundamental incongruency is discovered. Even accounting for traditional Buddhist approaches to apparent contradictions, Dōgen's problems in this regard call into question the assumption of consistency that has characterized modern interpretations of his views on time.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. Michelle Beer (2008). Prior's' Thank Goodness That's Over'Objection to the B-Theory. In L. Nathan Oaklander (ed.), The Philosophy of Time. Routledge.score: 150.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. William Lane Craig (1996). Tense and the New B-Theory Of. Philosophy 71:5.score: 150.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. M. Joshua Mozersky (forthcoming). The B-Theory in the 20th Century. In Adrian Bardon & Heather Dyke (eds.), The Blackwell Companion to the Philosophy of Time. Wiley-Blackwell.score: 150.0
  16. L. Nathan Oaklander (2008). Two Versions B-Theory Of. In , The Philosophy of Time. Routledge. 1--398.score: 150.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. Nigel J. T. Thomas (1989). Experience and Theory as Determinants of Attitudes Toward Mental Representation: The Case of Knight Dunlap and the Vanishing Images of J.B. Watson. Philosophical Explorations.score: 144.0
    Galton and subsequent investigators find wide divergences in people's subjective reports of mental imagery. Such individual differences might be taken to explain the peculiarly irreconcilable disputes over the nature and cognitive significance of imagery which have periodically broken out among psychologists and philosophers. However, to so explain these disputes is itself to take a substantive and questionable position on the cognitive role of imagery. This article distinguishes three separable issues over which people can be "for" or "against" mental images. Conflation (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. Carol Rausch Albright (2010). James B. Ashbrook and His Holistic World: Toward a "Unified Field Theory" of Mind, Brain, Self, World, and God. Zygon 45 (2):479-489.score: 144.0
    James B. Ashbrook's "new natural theology in an empirical mode" pursued an integrated understanding of the spiritual, psychological, and neurological dimensions of spiritual life. Knowledge of neuroscience and personality theory was central to his quest, and his understandings were necessarily revised and amplified as scientific findings emerged. As a result, Ashbrook's legacy may serve as a case example of how to do religion-and-science in a milieu of scientific change. The constant in the quest was Ashbrook's core belief in the basic (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. Marion Vorms (2012). A-Not-B Errors: Testing the Limits of Natural Pedagogy Theory. Review of Philosophy and Psychology 3 (4):525-545.score: 144.0
    Gergely and Csibra's theory, known as "natural pedagogy theory", is meant to explain how infants fast-learn generic knowledge from adults. In this paper, my goal is to assess the explanatory import of this theory in a particular case, namely the phenomena known as "A-not-B errors". I first propose a clarification of natural pedagogy theory's fundamental hypotheses. Then, I describe Topál et al.'s (Science, 321, 1831-1834, 2008) experiments, which consist in applying natural pedagogy theory's framework to the A-not-B errors. Finally, I (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. William M. Kallfelz (2009). A Response to G.B. Bagci's “Ghirardi-Rimini-Weber Collapse Theory and Whiteheadian Process Philosophy”. Process Studies 38 (2):394-411.score: 144.0
    I examine G.B. Bagci’s arguments for the Ghirardi-Rimini-Weber (GRW) interpretation of non-relativistic quantum mechanics as ideally suited for Whitehead’s philosophy. Much of Bagci’s claims are in response to Michael Epperson, who argues in the same vein in favor of decoherence accounts (Omnès; Zureck). Pace Epperson, I do not think that decoherence is the final arbiter here, and instead I contrast GRW with several other accounts addressing foundational problems of quantum theory (Finkelstein; Green; Peres and Terno; etc.), which also account for (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. R. Omnes (2003). Consistent Quantum Theory - Robert B. Griffiths, Cambridge, 2001, Pp. 400, US $95, ISBN 0521803497. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B 34 (2):329-331.score: 126.0
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  22. David Bohm (1973). Quantum Theory as an Indication of a New Order in Physics. B. Implicate and Explicate Order in Physical Law. Foundations of Physics 3 (2):139-168.score: 126.0
    In this paper, we inquire further into the question of the emergence of new orders in physics, first raised in an earlier paper. In this inquiry, we are led to suggest that the quantum theory indicates the need for yet another new order, which we call “enfolded” or “implicate.” One of the most striking examples of the implicate order is to be seen by considering the function of the hologram, which clearly reveals how a total content (in principle extending over (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  23. Lindsay R. Craig (2010). Gerd B. Müller and Massimo Pigliucci—Extended Synthesis: Theory Expansion or Alternative? Biological Theory 5 (4):395-396.score: 126.0
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  24. H. S. Kariel (1992). Books in Review: The Idea of Political Theory: Reflections on the Self in Political Time and Space by Tracy B. Strong. [REVIEW] Political Theory 20 (2):345-348.score: 126.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  25. Tobias Hansson Wahlberg (2009). Objects in Time: Studies of Persistence in B-Time. Dissertation, Lund Universityscore: 120.0
    This thesis is about the conceptualization of persistence of physical, middle-sized objects within the theoretical framework of the revisionary ‘B-theory’ of time. According to the B-theory, time does not flow, but is an extended and inherently directed fourth dimension along which the history of the universe is ‘laid out’ once and for all. It is a widespread view among philosophers that if we accept the B-theory, the commonsensical ‘endurance theory’ of persistence will have to be rejected. The (...)
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  26. Natalja Deng (2010). 'Beyond A- and B-Time' Reconsidered. Philosophia 38 (4):741-753.score: 120.0
    This article is a response to Clifford Williams’s claim that the debate between A- and B theories of time is misconceived because these theories do not differ. I provide some missing support for Williams’s claim that the B-theory includes transition, by arguing that representative B-theoretic explanations for why we experience time as passing (even though it does not) are inherently unstable. I then argue that, contra Williams, it does not follow that there is nothing at stake in the A- (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  27. Nicholas J. J. Smith (2011). Inconsistency in the A-Theory. Philosophical Studies 156 (2):231 - 247.score: 120.0
    This paper presents a new argument against A-theories of time. A-theorists hold that there is an objective now (present moment) and an objective flow of time, the latter constituted by the movement of the objective now through time. A-theorists therefore want to draw different pictures of reality—showing the objective now in different positions—depending upon the time at which the picture is drawn. In this paper it is argued that the times at which the different pictures are drawn may be taken (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  28. Mikel Burley (2006). Beyond “Beyond a- and B-Time”. Philosophia 34 (4):411-416.score: 120.0
    This Article critically discusses Clifford Williams’ claim that the A-theory and B-theory of time are indistinguishable. I examine three considerations adduced by Williams to support his claim that the concept of time essentially includes transition as well as extension, and argue that, despite its prima facie plausibility, the claim has not been adequately justified. Williams therefore begs the question against the B-theorist, who denies that transition is essential. By Williams’ own lights, he ought to deny that the B-theory (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  29. Christopher Hughes (1999). Bundle Theory From a to B. Mind 108 (429):149-156.score: 120.0
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  30. Jonathan Tallant (2008). What is It to “B” a Relation? Synthese 162 (1):117 - 132.score: 120.0
    The purpose of this paper is two fold: first, I look to show Oaklander’s (The ontology of time. New York: Prometheus Books, 2004) theory of time to be false. Second, I show that the only way to salvage the B-theory is via the adopting of the causal theory of time, and allying this to Oaklander’s claim that tense is to be eliminated. I then raise some concerns with the causal theory of time. My conclusion is that, if one adopts (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  31. R. Collins (1998). Book Reviews : J. B. Thompson, The Media and Modernity. A Social Theory of the Media. Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA, 1996. Pp. 336. Cloth, $49.50; Paper, $16.95. [REVIEW] Philosophy of the Social Sciences 28 (1):152-155.score: 120.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  32. Simon Prosser (2000). A New Problem for the a-Theory of Time. Philosophical Quarterly 50 (201):494-498.score: 120.0
    : I offer a new approach to the increasingly convoluted debate between the A- and B-theories of time, the ‘tensed’ and ‘tenseless’ theories. It is often assumed that the B-theory faces more difficulties than the A-theory in explaining the apparently tensed features of temporal experience. I argue that the A-theory cannot explain these features at all, because on any physicalist or supervenience theory of the mind, in which the nature of experience is fixed by the physical state of the (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  33. Bertram Morris (1965). Possessive Individualism and Political Realities:The Political Theory of Possessive Individualism: Hobbes to Locke C. B. MacPherson. Ethics 75 (3):207-.score: 120.0
  34. Gilbert Harman (1982). Critical Review: Richard B. Brandt, a Theory of the Good and the Right. [REVIEW] Philosophical Studies 42 (1):119 - 139.score: 120.0
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  35. Steven D. Smith (2011). Porter , Jean . Ministers of the Law: A Natural Law Theory of Legal Authority . Grand Rapids, MI: William B. Eerdmans, 2010. Pp. Xvi+351. $30.00 (Paper). [REVIEW] Ethics 122 (1):203-207.score: 120.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  36. William A. Rottschaefer (1982). Psychological Foundations of Value Theory: B. F. Skinners Science of Values. Zygon 17 (3):293-301.score: 120.0
  37. C. Hughes (1999). Discussion. Bundle Theory From a to B. Mind 108 (429):149-156.score: 120.0
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  38. G. C. Field (1929). Greek Philosophy Before Plato. By Robert Scoon B.A., Ph.D., (Princeton University Press; and London: Humphrey Milford. 1928. Pp. Viii+353. Price 3 Dollars 50; 16s.)Plato's Theory of Ethics. By R. C. Lodge. (London: Kegan Paul, French, Trübner & Co., Ltd. 1928. Pp. Xiv + 558. Price 21s.)The Hippias Major, Attributed to Plato. Edited, with Introductory Essay and Commentary, by Dorothy Tarrant M.A., (Cambridge University Press. 1928. Pp. Lxxxiv + 104. Price 12s. 6d.). [REVIEW] Philosophy 4 (13):117-.score: 120.0
  39. Eric Schliesser (2009). Neil McArthur, David Hume's Political Theory: Law, Commerce, and the Constitution of Government, Toronto: University of Toronto Press. 2007. 208pp. H/B. CDN$45. ISBN 978-0-8020-9335-. [REVIEW] Journal of Scottish Philosophy 7 (1):103-107.score: 120.0
  40. Emilio Betti (1988). The Principles of New Science of G. B. Vico and the Theory of Historical Interpretation. New Vico Studies 6:31-50.score: 120.0
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  41. G. W. Smith (1996). David Lyons, Rights, Welfare, and Mill's Moral Theory, New York, Oxford University Press, 1994, Pp. 224;Necip Fikri Alican, Mill's Principle of Utility: A Defense of John Stuart Mill's Notorious Proof, Amsterdam, Rodopi B.V. Editions, 1994, Pp. Xv + 240. [REVIEW] Utilitas 8 (01):127-.score: 120.0
  42. L. Susan Stebbing (1930). Five Types of Ethical Theory. By C. D. Broad Litt.D., F.B.A. (London: Kegan Paul, Trench, Trübner & Co., Ltd. 1930. Pp. Xxv + 288. Price 15s.). [REVIEW] Philosophy 5 (19):463-.score: 120.0
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  43. William R. Newman (1993). The Corpuscular Theory of J. B. Van Helmont and its Medieval Sources. Vivarium 31 (1):161-191.score: 120.0
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  44. Robert Noggle (2001). B. C. Postow, Reasons for Action: Toward a Normative Theory and Meta‐Level Criteria:Reasons for Action: Toward a Normative Theory and Meta‐Level Criteria. Ethics 112 (1):175-177.score: 120.0
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  45. Charles A. Baylis (1960). Book Review:Ethical Theory. Richard B. Brandt. [REVIEW] Ethics 70 (4):328-.score: 120.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  46. Patrick Primeaux (1997). Business Ethics in Theory and Practice: Diagnostic Notes B. A Prescription for Profit Maximization. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 16 (3):315-322.score: 120.0
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  47. Steve Reece (2010). The History of Writing (B.P.) Powell Writing. Theory and History of the Technology of Civilization. Pp. Xx + 276, Ills, Maps. Malden, MA and Oxford: Wiley–Blackwell, 2009. Cased, £50, €60. ISBN: 978-1-4051-6256-. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 60 (02):585-587.score: 120.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  48. Shaun P. Hargreaves Heap (2004). The Theory of the Individual in Economics: Identity and Value, by John B. Davis. Routledge, 2003, VIII + 216 Pages. [REVIEW] Economics and Philosophy 20 (2):403-409.score: 120.0
  49. A. E. Taylor (1943). The Theory of Motion in Plato's Later Dialogues. J. B. Skemp. (Cambridge University Press. 1942, Pp. Xv and 123. Price 8s. 6d. Net.). [REVIEW] Philosophy 18 (69):80-.score: 120.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  50. Alasdair MacIntyre (1991). Book Review:The Idea of Political Theory: Reflections on the Self in Political Time and Place. Tracy B. Strong. [REVIEW] Ethics 101 (4):878-.score: 120.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
1 — 50 / 1000