15 found
Sort by:
  1. B. Andrew Lustig (2007). The Church and the World: Are There Theological Resources for a Common Conversation? Christian Bioethics 13 (2):225-244.
    Abortion is an especially salient issue for considering the general problematic of religiously based conversation in the public square. It remains deeply divisive, fully thirty-four years after Roe v. Wade. Such divisiveness cannot be interpreted as merely an expression of profound differences between “secular” and “religious” voices, because differences also emerge among Christian denominations, reflecting different sources of moral authority, different accounts of moral discernment, and different judgments about the appropriate relations between law and morality in the context of pluralism. (...)
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. B. Andrew Lustig (2005). Challenging "Common-Sense" Assumptions in Bioethics. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 30 (4):325 – 329.
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. B. Andrew Lustig (2004). Natural Law and Global Ethics. In Mark J. Cherry (ed.), Natural Law and the Possibility of a Global Ethics. Kluwer Academic Publishers.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. B. Andrew Lustig (2004). Reconsidering Wisdom, Keywords, Concepts, and Models. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 29 (6):641 – 646.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. B. Andrew Lustig (2003). Roman Catholic Norms and the Allocation of Critical Care Resources. HEC Forum 15 (1):100-106.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. B. Andrew Lustig (2001). Theoretical and Clinical Concerns About Brain Death: The Debate Continues. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 26 (5):447 – 455.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. B. Andrew Lustig (1998). Concepts and Methods in Recent Bioethics: Critical Responses. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 23 (5):445 – 455.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. B. Andrew Lustig (1998). Speaking Faith to Policy. Hastings Center Report 28 (3):40-42.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. B. Andrew Lustig (1996). Informed Consent as a Tool for Medical Management. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 21 (1):101-109.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. Baruch A. Brody, H. Tristram Engelhardt Jr, John E. Fellers, Amir Halevy, B. Andrew Lustig, Elizabeth Heitman, Laurence B. McCullough, Gerald McKenny, J. Robert Nelson & Stuart Spicker (1995). For Further Information and/or to Register for the Seminar, Please Write or Call The Institute of Religion, Texas Medical Center, 1129 Wilkins Blvd., Houston, TX 77030.(713) 797-0600. [REVIEW] HEC Forum 7:5.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. Baruch A. Brody, H. Tristram Engelhardt Jr, Elizabeth Heitman, B. Andrew Lustig, Laurence B. McCullough, Gerald McKenny, Stuart F. Spieker & Porter B. Storey (1995). " Recovering the Traditions: Religious Perspectives in Medical Ethics. Christian Bioethics 1 (2):247.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. B. Andrew Lustig (1994). The Troubled Dream of Life. Daniel Callahan. New York: Simon and Schuster, 1993. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 3 (03):486-.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. B. Andrew Lustig (1993). Perseverations on a Critical Theme. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 18 (5):491-502.
    In response to my earlier critique of recent attempts to rebut principlism as an ethical approach, Green, Gert, and Clouser (GG&C) have in turn offered their own critique of my appraisal. This essay identifies eight major criticisms GG&C raise in their response and offers a rejoinder to each. Among them, three are especially important: (1) that the label of ‘deductivism’ fails to capture GG&C's ethical method and should be replaced by ‘descriptivism’; (2) that pluralistic accounts, including principlism, fail to offer (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. B. Andrew Lustig (1993). The Common Good in a Secular Society: The Relevance of a Roman Catholic Notion to the Healthcare Allocation Debate. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 18 (6):569-587.
    This essay analyzes Roman Catholic social teaching on the right to health care and the legitimacy of healthcare rationing. It considers that discussion at two levels: (1) the specific warrants that undergird key terms; and (2) the accessibility and applicability of those warrants to policy choices in a secular society. The essay concludes with a number of broader reflections meant to reserve an appropriate place for religious voices in the process of policy-making, as distinguished from its justification. Keywords: common good, (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. B. Andrew Lustig (1992). The Method of 'Principlism': A Critique of the Critique. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 17 (5):487-510.
    Several scholars have recently criticized the dominant emphasis upon mid-level principles in bioethics best exemplified by Beauchamp and Childress's Principles of Biomedical Ethics . In Part I of this essay, I assess the fairness and cogency of three broad criticisms raised against ‘principlism’ as an approach: (1) that principlism, as an exercise in applied ethics, is insufficiently attentive to the dialectical relations between ethical theory and moral practice; (2) that principlism fails to offer a systematic account of the principles of (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation