Search results for 'B. E. Gibson' (try it on Scholar)

6 found
Sort by:
  1. B. E. Gibson, R. E. G. Upshur, N. L. Young & P. McKeever (2007). Disability, Technology, and Place: Social and Ethical Implications of Long-Term Dependency on Medical Devices. Ethics, Place and Environment 10 (1):7 – 28.score: 290.0
    Medical technologies and assistive devices such as ventilators and power wheelchairs are designed to sustain life and/or improve functionality but they can also contribute to stigmatization and social exclusion. In this paper, drawing from a study of ten men with Duchenne muscular dystrophy, we explore the complex social processes that mediate the lives of persons who are dependent on multiple medical and assistive technologies. In doing so we consider the embodied and emplaced nature of disability and (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. B. E. Gibson, E. Stasiulis, S. Gutfreund, M. McDonald & L. Dade (2011). Assessment of Children's Capacity to Consent for Research: A Descriptive Qualitative Study of Researchers' Practices. Journal of Medical Ethics 37 (8):504-509.score: 290.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. F. N. Hales, W. H. Fairbrother, F. C. S. Schiller, S. H., A. E. Taylor, David Morrison, F. G. Nutt, B. Russell, W. R. Boyce Gibson, C. A. F. Rhys Davids, B. W. & T. Loveday (1903). New Books. [REVIEW] Mind 12 (46):255-274.score: 270.0
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Sabrina Golonka & Andrew D. Wilson (2012). Gibson's Ecological Approach – a Model for the Benefits of a Theory Driven Psychology. Avant 3 (2):40-53.score: 42.0
    Unlike most other sciences, psychology has no true core theory to guide a coherent research programme. It does have James J Gibson’s ecological approach to visual perception, however, which we suggest should serve as an example of the benefits a good theory brings to psychological research. Here we focus on an example of how the ecological approach has served as a guide to discovery, shaping and constraining a recent hypothesis about how humans perform coordinated rhythmic movements (Bingham 2004a, b). (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Paul Tibbetts (1969). Perception; Selected Readings in Science and Phenomenology. Chicago, Quadrangle Books.score: 27.0
    Introduction to sensory psychology, by C. Mueller.--Some reflections on brain and mind, by R. Brain.--In search of the engram, by K. Lashly.--Cerebral organization and behavior, by R. W. Sperry.--Relations between the central nervous system and the peripheral organs, by E. von Holst.--Effects of the Gestalt revolution, by J. E. Hochberg.--Seeing in depth, by R. L. Gregory.--The stimulus variables for visual depth perception, by J. J. Gibson.--The elaboration of the universe, by J. Piaget.--Visual perception approached by the method of stabilized (...)
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Robert E. Shaw & Jeffrey B. Wagman (2001). Explanatory Burdens and Natural Law: Invoking a Field Description of Perception-Action. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (5):905-906.score: 15.0
    Although we agree with Hommel et al. that perception and action refer to one another, we disagree that they do so via a code. Gibson (1966; 1979) attempted to frame perception-action as a field phenomenon rather than as a particle phenomenon. From such a perspective, perception and action are adjoint, mutually interacting through an information field, and codes are unnecessary.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation