4 found
Order:
  1.  24
    B. M. Dickens (2002). Can Sex Selection Be Ethically Tolerated? Journal of Medical Ethics 28 (6):335-336.
  2.  9
    B. M. Dickens (2004). Prenatal Sex and Race Determination is a Slippery Slope: Author's Reply. Journal of Medical Ethics 30 (4):376-376.
    It may be most convenient to respond to Dr Andreae’s points in turn. Unless the claim that a child should determine its own genetic characteristics before it is conceived or born is intended to be flippant, it is logically incoherent. Conception is a decision that only a prospective parent can make. The editorial argument is that denial of choice of sex contributes to preventable maternal mortality and morbidity, particularly in developing countries. ….
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  3.  5
    B. M. Dickens (1986). Prenatal Diagnosis and Female Abortion: A Case Study in Medical Law and Ethics. Journal of Medical Ethics 12 (3):143-150.
    Alarm over the prospect that prenatal diagnostic techniques, which permit identification of fetal sex and facilitate abortion of healthy but unwanted female fetuses has led some to urge their outright prohibition. This article argues against that response. Prenatal diagnosis permits timely action to preserve and enhance the life and health of fetuses otherwise endangered, and, by offering assurance of fetal normality, may often encourage continuation of pregnancies otherwise vulnerable to termination. Further, conditions in some societies may sometimes render excusable the (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  4. E. M. Meslin & B. M. Dickens (2008). Research Ethics. In Peter A. Singer & A. M. Viens (eds.), The Cambridge Textbook of Bioethics. Cambridge University Press 187--193.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography