7 found
Sort by:
Disambiguations:
Benjamin Spector [3]B. Spector [2]Bertram I. Spector [2]
  1. Benjamin Spector (forthcoming). Multivalent Semantics for Vagueness and Presupposition. Topoi:1-11.
    Both the phenomenon of presupposition and that of vagueness have motivated the use of one form or another of trivalent logic, in which a declarative sentence can not only receive the standard values true and false , but also a third, non-standard truth-value which is usually understood as ‘undefined’ . The goal of this paper is to propose a multivalent framework which can deal simultaneously with presupposition and vagueness, and, more specifically, capture their projection properties as well as their different (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Benjamin Spector & Paul Egré (2015). A Uniform Semantics for Embedded Interrogatives: An Answer, Not Necessarily the Answer. Synthese 192 (6):1729-1784.
    Our paper addresses the following question: Is there a general characterization, for all predicates P that take both declarative and interrogative complements , of the meaning of the P-interrogative clause construction in terms of the meaning of the P-declarative clause construction? On our account, if P is a responsive predicate and Q a question embedded under P, then the meaning of ‘P + Q’ is, informally, “to be in the relation expressed by P to some potential complete answer to Q”. (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. M. Abrusan & B. Spector (2011). A Semantics for Degree Questions Based on Intervals: Negative Islands and Their Obviation. Journal of Semantics 28 (1):107-147.
    According to the standard analysis of degree questions (see, among others, Rullmann 1995; Beck & Rullmann 1996), the logical form of a degree question contains a variable that ranges over individual degrees and is bound by the degree question operator how. In contrast with this, we claim that the variable bound by the degree question operator how does not range over individual degrees but over intervals of degrees, by analogy with Schwarzschild and Wilkinson's (2002) proposal regarding the semantics of comparative (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. E. Chemla & B. Spector (2011). Experimental Evidence for Embedded Scalar Implicatures. Journal of Semantics 28 (3):359-400.
    Scalar implicatures are traditionally viewed as pragmatic inferences that result from a reasoning about speakers' communicative intentions (Grice 1989). This view has been challenged in recent years by theories that propose that scalar implicatures are a grammatical phenomenon. Such theories claim that scalar implicatures can be computed in embedded positions and enter into the recursive computation of meaning—something that is not expected under the traditional pragmatic view. Recently, Geurts and Pouscoulous (2009) presented an experimental study in which embedded scalar implicatures (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Ora Matushansky & Benjamin Spector (2005). CNRS/Université Paris 8/ENS; LLF/Université Paris 7/ENS. In Emar Maier, Corien Bary & Janneke Huitink (eds.), Proceedings of Sub9.
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Bertram I. Spector (1993). Decision Analysis for Practical Negotiation Application. Theory and Decision 34 (3):183-199.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Bertram I. Spector (1993). Introduction. Theory and Decision 34 (3):177-181.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation