PhilPapers is currently in read-only mode while we are performing some maintenance. You can use the site normally except that you cannot sign in. This shouldn't last long.

Works by B. Vereijken ( view other items matching `B. Vereijken`, view all matches )
Disambiguations:
Beatrix Vereijken [3]B. Vereijken [1]

4 found
Sort by:
  1. Arve Vorland Pedersen & Beatrix Vereijken (2003). Laterality Probabilities Fluctuate During Ontogenetic Development. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (2):236-237.
    We argue that lateralities are not merely a result of phylogenetic processes but reflect probability functions that are influenced by task characteristics and extended practice. We support our argument by empirical findings on lateral biases in early infancy in general, and footedness in particular, and on hand preferences in nonhuman primates.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Jørn Hokland & Beatrix Vereijken (2001). Can Robots Without Hebbian Plasticity Make Good Models of Adaptive Behaviour? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (6):1060-1062.
    No. Animals' primary problem is the shaping of movements, guided by and adapting to sensory signals. This requires a narrower class of biorobotic models than that spanned by Webb's dimensions and examples. We claim that all model variables and mechanisms must have real counterparts, input vectors must model known sensor fields, internal state vectors and transformations must model neurophysiological processes, and output vectors must model coordinated muscle signals.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Beatrix Vereijken & H. T. A. Whiting (2001). “The Assumption of Separate Senses”: Pervasive? Perhaps – Persuasive? Hardly! Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (2):242-243.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. B. Vereijken & H. T. A. Whiting (1998). Hoist by Their Own Petard: The Constraints of Hierarchical Models. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (5):705-705.
    In the context of the motor skill literature on observational learning and hierarchical skill structuring, Byrne & Russon's findings call into question their standpoint that great apes imitate the behaviour of role models at the programme level. The authors impose a hierarchical model on their observations without properly considering alternative explanations. One such possibility, which stems from a constraints perspective that they dismiss, is put forward.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation