37 found
Order:
See also:
Profile: Bart Vandenabeele (University of Ghent)
  1. Bart Vandenabeele (2003). Schopenhauer, Nietzsche, and the Aesthetically Sublime. Journal of Aesthetic Education 37 (1):90-106.
  2.  39
    Bart Vandenabeele (2008). Schopenhauer on Aesthetic Understanding and the Values of Art. European Journal of Philosophy 16 (2):194-210.
    The article explores German philosopher Arthur Schopenhauer's view on aesthetics and the values of art. It contends that some important aspects of Schopenhauer's discussion of tragedy indicate that the theory that the value of art is deductible to the aesthetic pleasure it affords is inadequate. Moreover, it claims that Schopenhauer attaches great importance to the distinction between concept and idea. It also asserts that Schopenhauer's account of aesthetic experience is inspired by Plato's ideas.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  3.  35
    Bart Vandenabeele (2007). Schopenhauer on the Values of Aesthetic Experience. Southern Journal of Philosophy 45 (4):565-582.
    In this essay, I argue that Schopenhauer’s view of the aesthetic feelings of the beautiful and the sublime shows how a “dialectical” interpretation that homogenizes both aesthetic concepts and reduces thediscrepancy between both to merely quantitative differences is flawed. My critical analysis reveals a number of important tensions in both Schopenhauer’s own aesthetic theory—which does not ultimately succeed in “merging” Plato’s and Kant’s approaches—and the interpretation that unjustly reduces the value of aesthetic experience to a merely preliminary stage of ethical (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  4.  28
    Bart Vandenabeele (2008). Aesthetic Solidarity "After" Kant and Lyotard. Journal of Aesthetic Education 42 (4):pp. 17-30.
  5.  40
    Bart Vandenabeele (2001). On the Notion of "Disinterestedness": Kant, Lyotard, and Schopenhauer. Journal of the History of Ideas 62 (4):705-720.
  6.  76
    Bart Vandenabeele (2008). The Subjective Universality of Aesthetic Judgements Revisited. British Journal of Aesthetics 48 (4):410-425.
    When we are touched by the beauty of something, we cannot help judging that the experienced feeling of pleasure ought to be shared by others. In Kantian terms, a pure judgement of taste requires or demands everyone else's assent. I examine some of the major intricacies of Kant's account and aim to correct some distorted views of it. I argue that the autonomy (or ‘heautonomy’) of the judgement of taste is not presupposed but made possible by the modal requirement as (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  7.  47
    Bart Vandenabeele (2011). Schopenhauer on Sense Perception and Aesthetic Cognition. Journal of Aesthetic Education 45 (1):37-57.
    In Schopenhauer’s view, the whole organic and inorganic world is ultimately governed by an insatiable, blind will. Life as a whole is purposeless: there is no ultimate goal or meaning, for the metaphysical will is only interested in manifesting itself in (or as) a myriad of phenomena, which we call the “world” or “life.” Human life, too, is nothing but an insignificant product or “objectivation” of the blind, unconscious will, and because our life is determined by willing (that is, by (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  8.  21
    Bart Vandenabeele (2011). Het Sublieme in de Kunst: Van Kant Tot Duchamp En Verder. Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 73 (4):701-733.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  9.  22
    Bart Vandenabeele (2012). Beauty, Disinterested Pleasure, and Universal Communicability: Kant's Response to Burke. Kant-Studien 103 (2):207-233.
    Although Kant (wrongly) holds that the universal communicability of aesthetic judgments logically follows from the disinterested character of the pleasure upon which they are based, Kant's emphasis on the a priori validity of judgments of beauty can be viewed as a rebuttal of the kind of empiricist arguments that Burke offers to justify the social nature of the experience of beauty. I argue that the requirement of universal communicability is not a mere addition to the requirement of universal validity and (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  10.  12
    Bart Vandenabeele (2002). No Need for Essences. On Non-Verbal Communication in First Inter-Cultural Contacts. South African Journal of Philosophy 21 (2):85-96.
    Drawing on anthropological examples of first contacts between people from different cultures, I argue that non-verbal communication plays a far bigger part in intercultural communication than has been acknowledged in the literature so far. Communication rests on mutually attuning in a large number of judgements. Some sort of structuring principle is needed at this point, and Davidson's principle of charity is a good candidate, provided sufficient attention is given to non-verbal communication. There will always be more and less successful interpretations (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  11.  25
    Bart Vandenabeele (2012). Aesthetic Disinterestedness in Kant and Schopenhauer. Estetika 49 (1):45-70.
    While several commentators agree that Schopenhauer’s theory of ‘will-less contemplation’ is a variant of Kant’s account of aesthetic disinterestedness, I shall argue here that Schopenhauer’s account departs from Kant’s in several important ways, and that he radically transforms Kant’s analysis of aesthetic judgement into a novel aesthetic attitude theory. In the first part of the article, I critically discuss Kant’s theory of disinterestedness, pay particular attention to rectifying a common misconception of this notion, and discuss some significant problems with Kant’s (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  12.  7
    Pepita Hesselberth, Carlos Miguel Roos Munoz & Bart Vandenabeele, Short Film Experience.
    Since the advent and standardization of the theatrical feature length film, the audio-visual short has been more or less marginalized in the discussions on cinematic experience. Historically stretching from the ‘early cinema’ of the vaudeville, to the now obsolete ‘little films’ of YouTube and beyond, the audio-visual short traverses a wide variety of media platforms, practices and technologies, including animation, video installation art, video clips and TV commercials, as well as animated GIFs, machinima and DIY movies, made to measure for (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  13.  10
    Bart Vandenabeele (1999). We Weep but Are Not Wounded. The Sublime Feeling in Schopenhauer's Aesthetics. Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 61 (4):663-695.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  14.  11
    Bart Vandenabeele (2001). Huiverend genieten in de hel. Ethische en tragische dimensies Van het sublieme gevoel. Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 63 (4):719 - 750.
    This article discusses Kant's and Schopenhauer's analyses of the feeling of the sublime. The focus is on the relationship between their ethics and aesthetics. It is argued that the kantian-schopenhauerian analysis of the sublime reveals an insurmountable fissure at the heart of subjectivity. This points out that a dialectical interpretation of kantian-schopenhauerian aesthetics, that reduces the sublime feeling to a kind of bridge or passage (Übergang) from the beautiful to the good is not without complications. Although this is not always (...)
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  15.  11
    Bart Vandenabeele (2015). The Sublime in Art: Kant, the Mannerist, and the Matterist Sublime. Journal of Aesthetic Education 49 (3):32-49.
    Numerous contemporary artworks are found repellent, even by genuine art lovers, either because they deliberately derange our perception and imagination by an abundance of incoherent representations and stimuli or because they demand that we value seemingly nonsensical objects or all kinds of disgusting materials. Installations, collages, and so-called unassisted ready-mades especially cannot count on too much appreciation, unless the artists in question are sufficiently supported by clever managers who reduce their work to commodities, which then serve merely as illustrations of (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  16.  8
    Bart Vandenabeele (2001). Shuddering with Pleasure in Hell. Ethical and Tragic Dimensions of the Sublime Feeling. Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 63 (4):719-750.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  17.  6
    Bart Vandenabeele (2001). Schuren Langs Esthetische Ideeën: Burke, Kant En Schopenhauer Over Het Sublieme En de Kunst. de Uil Van Minerva 17:137-149.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  18.  9
    Johan Siebers, Tino Meitz, Bart Vandenabeele, Vincenzo Romania & Vincent Blok (2013). Media Processes. Empedocles: European Journal for the Philosophy of Communication 3.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  19.  6
    Bart Vandenabeele (2013). Beauty, Disinterested Pleasure and Pure Contemplation: Schopenhauer's Response to Kant. Schopenhauer Jahrbuch 93:241-255.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  20.  2
    Violi Sahaj & Bart Vandenabeele (2015). Nietzsche, Selfhood, and the Limitations of the Transcendental Reading. Nietzsche-Studien 44 (1).
    Name der Zeitschrift: Nietzsche-Studien Jahrgang: 44 Heft: 1 Seiten: 315-339.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  21.  6
    Johan Siebers, Tino Meitz, Bart Vandenabeele, Vincenzo Romania, Vivienne Boon & Vincent Blok (2012). Interpersonal Communication. Empedocles: European Journal for the Philosophy of Communication 3.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  22.  10
    Bart Vandenabeele (2007). Schopenhauer on the Values of Aesthetic Experience. Southern Journal of Philosophy 45 (4):565-582.
    In this essay, I argue that Schopenhauer’s view of the aesthetic feelings of the beautiful and the sublime shows how a “dialectical” interpretation that homogenizes both aesthetic concepts and reduces thediscrepancy between both to merely quantitative differences is flawed. My critical analysis reveals a number of important tensions in both Schopenhauer’s own aesthetic theory—which does not ultimately succeed in “merging” Plato’s and Kant’s approaches—and the interpretation that unjustly reduces the value of aesthetic experience to a merely preliminary stage of ethical (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  23.  5
    Bart Vandenabeele (2012). Why Share a Language or Tradition? Gadamer and Davidson in Dispute. Budhi: A Journal of Ideas and Culture 16 (3):1-21.
  24.  4
    Bart Vandenabeele (1996). Strelend wonden helen: over Hadewych, erotiek en esthetiek. de Uil Van Minerva 13:89-95.
    No categories
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  25.  2
    Bart Vandenabeele (2013). Disinterested Pleasure and the Universal Voice of Beauty: Kant’s Response to Burke. In Margit Ruffing, Claudio La Rocca, Alfredo Ferrarin & Stefano Bacin (eds.), Kant Und Die Philosophie in Weltbürgerlicher Absicht: Akten des Xi. Kant-Kongresses 2010. De Gruyter 311-324.
  26.  11
    Bart Vandenabeele (2004). "New" Media, Art, and Intercultural Communication. Journal of Aesthetic Education 38 (4):1-9.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  27.  4
    Bart Vandenabeele (2001). Schopenhauer on the Beautiful and the Sublime: A Qualitative or Gradual Distinction? Schopenhauer Jahrbuch 82:99-112.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  28.  3
    Johan Siebers, Tino Meitz, Bart Vandenabeele, Vincenzo Romania, Vivienne Boon & Vincent Blok (2012). Literature as Communication. Empedocles: European Journal for the Philosophy of Communication 2.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  29.  1
    Bart Vandenabeele (2014). 7. Schopenhauer on Aesthetic Contemplation. In Matthias Koßler & Oliver Hallich (eds.), Arthur Schopenhauer: Die Welt Als Wille Und Vorstellung. Oldenbourg Wissenschaftsverlag 101-118.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  30.  1
    Johan Siebers, Mats Bergman, Vincenzo Romania & Bart Vandenabeele (2011). Communication and Memory. Empedocles: European Journal for the Philosophy of Communication 2.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  31. Frank Brisard, Michael Meeuwis, Bart Vandenabeele & Herman Parret (2004). Seduction, Community, Speech a Festschrift for Herman Parret.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  32. Samuel Ijsseling, Bart Vandenabeele & Pieter Van Reijbrouck (2000). Macht en onmacht. Essays. Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 62 (2):401-402.
    No categories
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  33.  16
    Bart Vandenabeele (ed.) (2011). A Companion to Schopenhauer. Wiley-Blackwell.
    _A Companion to Schopenhauer_ provides a comprehensive guide to all the important facets of Schopenhauer’s philosophy. The volume contains 26 newly commissioned essays by prominent Schopenhauer scholars working in the field today. A thoroughly comprehensive guide to the life, work, and thought of Arthur Schopenhauer Demonstrates the range of Schopenhauer’s work and illuminates the debates it has generated 26 newly commissioned essays by some of the most prominent Schopenhauer scholars working today reflect the very latest trends in Schopenhauer scholarship Covers (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  34. Bart Vandenabeele (1999). Affect en contemplatie: De ambivalente positie van de muziek in Schopenhauers filosofie. Algemeen Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Wijsbegeerte 91 (3):194-207.
    No categories
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  35. Bart Vandenabeele (2002). De bloesem van het leven. Esthetiek en ethiek in Arthur Schopenhauers filosofie. Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 64 (2):384-387.
    No categories
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  36. Bart Vandenabeele (2001). On the Notion of "Disinterestedness": Kant, Lyotard, and Schopenhauer. Journal of the History of Ideas 62 (4):705.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  37. Bart Vandenabeele (2011). Schopenhauer on Sense Perception and Aesthetic Cognition. Journal of Aesthetic Education 45 (1):37.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography