Search results for 'Bart van Klink' (try it on Scholar)

1000+ found
Sort by:
  1. Bart van Klink (2007). Does Necessity Knows [Sic] No Laws? Application of Law in a State of Exception. In José Rubio Carrecedo (ed.), Political Philosophy: New Proposals for New Questions: Proceedings of the 22nd Ivr World Congress, Granada 2005, Volume Ii = Filosofía Política: Nuevas Propuestas Para Nuevas Cuestiones. Franz Steiner Verlag.score: 870.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Gremmen Bart & Belt Henk Van Den (2000). The Precautionary Principle and Pesticides. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 12 (2).score: 240.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Huib Klink (2012). Guillaume Groen van Prinsterer. In Thierry Baudet & Michiel Visser (eds.), Revolutionair Verval En de Conservatieve Vooruitgang in de Achttiende En Negentiende Eeuw. Bakker.score: 240.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Ab Klink (2002). Goed, kwaad en de affirmatie van het leven. Philosophia Reformata 67 (1):65-79.score: 240.0
    No categories
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. María G. Navarro (2009). Critical Notice of 'Controversy and Confrontation. Relating Controversy Analysis with Argumentation Theory' by Frans H. Van Eemeren and Bart Garssen. [REVIEW] Informal Logic 31 (1):69-74.score: 126.0
    Since the first volume appeared in 2005, the collection Controversies has brought together pieces of work related to the field of argumentation, giving particular attention to those that are concerned with theoretical and practical problems connected with discursive controversy and confrontation. Authors such as P. Barrotta, M. Dascal, S. Frogel, H. Chang and D. Walton had already either edited or written previous editions to the present volume (volume six) of the collection. F. H. van Eemeren and B. Garssen (the former (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Samenvatting van (forthcoming). De Stem van de St (r) aat. Res Publica.score: 120.0
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Dale Hample (2010). Frans van Eemeren, Bart Garssen, & Bert Meuffels: Fallacies and Judgments of Reasonableness: Empirical Research Concerning the Pragma-Dialectical Discussion Rules. Argumentation 24 (3):375-381.score: 96.0
    Frans van Eemeren, Bart Garssen, & Bert Meuffels: Fallacies and Judgments of Reasonableness: Empirical Research Concerning the Pragma-Dialectical Discussion Rules Content Type Journal Article Pages 375-381 DOI 10.1007/s10503-010-9183-6 Authors Dale Hample, University of Maryland College Park MD 20742 USA Journal Argumentation Online ISSN 1572-8374 Print ISSN 0920-427X Journal Volume Volume 24 Journal Issue Volume 24, Number 3.
    No categories
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Sjaak Koenis (2009). Bart Van leeuwen, het verlangen naar cultuur: Nederland en het einde Van het geloof in een moderne politiek. Algemeen Nederlands Tijdschrift Voor Wijsbegeerte 101 (4).score: 84.0
    No categories
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. Peter Milward (2013). Shakespeare in Company. By Bart Van Es. Pp. Xiv, 357, Oxford University Press, 2013, $34.51. [REVIEW] Heythrop Journal 54 (6):1039-1041.score: 84.0
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. Guido Vanackere (2001). Bart Van Kerkhove. Studia Logica 68:1-30.score: 84.0
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. Mark Aakhus (forthcoming). Frans H. Van Eemeren and Bart Garssen (Eds): Topical Themes in Argumentation Theory: Twenty Exploratory Studies. Argumentation:1-4.score: 78.0
    Every 4 years, for the past three decades, the world of argumentation research has gathered in Amsterdam at the International Society for the Study of Argumentation conferences to explore advances in understanding argumentation and how argumentation advances our understanding of the human condition. While comprehensive proceedings of selected papers are produced to document what has transpired in the world of argumentation over the preceding 4 years, there remains the important matter of taking the intellectual pulse of the world’s argumentation scholars, (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. Harry Weger (2011). Frans H. Van Eemeren and Bart Garssen (Eds): Pondering on Problems of Argumentation: Twenty Essays on Theoretical Issues. [REVIEW] Argumentation 25 (1):115-122.score: 72.0
    No categories
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. Lester van der Pluijm & Jacky Visser (2011). David Hitchcock and Bart Verheij (Eds): Arguing on the Toulmin Model. New Essays in Argument Analysis and Evaluation. [REVIEW] Argumentation 25 (4):527-539.score: 48.0
    David Hitchcock and Bart Verheij (eds): Arguing on the Toulmin Model. New Essays in Argument Analysis and Evaluation Content Type Journal Article Pages 1-13 DOI 10.1007/s10503-011-9214-y Authors Lester C. van der Pluijm, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands Jacky C. Visser, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands Journal Argumentation Online ISSN 1572-8374 Print ISSN 0920-427X.
    No categories
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. B. M. J. van Klink & J. A. Klein Kranenberg (1995). De grenzen van Law's Empire: Dworkins rechtsfilosofie onder vuur. Krisis 15 (59):63-71.score: 46.0
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. Bart van Leeuwen (2005). Door de ogen van de haat: Racisme geïnterpreteerd vanuit sartres existentiële fenomenologie. Algemeen Nederlands Tijdschrift Voor Wijsbegeerte 97 (4).score: 42.0
    No categories
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. Bart Van Der Herten (1996). De ontwikkeling van de Belgische Post (1830-1913). Revue Belge de Philologie Et D'Histoire 74 (3):805-837.score: 42.0
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. Frans van Eemeren, Bart Garssen & Bert Meuffels (2012). Effectiveness Through Reasonableness Preliminary Steps to Pragma-Dialectical Effectiveness Research. Argumentation 26 (1):33-53.score: 30.0
    The introduction of the concept of strategic maneuvering into the pragma-dialectical theory makes it possible to formulate testable hypotheses regarding the persuasiveness of argumentative moves that are made in argumentative discourse. After summarizing the standard pragma-dialectical approach to argumentation, van Eemeren, Garssen, and Meuffels explain what the extension of the pragma-dialectical approach with strategic maneuvering involves and discuss the fallacies in terms of the extended pragma-dialectical approach as derailments of strategic maneuvering. Then they give an empirical interpretation of the extended (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. Frans H. van Eemeren, Bart Garssen & Bert Meuffels (2012). The Disguised Abusive Ad Hominem Empirically Investigated: Strategic Manoeuvring with Direct Personal Attacks. Thinking and Reasoning 18 (3):344 - 364.score: 30.0
    The main finding of a comprehensive empirical research project on the intersubjective acceptability of the pragma-dialectical discussion rules (Van Eemeren, Garssen & Meuffels, 2009) is that ordinary language users judge discussion moves that are considered fallacious from an argumentation-theoretical perspective as unreasonable. In light of this finding it is remarkable that in everyday argumentative discourse fallacies occur regularly and seem many times not to be noticed by the participants in the discourse. This also goes for the abusive argumentum ad hominem. (...)
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. Bart Cusveller (1998). Geloof in zorg, zorg in geloof een wijsgerige analyse Van het zorgbegrip in verband met levensbeschouwing en zorgverlening. Philosophia Reformata: Orgaan van de Vereniging Voor Calvinistische Wijsbegeerte 63:105.score: 30.0
    No categories
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. Bart Van Kerkhove & Jean Paul Van Bendegem (2008). Pi on Earth, or Mathematics in the Real World. Erkenntnis 68 (3):421-435.score: 28.0
    We explore aspects of an experimental approach to mathematical proof, most notably number crunching, or the verification of subsequent particular cases of universal propositions. Since the rise of the computer age, this technique has indeed conquered practice, although it implies the abandonment of the ideal of absolute certainty. It seems that also in mathematical research, the qualitative criterion of effectiveness, i.e. to reach one’s goals, gets increasingly balanced against the quantitative one of efficiency, i.e. to minimize one’s means/ends ratio. Our (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. Bart Gremmen & Henk Van Den Belt (2000). The Precautionary Principle and Pesticides. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 12 (2):197-205.score: 28.0
    In 1998, Greenpeace, Natuur en Milieu(Nature and Environment), Milieudefensie(Environmental Defense), and the National ConsumersUnion presented a report about the possible risks andhazards associated with pesticide residues on fruitsand vegetables. Although these organizationsexplicitly denied having unassailable evidence on theharmful effects of pesticides, they claimed that bynow there are sufficient indications that pesticidesmay indeed lead to such health hazards. They used anappeal to the so-called precautionary principle tounderpin their claims. The committee officially incharge of deciding on the admission of pesticidesaccused the organizations (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  22. Bart Van Kerkhove, Jean Paul Van Bendegem & Sal Restivo (2006). Introduction to the Special Issue Entitled 'Mathematics: What Does It All Mean?'. [REVIEW] Foundations of Science 11 (1-2):1-3.score: 28.0
  23. Bart Van Kerkhove & Guido Vanackere (2003). Vagueness-Adaptive Logic: A Pragmatical Approach to Sorites Paradoxes. Studia Logica 75 (3):383 - 411.score: 28.0
    This paper defends a pragmatical approach to vagueness. The vagueness-adaptive logic VAL is a good reconstruction of and an excellent instrument for human reasoning processes in which vague predicates are involved. Apart from its proof-theory and semantics, a Sorites-treating model based on it is presented, disarming the paradox. The paper opens perspectives with respect to the construction of theories by means of vague predicates.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  24. Bart Pattyn & Luc van Liedekerke (2001). Anxiety and Uncertainty in Modern Society. Ethical Perspectives 8 (2):88-104.score: 28.0
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  25. Bart Garssen & Jan Albert van Laar (2010). A Pragma-Dialectical Response to Objectivist Epistemic Challenges. Informal Logic 30 (2):122-141.score: 28.0
    The epistemologists Biro and Siegel have raised two objections against the pragma-dialectical approach to argumentation. According to the first objection the pragma-dialectical theory is not genuinely normative. According to the second objection the rejection of justificationism by pragma-dialecticians is unwarranted: they reject justificationism prematurely and they are not consistent in accepting some arguments (‘justifications’) as sound. The first objection is based on what we regard as the misconception that the goal of resolving differences of opinion cannot provide a normative approach. (...)
    Direct download (20 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  26. Bart Van Kerkhove & Jean Paul Van Bendegem (2005). Mathematical Practice and Naturalist Epistemology: Structures with Potential for Interaction. Philosophia Scientiae 9:61-78.score: 28.0
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  27. Bart van Leeuwen & Karen Vintges (2010). "A Dream, Dreamed by Reason . . . Hollow Like All Dreams": French Existentialism and Its Critique of Abstract Liberalism. [REVIEW] Hypatia 25 (3):653 - 674.score: 28.0
    The recent chiming of Simone de Beauvoir's legacy by French feminists for a policy of assimilation of Muslim women to Western models of self and society reduces the complexity and richness of Beauvoir's views in inacceptable ways. This article explores to what extent a politics of difference that challenges the ideals and political strategies of abstract liberalism can be extracted from and legitimized by the philosophies of Simone de Beauvoir and Jean-Paul Sartre. Without assuming their thought is identical, we can (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  28. Bart W. Schermer, Bart Custers & Simone van der Hof (2014). The Crisis of Consent: How Stronger Legal Protection May Lead to Weaker Consent in Data Protection. Ethics and Information Technology 16 (2):171-182.score: 28.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  29. Bart Geurts & Frans van der Slik (2005). Ups and Downs in Syllogistic Reasoning. Journal of Semantics 22:99-117.score: 28.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  30. Bart Hollebrandse, Angeliek van Hout & Petra Hendriks (2012). Children's First and Second-Order False-Belief Reasoning in a Verbal and a Low-Verbal Task. Synthese 191 (3):1-13.score: 28.0
    We can understand and act upon the beliefs of other people, even when these conflict with our own beliefs. Children’s development of this ability, known as Theory of Mind, typically happens around age 4. Research using a looking-time paradigm, however, established that toddlers at the age of 15 months old pass a non-verbal false-belief task (Onishi and Baillargeon in Science 308:255–258, 2005). This is well before the age at which children pass any of the verbal false-belief tasks. In this study (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  31. Bart Van Kerkhove & Jean Paul Van Bendegem (2008). Pi on Earth, or Mathematics in the Real World. Erkenntnis 68 (3):421 - 435.score: 28.0
    We explore aspects of an experimental approach to mathematical proof, most notably number crunching, or the verification of subsequent particular cases of universal propositions. Since the rise of the computer age, this technique has indeed conquered practice, although it implies the abandonment of the ideal of absolute certainty. It seems that also in mathematical research, the qualitative criterion of effectiveness, i.e. to reach one's goals, gets increasingly balanced against the quantitative one of efficiency, i.e. to minimize one's means/ends ratio. Our (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  32. Zoe Kourtzi, Bart Krekelberg & Richard J. A. van Wezel (2008). Linking Form and Motion in the Primate Brain. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 12 (6):230-236.score: 28.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  33. Bart van Leeuwen (2010). Dealing with Urban Diversity: Promises and Challenges of City Life for Intercultural Citizenship. Political Theory 38 (5):631 - 657.score: 28.0
    Intercultural citizenship seems to benefit from certain generic aspects of city life that carry a negative quality, such as "blasé attitude" or the typical "indifference" of city dwellers. The main part of this essay argues that this observation allows the formulation of a moral minimum—a threshold conception—of intercultural citizenship in the urban setting, namely, what I call side-by-side citizenship. A certain level of indifference makes possible personal freedom and a tolerant multicultural city, although there are more ideal formulations of intercultural (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  34. Bart Van Der Herten & Michangelo Van Meerten (1994). De spoorlijn Antwerpen-Gent, 1841-1897. De wisselwerking tussen privé-initiatief en overheidsinterventie in de Belgische spoorwegen. [REVIEW] Revue Belge de Philologie Et D'Histoire 72 (4):861-912.score: 28.0
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  35. Bart Van Kerkhove & Jean Paul Van Bendegem (2005). Mathematical Practice and Naturalist Epistemology: Structures with Potential for Interaction. Philosophia Scientiae 9 (2).score: 28.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  36. Bart Van Kerkhove, Jean Paul Van Bendegem & Jonas De Vuyst (eds.) (2010). Philosophical Perspectives on Mathematical Practice. College Publications.score: 28.0
  37. Michael Walzer, Marc Hooghe, Bart Pattyn & Jaap van Brakel (1999). International Society: What is the Best We Can Do? The Multatuli Lecture 1999. Ethical Perspectives 6 (3-4):199-200.score: 28.0
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  38. Bart van Leeuwen (2007). A Formal Recognition of Social Attachments: Expanding Axel Honneth's Theory of Recognition. Inquiry 50 (2):180 – 205.score: 24.0
    Axel Honneth draws a distinction between three types of recognition: (1) love, (2) respect and (3) social esteem. In his The Struggle for Recognition, the recognition of cultural particularity is situated in the third sphere. It will here be argued that the logic of recognition of cultural identity also demands a non-evaluative recognition, namely a respect for difference. Difference-respect is formal because it is a recognition of the value of a particular culture not "for society" or "as such", but for (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  39. Bart van Leeuwen (2007). To What Extent is Racism a Magical Transformation? An Existential-Phenomenological Perspective on Racism and Anti-Racism. Journal of Social Philosophy 38 (2):292–310.score: 24.0
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  40. Jean Paul van Bendegem & Bart van Kerkhove (2009). Mathematical Arguments in Context. Foundations of Science 14 (1-2):45-57.score: 24.0
    Except in very poor mathematical contexts, mathematical arguments do not stand in isolation of other mathematical arguments. Rather, they form trains of formal and informal arguments, adding up to interconnected theorems, theories and eventually entire fields. This paper critically comments on some common views on the relation between formal and informal mathematical arguments, most particularly applications of Toulmin’s argumentation model, and launches a number of alternative ideas of presentation inviting the contextualization of pieces of mathematical reasoning within encompassing bodies of (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  41. Krist Vaesen, Martin Peterson & Bart Van Bezooijen (2013). The Reliability of Armchair Intuitions. Metaphilosophy 44 (5):559-578.score: 24.0
    Armchair philosophers have questioned the significance of recent work in experimental philosophy by pointing out that experiments have been conducted on laypeople and undergraduate students. To challenge a practice that relies on expert intuitions, so the armchair objection goes, one needs to demonstrate that expert intuitions rather than those of ordinary people are sensitive to contingent facts such as cultural, linguistic, socio-economic, or educational background. This article does exactly that. Based on two empirical studies on populations of 573 and 203 (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  42. Bart Van Kerkhove (ed.) (2009). New Perspectives on Mathematical Practices: Essays in Philosophy and History of Mathematics. [REVIEW] World Scientific.score: 24.0
    This volume focuses on the importance of historical enquiry for the appreciation of philosophical problems concerning mathematics.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  43. Bart van Leeuwen (2006). Social Attachments as Conditions for the Condition of the Good Life? A Critique of Will Kymlicka's Moral Monism. Philosophy and Social Criticism 32 (3):401-428.score: 24.0
    The moral justification of Will Kymlicka's theory of minority rights is unconvincing. According to Kymlicka, cultural embeddedness is a necessary condition for personal autonomy (which is, in turn, the precondition for the good life) and for that reason liberals should be concerned about culture. I will criticize this instrumentalism of social attachments and the moral monism behind it. On the basis of a modification of Axel Honneth's theory of recognition, I will reject the false opposition between the instrumental value and (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  44. Bart Van Kerkhove & Guido Vanackere (2003). Vagueness-Adaptive Logic: A Pragmatical Approach to Sorites Paradoxes. Studia Logica 75 (3):383-411.score: 24.0
    This paper defends a pragmatical approach to vagueness. The vagueness-adaptive logic VAL is a good reconstruction of and an excellent, instrument for human reasoning processes in which vague predicates are involved. Apart from its proof-theory and semantics, a Sorites-treating model based on it is presented, disarming the paradox. The paper opens perspectives with respect to the construction of theories by means of vague predicates.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  45. Henk van den Belt & Bart Gremmen (2002). Between Precautionary Principle and “Sound Science”: Distributing the Burdens of Proof. [REVIEW] Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 15 (1):103-122.score: 24.0
    Opponents of biotechnology ofteninvoke the Precautionary Principle to advancetheir cause, whereas biotech enthusiasts preferto appeal to ``sound science.'' Publicauthorities are still groping for a usefuldefinition. A crucial issue in this debate isthe distribution of the burden of proof amongthe parties favoring and opposing certaintechnological developments. Indeed, the debateon the significance and scope of thePrecautionary Principle can be fruitfullyre-framed as a debate on the proper division ofburdens of proof. In this article, we attemptto arrive at a more refined way of thinkingabout (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  46. Floris J. Bex, Peter J. van Koppen, Henry Prakken & Bart Verheij (2010). A Hybrid Formal Theory of Arguments, Stories and Criminal Evidence. Artificial Intelligence and Law 18 (2):123-152.score: 24.0
    This paper presents a theory of reasoning with evidence in order to determine the facts in a criminal case. The focus is on the process of proof, in which the facts of the case are determined, rather than on related legal issues, such as the admissibility of evidence. In the literature, two approaches to reasoning with evidence can be distinguished, one argument-based and one story-based. In an argument-based approach to reasoning with evidence, the reasons for and against the occurrence of (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  47. Bart van Kerkhove (2004). Review of B. Heintz, Die Innenwelt der Matheznatik. Zur Kultur Und Praxis Einer Beweisenden Disziplin. [The Inner World of Mathematics. On the Culture and Practice of a Proof-Based Discipline.]. [REVIEW] Philosophia Mathematica 12 (1):75-78.score: 24.0
  48. Bart Van Kerkhove (2010). The Philosophy of Mathematical Practice. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 24 (1):118 – 122.score: 24.0
    This title offers philosophical analyses of important characteristics of contemporary mathematics and of many aspects of mathematical activity which escape purely formal logical treatment.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  49. Bart Vandenabeele (2011). Het Sublieme in de Kunst: Van Kant Tot Duchamp En Verder. Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 73 (4):701-733.score: 24.0
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
1 — 50 / 1000