Search results for 'Ben S. Cordry' (try it on Scholar)

7 found
Sort by:
  1. Ben S. Cordry (2004). Necessity and Rigidly Designating Kind Terms. Philosophical Studies 119 (3):243-264.score: 290.0
    Kripke claims that certainkind terms, particularly natural kind terms,are, like names, rigid designators. However,kind terms are more complicated than names aseach is connected both to a principle ofinclusion and an extension. So, there is aquestion regarding what it is that rigidlydesignating kind terms rigidly designate. Inthis paper, I assume that there are rigidlydesignating kind terms and attempt to answerthe question as to what it is that they rigidlydesignate. I then use this analysis of rigidlydesignating kind terms to show how Kripke''sreasoning (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Benjamin S. Cordry (2009). Divine Hiddenness and Belief de Re. Religious Studies 45 (1):1-19.score: 150.0
    In this paper I argue that Poston and Dougherty's attempt to undermine the problem of divine hiddenness by using the notion of belief de re is problematic at best. They hold that individuals who appear to be unbelievers (because they are de dicto unbelievers) may actually be de re believers. I construct a set of conditions on ascribing belief de re to show that it is prima facie implausible to claim that seemingly inculpable and apparent unbelievers are really de re (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Benjamin Cordry (2011). A More Dangerous Enemy? Philo's “Confession” and Hume's Soft Atheism. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 70 (1):61-83.score: 150.0
    While Hume has often been held to have been an agnostic or atheist, several contemporary scholars have argued that Hume was a theist. These interpretations depend chiefly on several passages in which Hume allegedly confesses to theism. In this paper, I argue against this position by giving a threshold characterization of theism and using it to show that Hume does not confess. His most important confession does not cross this threshold and the ones that do are often expressive rather than (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Benjamin S. Cordry (2010). A Critique of Religious Fictionalism. Religious Studies 46 (1):77-89.score: 120.0
    Andrew Eshleman has argued that atheists can believe in God by being fully engaged members of religious communities and using religious discourse in a non-realist way. He calls this position 'fictionalism' because the atheist takes up religion as a useful fiction. In this paper I critique fictionalism along two lines: that it is problematic to successfully be a fictionalist and that fictionalism is unjustified. Reflection on fictionalism will point to some wider problems with religious anti-realism.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Benjamin S. Cordry (2006). Theism and the Philosophy of Nature. Religious Studies 42 (3):273-290.score: 120.0
    In this paper I argue that traditional theism, in its theory, history, and practice has implications for the philosophy of nature. Namely, nature should be designed around aesthetic or meaningful principles and nature should be engineered in order to fulfil a fairly well defined set of purposes. If theism is true, we should be able to study nature objectively as a teleological system. After all, the teleological structure of nature is more important to us as spiritual beings than its mechanisms. (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Benjamin S. Cordry (2009). Martin W. F. Stone (Ed.) Reason, Faith, and History: Essays for Paul Helm . (Aldershot: Ashgate, 2009). Pp. XI+243. £55.00 (Hbk). Isbn 978 0 7546 0926. [REVIEW] Religious Studies 45 (4):515-520.score: 120.0
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Mark Wynn (2006). A Response to Cordry on Design. Religious Studies 42 (3):291-297.score: 36.0
    In his paper ‘Theism and the philosophy of nature’, Ben Cordry argues that theism's conception of nature has been falsified. In this response, I argue that the universe in many ways conforms to theistic expectations, and that there is no presumption that a divinely ordered world will take the form that Cordry proposes. (Published Online July 10 2006).
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation