87 found
Order:
  1. Bernard Linsky & Edward N. Zalta (1994). In Defense of the Simplest Quantified Modal Logic. Philosophical Perspectives 8 (Logic and Language):431-458.
    The simplest quantified modal logic combines classical quantification theory with the propositional modal logic K. The models of simple QML relativize predication to possible worlds and treat the quantifier as ranging over a single fixed domain of objects. But this simple QML has features that are objectionable to actualists. By contrast, Kripke-models, with their varying domains and restricted quantifiers, seem to eliminate these features. But in fact, Kripke-models also have features to which actualists object. Though these philosophers have introduced variations (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   28 citations  
  2.  5
    Bernard Linsky (1999). Russell's Metaphysical Logic. Center for the Study of Language and Inf.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   14 citations  
  3. Bernard Linsky & Edward N. Zalta (1996). In Defense of the Contingently Nonconcrete. Philosophical Studies 84 (2-3):283-294.
    In "Actualism or Possibilism?" (Philosophical Studies, 84 (2-3), December 1996), James Tomberlin develops two challenges for actualism. The challenges are to account for the truth of certain sentences without appealing to merely possible objects. After canvassing the main actualist attempts to account for these phenomena, he then criticizes the new conception of actualism that we described in our paper "In Defense of the Simplest Quantified Modal Logic" (Philosophical Perspectives 8: Philosophy of Logic and Language, Atascadero, CA: Ridgeview, 1994). We respond (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   22 citations  
  4. Bernard Linsky (2009). Logical Types in Some Arguments About Knowability and Belief. In Joe Salerno (ed.), New Essays on the Knowability Paradox. Oxford University Press
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   7 citations  
  5. Bernard Linsky (2003). A Companion to Analytic Philosophy (Review). Journal of the History of Philosophy 41 (1):139-140.
    A Companion to Analytic Philosophy is a comprehensive guide to many significant analytic philosophers and concepts of the last hundred years. Provides a comprehensive guide to many of the most significant analytic philosophers of the last one hundred years. Offers clear and extensive analysis of profound concepts such as truth, goodness, knowledge, and beauty. Written by some of the most distinguished philosophers alive, some of whom have entries in the book devoted to them.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  6. Bernard Linsky & Edward N. Zalta (2006). What is Neologicism? Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 12 (1):60-99.
    In this paper, we investigate (1) what can be salvaged from the original project of "logicism" and (2) what is the best that can be done if we lower our sights a bit. Logicism is the view that "mathematics is reducible to logic alone", and there are a variety of reasons why it was a non-starter. We consider the various ways of weakening this claim so as to produce a "neologicism". Three ways are discussed: (1) expand the conception of logic (...)
    Direct download (10 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  7.  23
    Donovan Wishon & Bernard Linsky (2015). The Place of The Problems of Philosophy in Philosophy. In Acquaintance, Knowledge, and Logic: New Essays on Bertrand Russell's The Problems of Philosophy.
    This chapter summarizes Russell’s The Problems of Philosophy, presents new biographical details about how and why Russell wrote it, and highlights its continued significance for contemporary philosophy. It also surveys Russell’s famous distinction between “knowledge by acquaintance” and “knowledge by description,” his developing views about our knowledge of physical reality, and his views about our knowledge of logic, mathematics, and other abstract objects.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  8.  79
    Bernard Linsky & Edward N. Zalta (1995). Naturalized Platonism Versus Platonized Naturalism. Journal of Philosophy 92 (10):525-555.
    In this paper, we develop an alternative strategy, Platonized Naturalism, for reconciling naturalism and Platonism and to account for our knowledge of mathematical objects and properties. A systematic (Principled) Platonism based on a comprehension principle that asserts the existence of a plenitude of abstract objects is not just consistent with, but required (on transcendental grounds) for naturalism. Such a comprehension principle is synthetic, and it is known a priori. Its synthetic a priori character is grounded in the fact that it (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   7 citations  
  9.  43
    Bernard Linsky (2006). General Terms as Rigid Designators. [REVIEW] Philosophical Studies 128 (3):655 - 667.
    According to Scott Soames’ Beyond Rigidity, there are two important pieces of unfinished business left over from Saul Kripke’s influential Naming and Necessity. Soames reads Kripke’s arguments about names as primarily negative, that is, as proving that names don’t have a meaning expressible by definite descriptions or clusters of them. The famous Kripkean doctrine that names are rigid designators is really only part of the negative case. The thesis that names refer to the same object with respect to every possible (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  10.  43
    Bernard Linsky (1986). Factives, Blindspots and Some Paradoxes. Analysis 46 (1):10 - 15.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  11. Bernard Linsky (2011). Critical Notice of Richard Gaskin's The Unity of the Proposition. [REVIEW] Canadian Journal of Philosophy 41 (3):469-481.
    According to Richard Gaskin, The Problem of the Unity of the Proposition is to explain 'what distinguishes propositions from mere aggregates, and enables them to be true or false' (18).1 This problem arises from the simpler problem of distinguishing a sentence from a 'mere list' of words (1). The unity of a sentence is due to its syntax, a level of structure which is not apparent in the string of words which are uttered or written, and which distinguishes a sentence (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  12.  57
    Bernard Linsky & Edward N. Zalta (1991). Is Lewis a Meinongian? Australasian Journal of Philosophy 69 (4):438–453.
    The views of David Lewis and the Meinongians are both often met with an incredulous stare. This is not by accident. The stunned disbelief that usually accompanies the stare is a natural first reaction to a large ontology. Indeed, Lewis has been explicitly linked with Meinong, a charge that he has taken great pains to deny. However, the issue is not a simple one. "Meinongianism" is a complex set of distinctions and doctrines about existence and predication, in addition to the (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   5 citations  
  13. Bernard Linsky (1984). General Terms as Designators. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 65 (3):259.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   7 citations  
  14. Bernard Linsky (2002). The Substitutional Paradox in Russell's 1907 Letter to Hawtrey. Russell 22 (1).
    This note presents a transcription of Russell's letter to Hawtrey of 22 January 1907 accompanied by some proposed emendations. In that letter Russell describes the paradox that he says "pilled" the "substitutional theory" developed just before he turned to the theory of types. A close paraphrase of the derivation of the paradox in a contemporary Lemmon-style natural deduction system shows which axioms the theory must assume to govern its characteristic notion of substituting individuals and propositions for each other in other (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  15.  17
    Bernard Linsky (2003). 11 The Metaphysics of Logical Atomism. In Nicholas Griffin (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Bertrand Russell. Cambridge University Press 371.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  16.  74
    Francis Jeffry Pelletier & Bernard Linsky (2009). Russell Vs. Frege on Definite Descriptions as Singular Terms. In Nicholas Griffin & Dale Jacquette (eds.), Russell Vs. Meinong: The Legacy of "on Denoting". Routledge
    In ‘On Denoting’ and to some extent in ‘Review of Meinong and Others, Untersuchungen zur Gegenstandstheorie und Psychologie’, published in the same issue of Mind (Russell, 1905a,b), Russell presents not only his famous elimination (or contextual defi nition) of defi nite descriptions, but also a series of considerations against understanding defi nite descriptions as singular terms. At the end of ‘On Denoting’, Russell believes he has shown that all the theories that do treat defi nite descriptions as singular terms fall (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  17. Bernard Linsky (2004). Russell's Marginalia in His Copies of Frege's Works. Russell 24 (1).
    A transcription of Russell's marginal comments in his copies of Frege's works, from his readings of Frege in 1902. The greatest number are in the early sections of Grundgesetze der Arithmetik, Vol. I, but there are also marginal comments in Begriffsschrift, Grundlagen der Arithmetik, "Ueber Formale Theorien der Arithmetik", "Ueber Begriff und Gegenstand", "Function und Begriff", "Kritische Beleuchtung einiger Punkte in E. Schroeders ..." and two corrections of typographical errors in "Ueber Sinn und Bedeutung".
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  18.  12
    Bernard Linsky (1992). Editorial. Philosophical Studies 65 (1-2):1-1.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  19.  11
    Bernard Linsky, Logical Constructions. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  20.  47
    Bernard Linsky (1984). Phenomenal Qualities and the Identity of Indistinguishables. Synthese 59 (June):363-380.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  21.  39
    Bernard Linsky (1991). Truth at a World is a Modality. Philosophia 20 (4):387-394.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  22. Bernard Linsky (2007). Logical Analysis and Logical Construction. In Micahel Beaney (ed.), The Analytic Turn. Routledge 107--122.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  23.  16
    Bernard Linsky (1988). Propositional Functions and Universals in Principia Mathematica. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 66 (4):447 – 460.
  24.  7
    Bernard Linsky (2004). Leon Chwistek on the No-Classes Theory inPrincipia Mathematica. History and Philosophy of Logic 25 (1):53-71.
    Leon Chwistek's 1924 paper ?The Theory of Constructive Types? is cited in the list of recent ?contributions to mathematical logic? in the second edition of Principia Mathematica, yet its prefatory criticisms of the no-classes theory have been seldom noticed. This paper presents a transcription of the relevant section of Chwistek's paper, comments on the significance of his arguments, and traces the reception of the paper. It is suggested that while Russell was aware of Chwistek's points, they were not important in (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  25.  3
    Bernard Linsky (2002). Russell's Logical Form, LF, and Truth Conditions. In Gerhard Preyer Georg Peter (ed.), Logical Form and Language. Oxford University Press 391--408.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  26.  12
    Bernard Linsky (1982). Identity and Essence. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 12 (2):391-407.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  27.  23
    Bernard Linsky (1977). Putnam on the Meaning of Natural Kind Terms. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 7 (4):819 - 828.
    In "the meaning of 'meaning'," hilary putnam uses three "twin earth" examples to argue that natural kind terms do not have a sense. I argue that the first two only show that kind terms are like indexicals and that they are rigid designators but that this is compatible with having a sense. The third argument relies on a theory about the epistemological role of kind terms and the claim that there are no analytic truths about kinds that could arise from (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  28.  15
    Bernard Linsky & John King-Farlow (1984). John Heintz's "Subjects and Predicables. Philosophical Inquiry 6 (1):47-56.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  29.  25
    Bernard Linsky (1994). Truth Makers for Modal Propositions. The Monist 77 (2):192-206.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  30.  17
    Bernard Linsky (1980). Critical Notice of Mark Platts, Ways of Meaning. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 10 (3):513-523.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  31.  15
    Bernard Linsky (1984). Reference and Essence. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 14 (3):499-515.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  32.  9
    Bernard Linsky (forthcoming). Philosophy After Quine. Eidos: Revista de Filosofía de la Universidad Del Norte 13.
    As a survey included in an issue devoted to W.V. Quine this article contains a list of sixteen distinctively Quinean theses and a brief discussion of the influence of several of them on contemporary philosophy. In particular, I mention how Quine's views have had a profound influence on contemporary discussions of the nature of logic, the theory of meaning and on realism. Many who explicitly reject some of his more controversial doctrines may not have worked out the interconnections of theses (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  33. Bernard Linsky (1992). J. Alberto Coffa, The Semantic Tradition From Kant to Carnap; To the Vienna Station Reviewed By. Philosophy in Review 12 (4):233-235.
  34.  20
    Bernard Linsky (1992). The Logical Form of Descriptions. Dialogue 31 (04):677-.
    This critical notice of Stephen Neale's "Descriptions", (MIT Press, 1990) summarizes the content of the book and presents several objections to its arguments, as well as praising Neale for showing just how close the linguistic notion of L F is to the analytic philosopher's notion of "logical form". It is claimed that Neale's use of generalized quantifiers to represent definite descriptions from Russell's account by which descriptions are "incomplete symbols". I also argue that his assessment of the Quine/Smullyan exchange about (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  35.  8
    Bernard Linsky (2009). Russell And Frege On The Logic of Functions. The Baltic International Yearbook of Cognition, Logic and Communication 4 (1):1-17.
    I compare Russell’s theory of mathematical functions, the “descriptive functions” from Principia Mathematica ∗30, with Frege’s well known account of functions as “unsaturated” entities. Russell analyses functional terms with propositional functions and the theory of definite descriptions. This is the primary technical role of the theory of descriptions in P M . In Principles of Mathematics and some unpublished writings from before 1905, Russell offered explicit criticisms of Frege’s account of functions. Consequenly, the theory of descriptions in “On Denoting” can (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  36.  16
    Bernard Linsky (2002). The Resolution of Russell's Paradox in "Principia Mathematica". Noûs 36 (s16):395 - 417.
  37.  6
    Bernard Linsky (2001). The Worlds of Possibility. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 63 (2):483-486.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  38.  5
    Bernard Linsky & Edward N. Zalta (1995). Current Periodical Articles 705. ARGUMENT 92 (11).
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  39.  11
    Bernard Linsky (2005). Remarks on Platonized Naturalism. Croatian Journal of Philosophy 5 (1):3-15.
    A discussion of views first presented by this author and Edward Zalta in 1995 in the paper “Naturalized Platonism vs. Platonized Naturalism”. That paper presents an application of Zalta’s “object theory” to the ontology of mathematics, and claims that there is a plenitude of abstract objects, all the creatures of distinct mathematical theories. After a summary of the position, two questions concerning the view are singled out for discussion: just how many mathematical objects there are by our account, and the (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  40.  14
    Bernard Linsky (1981). Treatise on Basic Philosophy. Vol. I Semantics, Sense and Reference. Vol. II Semantics, Interpretation and Truth. By Mario Bunge, Dordrecht, Holland: D. Reidel Publishing Co. 1974. Vol. I Pp Xn, 185; Vol. II Pp XII, 210. [REVIEW] Dialogue 20 (2):384-391.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  41.  13
    Bernard Linsky (1993). Paradoxes of Belief and Strategic Rationality (Cambridge Studies in Probability, Induction, Decision Theory). Philosophical Books 34 (1):27-28.
  42.  17
    Bernard Linsky (1982). Is Transmutation Possible? Philosophical Studies 41 (3):367 - 381.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  43.  14
    Bernard Linsky (1994). G. W. Fitch's Paleontology. Philosophical Studies 73 (2-3):189 - 193.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  44.  10
    Bernard Linsky (1989). The Collected Papers of Bertrand Russell Vol. 8: The Philosophy of Logical Atomism and Other Essays: 1914–19 John G. Slater, Editor London: George Allen and Unwin, 1986. Pp. Xl, 418. $60.00 (U.S.). [REVIEW] Dialogue 28 (04):675-.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  45.  3
    Bernard Linsky (2005). Russell's Notes on Frege for Appendix A of The Principles of Mathematics. Russell 24 (2):133-172.
    This article presents notes that Russell made while reading the works of Gottlob Frege in 1902. These works include Frege's books as well as the packet of off-prints Frege sent at Russell's request in June of that year. Russell relied on these notes while composing "Appendix A: The Logical and Arithmetical Doctrines of Frege" to add to The Principles of Mathematics, which was then in press. A transcription of the marginal comments in those works of Frege appeared in the previous (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  46.  7
    Bernard Linsky (2001). Placing Abstract Objects in Naturalism. Philosophical Inquiry 23 (1-2):73-85.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  47.  9
    Bernard Linsky (2006). Review: General Terms as Rigid Designators. [REVIEW] Philosophical Studies 128 (3):655 - 667.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  48. Bernard Linsky (1984). Gareth Evans, The Varieties of Reference Reviewed By. Philosophy in Review 4 (3):103-105.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  49. Bernard Linsky (1982). Hartry H. Field, Science Without Numbers Reviewed By. Philosophy in Review 2 (4):161-164.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  50.  10
    Bernard Linsky (1991). A Note on the ``Carving Up Content'' Principle in Frege's Theory of Sense. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 33 (1):126-135.
1 — 50 / 87