Search results for 'Bernard R. Hodgson' (try it on Scholar)

1000+ found
Order:
  1.  21
    Clement F. Kent & Bernard R. Hodgson (1989). Extensions of Arithmetic for Proving Termination of Computations. Journal of Symbolic Logic 54 (3):779-794.
    Kirby and Paris have exhibited combinatorial algorithms whose computations always terminate, but for which termination is not provable in elementary arithmetic. However, termination of these computations can be proved by adding an axiom first introduced by Goodstein in 1944. Our purpose is to investigate this axiom of Goodstein, and some of its variants, and to show that these are potentially adequate to prove termination of computations of a wide class of algorithms. We prove that many variations of Goodstein's axiom are (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  2.  10
    William S. Hatcher & Bernard R. Hodgson (1981). Complexity Bounds on Proofs. Journal of Symbolic Logic 46 (2):255-258.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  3.  16
    David Hodgson, Review of John R. Searle Rationality in Action. [REVIEW]
  4. L. L. Bernard (1924). Instinct: A Study in Social Psychology. By J. R. Kantor. [REVIEW] Ethics 35:429.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  5. J. B. R. (1967). Collection: Papers by Bernard Lonergan, S.J. [REVIEW] Review of Metaphysics 21 (1):167-167.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  6. G. S. R. (1956). The Mystical Theology of St. Bernard. [REVIEW] Review of Metaphysics 9 (4):703-703.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  7.  1
    R. M. Bernard (1977). Studies on Lactation and Contraception in WHO's Research Programme. Journal of Biosocial Science 9 (S4):113-120.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  8. R. P. Bernard, Rohit V. Bhatt, D. M. Potts & A. Padma Rao (1978). Seasonality of Birth in India. Journal of Biosocial Science 10 (4):409.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  9.  22
    P. Langat, D. Pisartchik, D. Silva, C. Bernard, K. Olsen, M. Smith, S. Sahni & R. Upshur (2011). Is There a Duty to Share? Ethics of Sharing Research Data in the Context of Public Health Emergencies. Public Health Ethics 4 (1):4-11.
    Making research data readily accessible during a public health emergency can have profound effects on our response capabilities. The moral milieu of this data sharing has not yet been adequately explored. This article explores the foundation and nature of a duty, if any, that researchers have to share data, specifically in the context of public health emergencies. There are three notable reasons that stand in opposition to a duty to share one’s data, relating to: (i) data property and ownership, (ii) (...)
    Direct download (12 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  10.  8
    Abraham R. Oduro, Raymond A. Aborigo, Dickson Amugsi, Francis Anto, Thomas Anyorigiya, Frank Atuguba, Abraham Hodgson & Kwadwo A. Koram (2008). Understanding and Retention of the Informed Consent Process Among Parents in Rural Northern Ghana. BMC Medical Ethics 9 (1):12-.
    The individual informed consent model remains critical to the ethical conduct and regulation of research involving human beings. Parental informed consent process in a rural setting of northern Ghana was studied to describe comprehension and retention among parents as part of the evaluation of the existing informed consent process.
    Direct download (13 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  11.  27
    Bernard Hodgson (2012). Democratic Agency and the Market Machine. Journal of Business Ethics 108 (1):3-14.
    The alliance of pure market economies with democratic polities has traditionally been a problematic one. It is argued that orthodox theoretical conceptualizations of market behaviour and the application of such theory to our communal lives have entrenched an incoherent alliance. In particular, the reductive mechanism characteristic of both neo-classical economic theory and its deployment in our socio-economic order has severely undermined the telic agency required for the autonomy or self-rule definitive of an authentic democratic order. Such reduction is observed to (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  12.  26
    Bernard J. Hodgson (2001). Can the Beast Be Tamed?: Reflections on John McMurtry's Unequal Freedoms: The Global Market as an Ethical System. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 33 (1):71 - 78.
    My paper responds to certain themes of Professor John McMurtry's recent book, Unequal Freedoms: The Global Market as an Ethical System. Although I am in general sympathy with McMurtry's penetrating critique of conventional market theory and practice, I find Unequal Freedoms ambivalent on the critical question of whether endorsing and enacting the life-value code McMurtry proposes would require only a mitigation of the principles and definitive activities of the competitive market system or whether significant reforms within the system would have (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  13.  20
    Bernard Hodgson (1983). Economic Science and Ethical Neutrality: The Problem of Teleology. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 2 (4):237 - 253.
    Two disputes have continually frustrated attempts to provide a tenable method of enquiry for economic science:(a) Should theory construction in economics include a commitment to moral principles? Or should economic theory remain value-free? (b) Does the peculiar subject matter of economics demand a teleological, or a mechanistic pattern of explanation? It is the aim of this paper to shed light on both the preceding controversies by seeking to clarify the relation between them. In particular, it is argued via a case (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  14. Alan N. Hodgson, Brian R. Allanson & Robyn Cretchley (2000). An Estimation of the Standing Stock and Population Structure ofUpogebia Africana in the Knysna Estuary. Transactions of the Royal Society of South Africa 55 (2):187-196.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  15.  17
    Bernard J. Hodgson (2001). Michalos and the Theory of Ethical Theory. Journal of Business Ethics 29 (1-2):19 - 23.
    The paper replies to Professor Alex Michalos'' keynote address, "Ethics Counsellors as a New Priesthood". Michalos argues that an intractable diversity of opinion about fundamental issues in ethical theory precludes substantive, well-founded ethical counselling. However, Michalos has inappropriately modelled his understanding of an acceptable structure and application for ethical theory on natural scientific theory. For we may countenance a less severe understanding of theory for ethical theory than in the hard sciences. In particular, instructive moral reasoning may tolerate a degree (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  16.  35
    Bernard Bosanquet, Shadworth H. Hodgson & G. E. Moore (1897). In What Sense, If Any, Do Past and Future Time Exist? Mind 6 (22):228-240.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  17.  10
    Bernard Hodgson (2009). 18 Equity. In Jan Peil & Irene van Staveren (eds.), Handbook of Economics and Ethics. Edward Elgar 130.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  18.  20
    Bernard Hodgson (2005). Thinking and Acting Outside the Neo-Classical Economic Box: Reply to McMurtry. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 56 (3):289 - 303.
    This paper responds to Professor John McMurtry, primarily to his critique of my recent book, Economics as Moral Science . Although agreeing with my attribution of a "moral a priorism" to orthodox or neo-classical economics, McMurtry takes issue with my "conversion thesis", that an a priori, ethically committed theory can be transformed into a testable empirical science of actual behaviour through the application of institutional constraints to individual motivations. McMurtry views such a thesis as "logically possible but morally abhorrent". In (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  19.  19
    Bernard Hodgson (1992). Rationality in Economics, Shaun Hargreaves Heap. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1989, Ix + 224 Pages. [REVIEW] Economics and Philosophy 8 (2):290-298.
  20.  5
    Bernard Bosanquet, A. E. Taylor & Shadworth H. Hodgson (1901). Recent Criticism of Green's Ethics [with Discussion]. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 2:25 - 73.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  21. Alan N. Hodgson, Brian R. Allanson & Robyn Cretchley (2000). The Exploitation ofUpogebia Africana for Bait in the Knysna Estuary. Transactions of the Royal Society of South Africa 55 (2):197-204.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  22.  13
    Bernard Hodgson (1988). Economic Science and Ethical Neutrality II: The Intransigence of Evaluative Concepts. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 7 (5):321 - 335.
    This paper returns to a perennial controversy I examined in a previous paper in the Journal of Business Ethics (Vol. 2, 1983). Is economic theory an ethically neutral discipline or do its statements presuppose a commitment to moral values? Once again this issue is addressed via a case study of the neo-classical theory of rational choice. In the present paper I focus on behaviourist forms of operationalist attempts to short-circuit any argument that would seek to infer moral presuppositions from the (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  23.  5
    J. Bernard & R. W. Gilbert (1941). The Specificity of the Effect of Shock for Error in Maze Learning with Human Subjects. Journal of Experimental Psychology 28 (2):178.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  24.  4
    Alexander Bain, W. R. Sorley, J. S. Mann, E. P. Scrymgour & Shadworth H. Hodgson (1887). Symposium: The Distinction Between Will and Desire. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 1 (1):54 - 69.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  25.  5
    Shadworth H. Hodgson, David G. Ritchie, G. F. Stout, Bernard Bosanquet & S. Alexander (1887). Symposium: Is Mind Synonymous with Consciousness? Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 1 (1):5 - 33.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  26. B. Buck, R. N. Maddison & P. E. Hodgson (1960). Optical Model Analysis of Nuclear Scattering. Philosophical Magazine 5 (59):1181-1191.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  27. Shri Aurobindo, C. Rao, J. Herbert, R. Guénon & Theos Bernard (1950). La Bhagavad-Gita. Revista Portuguesa de Filosofia 6 (3):329-330.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  28. Solomon Gandz, Henri Bernard, R. Ockenden, Kate Mead & Lynn Thorndike (1936). Notes and Correspondence. Isis: A Journal of the History of Science 25:449-460.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  29. Solomon Gandz, Henri Bernard, R. E. Ockenden, Lynn Thorndike, George Sarton, Ralph C. Benedict & Edmund O. von Lippmann (1936). Notes and Correspondence. Isis 25 (2):449-460.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  30. Pierre Gendron & Claude Bernard (1992). Claude Bernard, Rationalit'e d'Une M'ethode. Monograph Collection (Matt - Pseudo).
    No categories
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  31. R. Hodgson (1883). Essays in Philosophical Criticism. [REVIEW] Mind 8:580.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  32. Peter C. Hodgson, R. F. Brown, P. C. Hodgson & J. M. Stewart (1987). Hegel's Lectures on the Philosophy of Religion, Vol. III: The Consummate Religion. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 21 (1):60-62.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  33. Timothy L. Hodgson, Benjamin A. Parris, Abdelmalek Benattayallah & Ian R. Summers (2015). Multi-Modal Representation of Effector Modality in Frontal Cortex During Rule Switching. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 9.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  34. Bernard Hodgson (2005). Thinking and Acting Outside the Neo-Classical Economic Box: Reply to McMurtry. Journal of Business Ethics 56 (3):289-303.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  35. R. McK & Walter Bernard (1936). The Philosophy of Spinoza and Brunner. Journal of Philosophy 33 (9):248.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  36. Joe Pizzillo, Robert W. Bernard, Robert H. Graham, Susan Ludmer-Gliebe, -Joseph M. McCarthy, Erskine S. Dottin, John R. Thelin, Richard A. Hartnett, -John F. Murphy & -Jack K. Campbell (1977). Book Review Section 1. [REVIEW] Educational Studies 8 (3):263-285.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  37. Donald R. Warren, Ronald E. Butchart, Edward R. Beauchamp, Thomas L. Bernard, Alpha E. Wilson, Lynn Phillips, M. Mobin Shorish, Bruce W. Tuckman, Llyod Suttell, Leo Fay, Dayle M. Bethel & Robert A. Morgart (1974). Book Review Section 2. [REVIEW] Educational Studies 5 (3):148-159.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  38.  9
    G. B. R. (1914). The Authorship of the Platonic Epistles. By R. Hackforth, M.A. 8vo. 1 Vol. Pp. 203. Manchester: University Press, 1913. The Classical Review 28 (07):231-232.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  39.  6
    Y. T. R. (1899). Cambridge Compositions Cambridge Compositions, Greek and Latin. Edited by R. D. Archer-Hind, M.A., and R. D. Hicks, M.A., Fellows of Trinity College, Cambridge. Cambridge: At the University Press. 1899. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 13 (04):227-230.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  40.  2
    L. A. R. (1952). Book Review:Creative Aspects of Natural Law R. A. Fisher. [REVIEW] Philosophy of Science 19 (4):350-.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  41.  9
    C. S. R. (1895). Blake's Edition of Xenophon's Hellenica I. II., and Other Selections The Hellenica of Xenophon, Books I. And II., Together with Selections From Lysias C. Eratosthenes and From Aristotle's Constitution of Athens, Edited with Notes by R. W. Blake, A.M. Boston. 1894. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 9 (04):231-.
  42.  7
    Shadworth H. Hodgson (1877). Mr. Hodgson on `Cogito Ergo Sum'. Mind 2 (5):126-130.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  43.  2
    G. G. R. (1931). Psychopathology. By J. S. Nicole, M.R.C.P. & S. (London: Bailliere Tindall & Cox. 1930. Pp. Xii + 203. Price 10s. 6d.). Philosophy 6 (22):271-.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  44.  3
    Shadworth H. Hodgson (1881). Letter of Dr. S. H. Hodgson. Journal of Speculative Philosophy 15 (3):320 - 322.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  45.  2
    B. R. (2008). Jeremiah 21–36 (Anchor Bible 21b) and Jeremiah 37–52 (Anchor Bible 21c). By Jack R. Lundbom. Heythrop Journal 49 (1):168–169.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  46. L. A. R. (1954). Book Review:Evaluating Research and Development I. R. Weschler, Paula Brown. [REVIEW] Philosophy of Science 21 (1):76-.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  47.  2
    Robert G. Morrison (2005). The Solar Model in Joseph Ibn Joseph Ibn nahmias'I Would Like to Thank Bernard R. Goldstein of the University of Pittsburgh and George Saliba of Columbia University for Bringing This Manuscript to My Attention in 1992. I Presented Part of This Paper at the 2002 History of Science Society Conference in Milwaukee, Wi, and Thank Jamil Ragep of the University of Oklahoma for Thoughtful Comments. I Would Also Like to Acknowledge the Time and Care Taken by the Anonymous Referees at Arabic Sciences and Philosophy. Discussions with Albert and Laura Schueller and David Guichard of the Whitman College Department of Mathematics Were Also Beneficial. Any Shortcomings in This Article Are My Responsibility. Light of the World: The Solar Model in Light of the World. [REVIEW] Arabic Sciences and Philosophy 15 (1):57-108.
    In an influential article, A. I. Sabra identified an intellectual trend from twelfth and thirteenth-century Andalusia which he described as the ‘‘Andalusian revolt against Ptolemaic astronomy.” Philosophers such as Ibn Rushd , Ibn Tufayl , and Maimonides objected to Ptolemy’s theories on philosophic grounds, not because of shortcomings in the theories' predictive accuracy. Sabra showed how al-Bitrūjī's Kitāb al-Hay'a attempted to account for observed planetary motions in a way that met the philosophic standards of those philosophers and others. In Nūr (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  48.  10
    Dennis Badeen (2012). Bernard Hodgson's Trojan Horse Critique of Neoclassical Economics and the Second Phase of the Empiricist Level of Analysis. Journal of Business Ethics 108 (1):15-25.
    This article examines and assesses Bernard Hodgson’s critique of the Neoclassical concept of rationality and its place in the literature. It is argued that Hodgson’s Trojan horse critique is superior to the others because it addresses the role of empiricist epistemology in reducing reason to instrumental rationality and consequent disappearance of the human subject of political economy. The second phase of the empiricist level of analysis reintroduces the capacities for ethical deliberation, self-determination, and the socio-historical conditions and (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  49.  4
    David Geoffrey Holdsworth (2012). Economics and the Limits of Optimization: Steps Towards Extending Bernard Hodgson's Moral Science. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 108 (1):37-48.
    In this essay, my point of departure is Bernard Hodgson’s analysis of neo-classical economic theory and his demonstration that neo-classical economic thought is already a branch of normative theory. I undertake to broaden the demonstration by showing that other contemporary conceptions of economics are also irreducibly normative. The essay begins with an overview of Hodgson’s argument strategy, and a discussion of his thesis that economics is a moral science. This illustrates in what way moral presuppositions are at (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  50.  7
    John McMurtry (2003). The Life-Blind Structure of the Neoclassical Paradigm: A Critique of Bernard Hodgson's "Economics as a Moral Science". [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 44 (4):377-389.
    This paper achieves two general objectives. It first analyses Bernard Hodgson's "Economic As Moral Science" as a path-breaking internal critique of neo-classical economic theory, and it then demonstrates that the underlying neo-classical paradigm he presupposes suffers from a deeper-structural myopia than his standpoint recognizes. EMS mainly exposes the a priori moral prescriptions underlying orthodox consumer choice theory - namely, its classical utilitarian ground and four or, as argued here, five hidden universal categorical-ought prescriptions which the theory presupposes as (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
1 — 50 / 1000