8 found
Sort by:
  1. Bernardo J. Canteñs (2010). The Rights of the American Indians. In Susana Nuccetelli, Ofelia Schutte & Otávio Bueno (eds.), A Companion to Latin American Philosophy. Wiley-Blackwell.
  2. Bernardo J. Cantens (2008). Review: Pragmatismo Hispánico. [REVIEW] Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 44 (4):pp. 739-747.
  3. Bernardo J. Cantens (2008). Pragmatismo Hispánico (Review). Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society: A Quarterly Journal in American Philosophy 44 (4):739-747.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Bernardo J. Cantens (2006). Ultimate Reality in the Philosophy of Charles Sanders Peirce: To Want to Learn the Truth. Ultimate Reality and Meaning 29 (4):229-243.
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Bernardo J. Canteñs (2003). Suárez on Beings of Reason. American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 77 (2):171-187.
    Beings of reason or non-existent objects have always been a source of mind-boggling paradoxes that have vexed philosophers and thinkers in the past and present. Consider Bertrand Russell’s paradox: “if A and B are not different, then the difference between A and B does not subsist. But how can a non-entity be the subject of a proposition?” Or Meinong’s paradox: “There are objects of which it is true that there are no such objects.” At the root of these troubling conundrums (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Bernardo J. Canteñs (2002). Peirce and the Spontaneous Conjectures of Instinctive Reason. Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 76:89-101.
    In this paper, I will analyze Charles S. Peirce’s “A Neglected Argument for the Reality of God.” I want to argue for two conclusions: 1) that Peirce’s conception of spontaneous conjectures of instinctive reason allows for a rationally justified belief in the reality of God; and 2) that this belief is not the result of a sound argument or even a complete argument and thus is not a secure belief. This paper is divided into three parts. First, I will explain (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Bernardo J. Cantens (2001). A Solution to the Problem of Personal Identity in the Metaphysics of Thomas Aquinas. Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 75:121-134.
    This paper presents a solution to the problem of personal identity over time in Thomas’s metaphysics. I argue that Professor Gracia’s solution to the problem of personal identity, existence, and Professor Stump’s solution, form or the human soul, are not only compatible but also necessarily interdependent on one another. This argument rests on (1) the special nature of the human soul, and (2) the metaphysical claim that for Thomas the human soul and existence are inseparable. First, I refine the problem (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Bernardo J. Cantens (2000). The Relationship Between God and Essences and the Notion of Eternal Truths According to Francisco Suárez. Modern Schoolman 77 (2):127-143.
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation