11 found
Order:
  1. Bert Meuffels, Rob Grootendorst, Frans Eemeren & Frans H. van Eemeren (1st ed. 2015). The Skill of Identifying Argumentation. In Bert Meuffels, Rob Grootendorst, Frans Eemeren & Frans H. van Eemeren (eds.), Reasonableness and Effectiveness in Argumentative Discourse. Springer International Publishing
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  2. Bert Meuffels, Bart Garssen, Frans Eemeren & Frans H. van Eemeren (1st ed. 2015). The Extended Pragma-Dialectical Argumentation Theory Empirically Interpreted. In Bert Meuffels, Bart Garssen, Frans Eemeren & Frans H. van Eemeren (eds.), Reasonableness and Effectiveness in Argumentative Discourse. Springer International Publishing
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  3.  19
    Frans H. van Eemeren, Bart Garssen & Bert Meuffels (2012). The Disguised Abusive Ad Hominem Empirically Investigated: Strategic Manoeuvring with Direct Personal Attacks. Thinking and Reasoning 18 (3):344 - 364.
    The main finding of a comprehensive empirical research project on the intersubjective acceptability of the pragma-dialectical discussion rules (Van Eemeren, Garssen & Meuffels, 2009) is that ordinary language users judge discussion moves that are considered fallacious from an argumentation-theoretical perspective as unreasonable. In light of this finding it is remarkable that in everyday argumentative discourse fallacies occur regularly and seem many times not to be noticed by the participants in the discourse. This also goes for the abusive argumentum ad hominem. (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  4.  53
    Peter J. Schulz & Bert Meuffels (2012). “It is About Our Body, Our Own Body!”: On the Difficulty of Telling Dutch Women Under 50 That Mammography is Not for Them. Journal of Argumentation in Context 1 (1):130-142.
    This article is concerned with the reasons why sometimes good arguments in health communication leaflets fail to convince the targeted audience. As an illustrative example it uses the age-dependent eligibility of women in the Netherlands to receive routine breast cancer screening examinations: according to Dutch regulations women under 50 are ineligible for them. The present qualitative study rests on and complements three experimental studies on the persuasiveness of mammography information leaflets; it uses interviews to elucidate reasons why the arguments in (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  5.  21
    Frans van Eemeren, Bart Garssen & Bert Meuffels (2012). Effectiveness Through Reasonableness Preliminary Steps to Pragma-Dialectical Effectiveness Research. Argumentation 26 (1):33-53.
    The introduction of the concept of strategic maneuvering into the pragma-dialectical theory makes it possible to formulate testable hypotheses regarding the persuasiveness of argumentative moves that are made in argumentative discourse. After summarizing the standard pragma-dialectical approach to argumentation, van Eemeren, Garssen, and Meuffels explain what the extension of the pragma-dialectical approach with strategic maneuvering involves and discuss the fallacies in terms of the extended pragma-dialectical approach as derailments of strategic maneuvering. Then they give an empirical interpretation of the extended (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  6.  14
    Frans H. Eemeren, Bart Garssen & Bert Meuffels (2012). Effectiveness Through Reasonableness Preliminary Steps to Pragma-Dialectical Effectiveness Research. Argumentation 26 (1):33-53.
    The introduction of the concept of strategic maneuvering into the pragma-dialectical theory makes it possible to formulate testable hypotheses regarding the persuasiveness of argumentative moves that are made in argumentative discourse. After summarizing the standard pragma-dialectical approach to argumentation, van Eemeren, Garssen, and Meuffels explain what the extension of the pragma-dialectical approach with strategic maneuvering involves and discuss the fallacies in terms of the extended pragma-dialectical approach as derailments of strategic maneuvering. Then they give an empirical interpretation of the extended (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  7. Bert Meuffels, Bart Garssen, Frans Eemeren & Frans H. van Eemeren (1st ed. 2015). Effectiveness Through Reasonableness: A Pragma-Dialectical Perspective. In Bert Meuffels, Bart Garssen, Frans Eemeren & Frans H. van Eemeren (eds.), Reasonableness and Effectiveness in Argumentative Discourse. Springer International Publishing
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  8.  1
    Bert Meuffels, Rob Grootendorst, Frans Eemeren & Frans H. van Eemeren, Reasonableness and Effectiveness in Argumentative Discourse.
    This article is a report on empirical research in which two main questions were posed: Can 14-year-old school children in secondary schools recognize argumentation without having received systematic instruction? To what extent is the identification of argumentation an independent skill? The practical relevance of the first question is self-evident. The epistemological relevance of the second question is that it seeks to provide an answer to the question of whether or not the identification of argumentation is based on the traditionally known (...)
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  9. Bert Meuffels, Bart Garssen, Frans van Eemeren & Frans H. van Eemeren (eds.) (1st ed. 2015). Reasonableness and Effectiveness in Argumentative Discourse. Springer International Publishing.
    The study of argumentation is prospering. After its brilliant start in Antiquity, highlighted in the classical works of Aristotle, after an alternation of ups and downs during the following millennia, in the post-Renaissance period its gradual decline set in. Revitalization took place only after Toulmin and Perelman published in the same year their landmark works The Uses of Argument and La nouvelle rhétorique. The model of argumentation presented by Toulmin and Perelman’s inventory of argumentation techniques inspired a great many scholars (...)
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  10. Bert Meuffels, Bart Garssen, Frans Eemeren & Frans H. van Eemeren (1st ed. 2015). The Disguised Ad Baculum Fallacy Empirically Investigated. Strategic Maneuvering with Threats. In Bert Meuffels, Bart Garssen, Frans Eemeren & Frans H. van Eemeren (eds.), Reasonableness and Effectiveness in Argumentative Discourse. Springer International Publishing
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  11. Bert Meuffels, Bart Garssen, Frans van Eemeren & Frans H. van Eemeren (1st ed. 2015). The Disguised Abusive Ad Hominem Empirically Investigated: Strategic Maneuvering with Direct Personal Attacks. In Bert Meuffels, Bart Garssen, Frans van Eemeren & Frans H. van Eemeren (eds.), Reasonableness and Effectiveness in Argumentative Discourse. Springer International Publishing
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography