Search results for 'Bertil Strömberg' (try it on Scholar)

69 found
Sort by:
  1. Belfrage Bertil (1985). The Order and Dating of Berkeley's Notebooks. Revue Internationale de Philosophie 154 (3):196-214.score: 30.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Belfrage Bertil (2007). The Theological Positivism of George Berkeley (1707-1708). Acta Philosophica Fennica 83:37 - 52.score: 30.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. M. Oakeshott (1936). Bernard Bosanquet's Philosophy of the State. A Historical and Systematical Study, by Bertil Pfannenstill. (Lund: C. W. K. Gleerup. 1936. Pp. Iv + 324. Price 10 Kr.). [REVIEW] Philosophy 11 (44):482-.score: 9.0
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. E. J. Kenney (1989). Bertil Axelson Bertil Axelson: Kleine Schriften zur lateinischen Philologie, herausgegeben von Alf Önnerfors und Claes Schaar. (Acta Regiae Societatis Humaniorum Litterarum Lundensis, 78.) Pp. 330; portrait frontispiece. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell, 1987. Paper. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 39 (02):369-370.score: 9.0
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. G. B. A. Fletcher (1945). The Text of Seneca Bertil Axelson: Neue Senecastudien. (Lunds Universitets Årsskrift, N.F., Avd. 1, Bd. 36, Nr. 1.) Pp. Viii+243. Lund: Gleerup, 1939. Paper, Kr. 8. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 59 (02):66-67.score: 9.0
  6. J. W. Pirie (1937). Bertil Junel: In Cassium Felicem Studia. (Uppsala Universitets Årsskrift 1936: 6.) Pp. xv + 156. Uppsala: Lundequist, 1936. Paper, 5 kr. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 51 (04):149-150.score: 9.0
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Walter C. Summers (1934). A Swedish Scholar on Seneca Bertil Axelson. Senecastudien: Kritische Bemerkungen zu Senecas Naturales Quaestiones. Pp. viii + 119. (Lunds Universitets Årsskrift. N. F. Avd. 1. Bd. 29. Nr. 3.) Lund: Universitets Biblioteket, 1933. Paper, 4 kr. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 48 (02):79-80.score: 9.0
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. W. W. Tarn (1937). Axelson Bertil: Zum Alexanderroman des Julius Valerius. (Bulletin de la Société Royale des Lettres de Lund 1935–1936, III.) Pp. 32. Lund: Gleerup (London: Milford), 1936. Paper, Is. 6d. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 51 (04):148-.score: 9.0
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. E. J. Kenney (1969). Tantvm Religio … Bertil Axelson: Korruptelenkult. Studien zur Textkritik der unechten Seneca-Tragöie Hercules Oetaeus. (Scripta Minora Societatis Humaniorum Litterarum Lundensis, 1964–5: 3.) Pp. 121. Lund: Gleerup, 1967. Paper, kr. 23. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 19 (02):173-175.score: 9.0
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. Otto Skutsch (1938). Bertil Axelson: Ein drittes Werk des Firmicus Maternus? Zur Kritik der philologischen Identifizierungsmethode. Pp. 26. (K. Humanistiska Vetenskapssamfundets i Lund Årsberättelse 1936–1937, IV.) Lund: Gleerup, 1937. Paper. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 52 (02):86-.score: 9.0
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. Alexander W. Cappelen & Bertil Tungodden (2006). Relocating the Responsibility Cut: Should More Responsibility Imply Less Redistribution? Politics, Philosophy and Economics 5 (3):353-362.score: 6.0
    Norwegian School of Economics and Business Administration and Chr. Michelsen Institute, Norway, bertil.tungodden{at}nhh.no ' + u + '@' + d + ' '//--> Liberal egalitarian theories of justice argue that inequalities arising from non-responsibility factors should be eliminated, but that inequalities arising from responsibility factors should be accepted. This article discusses how the fairness argument for redistribution within a liberal egalitarian framework is affected by a relocation of the cut between responsibility and non-responsibility factors. The article also discusses the (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. Larry S. Temkin (2003). Equality, Priority or What? Economics and Philosophy 19 (1):61-87.score: 3.0
    This paper aims to illuminate some issues in the equality, priority, or what debate. I characterize egalitarianism and prioritarianism, respond to the view that we should care about sufficiency or compassion rather than equality or priority, discuss the levelling down objection, and illustrate the significance of the distinction between prioritarianism and egalitarianism, establishing that the former is no substitute for the latter. In addition, I respond to Bertil Tungodden's views regarding the Slogan, the levelling down objection, the Pareto Principle, (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. Wlodek Rabinowicz & Bertil Strömberg (1996). What If I Were in His Shoes? On Hare's Argument for Preference Utilitarianism. Theoria 62 (1-2):95-123.score: 3.0
    This paper discusses the argument for preference utilitarianism proposed by Richard Hare in Moral Thinking(Hare, 1981). G. F. Schueler (1984) and Ingmar Persson (1989) identified a serious gap in Hare’s reasoning, which might be called the No-Conflict Problem. The paper first tries to fill the gap. Then, however, starting with an idea of Zeno Vendler, the question is raised whether the gap is there to begin with. Unfortunately, this Vendlerian move does not save Hare from criticism. Paradoxically, it instead endangers (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. Peter Vallentyne & Bertil Tungodden (2007). Paretian Egalitarianism with Variable Population Size. In John Roemer & Kotaro Suzumura (eds.), Intergenerational Equity and Sustainability. Palgrave Publishers Ltd.score: 3.0
    Where there is a fixed population (i.e., who exists does not depend on what choice an agent makes), the deontic version of anonymous Paretian egalitarianism holds that an option is just if and only if (1) it is anonymously Pareto optimal (i.e., no feasible alternative has a permutation that is Pareto superior), and (2) it is no less equal than any other anonymously Pareto optimal option. We shall develop and discuss a version of this approach for the variable population case (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. Marc Fleurbaey, Bertil Tungodden & Peter Vallentyne (2009). On the Possibility of Nonaggregative Priority for the Worst Off. Social Philosophy and Policy 26 (1):258-285.score: 3.0
    We shall focus on moral theories that are solely concerned with promoting the benefits (e.g., wellbeing) of individuals and explore the possibility of such theories ascribing some priority to benefits to those who are worse off—without this priority being absolute. Utilitarianism (which evaluates alternatives on the basis of total or average benefits) ascribes no priority to the worse off, and leximin (which evaluates alternatives by giving lexical priority to the worst off, and then the second worst off, and so on) (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. Peter Vallentyne & Bertil Tungodden (2006). Who Are the Least Advantaged? In Nils Holtug & Kasper Lippert-Rasmussen (eds.), Egalitarianism: New Essays on the Nature and Value of Equality. Oxford University Press.score: 3.0
    The difference principle, introduced by Rawls (1971, 1993), is generally interpreted as leximin, but this is not how he intended it. Rawls explicitly states that the difference principle requires that aggregate benefits (e.g., average or total) to those in the least advantaged group be given lexical priority over benefits to others, where the least advantaged group includes more than the strictly worst off individuals. We study the implications of adopting different approaches to the definition of the least advantaged group and (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. Bertil Belfrage (1987). The Notebooks of George Berkeley, Bishop of Cloyne. 1685-1753. Journal of the History of Philosophy 25 (3):448-450.score: 3.0
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. Bertil Tungodden (2003). The Value of Equality. Economics and Philosophy 19 (1):1-44.score: 3.0
    Over the years, egalitarian philosophers have made some challenging claims about the nature of egalitarianism. They have argued that egalitarian reasoning should make us reject the Pareto principle; that the Rawlsian leximin principle is not an egalitarian idea; that the Pigou–Dalton principle needs modification; that the intersection approach faces deep problems; that the numbers should not count within an egalitarian framework, and that egalitarianism should make us reject the property of transitivity in normative reasoning. In this paper, taking the recent (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. Bertil RolF (1982). Russell's Theses on Vagueness. History and Philosophy of Logic 3 (1):69-83.score: 3.0
    In a seminal paper of 1923 on vagueness, Bertrand Russell discussed some of the most important problems concerning the nature of vagueness, its extension within the language, and its relation to truth and logic. The present paper inquires into Russell's theory. The following topics will be analysed and discussed in turn in sections 1?5: Russell's definition of vagueness; his claim that all phrases are vague; his theory of the source of the vagueness in our language; his principles for the transmission (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. Bertil Tungodden (2000). Egalitarianism: Is Leximin the Only Option? Economics and Philosophy 16 (2):229-245.score: 3.0
    The most influential egalitarian perspective is undoubtedly Rawls's (1971, 1993), which assigns absolute priority to the least advantaged in society (the difference principle). However, many have claimed that even though an egalitarian perspective should imply some priority to the worst off, the Rawlsian perspective is too demanding. One response to this criticism is to argue in favour of an egalitarian perspective that never assigns absolute priority to the worse off, but which still includes limited priority to those members of society (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. Alexander W. Cappelen & Bertil Tungodden (2006). A Liberal Egalitarian Paradox. Economics and Philosophy 22 (3):393-408.score: 3.0
    A liberal egalitarian theory of justice seeks to combine the values of equality, personal freedom, and personal responsibility. It is considered a much more promising position than strict egalitarianism, because it supposedly provides a fairness argument for inequalities reflecting differences in choice. However, we show that it is inherently difficult to fulfill this ambition. We present a liberal egalitarian paradox which shows that there does not exist any robust reward system that satisfies a minimal egalitarian and a minimal liberal requirement. (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  22. Giacomo Bonanno, Martin van Hees, Christian List & Bertil Tungodden (2009). Introduction to the Special Issue of Economics and Philosophy on Ambiguity Aversion. Economics and Philosophy 25 (3):247-248.score: 3.0
    The paradigm for modelling decision-making under uncertainty has undoubtedly been the theory of Expected Utility, which was first developed by von Neumann and Morgenstern (1944) and later extended by Savage (1954) to the case of subjective uncertainty. The inadequacy of the theory of Subjective Expected Utility (SEU) as a descriptive theory was soon pointed out in experiments, most famously by Allais (1953) and Ellsberg (1961). The observed departures from SEU noticed by Allais and Ellsberg became known as “paradoxes”. The Ellsberg (...)
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  23. Bertil Mårtensson (1991). The Paradoxes of Utopia a Study in Utopian Rationalism. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 21 (4):476-514.score: 3.0
    Utopian rationalism names the belief that science has made utopia a practical possibility. Its characteristics include determinism, collectivism, distrust of individual initiative and belief in the superiority of collective planning in securing human happiness. The first section traces the utopian and dystopian tradition into modern science fiction. The ideas collected here are systematized in the next section, which on all points dismisses the tenets and claims of utopian rationalism as false, and in a final section, which discusses utopian thinking and (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  24. Bertil Rolf (1980). A Theory of Vagueness. Journal of Philosophical Logic 9 (3):315 - 325.score: 3.0
  25. Giacomo Bonanno, Christian List, Bertil Tungodden & Peter Vallentyne (2008). Introduction to the Special Issue of Economics and Philosophy on Neuroeconomics. Economics and Philosophy 24 (3):301-302.score: 3.0
    ABSTRACT The past fifteen years or so have witnessed considerable progress in our understanding of how the human brain works. One of the objectives of the fast-growing field of neuroscience is to deepen our knowledge of how the brain perceives and interacts with the external world. Advances in this direction have been made possible by progress in brain imaging techniques and by clinical data obtained from patients with localized brain lesions. A relatively new field within neuroscience is neuroeconomics, which focuses (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  26. Bertil Rolf (1984). Sorites. Synthese 58 (2):219 - 250.score: 3.0
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  27. Peter Vallentyne & Bertil Tungodden (2013). Liberal Resourcism: Problems and Possibilities. Journal of Social Philosophy 44 (4):348-369.score: 3.0
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  28. Bertil Belfrage (1986). Berkeley's Theory of Emotive Meaning (1708). Hisory of European Ideas 7 (6):643-649.score: 3.0
  29. Bertil Belfrage (1986). Development of Berkeley's Early Theory of Meaning. Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 176 (3):319-330.score: 3.0
  30. Bertil Rolf (1980). Black and Hempel on Vagueness. Journal for General Philosophy of Science 11 (2):332-346.score: 3.0
    Summary A. Vagueness is not definable in terms of behaviour (Section 4).
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  31. Bertil Belfrage (1988). Berkeley. International Studies in Philosophy 20 (1):117-117.score: 3.0
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  32. Alexander W. Cappelen, Rune Jansen Hagen & and Bertil Tungodden (2007). National Responsibility and the Just Distribution of Debt Relief. Ethics and International Affairs 21 (1):69–83.score: 3.0
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  33. Bertil Tungodden & Peter Vallentyne (2007). Person-Affecting Paretian Egalitarianism with Variable Population Size. In John Roemer & Kotaro Suzumura (eds.), Intergenerational Equity and Sustainability. Palgrave Publishers Ltd..score: 3.0
    Where there is a fixed population (i.e., who exists does not depend on what choice an agent makes), the deontic version of anonymous Paretian egalitarianism holds that an option is just if and only if (1) it is anonymously Pareto optimal (i.e., no feasible alternative has a permutation that is Pareto superior), and (2) it is no less equal than any other anonymously Pareto optimal option. We shall develop and discuss a version of this approach for the variable population case (...)
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  34. Alexander W. Cappelen & Bertil Tungodden (2003). Reward and Responsibility: How Should We Be Affected When Others Change Their Effort? Politics, Philosophy and Economics 2 (2):191-211.score: 3.0
    University of Oslo and Norwegian School of Economics and Business Administration, Norway We look at how one should reward effort without rewarding talent. One way to approach this issue is to ask how an increase in one individual's effort should be allowed to affect the post-tax income of others. The article provides characterizations of three main classes of redistribution mechanism on the basis of how these answer this question. Key Words: reward • effort • responsibility • equal opportunity • distributive (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  35. Bertil Pfannenstill (1951). A Critical Analysis of Operational Definitions. Theoria 17 (1-3):193-209.score: 3.0
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  36. Bertil Rolf (1982). Korner On Vagueness And Applied Mathematics. Grazer Philosophische Studien 15:81-108.score: 3.0
    Körner's notion of vagueness, its relation to ostension and the alledged gulf between logic and experience are examined. Ostension is seen not to cause vagueness ~ there are precise concepts of mathematics which can be ostensively introduced. A distinction is drawn between classical logic not applying to the vague world and not applying to the vague language. The claims about logic and the vague world are unverifiable claims about existence. Körner's attempt to elimmate the seeming incompatibility between vague language and (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  37. Bertil Belfrage (1985). The Clash on Semantics in Berkeley's Notebook A. Hermathena 139:117-126.score: 3.0
  38. Bertil Rolf (1980). The Finitary Standpoint. Erkenntnis 15 (3):287 - 300.score: 3.0
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  39. Bertil Belfrage (2011). On George Berkeley's Alleged Letter to Browne: A Study in Unsound Rhetoric. Berkeley Studies 22.score: 3.0
  40. Bertil Belfrage (1986). Une Nouvelle Édition de Berkeley. Revue Philosophique de la France Et de L'Étranger 176 (3):367 - 372.score: 3.0
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  41. Timo Airaksinen & Bertil Belfrage (eds.) (2011). Berkeley's Lasting Legacy: 300 Years Later. Cambridge Scholars Pub..score: 3.0
  42. Bertil Belfrage (2010). A Paradigm Shift in George Berkeley's Philosophy 1707-1709. Revue Philosophique de la France Et de L'Étranger 200 (1):71 - 82.score: 3.0
    In this paper, I argue that there is a paradigm shift in George Berkeley's philosophy between his early, unpublished manuscripts (1707-1708) and the Theory of Vision (1709). If so, the traditional method of mixing published and unpublished material will lead to a confused picture of both his early, unpublished view and the doctrine that he published. Cet article montre qu'il y a eu un changement de paradigme dans la philosophie de Berkeley entre ses premiers manuscrits, non publiés, de 1707-1708 et (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  43. Bertil Belfrage (2007). The Theological Positivism of George Berkeley (1707-1708). Acta Philosophica Fennica 83:37-52.score: 3.0
    Did George Berkeley, as I argued long ago in Belfrage (1986), defend a theory of "emotive meaning" in his Manuscript Introduction (an early version of the introduction to the Principles)? This question has raised a broad spectrum of different issues, which I think it is important to keep apart, such as rhetorical, psychological, semantic, ethical, metaphysical, and theological aspects. In the present paper, I hope to clear the ground of ambiguities, which have led to serious misunderstandings on this interesting point (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  44. Helena Morténius, Bertil Marklund, Lars Palm, Cecilia Björkelund & Amir Baigi (2012). Implementation of Innovative Attitudes and Behaviour in Primary Health Care by Means of Strategic Communication: A 7‐Year Follow‐Up. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 18 (3):659-665.score: 3.0
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  45. Bertil Pfannenstill (1942). Method and Object in Sociology. Theoria 8 (1):23-57.score: 3.0
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  46. Ann‐Charlotte Smedler & Bertil Törestad (1996). Verbal Intelligence: A Key to Basic Skills? Educational Studies 22 (3):343-356.score: 3.0
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  47. Bertil Törestad & David Magnusson (1996). Basic Skills, Early Problematic Behaviour and Social Maladjustment. Educational Studies 22 (2):165-176.score: 3.0
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  48. Timo Airaksinen & Bertil Belfrage Airaksinen (eds.) (2011). Berkeley's Lasting Legacy: 300 Years Later. Cambridge Scholars.score: 3.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  49. Bertil Belfrage (1987). A New Approach to Berkeley's 'Philosophical Notebooks'. In Ernest Sosa (ed.), Essays on the Philosophy of George Berkeley. D. Reidel.score: 3.0
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
1 — 50 / 69