Search results for 'Biological function' (try it on Scholar)

1000+ found
Order:
  1.  18
    Wilfried Allaerts (1999). The Biological Function Paradigm Applied to the Immunological Self-Non-Self Discrimination: Critique of Tauber's Phenomenological Analysis. [REVIEW] Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 30 (1):155-171.
    Biological self reference idioms in brain-centered or nervous-system-centered self determination of the consious Self reveal an interesting contrast with biological self-determination by immunological self/non-self discrimination. This contrast is both biological and epistemological. In contrast to the consciousness conscious of itself, the immunological self-determination imposes a protective mechanism against self-recognition (Coutinho et al. 1984), which adds to a largely unconscious achievement of the biological Self (Popper 1977; Medawar 1959). The latter viewpoint is in contrast with the immunological (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  2. Michael Bertrand (2013). Proper Environment and the SEP Account of Biological Function. Synthese 190 (9):1503-1517.
    The survival enhancing propensity (SEP) account has a crucial role to play in the analysis of proper function. However, a central feature of the account, its specification of the proper environment to which functions are relativized, is seriously underdeveloped. In this paper, I argue that existent accounts of proper environment fail because they either allow too many or too few characters to count as proper functions. While SEP accounts retain their promise, they are unworkable because of their inability to (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  3.  72
    Arno G. Wouters (2003). Four Notions of Biological Function. Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 34 (4):633-668.
    I argue that there are at least four different ways in which the term ‘function’ is used in connection with the study of living organisms, namely: function as activity, function as biological role, function as biological advantage, and function as selected effect. Notion refers to what an item does by itself; refers to the contribution of an item or activity to a complex activity or capacity of an organism; refers to the value for (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   17 citations  
  4. Agustín Vicente (2012). Burge on Representation and Biological Function. Thought: A Journal of Philosophy 1 (2):125-133.
    In Origins of Objectivity, Burge presents three arguments against what he calls ‘deflationism’: the project of explaining the representational function in terms of the notion of biological function. I evaluate these arguments and argue that they are not convincing.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  5.  86
    Marshall Abrams (2009). Fitness “Kinematics”: Biological Function, Altruism, and Organism–Environment Development. Biology and Philosophy 24 (4):487-504.
    It’s recently been argued that biological fitness can’t change over the course of an organism’s life as a result of organisms’ behaviors. However, some characterizations of biological function and biological altruism tacitly or explicitly assume that an effect of a trait can change an organism’s fitness. In the first part of the paper, I explain that the core idea of changing fitness can be understood in terms of conditional probabilities defined over sequences of events in an (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   7 citations  
  6.  55
    Colin Allen & Marc Bekoff (1995). Biological Function, Adaptation, and Natural Design. Philosophy of Science 62 (4):609-622.
    Recently something close to a consensus about the best way to naturalize the notion of biological function appears to be emerging. Nonetheless, teleological notions in biology remain controversial. In this paper we provide a naturalistic analysis for the notion of natural design. Many authors assume that natural design should be assimilated directly to function. Others find the notion problematic because it suggests that evolution is a directed process. We argue that both of these views are mistaken. Our (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   22 citations  
  7.  11
    Richard J. Hall (1990). Does Representational Content Arise From Biological Function? PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1990:193 - 199.
    In virtue of what does a representational state have the content it does? Several philosophers have recently proposed that a representational state gets its content from its biological function. After explaining the sense of biological function used in these views, I criticise the proposal. I argue that biological function only determines representational content up to extensional equivalence. I maintain that this holds even if biological function is defined in terms of an intensional (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  8.  21
    Arno Wouters (2003). Four Notions of Biological Function. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C 34 (4):633-668.
    I argue that there are at least four different ways in which the term ‘function’ is used in connection with the study of living organisms, namely: function as activity, function as biological role, function as biological advantage, and function as selected effect. Notion refers to what an item does by itself; refers to the contribution of an item or activity to a complex activity or capacity of an organism; refers to the value for (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   12 citations  
  9.  12
    Jacques Viret (2005). Generalised Biological Function. Acta Biotheoretica 53 (4):393-409.
    A physiological function can be described as a cycle based on a cusp bifurcation set in catastrophe theory. This cycle involves four phases that are successively developed along a functional potential, which is used to perform a given physiological act. The work we present is firstly based on a detailed study of the global function of vision, which covers a vast field extending from the molecular to cerebral scale. We then present other examples of generalised functions by expanding (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  10.  14
    Brian Leahy & Maximilian Huber (forthcoming). Two Arguments for the Etiological Theory Over the Modal Theory of Biological Function. Synthese:1-19.
    This paper contains a positive development and a negative argument. It develops a theory of function loss and shows how this undermines an objection raised against the etiological theory of function in support of the modal theory of function. Then it raises two internal problems for the modal theory of function.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  11.  54
    Kenneth G. Ferguson (2007). Biological Function and Normativity. Philo 10 (1):17-26.
    Ruth Millikan and others adopt a normative definition of biological functions that is heavily used in areas such as Millikan’s teleosemantics, and also for emerging efforts to naturalize other areas of philosophy. I propose an experiment called the Lapse Test to determine exactly what form of normativity, if any, truly applies to biological functions. Millikan has not gone far enough in playing down as “impersonal” or “quasi” the precise mode of normativity that she attributes to biological functions. (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  12.  16
    Richard N. Manning (1997). Biological Function, Selection, and Reduction. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 48 (1):69-82.
    It is widely assumed that selection history accounts of function can support a fully reductive naturalization of functional properties. I argue that this assumption is false. A problem with the alternative causal role account of function in this context is that it invokes the teleological notion of a goal in analysing real function. The selection history account, if it is to have reductive status, must not do the same. But attention to certain cases of selection history (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  13. Arno G. Wouters (2003). Four Notions of Biological Function. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 34 (4):633-668.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  14. Elizabeth W. Prior (1985). What is Wrong with Etiological Accounts of Biological Function? Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 66 (3-4):310.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   9 citations  
  15.  9
    Alexander Rosenberg (1989). Perceptual Presentations and Biological Function: A Comment on Matthen. Journal of Philosophy 86 (January):38-44.
  16.  6
    A. C. Purton (1979). Biological Function. Philosophical Quarterly 29 (114):10-24.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  17. Wilfried Allaerts (1997). The Self and its Biological Function: Contrasts Between Popper and Sartre. Logique Et Analyse 40:189-214.
  18.  44
    Alan C. Love (2007). Functional Homology and Homology of Function: Biological Concepts and Philosophical Consequences. Biology and Philosophy 22 (5):691-708.
    “Functional homology” appears regularly in different areas of biological research and yet it is apparently a contradiction in terms—homology concerns identity of structure regardless of form and function. I argue that despite this conceptual tension there is a legitimate conception of ‘homology of function’, which can be recovered by utilizing a distinction from pre-Darwinian physiology (use versus activity) to identify an appropriate meaning of ‘function’. This account is directly applicable to molecular developmental biology and shares a (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   10 citations  
  19.  2
    Maël Lemoine, Function as a Causal Role in a Biological Model.
    Philosophers of biology usually distinguish historical and systemic accounts of functions. In many areas of experimental biology the "systemic" account is often the most relevant. Yet there are problems this account does admittedly not face up to very well. My contention is that, though two minor problems are irredeemably unsolvable for the systemic account of function, the major ones can be solved by assuming that 'function' denotes (directly) a causal role in a model and (indirectly) the corresponding process (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  20. Bence Nanay (2010). A Modal Theory of Function. Journal of Philosophy 107 (8):412-431.
    The function of a trait token is usually defined in terms of some properties of other (past, present, future) tokens of the same trait type. I argue that this strategy is problematic, as trait types are (at least partly) individuated by their functional properties, which would lead to circularity. In order to avoid this problem, I suggest a way to define the function of a trait token in terms of the properties of the very same trait token. To (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   7 citations  
  21. Bence Nanay (2011). Function, Modality, Mental Content. Journal of Mind and Behavior 32 (2):84-87.
    I clarify some of the details of the modal theory of function I outlined in Nanay (2010): (a) I explicate what it means that the function of a token biological trait is fixed by modal facts; (b) I address an objection to my trait type individuation argument against etiological function and (c) I examine the consequences of replacing the etiological theory of function with a modal theory for the prospects of using the concept of (...) function to explain mental content. (shrink)
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   5 citations  
  22.  40
    Benoni B. Edin (2008). Assigning Biological Functions: Making Sense of Causal Chains. Synthese 161 (2):203 - 218.
    A meaningful distinction can be made between functions and mere effects in biological systems without resorting to teleological arguments: (i) biological systems must cope with a multitude of problems or they will cease to exist; (ii) the solutions to these problems invariably depend on circular causal chains (“feedback loops”); and (iii) biological functions are attributes of elements in biological systems that have an effect which, by contributing to the correcting behavior of a feedback control system, assists (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   8 citations  
  23.  15
    Michael D. Wyatt, James M. Allan, Albert Y. Lau, Tom E. Ellenberger & Leona D. Samson (1999). 3‐Methyladenine DNA Glycosylases: Structure, Function, and Biological Importance. Bioessays 21 (8):668-676.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  24. Big Bang (2003). ""Biology 78, 79; Biological Complexity 73, 133; Function 88, 266" Blind Watchmaker" Hypothesis 133 Buddhism 204 Cambridge Platonists 81, 88. [REVIEW] In Paul K. Moser & Paul Copan (eds.), The Rationality of Theism. Routledge 78--80.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  25. J. C. Dupont (2004). Human Brain Function (Biological and Philosophical Considerations). Revue Philosophique de la France Et de L Etranger 129 (3):307-313.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  26. Arantza Etxeberria & Jon Umerez (2009). Biological Organization and the Role of Theoretical Biology : Function and Autonomy. In González Recio & José Luis (eds.), Philosophical Essays on Physics and Biology. G. Olms
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  27. Doreen Kimura (1988). Biological Influences on Cognitive Function. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 11 (2):200.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  28. Angelo M. Scanu (1984). Membrane Biochemistry By Edith Sim, And: Dynamics of Biological Membranes: Influence on Synthesis, Structure and Function By Miles D. Houslan and Keith K. Stanley. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 27 (2):317-319.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  29. P. N. Srivastava (1968). Radiation Biological Techniques in the Study of Thyroid Function. In Peter Koestenbaum (ed.), Proceedings. [San Jose? Calif. 36--82.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  30. Michael D. Wyatt, James M. Allan, Albert Y. Lau, Tom E. Ellenberger & Leona D. Samson (1999). 3-Methyladenine DNA Glycosylases: Structure, Function, and Biological Importance. Bioessays 21 (8):668-676.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  31.  75
    Bence Nanay (2012). Function Attribution Depends on the Explanatory Context: A Reply to Neander and Rosenberg's Reply to Nanay. Journal of Philosophy 109 (10):623-627.
    In ‘A modal theory of function’, I gave an argument against all existing theories of function and outlined a new theory. Karen Neander and Alex Rosenberg argue against both my negative and my positive claim. My aim here is not merely to defend my account from their objections, but to (a) very briefly point out that the new account of etiological function they propose in response to my criticism cannot avoid the circularity worry either and, more importantly, (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  32.  15
    Pierre-Luc Germain, Emanuele Ratti & Federico Boem (2014). Junk or Functional DNA? ENCODE and the Function Controversy. Biology and Philosophy 29 (6):807-831.
    In its last round of publications in September 2012, the Encyclopedia Of DNA Elements (ENCODE) assigned a biochemical function to most of the human genome, which was taken up by the media as meaning the end of ‘Junk DNA’. This provoked a heated reaction from evolutionary biologists, who among other things claimed that ENCODE adopted a wrong and much too inclusive notion of function, making its dismissal of junk DNA merely rhetorical. We argue that this criticism rests on (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  33.  50
    Micah Lott (2012). Have Elephant Seals Refuted Aristotle? Nature, Function, and Moral Goodness. Journal of Moral Philosophy 9 (3):353-375.
    An influential strand of neo-Aristotelianism, represented by writers such as Philippa Foot, holds that moral virtue is a form of natural goodness in human beings, analogous to deep roots in oak trees or keen vision in hawks. Critics, however, have argued that such a view cannot get off the ground, because the neo-Aristotelian account of natural normativity is untenable in light of a Darwinian account of living things. This criticism has been developed most fully by William Fitzpatrick in his book (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  34.  12
    Michael C. Reed, Anna Lieb & H. Frederik Nijhout (2010). The Biological Significance of Substrate Inhibition: A Mechanism with Diverse Functions. Bioessays 32 (5):422-429.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  35.  31
    Oliver M. Lean (2014). Getting the Most Out of Shannon Information. Biology and Philosophy 29 (3):395-413.
    Shannon information is commonly assumed to be the wrong way in which to conceive of information in most biological contexts. Since the theory deals only in correlations between systems, the argument goes, it can apply to any and all causal interactions that affect a biological outcome. Since informational language is generally confined to only certain kinds of biological process, such as gene expression and hormone signalling, Shannon information is thought to be unable to account for this restriction. (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  36.  50
    R. Goode & P. E. Griffiths (1995). The Misuse of Sober's Selection for/Selection of Distinction. Biology and Philosophy 10 (1):99-108.
    Elliott Sober''s selection for/selection of distinction has been widely used to clarify the idea that some properties of organisms are side-effects of selection processes. It has also been used, however, to choose between different descriptions of an evolutionary product when assigning biological functions to that product. We suggest that there is a characteristic error in these uses of the distinction. Complementary descriptions of function are misrepresented as mutually excluding one another. This error arises from a failure to appreciate (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   6 citations  
  37.  3
    Cristian Saborido & Alvaro Moreno (2015). Biological Pathology From an Organizational Perspective. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 36 (1):83-95.
    In contrast to the “normativist” view, “naturalist” theorists claim that the concept of health refers to natural or normal states and propose different characterizations of healthy and diseased conditions that are meant to be objectivist and biologically grounded. In this article, we examine the core concept of these naturalist accounts of disease, i.e., the concept of biological malfunction, and develop a new formulation of the notion of malfunction following the recent organizational approach to functions in the philosophy of biology. (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  38.  77
    Ulrich Krohs (2009). Functions as Based on a Concept of General Design. Synthese 166 (1):69-89.
    Looking for an adequate explication of the concept of a biological function, several authors have proposed to link function to design. Unfortunately, known explications of biological design in turn refer to functions. The concept of general design I will introduce here breaks up this circle. I specify design with respect to its ontogenetic role. This allows function to be based on design without making reference to the history of the design, or to the phylogeny of (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   8 citations  
  39. Robert Arp & Barry Smith, Function, Role and Disposition in Basic Formal Ontology. Nature Precedings.
    Numerous research groups are now utilizing Basic Formal Ontology (BFO) as an upper-level framework to assist in the organization and integration of biomedical information. This paper provides elucidation of the three existing BFO subcategories of realizable entity, namely function, role, and disposition. It proposes one further sub-category of tendency, and considers the merits of recognizing two sub-categories of function for domain ontologies, namely, artifactual and biological function. The motivation is to help advance the coherent ontological treatment (...)
    Translate
      Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  40. Antti Revonsuo (2000). The Reinterpretation of Dreams: An Evolutionary Hypothesis of the Function of Dreaming. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (6):877-901.
    Several theories claim that dreaming is a random by-product of REM sleep physiology and that it does not serve any natural function. Phenomenal dream content, however, is not as disorganized as such views imply. The form and content of dreams is not random but organized and selective: during dreaming, the brain constructs a complex model of the world in which certain types of elements, when compared to waking life, are underrepresented whereas others are over represented. Furthermore, dream content is (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   32 citations  
  41.  65
    Mohan P. Matthen (1988). Biological Functions and Perceptual Content. Journal of Philosophy 85 (January):5-27.
    Perceptions "present" objects as red, as round, etc.-- in general as possessing some property. This is the "perceptual content" of the title, And the article attempts to answer the following question: what is a materialistically adequate basis for assigning content to what are, after all, neurophysiological states of biological organisms? The thesis is that a state is a perception that presents its object as "F" if the "biological function" of the state is to detect the presence of (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   64 citations  
  42. Peter J. Graham (2014). The Function of Perception. In Abrol Fairweather (ed.), Virtue Scientia: Bridges between Virtue Epistemology and Philosophy of Science. Synthese Library 13-31.
    What is the biological function of perception? I hold perception, especially visual perception in humans, has the biological function of accurately representing the environment. Tyler Burge argues this cannot be so in Origins of Objectivity (Oxford, 2010), for accuracy is a semantical relationship and not, as such, a practical matter. Burge also provides a supporting example. I rebut the argument and the example. Accuracy is sometimes also a practical matter if accuracy partly explains how perception contributes (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  43.  33
    Daisie M. Radner (1999). Mind and Function in Animal Communication. Erkenntnis 51 (1):633-648.
    Functional hypotheses about animal signalling often refer to mental states of the sender or the receiver. Mental states are functional categorizations of neurophysiological states. Functional questions about animal signals are intertwined with causal questions. This interrelationship is illustrated in regard to avian distraction displays. In purposive signalling, the sender has a goal of influencing the behavior of the receiver. Purposive signalling is innovative if the sender's goal is unrelated to the biological function of the signal. This may be (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  44. Beth Preston (2009). Biological and Cultural Proper Functions in Comparative Perspective. In Ulrich Krohs & Peter Kroes (eds.), Functions in Biological and Artificial Worlds: Comparative Philosophical Perspectives. MIT Press
    Both biological traits and artifacts have proper functions. But accounts of proper function are typically based on the biological case. So adapting these accounts to the artifact case requires finding cultural analogues of biological concepts. This can go wrong in two ways. The biological concepts may not pick out either biological or cultural proper functions correctly; or they may have no cultural analogues. I argue that things have gone wrong in the first way with (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  45.  55
    Paul E. Griffiths (2006). Function, Homology, and Character Individuation. Philosophy of Science 73 (1):1-25.
    I defend the view that many biological categories are defined by homology against a series of arguments designed to show that all biological categories are defined, at least in part, by selected function. I show that categories of homology are `abnormality inclusive'—something often alleged to be unique to selected function categories. I show that classifications by selected function are logically dependent on classifications by homology, but not vice-versa. Finally, I reject the view that biologists must (...)
    Direct download (11 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   20 citations  
  46.  89
    Beth Preston (1998). Why is a Wing Like a Spoon? A Pluralist Theory of Function. Journal of Philosophy 95 (5):215-254.
    Function theorists routinely speculate that a viable function theory will be equally applicable to biological traits and artifacts. However, artifact function has received only the most cursory scrutiny in its own right. Closer scrutiny reveals that only a pluralist theory comprising two distinct notions of function--proper function and system function--will serve as an adequate general theory. The first section describes these two notions of function. The second section shows why both notions are (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   19 citations  
  47.  6
    Miguel Ángel Sebastián (forthcoming). Functions and Mental Representation: The Theoretical Role of Representations and its Real Nature. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences:1-20.
    Representations are not only used in our folk-psychological explanations of behaviour, but are also fruitfully postulated, for example, in cognitive science. The mainstream view in cognitive science maintains that our mind is a representational system. This popular view requires an understanding of the nature of the entities they are postulating. Teleosemantic theories face this challenge, unpacking the normativity in the relation of representation by appealing to the teleological function of the representing state. It has been argued that, if (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  48.  97
    Ron Amundson & George V. Lauder (1994). Function Without Purpose. Biology and Philosophy 9 (4):443-469.
    Philosophers of evolutionary biology favor the so-called etiological concept of function according to which the function of a trait is its evolutionary purpose, defined as the effect for which that trait was favored by natural selection. We term this the selected effect (SE) analysis of function. An alternative account of function was introduced by Robert Cummins in a non-evolutionary and non-purposive context. Cummins''s account has received attention but little support from philosophers of biology. This paper will (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   18 citations  
  49.  94
    Attila Grandpierre & Menas Kafatos (2012). Biological Autonomy. Philosophy Study 2 (9):631-649.
    We argue that genuine biological autonomy, or described at human level as free will, requires taking into account quantum vacuum processes in the context of biological teleology. One faces at least three basic problems of genuine biological autonomy: (1) if biological autonomy is not physical, where does it come from? (2) Is there a room for biological causes? And (3) how to obtain a workable model of biological teleology? It is shown here that the (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  50.  7
    Gary Hatfield (1991). Representation in Perception and Cognition: Connectionist Affordances. In William Ramsey, Stephen P. Stich & D. Rumelhart (eds.), Philosophy and Connectionist Theory. Lawrence Erlbaum 163--95.
    There is disagreement over the notion of representation in cognitive science. Many investigators equate representations with symbols, that is, with syntactically defined elements in an internal symbol system. In recent years there have been two challenges to this orthodoxy. First, a number of philosophers, including many outside the symbolist orthodoxy, have argued that "representation" should be understood in its classical sense, as denoting a "stands for" relation between representation and represented. Second, there has been a growing challenge to orthodoxy under (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   8 citations  
1 — 50 / 1000