4 found
Sort by:
  1. Truls Wyller, Siri Granum Carson, Jonathan Knowles & Bjørn K. Myskja (eds.) (2011). Kant, Here, Now, and How: Essays in Honour of Truls Wyller. Mentis.
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Bjørn K. Myskja (2009). Rationality and Religion in the Public Debate on Embryo Stem Cell Research and Prenatal Diagnostics. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 12 (2):213-224.
    Jürgen Habermas has argued that religious views form a legitimate background for contributions to an open public debate, and that religion plays a particular role in formulating moral intuitions. Translating religious arguments into “generally accessible language” (Habermas, Eur J Philos 14(1):1–25, 2006) to enable them to play a role in political decisions is a common task for religious and non-religious citizens. The article discusses Habermas’ view, questioning the particular role of religion, but accepting the significance of including such counter-voices to (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Bjørn K. Myskja (2008). The Categorical Imperative and the Ethics of Trust. Ethics and Information Technology 10 (4):213-220.
    Trust can be understood as a precondition for a well-functioning society or as a way to handle complexities of living in a risk society, but also as a fundamental aspect of human morality. Interactions on the Internet pose some new challenges to issues of trust, especially connected to disembodiedness. Mistrust may be an important obstacle to Internet use, which is problematic as the Internet becomes a significant arena for political, social and commercial activities necessary for full participation in a liberal (...)
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Bjørn K. Myskja (2006). “The Moral Difference Between Intragenic and Transgenic Modification of Plants”. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 19 (3):225-238.
    Public policy on the development and use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) has mainly been concerned with defining proper strategies of risk management. However, surveys and focus group interviews show that although lay people are concerned with risks, they also emphasize that genetic modification is ethically questionable in itself. Many people feel that this technology “tampers with nature” in an unacceptable manner. This is often identified as an objection to the crossing of species borders in producing transgenic organisms. Most scientists (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation