Search results for 'Bradley Stewart Chilton' (try it on Scholar)

1000+ found
Order:
  1.  5
    Bradley Stewart Chilton (1998). Constitutional Conscience: Criminal Justice and Public Interest Ethics. Criminal Justice Ethics 17 (2):33-41.
    (1998). Constitutional conscience: Criminal justice and public interest ethics. Criminal Justice Ethics: Vol. 17, No. 2, pp. 33-41. doi: 10.1080/0731129X.1998.9992056.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  2. Jennifer R. Sedgewick, Bradley Weiers, Aaron Stewart & Lorin J. Elias (2015). The Thinker: Opposing Directionality of Lighting Bias Within Sculptural Artwork. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 9.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  3. James Bradley & Leslie Armour (1996). Philosophy After F.H. Bradley a Collection of Essays. Monograph Collection (Matt - Pseudo).
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  4. F. H. Bradley (1999). Collected Works of F.H. Bradley. Thoemmes Press.
    F. H. Bradley (1846-1924) was considered in his day to be the greatest British philosopher since Hume. For modern philosophers he continues to be an important and influential figure. However, the opposition to metaphysical thinking throughout most of the twentieth century has somewhat eclipsed his important place in the history of British thought. Consequently, although there is renewed interest in his ideas and role in the development of Western philosophy, his writings are often hard to find. This collection unites (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  5.  16
    F. H. Bradley (1995). FH Bradley Bibliography. Modern Schoolman 73 (2):91-114.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  6.  15
    James Bradley (1912). The Rev. James Bradley on the Motion of the Fixed Stars. The Monist 22 (2):268-285.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  7.  49
    F. H. Bradley (1895). "Rational Hedonism."-Note by Mr. Bradley. International Journal of Ethics 5 (3):383-384.
  8. E. Clinton- Andrews & Richard Bradley (1903). Richard Bradley.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  9. F. H. Bradley (1895). "Rational Hedonism."-Note by Mr. Bradley. Ethics 5 (3):383.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  10. F. H. Bradley (1895). "Rational Hedonism."-Note by Mr. Bradley. International Journal of Ethics 5 (3):383-384.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  11. J. Bradley (1992). Relations, Intelligibility and Non-Contradiction in Bradley, Fh Metaphysics of Feeling-a Reinterpretation. 2. Archives de Philosophie 55 (1):77-91.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  12. J. Bradley (1992). Relations, intelligibilité et non-contradiction dans la métaphysique du sentir de FH Bradley: une réinterprétation (II). Archives de Philosophie 55 (1):77-91.
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  13. James Bradley (1991). Richard Rorty and James Bradley. Heythrop Journal 32 (2):249-253.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  14. F. H. Bradley & Lionel Rubinoff (1968). The Presuppositions of Critical History [by] F.H. Bradley. Edited with Introd. And Commentary by Lionel Rubinoff. J.M. Dent.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  15. John Stewart (1806). The Conquest of the Moral World [by J. Stewart].
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  16. Dugald Stewart, William Hamilton & John Veitch (1854). The Collected Works of Dugald Stewart, Ed. By Sir W. Hamilton, [Concluded by J. Veitch].
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  17. John Stewart (1807). The Revelation of Reason and Nature, as Exhibited in the ... Opus Maximum [by J. Stewart].
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  18.  21
    James Levine (2009). Review of Stewart Candlish, The Russell/Bradley Dispute and its Significance for Twentieth-Century Philosophy. [REVIEW] Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2009 (2).
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  19.  14
    Jeff Speaks (2008). Review of Stewart Candlish, The Russell/Bradley Dispute and its Significance for Twentieth Century Philosophy. [REVIEW] Australasian Journal of Philosophy 86 (3):509-512.
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  20.  13
    Andy Hamilton (2008). The Russell/Bradley Dispute and its Significance for Twentieth Century Philosophy - by Stewart Candlish. Philosophical Books 49 (3):264-266.
  21. Sébastien Gandon (unknown). Review of Stewart Candlish, The Russell/Bradley Dispute and Its Significance for Twentieth-Century Philosophy. [REVIEW] Russell 28 (2).
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  22. Stewart Candlish (2007). The Russell/Bradley Dispute and its Significance for Twentieth-Century Philosophy. Palgrave Macmillan.
    In the early twentieth century an apparently obscure philosophical debate took place between F. H. Bradley and Bertrand Russell. The historical outcome was momentous: the demise of the movement known as British Idealism, and its eventual replacement by the various forms of analytic philosophy. Since then, a conception of this debate and its rights and wrongs has become entrenched in English-language philosophy. Stewart Candlish examines afresh the events of this formative period in twentieth-century thought and comes to some (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   5 citations  
  23.  20
    Stewart Candlish (1998). Perspectives on Bradley. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 6 (2):275 – 279.
    James Bradley (ed.), Philosophy after F. H. Bradley . Thoemmes Press Idealism Series, 1996, Bristol, Thoemmes Press; pp. 368 plus x. Hb. 1-85506-484-7 ( 48.00), pb. 1-85506-485-5 ( 16.95). W. J. Mander (ed.), Perspectives on the Logic and Metaphysics of F. H. Bradley . Thoemmes Press Idealism Series, 1996, Bristol, Thoemmes Press; pp. 290 plus xxvii. Hb. 1-85506-433-2 ( 45.00), pb. 1-85506-432-4 ( 14.95).
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  24.  15
    Stewart Candlish, Francis Herbert Bradley. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  25.  30
    Stewart Candlish (1989). The Truth About F. H. Bradley. Mind 98 (391):331-348.
  26.  8
    Stewart Candlish (1982). Idealism and Bradley's Logic. Idealistic Studies 12 (3):251-259.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  27.  48
    Stewart Candlish (1978). Bradley on My Station and its Duties. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 56 (2):155 – 170.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  28.  14
    Stewart Candlish (1981). The Status of Idealism In Bradley's Metaphysics. Idealistic Studies 11 (3):242-253.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  29.  2
    Stewart Candlish (1984). Bradley's Logic and Bradley's Logic. Philosophical Books 25 (2):65-73.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  30. Stewart Candlish (2001). 4 Grammar, Ontology, and Truth in Russell and Bradley. In Richard Gaskin (ed.), Grammar in Early Twentieth-Century Philosophy. Routledge 116.
  31. Stewart Candlish (1995). T. L. S. Sprigge, "James and Bradley: American Truth and British Reality". [REVIEW] Journal of the History of Philosophy 33 (4):697.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  32.  9
    F. Sauri (1998). Bradley's Supposed Rejection of Subject-Predicate Judgements. Bradley Studies 4 (1):102-112.
    Textual evidence normally quoted to justify the claim that F. H. Bradley rejects subject - predicate judgements has other functions: namely to reject concrete interpretations of subject - predicate judgements. Bradley has his own view of subject - predicate judgement: in a judgement subject and predicate forma an adjetive which is predicated of the whole reality.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  33. Anna-Sofia Maurin (2010). Trope Theory and the Bradley Regress. Synthese 175 (3):311-326.
    Trope theory is the view that the world is a world of abstract particular qualities. But if all there is are tropes, how do we account for the truth of propositions ostensibly made true by some concrete particular? A common answer is that concrete particulars are nothing but tropes in compresence. This answer seems vulnerable to an argument (first presented by F. H. Bradley) according to which any attempt to account for the nature of relations will end up either (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   6 citations  
  34.  48
    Katarina Perovic (2014). The Import of the Original Bradley's Regress(Es). Axiomathes 24 (3):375-394.
    Much of the recent metaphysical literature on the problem of the relational unity of complexes leaves the impression that Bradley (or some Bradleyan argument) has uncovered a serious problem to be addressed. The problem is thought to be particularly challenging for trope theorists and realists about universals. In truth, there has been little clarity about the nature and import of the original Bradley’s regress arguments. In this paper, I offer a careful analysis and reconstruction of the arguments in (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  35.  42
    Guido Bonino (2013). Bradley's Regress: Relations, Exemplification, Unity. Axiomathes 23 (2):189-200.
    Different interpretations of Bradley’s regress argument are considered. On the basis of textual evidences, it is argued that the most persuasive is the one that sees the argument as primarily addressing the general issue of unity or connectedness.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  36.  29
    Douglas W. Portmore (2010). Ben Bradley, Well-Being and Death (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2009), Pp. Xxi + 198. Utilitas 22 (4):500-503.
    Review of Ben Bradley's Well-Being and Death.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  37.  23
    Mathias Girel (2006). Relations internes et relations spatiales : James, Bradley et Green. Archives de Philosophie 3:395-414.
    La thèse du présent article est que l’opposition factice entre James, repré- sentant supposé des « relations externes », d’une part, et Bradley, représen- tant supposé des « relations internes », d’autre part, est due à une mauvaise appréhension des thèses de ce dernier. Ce premier contresens conduit alors à manquer le propos même de James.
    Translate
      Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  38.  30
    Igor Douven (2007). On Bradley's Preservation Condition for Conditionals. Erkenntnis 67 (1):111 - 118.
    Bradley has argued that a truth-conditional semantics for conditionals is incompatible with an allegedly very weak and intuitively compelling constraint on the interpretation of conditionals. I argue that the example Bradley offers to motivate this constraint can be explained along pragmatic lines that are compatible with the correctness of at least one popular truth-conditional semantics for conditionals.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  39.  47
    Holger Leerhoff (2008). Bradley's Regress, Russell's States of Affairs, and Some General Remarks on the Problem. Studia Philosophica Estonica 1 (2):249-264.
    In this paper, I will give a presentation of Bradley's two main arguments against the reality of relations. Whereas one of his arguments is highly specific to Bradley's metaphysical background, his famous regress argument seems to pose a serious threat not only for ontological pluralism, but especially for states of affairs as an ontological category. Amongst the proponents of states-of-affairs ontologies two groups can be distinguished: One group holds states of affairs to be complexes consisting of their particular (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  40.  53
    T. Allan Hillman (2008). The Early Russell on the Metaphysics of Substance in Leibniz and Bradley. Synthese 163 (2):245 - 261.
    While considerable ink has been spilt over the rejection of idealism by Bertrand Russell and G.E. Moore at the end of the 19th Century, relatively little attention has been directed at Russell’s A Critical Exposition of the Philosophy of Leibniz, a work written in the early stages of Russell’s philosophical struggles with the metaphysics of Bradley, Bosanquet, and others. Though a sustained investigation of that work would be one of considerable scope, here I reconstruct and develop a two-pronged argument (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  41.  3
    Michael Partridge & Leemon B. McHenry (1993). Whitehead and Bradley: A Comparative Analysis. Philosophical Quarterly 43 (173):545.
    In his magnum opus, Process and Reality, Alfred North Whitehead claims a special affinity to Oxford philosopher Francis Herbert Bradley. McHenry clarifies exactly how much of Whitehead's metaphysics is influenced by and accords with the main principles of Bradley's "absolute idealism." He argues that many of Whitehead's doctrines cannot be understood without an adequate understanding of Bradley, in terms of both affinities and contrasts. He evaluates the arguments between them and explores several important connections with William James, (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  42.  30
    T. S. Eliot (1964). Knowledge and Experience in the Philosophy of F.H. Bradley. Columbia University Press.
    T. S. Eliot left Harvard during his third year of study in the department of philosophy and went to England. Forty-six years later he authorized the publication of his doctoral dissertation. Here we have a reprint of his sympathetic but not entirely uncritical study of the English idealist philosopher F. H. Bradley.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  43. Bernard Bosanquet (1885). Knowledge and Reality a Criticism of Mr. F.H. Bradley's "Principles of Logic". Kegan Paul, Trench.
    After more than a decade teaching ancient Greek history and philosophy at University College, Oxford, British philosopher and political theorist Bernard Bosanquet resigned from his post to spend more time writing. He was particularly interested in contemporary social theory, and was involved with the Charity Organisation Society and the London Ethical Society. He wrote numerous articles before beginning this book, which was his first and was published in 1885 as a response to the Principles of Logic, published in 1883, by (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  44. Timothy L. S. Sprigge (1993). James and Bradley American Truth and British Reality.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   7 citations  
  45.  5
    F. C. S. Schiller (1908). Is Mr. Bradley Becoming a Pragmatist? Mind 17 (67):370-383.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  46.  20
    K. H. Sievers (1996). F.H. Bradley and the Coherence Theory of Truth. Bradley Studies 2 (2):82-103.
    The aim of this dissertation is to present a systematic account of F. H. Bradley's philosophy in so far as it is relevant to an understanding of his conception of the nature and criterion of truth. I argue that, for Bradley, the nature of truth is the identity of thought with reality given in immediate experience. There is no absolute separation between thought and its object. Bradley therefore rejects both the correspondence theory and epistemological realism. Thought is (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  47. Rolf-Peter Horstmann (1984). Ontologie Und Relationen Hegel, Bradley, Russell Und Die Kontroverse Über Interne Und Externe Beziehungen. Monograph Collection (Matt - Pseudo).
    No categories
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  48.  1
    Alex Gurnham (2011). Review of Adam Bradley, Book of Rhymes. [REVIEW] Mediatropes 3 (1):151-153.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  49. Gordon Macintyre (2003). Dugald Stewart the Pride and Ornament of Scotland. Monograph Collection (Matt - Pseudo).
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  50. Rudolf Kagey (1931). The Growth of F. H. Bradley's Logic. [N.P.].
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
1 — 50 / 1000