9 found
Sort by:
  1. Branko Klun (2012). Is Ontology Totalitarian? A Critical Rereading of Levinas. Revue Philosophique De Louvain 110 (4):659-683.
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Branko Klun (2012). L'ontologie est-elle totalitaire? Une relecture critique de Levinas. Revue Philosophique De Louvain 110 (4):659-683.
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Branko Klun (2007). Death as Boundary: On a Key Question of Emmanuel Levinas. Prolegomena 6 (2):253-266.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Branko Klun (2007). Der Tod als Grenze: Zu einer Schlüsselfrage von Emmanuel Levinas. Prolegomena 6 (2):253-266.
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Branko Klun (2007). Smrt Kao Granica: Uz Ključno Pitanje Emmanuela Levinasa. Prolegomena 6 (2):253-266.
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Branko Klun (2007). Transcendence and Time Levinas's Criticism of Heidegger. Gregorianum 88 (3):587-603.
    Heidegger's hermeneutic phenomenology can be seen as a specific reduction of meaning to its temporal constitution . Temporality as the universal horizon of Being makes any transcendence and meaning beyond time impossible. Levinas opposes such reduction of sense to finitude and historicity for ethical reasons. However, in his attempt to overcome Heidegger's primacy of time and transcend its totality, he must look for a completely different conception of significance which goes hand in hand with a new, "diachronic" understanding of time.
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Branko Klun (2006). ABHANDLUNGEN-Die Gottesfrage in Heideggers" Beitragen". Theologie Und Philosophie 81 (4):529.
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Branko Klun (2006). Die Störung der Metaphysik. Studia Phaenomenologica 6:155-170.
    Although Levinas’ “il y a” does not directly correspond to Heidegger’s conception of being, his criticism of Heidegger’s temporal ontology is nevertheless justified. With the reduction of every meaning (and being) to its temporal constitution, Heidegger excludes any possibility of transcendence beyond time. The problem of overcoming the radical finitude and historicity of meaning, which is ethically motivated, brings Levinas to the age-old question of metaphysics. However, taking Heidegger’s thought seriously, Levinas is forced to look for an entirely new understanding (...)
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. Branko Klun (2006). The Destruction of Metaphysics-Levinas Against Heidegger. Studia Phaenomenologica 6:155-170.
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation