40 found
Sort by:
Disambiguations:
Brian Bix [33]Brian H. Bix [8]
See also:
Profile: Brian Bix (University of Minnesota)
  1. Matthew Adler, Peter Alces, Larry Alexander, Susan Bandes, Saba Bazargan, Vera Bergelson, Mitchell Berman, Brian Bix, Gabriella Blum & Jeffrey Brand-Ballard (2012). Please Join Us in Thanking All of Those Experts in Law and Philosophy for Devoting Time and Effort to Review the Papers We Have Sent Them. The Editor and Publisher Acknowledge the Colleagues Listed Below for Their Excellent Reviews of Papers for Which Final Decisions Have Been Made in 2011. Law and Philosophy 31:367-368.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Brian H. Bix (2012). Defeasibility and Open Texture. In Jordi Ferrer Beltrán & Giovanni Battista Ratti (eds.), The Logic of Legal Requirements: Essays on Defeasibility. Oxford University Press.
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Brian H. Bix (2012). Shapiro , Scott J. Legality . Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 2011. Pp. 472. $39.95 (Cloth). Ethics 122 (2):444-448.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Brian Bix (2011). Radbruch's Formula and Conceptual Analysis. American Journal of Jurisprudence 56 (1):45-57.
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Brian H. Bix (2011). Constitutions, Originalism, and Meaning. In Grant Huscroft & Bradley W. Miller (eds.), The Challenge of Originalism: Essays in Constitutional Theory. Cambridge University Press.
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Andrew Altman, Michael Barnhart, Avner Baz, David Benatar, Yitzhak Benbaji, Talia Bettcher, Brian Bix, Jeffrey Bland-Ballard & Lene Bomann-Larsen (2010). Referees for Volume 7. Journal of Moral Philosophy 7:541-542.
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Brian Bix (2010). Contracts. In Franklin G. Miller & Alan Wertheimer (eds.), The Ethics of Consent: Theory and Practice. Oxford University Press.
    Consent, in terms of voluntary choice, is - or, at least, appears to be or purports to be - at the essence of contract law. Contract law, both in principle and in practice, is about allowing parties to enter arrangements on terms they choose - each party imposing obligations on itself in return for obligations another party has placed upon itself. This freedom of contract- an ideal by which there are obligations to the extent, but only to the extent, freely (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Brian Bix (2010). Law and Language: How Words Mislead Us. Jurisprudence 1 (1):25-38.
    Our world is full of fictional devices that let people feel better about their situation - through deception and self-deception. The legal realist, Felix Cohen, argued that law and legal reasoning is full of similarly dubious labels and bad reasoning, though of a special kind. He argued that judges, lawyers and legal commentators allow linguistic inventions and conventions to distort their thinking. Like the ancient peoples who built idols out of stone and wood and then asked them for assistance and (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. Brian Bix (2010). Natural Law Theory. In Dennis M. Patterson (ed.), A Companion to Philosophy of Law and Legal Theory, 2nd ed. Blackwell Publishers.
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. Brian Bix (2010). Will Versus Reason: Truth in Natural Law, Positive Law, and Legal Theory. In Kurt Pritzl (ed.), Truth: Studies of a Robust Presence. Catholic University of America Press.
    This article is based on a Lecture given as part of the Franklin J. Matchette Foundation Lecture Series on Truth at the Catholic University of America, School of Philosophy, in 2002. It explores what theorists in the natural law tradition and modern legal theorists have argued about what makes propositions of morality and law true, focusing on the rubric of "reason" as opposed to "will." It seems probable, and perhaps inevitable, that theorists about the nature of truth in morality must (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. Brian Bix (2009). Jurisprudence: Theory and Context, 5th Ed. Sweet & Maxwell (UK) and Carolina Academic Press (US).
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. Brian Bix (2009). On Philosophy in American Law : Analytical Legal Philosophy. In Francis J. Mootz & William S. Boyd (eds.), On Philosophy in American Law. Cambridge University Press.
    This short article was written for a collection on American legal philosophy today. It gives a brief overview of analytical legal philosophy, and speculates on why this theoretical approach has been consistently misunderstood in the United States, from the time of the legal realists until today.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. Brian H. Bix (2009). Global Error and Legal Truth. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 29 (3):535-547.
    One standard criterion for there being objectivity in an area of discourse is that there is conceptual space between what someone thinks to be the case and what actually is the case. That is, participants can be mistaken. This article explores one aspect of the objectivity debate as regards law: does it make sense to say that all legal officials or practitioners in a jurisdiction are mistaken (over a significant period of time) about some legal proposition? The possibility of legal (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. Brian Bix (2008). Contract Rights and Remedies, and the Divergence Between Law and Morality. Ratio Juris 21 (2):194-211.
    There is an ongoing debate in the philosophical and jurisprudential literature regarding the nature and possibility of Contract theory. On one hand are those who argue (or assume) that there is, or should be, a single, general, universal theory of Contract Law, one applicable to all jurisdictions and all times. On the other hand are those who assert that Contract theory should be localized to particular times and places, perhaps even with different theories for different types of agreements. This article (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. Brian Bix, John Austin. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. Brian Bix (2008). Legal Philosophy in America. In C. J. Misak (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of American Philosophy. Oxford University Press.
    This article, written for the forthcoming Oxford Handbook of American Philosophy, offers an overview of the most important American contributions to legal philosophy - American legal realism, law and economics, various critical schools of jurisprudence, Lon Fuller, and Ronald Dworkin - while speculating on what might be distinctive of American legal philosophy. One obvious recurring theme is a focus on practical application in general, and adjudication (especially constitutional adjudication) in particular.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. Brian Bix (2008). Review of Howard Schweber, The Language of Liberal Constitutionalism. [REVIEW] Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2008 (3).
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. Brian Bix (2007). Form and Formalism: The View From Legal Theory. Ratio Juris 20 (1):45-55.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. Brian Bix (2007). Is There a Right of Freedom of Expression? - by Larry Alexander. Philosophical Books 48 (3):285-286.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. Brian Bix (2006). Legal Positivism and 'Explaining' Normativity and Authority. American Philosophical Association Newsletter 5 (2 (Spring 2006)):5-9.
    It has become increasingly common for legal positivist theorists to claim that the primary objective of legal theory in general, and legal positivism in particular, is "explaining normativity." The phrase "explaining normativity" can be understood either ambitiously or more modestly. The more modest meaning is an analytical exploration of what is meant by legal or moral obligation, or by the authority claims of legal officials. When the term is understood ambitiously - as meaning an explanation of how conventional and other (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. Brian Bix (ed.) (2006). Philosophy of Law. Routledge.
    Edited by a leading scholar in the field, Philosophy of Law is a new title in the Routledge Major Works series Critical Concepts in Philosophy . It is a four-volume collection of canonical and cutting-edge research and covers a significant range of topics in the field. The first two volumes of the collection are devoted primarily to analytical legal theory—in particular, theories about the nature of law. This is the idea of legal philosophy most familiar to jurisprudential students in the (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  22. Brian Bix (2006). Reductionism and Explanation in Legal Theory. In J. W. Harris, Timothy Andrew Orville Endicott, Joshua Getzler & Edwin Peel (eds.), Properties of Law: Essays in Honour of Jim Harris. Oxford University Press.
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  23. Brian Bix (2006). Robert Alexy's Radbruch Formula, and the Nature of Legal Theory. Rechtstheorie 37:139-149.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  24. Brian Bix (2006). Teoría del Derecho: tipos y propósitos. Isonomía: Revista de Teoría y Filosofía Del Derecho 25:57-68.
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  25. Brian H. Bix (2006). Peter Cane, Responsibility in Law and Morality:Responsibility in Law and Morality. Ethics 117 (1):124-127.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  26. Brian H. Bix (2005). Legal Positivism. In Martin P. Golding & William A. Edmundson (eds.), The Blackwell Guide to the Philosophy of Law and Legal Theory. Blackwell Pub..
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  27. Brian Bix (2004). A Dictionary of Legal Theory. Oxford University Press.
    Modern legal theory contains a wide range of approaches and topics: from economic analysis of law to feminist legal theory to traditional analytical legal philosophy to a range of theories about justice. This healthy variety of jurisprudential work has created a problem: students and theorists working in one tradition may have difficulty understanding the concepts and terminology of a different tradition. This book works to make terminology and ways of thinking accessible. This dictionary covers topics from 'the autonomy of law' (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  28. Brian Bix (2003). Can Theories of Meaning and Reference Solve the Problem of Legal Determinacy? Ratio Juris 16 (3):281-295.
    A number of important legal theorists have recently argued for metaphysically realist approaches to legal determinacy grounded in particular semantic theories or theories of reference, in particular, views of meaning and reference based on the works of Putnam and Kripke. The basic position of these theorists is that questions of legal interpretation and legal determinacy should be approached through semantic meaning. However, the role of authority (in the form of lawmaker choice) in law in general, and democratic systems in particular, (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  29. Brian Bix (2003). Un problema: el análisis conceptual. Jurisprudence 48:17-51.
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  30. Brian H. Bix (2003). Raz on Necessity. Law and Philosophy 22 (6):537 - 559.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  31. Brian Bix (2002). Natural Law: The Modern Tradition. In Jules Coleman & Scott J. Shapiro (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Jurisprudence and Philosophy of Law. Oup Oxford.
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  32. Brian Bix (1999). Jules L. Coleman and Christopher W. Morris, Eds., Rational Commitment and Social Justice: Essays for Gregory Kavka Reviewed By. [REVIEW] Philosophy in Review 19 (5):318-320.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  33. Brian Bix (ed.) (1998). Analyzing Law: New Essays in Legal Theory. Oxford University Press.
    Analyzing Law offers an important selection of the most influential and challenging work now being done in legal theory. A central focus of the essays in this work is the contribution of the well-known philosopher Jules Coleman to the various topics which are covered by the contributors.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  34. Brian Bix (1998). JE Penner, The Idea of Property in Law Reviewed By. Philosophy in Review 18 (2):143-145.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  35. Brian Bix (1996). The Idea of Priwate Law. Philosophical Books 37 (2):131-132.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  36. Brian Bix (1995). Conceptual Questions and Jurisprudence. Legal Theory 1 (4):465-479.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  37. Brian Bix (1993). Book Reviews. [REVIEW] Mind 102 (405):193-195.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  38. Brian Bix (1993). Law, Language, and Legal Determinacy. Oxford University Press.
    This book discusses one of the central problems in the philosophy of law--the question of legal determinacy. Is the law a seamless web or are there gaps? Bix argues that the major re-thinking of the common and "common sense" views about law that have been proposed by various recent legal theories is unnecessary. He offers a reconsideration of the role of language in the law, and the way ideas about language have been used and misused in recent legal theory. He (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  39. Brian Bix (1992). A. D. Woozley and the Concept of Right Answers in Law. Ratio Juris 5 (1):58-66.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  40. Brian Bix (1991). H. L. A. Hart and the “Open Texture” of Language. Law and Philosophy 10 (1):51 - 72.
    H. L. A. Hart and the "Open Texture" of Language tries to clarify the writings of both Hart and Friedrich Waismann on "open texture". In Waismann's work, "open texture" referred to the potential vagueness of words under extreme (hypothetical) circumstances. Hart's use of the term was quite different, and his work has been misunderstood because those differences were underestimated. Hart should not be read as basing his argument for judicial discretion on the nature of language; primarily, he was putting forward (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation