Search results for 'Brian Douglas' (try it on Scholar)

999 found
Sort by:
  1. Brian Douglas & Terence Lovat (2010). The Integrity of Discourse in the Anglican Eucharistic Tradition: A Consideration of Philosophical Assumptions. Heythrop Journal 51 (5):847-861.score: 120.0
    This article explores the integrity of the discourse in the Anglican eucharistic tradition by considering the philosophical assumptions that underlie eucharistic theology. It argues that where the conversation of the Anglican eucharistic tradition is open and unfinished then the integrity of the discourse is facilitated as opposed to the conversations of party positions and particular interests which suggest exclusive versions of truth. The conversation or dialogue of Anglican eucharistic theology is seen to be enhanced through the consideration of the philosophical (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Angela E. Douglas (2011). SymbiosisThe Symbiotic Habit.Angela E. Douglas . Princeton University Press , 2010 . 214 Pp., Illus. $45.00 (ISBN 9780691113418 Cloth). [REVIEW] Bioscience 61 (4):326-327.score: 120.0
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. J. Douglas (2006). Den Uyl and Douglas B. Rasmussen," The Myth of Atomism,". Review of Metaphysics 59:843-70.score: 120.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Mary Douglas (1996). Thought Styles: Critical Essays on Good Taste. Sage Publications.score: 60.0
    We know we have thoughts, but are we aware that we have styles of thought? This book, written by one of the most gifted and celebrated social thinkers of our time, is a contribution to understanding the rules of the different styles of thinking. Author Mary Douglas takes us through a range of thought styles from the vulgar to the refined. Throughout this fascinating journey, Thought Styles shows us how the different styles work and how outsiders can learn the (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Heather Douglas (2011). Fraud From the Frontlines: The Importance of Being Nice. [REVIEW] Metascience 20 (3):553-556.score: 60.0
    Fraud from the frontlines: the importance of being nice Content Type Journal Article DOI 10.1007/s11016-010-9492-2 Authors Heather Douglas, Department of Philosophy, University of Tennessee at Knoxville, 815 McClung Tower, Knoxville, TN 37996-0480, USA Journal Metascience Online ISSN 1467-9981 Print ISSN 0815-0796.
    No categories
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Heather Douglas (2009). Science, Policy, and the Value-Free Ideal. University of Pittsburgh Press.score: 60.0
    Douglas proposes a new ideal in which values serve an essential function throughout scientific inquiry, but where the role values play is constrained at key points, protecting the integrity and objectivity of science.
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Donald G. Douglas (1973). Philosophers on Rhetoric: Traditional and Emerging Views. Skokie, Ill.,National Textbook Co..score: 60.0
    Johnstone, H. W., Jr. Rhetoric and communication in philosophy.--Smith, C. R. and Douglas, D. G. Philosophical principles in the traditional and emerging views of rhetoric.--Wallace, K. R. Bacon's conception of rhetoric.--Thonssen, L. W. Thomas Hobbes's philosophy of speech.--Walter, O. M., Jr. Descartes on reasoning.--Douglas, D. G. Spinoza and the methodology of reflective knowledge in persuasion.--Howell, W. S. John Locke and the new rhetoric.--Doering, J. F. David Hume on oratory.--Douglas, D. G. A neo-Kantian approach to the epistomology of (...)
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Kimberley Brownlee (2008). Justifying Punishment: A Response to Douglas Husak. [REVIEW] Criminal Law and Philosophy 2 (2):123-129.score: 18.0
    In ‘Why Criminal Law: A Question of Content?’, Douglas Husak argues that an analysis of the justifiability of the criminal law depends upon an analysis of the justifiability of state punishment. According to Husak, an adequate justification of state punishment both must show why the state is permitted to infringe valuable rights such as the right not to be punished and must respond to two distinct groups of persons who may demand a justification for the imposition of punishment, namely, (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. Douglas Walton (2007). A Bibliography of Douglas Walton's Published Works, 1971-2007. Informal Logic 27 (1):135-147.score: 15.0
    A Bibliography of Douglas Walton’s Published Works, 1971-20.
    Direct download (15 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. Gabriel Andrade (2004). Metáforas No Verbales: En Torna a Mary Douglas y Claude Lévi-Strauss. Utopía y Praxis Latinoamericana 9 (25):99-120.score: 15.0
    This ar ti cle ex tends, from a philo soph i cal and an thro po log i cal point of view, the re cent dis - cus sions as to what is met a phoric. Lan guage phi - los o phers have con trib uted to the un der stand ing of the na ture and func tion of met a phors, but their com ments have been tra ..
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. Brian Douglas Elwood (2001). Breaking Through Nihilism: Cross-Cultural Pathways in Soteriological Hermeneutics. De La Salle University Press.score: 15.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. Tuomas E. Tahko (2013). Tropes: Properties, Objects, and Mental Causation. By Douglas Ehring. [REVIEW] Philosophical Quarterly 63 (251):379-382.score: 12.0
    Book review of 'Tropes: Properties, Objects, and Mental Causation' (2011, OUP). By DOUGLAS EHRING.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. Jay L. Garfield & Jan Westerhoff (2011). Acquiring the Notion of a Dependent Designation: A Response to Douglas L. Berger. Philosophy East and West 61 (2):365-367.score: 12.0
    In a recent issue of Philosophy East and West Douglas Berger defends a new reading of Mūlamadhyamakakārikā XXIV : 18, arguing that most contemporary translators mistranslate the important term prajñaptir upādāya, misreading it as a compound indicating "dependent designation" or something of the sort, instead of taking it simply to mean "this notion, once acquired." He attributes this alleged error, pervasive in modern scholarship, to Candrakīrti, who, Berger correctly notes, argues for the interpretation he rejects.Berger's analysis, and the reading (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. Douglas V. Porpora (1989). Four Concepts of Social Structure Douglas V. Porpora. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 19 (2):195–211.score: 12.0
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. Berit Brogaard, Inconsistency Theories of Semantic Paradox, by Douglas Patterson. Philosopher's Digest.score: 12.0
    Douglas Patterson argues that the best way to respond to the semantic paradoxes that arise in natural language is to take natural language semantics to be (explosively) inconsistent. According to Patterson, to understand a natural language is to share with others cognition of a false semantic theory. Patterson’s main argument runs as follows. English is expressively rich. So, the first sentence occurring in this review could be.
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. Brian Davies (2006). Review of Thomas Aquinas, Brian Shanley, The Treatise on the Divine Nature, Summa Theologiae I, 1-13. [REVIEW] Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2006 (6).score: 12.0
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. Douglas Birkhead (1997). Book Review: The Role of Emotions in Moral Decisions: A Book Review by Douglas Birkhead. [REVIEW] Journal of Mass Media Ethics 12 (1):57 – 59.score: 12.0
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. Alex Callinicos (2006). Confronting a World Without Justice: Brian Barry's Why Social Justice Matters. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 9 (3):461-472.score: 12.0
    (2006). Confronting a World without Justice: Brian Barry’s Why Social Justice Matters. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy: Vol. 9, No. 3, pp. 461-472.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. Stevan Harnad, First Person Singular: Review Of: Brian Rotman: Becoming Beside Ourselves: Alphabet, Ghosts, Distributed Human Beings. [REVIEW]score: 12.0
    Brian Rotman argues that (one) “mind” and (one) “god” are only conceivable, literally, because of (alphabetic) literacy, which allowed us to designate each of these ghosts as an incorporeal, speaker-independent “I” (or, in the case of infinity, a notional agent that goes on counting forever). I argue that to have a mind is to have the capacity to feel. No one can be sure which organisms feel, hence have minds, but it seems likely that one-celled organisms and plants do (...)
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. Michael Devitt (1980). Brian Loar on Singular Terms. Philosophical Studies 37 (3):271 - 280.score: 12.0
    In "the semantics of singular terms," brian loar described and criticized a "causal" theory of reference and offered a new "description" theory. It is argued that the particular causal theory described is not to be found in the papers by donnellan and kripke cited as evidence for it, And is a straw man. Further "prima facie", Loar's new description theory fails to meet kripke's noncircularity condition. Should loar attempt to meet it, His theory is likely to run foul of (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. Rainer Kattel (forthcoming). Brian Leiter and Neil Sinhababu (Eds), Nietzsche and Morality. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice.score: 12.0
    Brian Leiter and Neil Sinhababu (eds), Nietzsche and Morality Content Type Journal Article DOI 10.1007/s10677-008-9134-6 Authors Rainer Kattel, Tallinn University of Technology Ehitajate tee 5 19086 Tallinn Estonia Journal Ethical Theory and Moral Practice Online ISSN 1572-8447 Print ISSN 1386-2820.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  22. Brian Boyd (2007). Brian Boyd Responds:. Philosophy and Literature 31 (1):196-199.score: 12.0
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  23. Michael Bacon (2003). Liberal Universalism: On Brian Barry and Richard Rorty. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 6 (2):41-62.score: 12.0
    At first sight it would seem difficult to find two philosophers as different as Brian Barry and Richard Rorty. It is widely held that the former is one of the most forceful proponents of liberal universalism, whereas the latter is typically viewed as the quintessential relativist. In this essay, different usages of the term univeralism are considered, and it is argued that Rorty's position is much closer to that of Barry than is generally supposed. Indeed, the article concludes by (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  24. Martin Barrett, Ellery Eells, Branden Fitelson & Elliott Sober (1999). Review: Models and Reality-A Review of Brian Skyrms's Evolution of the Social Contract. [REVIEW] Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 59 (1):237 - 241.score: 12.0
    Human beings are peculiar. In laboratory experiments, they often cooperate in one-shot prisoners’ dilemmas, they frequently offer 1/2 and reject low offers in the ultimatum game, and they often bid 1/2 in the game of divide-the-cake All these behaviors are puzzling from the point of view of game theory. The first two are irrational, if utility is measured in a certain way.1 The last isn’t positively irrational, but it is no more rational than other possible actions, since there are infinitely (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  25. Andrew Botterell (2013). Review of Douglas Husak, Philosophy of Criminal Law: Selected Essays. [REVIEW] University of Toronto Law Journal 63 (1):152-158.score: 12.0
    A review of Douglas Husak, Philosophy of Criminal Law: Selected Essays (Oxford University Press, 2010).
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  26. Branden Fitelson (1999). Review: Models and Reality-A Review of Brian Skyrms's Evolution of the Social Contract. [REVIEW] Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 59 (1):237 - 241.score: 12.0
    Human beings are peculiar. In laboratory experiments, they often cooperate in one-shot prisoners’ dilemmas, they frequently offer 1/2 and reject low offers in the ultimatum game, and they often bid 1/2 in the game of divide-the-cake All these behaviors are puzzling from the point of view of game theory. The first two are irrational, if utility is measured in a certain way.1 The last isn’t positively irrational, but it is no more rational than other possible actions, since there are infinitely (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  27. Douglas Husak & Brian P. McLaughlin (1993). Time-Frames, Voluntary Acts, and Strict Liability. Law and Philosophy 12 (1):95 - 120.score: 12.0
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  28. Joseph M. Rivera (2010). The Call and the Gifted in Christological Perspective: A Consideration of Brian Robinette's Critique of Jean-Luc Marion. Heythrop Journal 51 (6):1053-1060.score: 12.0
    In his recent article, ‘A Gift to Theology? Jean-Luc Marion's ‘Saturated Phenomena’ in Christological Perspective’, Brian Robinette has critiqued Marion's phenomenology for confining theology to a one-sided approach to Christology, one that stresses only the passive, mystical reception of Christ. To correct this imbalance, Robinette brings Marion into dialogue with those more active Christologies or ‘prophetical-ethical’ liberation theologies of Gustavo Gutierrez, Johann Baptist Metz and others that stress a life-praxis focused on confronting evil and suffering. In this essay I (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  29. Brian Jonathan Garrett (2013). Douglas Ehring , Tropes: Properties, Objects and Mental Causation . Reviewed By. Philosophy in Review 33 (4):279-281.score: 12.0
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  30. A. D. Block & S. E. Cuypers (2012). Why Darwinians Should Not Be Afraid of Mary Douglas--And Vice Versa: The Case of Disgust. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 42 (4):459-488.score: 12.0
    Evolutionary psychology and human sociobiology often reject the mere possibility of symbolic causality. Conversely, theories in which symbolic causality plays a central role tend to be both anti-nativist and anti-evolutionary. This article sketches how these apparent scientific rivals can be reconciled in the study of disgust. First, we argue that there are no good philosophical or evolutionary reasons to assume that symbolic causality is impossible. Then, we examine to what extent symbolic causality can be part of the theoretical toolbox of (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  31. J. L. Austin, Cuckoo, Brian Ellis, Douglas Gasking & G. M. Matthews (1952). Report on Analysis "Problem" No. 1. Analysis 12 (6):125 - 132.score: 12.0
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  32. Brian Davies (2006). Review of Brian Hebblethwaite, Philosophical Theology and Christian Doctrine. [REVIEW] Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2006 (1).score: 12.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  33. R. Douglas Geivett (2012). The Reality of God and the Problem of Evil, by Brian Davies. Faith and Philosophy 29 (4):490-494.score: 12.0
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  34. Douglas W. MacPherson & Brian D. Gushulak (2001). Human Mobility and Population Health: New Approaches in a Globalizing World. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 44 (3):390-401.score: 12.0
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  35. Douglas Kellner, By Douglas Kellner (Http://Www.Gseis.Ucla.Edu/Faculty/Kellner/).score: 12.0
    During the Gulf war, CNN correspondent Peter Arnett distinguished himself with its courageous reporting in Iraq while under fire by the U.S.-led coalition which dropped more bombs on Iraq than were unleashed in World War II. Reporting live from Baghdad throughout the war, Arnett provided vivid daily accounts of life in Iraq during one of the most sustained air attacks in history. From his live telephone reporting of the early hours of the U.S. attack on Iraq in January 1991 through (...)
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  36. Gigi Berardi (2012). Douglas Harper and Patrizia Faccioli: The Italian Way: Food & Social Life. [REVIEW] Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 25 (6):929-932.score: 12.0
    Douglas Harper and Patrizia Faccioli: The Italian Way: Food & Social Life Content Type Journal Article Category Book Review Pages 1-4 DOI 10.1007/s10806-012-9379-x Authors Gigi Berardi, Department of Environmental Studies, Huxley College of the Environment, Western Washington University, Bellingham, WA, USA Journal Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics Online ISSN 1573-322X Print ISSN 1187-7863.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  37. William A. Dembski, Addicted to Caricatures: A Response to Brian Charlesworth.score: 12.0
    One prominent evolutionist I know confided in me that he sometimes spends only an hour perusing a book that he has to review. I doubt if Brian Charlesworth spent even that much time with my book No Free Lunch. Charlesworth is a bright guy and could have done better. But no doubt he is also a busy guy. To save time and effort, it's therefore easier to put these crazy intelligent design creationists in their place rather than actually engage (...)
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  38. G. Crowder (2008). Berlin, Value Pluralism and the Common Good: A Reply to Brian Trainor. Philosophy and Social Criticism 34 (8):925-939.score: 12.0
    Brian Trainor argues that the current hostility of political theorists towards the idea of the common good is in part due to the influence of Isaiah Berlin's concept of `value pluralism', or the incommensurability of basic human values. I agree with Trainor's opposition to the `agonistic' interpretation of pluralism, associated with thinkers like Chantal Mouffe. However, it is not the case that the only alternative to the pluralism— agonism thesis is the monist defence of a thick common good advocated (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  39. Michael Magee (2007). Review: Philosophy Americana: Making Philosophy at Home in American Culture by Douglas R. Anderson. [REVIEW] Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 43 (2):411-417.score: 12.0
    Douglas R. Anderson's Philosophy Americana reads like a series of rescue attempts: an attempt to rescue academic teaching from institutional and bureaucratic logic; to rescue philosophers such as Bugbee and Royce from their pragmatist critics; to rescue the pragmatists themselves from their would-be champions among the postmodernists; to (in a related move) save Emerson from Cavell; to save country music from the charge that it is either politically retrograde or an experiential dead-end; and to save Kerouac and the Beats (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  40. Jacob Nebel, Ryan W. Davis, Peter van Elswyk & Ben Holguin (2013). Teaching Philosophy Through Lincoln-Douglas Debate. Teaching Philosophy 36 (3):271-289.score: 12.0
    This paper is about teaching philosophy to high school students through Lincoln-Douglas (LD) debate. LD, also known as “values debate,” includes topics from ethics and political philosophy. Thousands of high school students across the U.S. debate these topics in class, after school, and at weekend tournaments. We argue that LD is a particularly effective tool for teaching philosophy, but also that LD today falls short of its potential. We argue that the problems with LD are not inevitable, and we (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  41. Geoff Hunt, The Patrick O'Brian Novels.score: 12.0
    Patrick O'Brian, the Aubrey-Maturin Series of twenty novels (Norton, 1970-1999). My appreciation written for WIRED magazine: "I re-read this extraordinary series of novels because of the depth of portrayal of the major and minor characters, but also because they teach me so much about what science and technology were like two centuries ago. O'Brian shows you the world-that-was through the eyes of a Tory naval captain (Jack Aubrey), at sea since the age of 12, working his way up (...)
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  42. R. L. Pierce (2012). Whose Ethics of Knowledge? Taking the Next Step in Evaluating Knowledge in Synthetic Biology: A Response to Douglas and Savulescu. Journal of Medical Ethics 38 (10):636-638.score: 12.0
    The recent proposal by Douglas and Savulescu for an ethics of knowledge provokes a renewed consideration of an enduring issue. Yet, the concept raises significant challenges for procedural and substantive justice. Indeed, the operationalisation of ‘an ethics of knowledge’ could be as alarming as what it seeks to prevent. While we can acknowledge that there is, and surely always will be, potential for misuse of beneficial science and technology, a contemplated conception of what we ought to not know, devise (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  43. Re'em Segev (2010). Is the Criminal Law (So) Special? Comments on Douglas Husak’s Theory of Criminalization. Jerusalem Review of Legal Studies 1 (1):3-20.score: 12.0
    This is Re'em Segev's contribution to the symposium on Douglas Husak's book "Overcriminalization.".
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  44. Brian Teare (2013). Brian Teare, From The Empty Form Goes All the Way to Heaven. Journal of Medical Humanities 34 (2):277-281.score: 12.0
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  45. Francis Bacon, Robert Leslie Ellis, Douglas Denon Heath, William Rawley & James Spedding, Works; Collected and Edited by James Spedding, Robert Leslie Ellis and Douglas Denon Heath.score: 12.0
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  46. Justin D'Arms, Robert Francesscotti, I. Haji, Susan Hurley, Leonard Kahn, Brian Kierland, K. Lippert-Rasmussen, Douglas Portmore, Betsy Postow & Bernard Rollin (2006). Manuscript Referees for The Journal of Ethics: August 2005–July 2006. Journal of Ethics 10:507.score: 12.0
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  47. Brian Gregor (2011). Niels Jørgen Cappelørn, Alastair Hannay, David Kangas, Bruce H. Kirmmse, George Pattison, Vanessa Rumble, and K. Brian Söderquist, Eds. , Kierkegaard's Journals and Notebooks Volume 3: Notebooks 1-15 . Reviewed By. [REVIEW] Philosophy in Review 31 (2):107-110.score: 12.0
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  48. Douglas W. Hands (1979). Review Symposium : Douglas W. Hands G. C. Archibald Joseph Agassi on S. J. Latsis, Ed. Method and Appraisal in Economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1976. Pp. VIII + 218. $17.50 the Methodology of Economic Research Programmes. [REVIEW] Philosophy of the Social Sciences 9 (3):293-303.score: 12.0
  49. Stephen Palmquist, Book Review Of: Douglas Burnham: An Introduction to Kant’s Critique of Judgement . Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press Ltd, 2000. X + 198 Pages. [REVIEW]score: 12.0
           As is appropriate for an introductory text, Douglas Burnham’s book opens with a chapter providing general background information on Kant, a systematic overview of the whole Critical philosophy, a sketch of the basic issues dealt with in the third Critique, and an explanation of the overall structure of Kant’s book. Here and throughout Burnham’s book each section ends with a helpful summary, with diagrams and other convenient “lists†being supplied along the way (...)
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  50. Douglas Simpson, William Bruneau & Adam Scarfe (2013). Dewey, Russell , Whitehead: Philosophers as Educators by Brian P. Hendley. Process Studies 41 (2):342-349.score: 12.0
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
1 — 50 / 999