Search results for 'Brian Fisher' (try it on Scholar)

999 found
Sort by:
  1. Brian Fisher, Tera Marie Green & Richard Arias-Hernández (2011). Visual Analytics as a Translational Cognitive Science. Topics in Cognitive Science 3 (3):609-625.score: 240.0
    Visual analytics is a new interdisciplinary field of study that calls for a more structured scientific approach to understanding the effects of interaction with complex graphical displays on human cognitive processes. Its primary goal is to support the design and evaluation of graphical information systems that better support cognitive processes in areas as diverse as scientific research and emergency management. The methodologies that make up this new field are as yet ill defined. This paper proposes a pathway for development of (...)
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Michael H. Fisher, Gregory C. Kozlowski, Kurtis R. Schaeffer, Francis X. Clooney, Carl Olson, Martha Ann Selby, Thomas Forsthoefel, Lise F. Vail, Rebecca J. Manring, Narasingha P. Sil, Brian K. Pennington, Ashley James Dawson, Sarah Hodges & Thomas Forsthoefel (2002). Book Reviews and Notices. [REVIEW] International Journal of Hindu Studies 6 (2):199-220.score: 240.0
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Simon Ferrier, George V. N. Powell, Karen S. Richardson, Glenn Manion, Jake M. Overton, Thomas F. Allnutt, Susan E. Cameron, Kellie Mantle, Neil D. Burgess, Daniel P. Faith, John F. Lamoreux, Gerold Kier, Robert J. Hijmans, Vicki A. Funk, Gerasimos A. Cassis, Brian L. Fisher, Paul Flemons, David Lees, Jon C. Lovett & Renaat S. A. R. van Rompaey (2004). Mapping More of Terrestrial Biodiversity for Global Conservation Assessment. BioScience 54 (12):1101.score: 240.0
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. John Andrew Fisher (1996). The Myth of Anthropomorphism John Andrew Fisher. In Colin Allen & D. Jamison (eds.), Readings in Animal Cognition. Mit Press.score: 180.0
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Edward Hulmes (2014). Just War on Terror? A Christian and Muslim Response. Edited by David Fisher and Brian Wicker . Pp. 231, Farnham, Ashgate, 2010, $12.53. Rewarding Encounters: Islam and the Comparative Theologies of Kenneth Cragg and Wilfred Cantwell Smith. By Bård Mæland. Pp. 387, Melisende/London, 2003, $5.95. [REVIEW] Heythrop Journal 55 (3):523-524.score: 120.0
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. David Fisher (2012). Questioning Faith, Hope and Charity. Australian Humanist, The (106):12.score: 60.0
    Fisher, David We are given many 'eternal truths' and verities we are expected to accept. We can and should question all of them. Whether or not a person is a religious believer, she or he tends to equate having a religious back-ground with being a good person. One of the phrases we generally accept is the trio of virtues - faith, hope and charity.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Simon Fisher (1988). Revelatory Positivism?: Barth's Earliest Theology and the Marburg School. Oxford University Press.score: 60.0
    Filling a gap in scholarship on 19th- and 20th-century religious thought, this book discusses the philosophy and theology of the influential Marburg School in Germany before 1914, focusing on the writings of Hermann Cohen, its leader, and on the Ritschlian theologian Wilhelm Herrmann, Karl Barth's teacher. In addition, Fisher examines Barth's earliest writings and clarifies the little-known liberal phase of Barth's theology.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. David Fisher (2012). The Last Time. Australian Humanist, The 108 (108):20.score: 60.0
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. David Fisher (2011). Morality and War: Can War Be Just in the Twenty-First Century? OUP Oxford.score: 60.0
    With the ending of the strategic certainties of the Cold War, the need for moral clarity over when, where and how to start, conduct and conclude war has never been greater. There has been a recent revival of interest in the just war tradition. But can a medieval theory help us answer twenty-first century security concerns? -/- David Fisher explores how just war thinking can and should be developed to provide such guidance. His in-depth study examines philosophical challenges to (...)
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. David Fisher (2014). The Virgin Birth. Australian Humanist, The 113:10.score: 60.0
    Fisher, David Religious belief will maintain doctrines even when there is evidence that those doctrines can be shown to be untenable. That's one trouble with religions that contain dogmas. A dogma may require belief in a deity. Since the existence of deity can neither be proven nor disproven, such a dogma is irrefutable and therefore one can maintain such a dogma.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. Justin C. Fisher (2007). Why Nothing Mental is Just in the Head. Noûs 41 (2):318-334.score: 30.0
    Mental internalists hold that an individuals mental features at a given time supervene upon what is in that individuals head at that time. While many people reject mental internalism about content and justification, mental internalism is commonly accepted regarding such other mental features as rationality, emotion-types, propositional-attitude-types, moral character, and phenomenology. I construct a counter-example to mental internalism regarding all these features. My counter-example involves two creatures: a human and an alien from Pulse World. These creatures environments, behavioral dispositions and (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. C. M. Fisher (2001). If There Were No Free Will. Medical Hypotheses 56:364-366.score: 30.0
  13. Justin C. Fisher (2006). Does Simulation Theory Really Involve Simulation? Philosophical Psychology 19 (4):417 – 432.score: 30.0
    This paper contributes to an ongoing debate regarding the cognitive processes involved when one person predicts a target person's behavior and/or attributes a mental state to that target person. According to simulation theory, a person typically performs these tasks by employing some part of her brain as a simulation of what is going on in a corresponding part of the brain of the target person. I propose a general intuitive analysis of what 'simulation' means. Simulation is a particular way of (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. Mark Fisher (1983). A Note on Free Will and Artificial Intelligence. Philosophia 13 (September):75-80.score: 30.0
  15. Justin C. Fisher, Color Representations as Hash Values.score: 30.0
    The goal of this paper is to answer the following question: When we have mental states that represent certain things as being colored, what properties are our mental states representing these things as having?
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. Justin Fisher, Representational Content and the Keys to Success.score: 30.0
    I consider the question of whether success-linked theories of content – theories like those of Ramsey (1927), Millikan (1984) and Blackburn (2005) which take there to be a definitional link between representational content and behavioral success – are consistent with the plausible claim that we can use content-attributions to explain behavioral success. Peter Godfrey-Smith (1996) argues that success-linked theories of content are too closely linked to success to be able to explain it. Against this, I present a plausible account of (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. Justin C. Fisher (1988). The Wrong Stuff: Chinese Rooms and the Nature of Understanding. Philosophical Investigations 11 (October):279-99.score: 30.0
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. Jill A. Fisher (2006). Procedural Misconceptions and Informed Consent: Insights From Empirical Research on the Clinical Trials Industry. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 16 (3):251-268.score: 30.0
    : This paper provides a simultaneously reflexive and analytical framework to think about obstacles to truly informed consent in social science and biomedical research. To do so, it argues that informed consent often goes awry due to procedural misconceptions built into the research context. The concept of procedural misconception is introduced to describe how individuals respond to what is familiar in research settings and overlook what is different. In the context of biomedical research, procedural misconceptions can be seen to function (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. F. A. Y. Brian (1978). Practical Reasoning, Rationality and the Explanation of Intentional Action. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 8 (1):77–101.score: 30.0
  20. Pradip Bhattacharya, Edward T. Ulrich, Joseph A. Bracken, Richard Weiss, Christopher Key Chapple, Michael C. Brannigan, Theodore M. Ludwig, S. Nagarajan, Michael H. Fisher, Steve Derné, Herman Tull, Jarrod W. Brown, Joanna Kirkpatrick, Edward T. Ulrich, Carl Olson & Deepak Sarma (2004). Book Reviews. [REVIEW] International Journal of Hindu Studies 8 (1-3):203-227.score: 30.0
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. Kerstin Tham, Elisabeth Ginsburg, Anne G. Fisher & Richard Tegnér (2001). Training to Improve Awareness of Disabilities in Clients with Unilateral Neglect. American Journal of Occupational Therapy 55 (1):46-54.score: 30.0
  22. Saul Fisher (2003). Early Modern Philosophy and Biological Thought. Perspectives on Science 11 (4):373-377.score: 30.0
    Presents several articles on the modern philosophy and biological perspective on life science.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  23. Saul Fisher (2003). Gassendi's Atomist Account of Generation and Heredity in Plants and Animals. Perspectives on Science 11 (4):484-512.score: 30.0
  24. L. E. E. Brian (1969). Book Reviews. [REVIEW] British Journal of Aesthetics 9 (2).score: 30.0
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  25. ed Goodman, Robert F. & ed Fisher, Walter R. (1995). Book Review: Rethinking Knowledge: Reflections Across the Disciplines. [REVIEW] Philosophy and Literature 19 (2).score: 30.0
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  26. Justin C. Fisher, Emotions as Modes of Cognition.score: 30.0
    I. Introduction. II. Ratiocination vs. Cognition. III. Emotions as Modes of Cognition. IV. Four Competing Proposals. V. The Impact of Emotion on Cognition. VI. The Kinematics of Ratiocination. VII. Competing Cognitive Theories. VIII. Why think Emotions are Beliefs? IX. The Intentionality of Emotions. X. The Kinematics of Emotions. XI. A Unified Account of the Emotions. XII. The Rationality of Emotions.
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  27. B. Alan Wallace & Linda Fisher (2000). Biological Rhythms and Individual Differences in Consciousness. In Robert G. Kunzendorf & B. Alan Wallace (eds.), Individual Differences in Conscious Experience. John Benjamins.score: 30.0
  28. Shunlong Luo (2002). Maximum Shannon Entropy, Minimum Fisher Information, and an Elementary Game. Foundations of Physics 32 (11):1757-1772.score: 24.0
    We formulate an elementary statistical game which captures the essence of some fundamental quantum experiments such as photon polarization and spin measurement. We explore and compare the significance of the principle of maximum Shannon entropy and the principle of minimum Fisher information in solving such a game. The solution based on the principle of minimum Fisher information coincides with the solution based on an invariance principle, and provides an informational explanation of Malus' law for photon polarization. There is (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  29. James Tabery (2008). R. A. Fisher, Lancelot Hogben, and the Origin(s) of Genotype-Environment Interaction. Journal of the History of Biology 41 (4):717 - 761.score: 24.0
    This essay examines the origin(s) of genotype-environment interaction, or G×E. "Origin(s)" and not "the origin" because the thesis is that there were actually two distinct concepts of G×E at this beginning: a biometric concept, or \[G \times E_B\] , and a developmental concept, or \[G \times E_D \] . R. A. Fisher, one of the founders of population genetics and the creator of the statistical analysis of variance, introduced the biometric concept as he attempted to resolve one of the (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  30. Xavier Donato Rodríguez & Alfonso Arroyo Santos (2012). The Structure of Idealization in Biological Theories: The Case of the Wright-Fisher Model. [REVIEW] Journal for General Philosophy of Science 43 (1):11-27.score: 24.0
    In this paper we present a new framework of idealization in biology. We characterize idealizations as a network of counterfactual and hypothetical conditionals that can exhibit different “degrees of contingency”. We use this idea to say that, in departing more or less from the actual world, idealizations can serve numerous epistemic, methodological or heuristic purposes within scientific research. We defend that, in part, this structure explains why idealizations, despite being deformations of reality, are so successful in scientific practice. For illustrative (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  31. Robert A. Skipper (2002). The Persistence of the R.A. Fisher-Sewall Wright Controversy. Biology and Philosophy 17 (3):341-367.score: 24.0
    This paper considers recent heated debates led by Jerry A. Coyne andMichael J. Wade on issues stemming from the 1929–1962 R.A. Fisher-Sewall Wrightcontroversy in population genetics. William B. Provine once remarked that theFisher-Wright controversy is central, fundamental, and very influential.Indeed,it is also persistent. The argumentative structure of therecent (1997–2000) debates is analyzed with the aim of eliminating a logicalconflict in them, viz., that the two sides in the debates havedifferent aims and that, as such, they are talking past each (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  32. Anya Plutynski (2006). What Was Fisher's Fundamental Theorem of Natural Selection and What Was It For? Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C 37 (1):59-82.score: 24.0
    Fisher’s ‘fundamental theorem of natural selection’ is notoriously abstract, and, no less notoriously, many take it to be false. In this paper, I explicate the theorem, examine the role that it played in Fisher’s general project for biology, and analyze why it was so very fundamental for Fisher. I defend Ewens (1989) and Lessard (1997) in the view that the theorem is in fact a true theorem if, as Fisher claimed, ‘the terms employed’ are ‘used strictly (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  33. Nancy S. Hall (2007). R. A. Fisher and His Advocacy of Randomization. Journal of the History of Biology 40 (2):295 - 325.score: 24.0
    The requirement of randomization in experimental design was first stated by R. A. Fisher, statistician and geneticist, in 1925 in his book Statistical Methods for Research Workers. Earlier designs were systematic and involved the judgment of the experimenter; this led to possible bias and inaccurate interpretation of the data. Fisher's dictum was that randomization eliminates bias and permits a valid test of significance. Randomization in experimenting had been used by Charles Sanders Peirce in 1885 but the practice was (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  34. Xavier de Donato Rodríguez & Alfonso Arroyo Santos (2012). The Structure of Idealization in Biological Theories: The Case of the Wright-Fisher Model. [REVIEW] Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 43 (1):11 - 27.score: 24.0
    In this paper we present a new framework of idealization in biology. We characterize idealizations as a network of counterfactual and hypothetical conditionals that can exhibit different "degrees of contingency". We use this idea to say that, in departing more or less from the actual world, idealizations can serve numerous epistemic, methodological or heuristic purposes within scientific research. We defend that, in part, this structure explains why idealizations, despite being deformations of reality, are so successful in scientific practice. For illustrative (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  35. Paul Brazier (2014). C. S. Lewis: The Question of Multiple Incarnations. Heythrop Journal 55 (3):391-408.score: 24.0
    Formulated by Aquinas, commented on by post-Copernican philosophers and theologians, analysed in depth by C.S. Lewis, and deliberated by some contemporary writers, the question of multiple incarnations either within humanity or amongst extra-terrestrial sentient species is all too intermittently examined: ‘Can the Christ be incarnated more than once in our reality, or somewhere else in the universe, or another reality?’ In this paper, we examine the debate and the conclusions: that is, Lewis’s position within his philosophical theology and his analogical (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  36. George Bowles (1993). Professor Fisher on Suppositions. Argumentation 7 (3):237-246.score: 24.0
    I first support Alec Fisher's thesis that premises and conclusions in arguments can be unasserted first by arguing in its favor that only it preserves our intuition that it is at least possible that two arguments share the same premises and the same conclusion although not everything that is asserted in the one is also asserted in the other and second by answering two objections that might be raised against it. I then draw from Professor Fisher's thesis the (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  37. Plutynski Anya (2005). Parsimony and the Fisher–Wright Debate. Biology and Philosophy 20 (4):697-713.score: 21.0
    In the past five years, there have been a series of papers in the journal Evolution debating the relative significance of two theories of evolution, a neo-Fisherian and a neo-Wrightian theory, where the neo-Fisherians make explicit appeal to parsimony. My aim in this paper is to determine how we can make sense of such an appeal. One interpretation of parsimony takes it that a theory that contains fewer entities or processes, (however we demarcate these) is more parsimonious. On the account (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  38. B. Roy Frieden (1999). F-Information, a Unitless Variant of Fisher Information. Foundations of Physics 29 (10):1521-1541.score: 18.0
    A new information matrix [F] with elements F mn = 〈 (y m - a m )(y n - a n) (∂ ln p(y | a)/∂a m ) (∂ ln p(y | a)/∂a n ) 〉 is analyzed. The PDF p(y | a) is the usual likelihood law. [F] differs from the Fisher information matrix by the presence of the first two factors in the given expectation. These factors make F mn unitless, in contrast with the Fisher information. (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  39. Johannes Lenhard (2006). Models and Statistical Inference: The Controversy Between Fisher and Neyman–Pearson. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 57 (1):69-91.score: 18.0
    The main thesis of the paper is that in the case of modern statistics, the differences between the various concepts of models were the key to its formative controversies. The mathematical theory of statistical inference was mainly developed by Ronald A. Fisher, Jerzy Neyman, and Egon S. Pearson. Fisher on the one side and Neyman–Pearson on the other were involved often in a polemic controversy. The common view is that Neyman and Pearson made Fisher's account more stringent (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  40. Brian Davies (2006). Review of Thomas Aquinas, Brian Shanley, The Treatise on the Divine Nature, Summa Theologiae I, 1-13. [REVIEW] Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2006 (6).score: 18.0
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  41. Margaret Morrison (2006). Unification, Explanation and Explaining Unity: The Fisher–Wright Controversy. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 57 (1):233-245.score: 18.0
    I argued that the frameworks and mechanisms that produce unification do not enable us to explain why the unified phenomena behave as they do. That is, we need to look beyond the unifying process for an explanation of these phenomena. Anya Plutynski ([2005]) has called into question my claim about the relationship between unification and explanation as well as my characterization of it in the context of the early synthesis of Mendelism with Darwinian natural selection. In this paper I argue (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  42. Mary S. Morgan (1997). The Technology of Analogical Models: Irving Fisher's Monetary Worlds. Philosophy of Science 64 (4):314.score: 18.0
    Mary Hesse's well-known work on models and analogies gives models a creative role to play in science, which rests on developing certain analogical properties considered neutral between the two fields. Case study material from Irving Fisher's work (The Purchasing Power of Money, 1911), in which he used analogies to construct models of monetary relations and the monetary system, highlights certain omissions in Hesse's account. The analysis points to the importance of taking account of the negative properties in the analogies (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  43. Donato Rodriguez Xavier & Arroyo-Santos Alfonso (2012). The Structure of Idealization in Biological Theories: The Case of the Wright-Fisher Model. Journal for General Philosophy of Science.score: 18.0
    In this paper we present a new framework of idealization in biology. We characterize idealizations as a network of counterfactual and hypothetical conditionals that can exhibit different “degrees of contingency”. We use this idea to say that, in departing more or less from the actual world, idealizations can serve numerous epistemic, methodological or heuristic purposes within scientific research. We defend that, in part, this structure explains why idealizations, despite being deformations of reality, are so successful in scientific practice. For illustrative (...)
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  44. Brian Boyd (2007). Brian Boyd Responds:. Philosophy and Literature 31 (1):196-199.score: 18.0
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  45. Alex Callinicos (2006). Confronting a World Without Justice: Brian Barry's Why Social Justice Matters. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 9 (3):461-472.score: 18.0
    (2006). Confronting a World without Justice: Brian Barry’s Why Social Justice Matters. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy: Vol. 9, No. 3, pp. 461-472.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  46. Michael Devitt (1980). Brian Loar on Singular Terms. Philosophical Studies 37 (3):271 - 280.score: 18.0
    In "the semantics of singular terms," brian loar described and criticized a "causal" theory of reference and offered a new "description" theory. It is argued that the particular causal theory described is not to be found in the papers by donnellan and kripke cited as evidence for it, And is a straw man. Further "prima facie", Loar's new description theory fails to meet kripke's noncircularity condition. Should loar attempt to meet it, His theory is likely to run foul of (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  47. Margaret Morrison (2002). Modelling Populations: Pearson and Fisher on Mendelism and Biometry. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 53 (1):39-68.score: 18.0
    The debate between the Mendelians and the (largely Darwinian) biometricians has been referred to by R. A. Fisher as ‘one of the most needless controversies in the history of science’ and by David Hull as ‘an explicable embarrassment’. The literature on this topic consists mainly of explaining why the controversy occurred and what factors prevented it from being resolved. Regrettably, little or no mention is made of the issues that figured in its resolution. This paper deals with the latter (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  48. Stevan Harnad, First Person Singular: Review Of: Brian Rotman: Becoming Beside Ourselves: Alphabet, Ghosts, Distributed Human Beings. [REVIEW]score: 18.0
    Brian Rotman argues that (one) “mind” and (one) “god” are only conceivable, literally, because of (alphabetic) literacy, which allowed us to designate each of these ghosts as an incorporeal, speaker-independent “I” (or, in the case of infinity, a notional agent that goes on counting forever). I argue that to have a mind is to have the capacity to feel. No one can be sure which organisms feel, hence have minds, but it seems likely that one-celled organisms and plants do (...)
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  49. Sandra D. Hojniak (2011). David E. Fisher: Much Ado About (Practically) Nothing. A History of the Noble Gases. [REVIEW] Foundations of Chemistry 13 (2):167-169.score: 18.0
    David E. Fisher: Much Ado about (Practically) Nothing. A History of the Noble Gases Content Type Journal Article Pages 1-3 DOI 10.1007/s10698-011-9114-0 Authors Sandra D. Hojniak, Department of Chemistry, Laboratory of Coordination Chemistry, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Celestijnenlaan 200F, 3001 Leuven, Belgium Journal Foundations of Chemistry Online ISSN 1572-8463 Print ISSN 1386-4238.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  50. Samir Okasha (2008). Fisher's Fundamental Theorem of Natural Selection—a Philosophical Analysis. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 59 (3):319-351.score: 18.0
    This paper provides a philosophical analysis of the ongoing controversy surrounding R.A. Fisher's famous ‘fundamental theorem’ of natural selection. The difference between the ‘traditional’ and ‘modern’ interpretations of the theorem is explained. I argue that proponents of the modern interpretation have captured Fisher's intended meaning correctly and shown that the theorem is mathematically correct, pace the traditional consensus. However, whether the theorem has any real biological significance remains an unresolved issue. I argue that the answer depends on whether (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
1 — 50 / 999