Search results for 'Brian Fisher' (try it on Scholar)

1000+ found
Order:
  1.  1
    Anthony Fisher (2015). Building a Civilisation of Life and Love. Australasian Catholic Record, The 92 (3):289.
    Fisher, Anthony Thank you to Lyle Shelton, Tony McLellan, and the Australian Christian Lobby for the invitation to address you tonight. Thanks also to Fr Brian Lucas, General Secretary of the Australian Catholic Bishops Conference, for his kind introduction. Let me take this opportunity to applaud the work of the ACL, its volunteers and friends, for ensuring Christian voices are heard in debates of political and cultural significance. As a Catholic bishop I am very grateful for your capacity (...)
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  2. Ronald Aylmer Fisher & J. H. Bennett (1990). Statistical Inference and Analysis Selected Correspondence of R.A. Fisher. Monograph Collection (Matt - Pseudo).
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  3.  20
    Brian Fisher, Tera Marie Green & Richard Arias-Hernández (2011). Visual Analytics as a Translational Cognitive Science. Topics in Cognitive Science 3 (3):609-625.
    Visual analytics is a new interdisciplinary field of study that calls for a more structured scientific approach to understanding the effects of interaction with complex graphical displays on human cognitive processes. Its primary goal is to support the design and evaluation of graphical information systems that better support cognitive processes in areas as diverse as scientific research and emergency management. The methodologies that make up this new field are as yet ill defined. This paper proposes a pathway for development of (...)
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  4.  12
    Michael H. Fisher, Gregory C. Kozlowski, Kurtis R. Schaeffer, Francis X. Clooney, Carl Olson, Martha Ann Selby, Thomas Forsthoefel, Lise F. Vail, Rebecca J. Manring, Narasingha P. Sil, Brian K. Pennington, Ashley James Dawson, Sarah Hodges & Thomas Forsthoefel (2002). Book Reviews and Notices. [REVIEW] International Journal of Hindu Studies 6 (2):199-220.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  5. John Andrew Fisher (1996). The Myth of Anthropomorphism John Andrew Fisher. In Colin Allen & D. Jamison (eds.), Readings in Animal Cognition. MIT Press
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  6. Alden L. Fisher & George B. Murray (1969). Philosophy and Science as Modes of Knowing Selected Essays. Edited by Alden L. Fisher Ànd George B. Murray.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  7. Edward Hulmes (2014). Just War on Terror? A Christian and Muslim Response. Edited by David Fisher and Brian Wicker . Pp. 231, Farnham, Ashgate, 2010, $12.53. Rewarding Encounters: Islam and the Comparative Theologies of Kenneth Cragg and Wilfred Cantwell Smith. By Bård Mæland. Pp. 387, Melisende/London, 2003, $5.95. [REVIEW] Heythrop Journal 55 (3):523-524.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  8.  7
    Tim Fisher (2012). Cogito Ergo Sum Rectam (I Think Therefore I Am Right). Questions: Philosophy for Young People 12:12-14.
    Tim Fisher examines a troubling misconception about philosophy that he noticed his high school students possessed: that when it comes to philosophy, you can never be wrong. He expected incoming philosophy students to hold this belief, but was surprised to learn that even after completing his course, students still held the belief that philosophy had no wrong answers—that all views are equally reasonable. Fisher began to wonder where he went wrong. To rectify this misconception, Fisher details an (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  9.  5
    David Fisher (2014). The Virgin Birth. Australian Humanist, The 113:10.
    Fisher, David Religious belief will maintain doctrines even when there is evidence that those doctrines can be shown to be untenable. That's one trouble with religions that contain dogmas. A dogma may require belief in a deity. Since the existence of deity can neither be proven nor disproven, such a dogma is irrefutable and therefore one can maintain such a dogma.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  10.  9
    David Fisher (2012). Questioning Faith, Hope and Charity. The Australian Humanist (106):12.
    Fisher, David We are given many 'eternal truths' and verities we are expected to accept. We can and should question all of them. Whether or not a person is a religious believer, she or he tends to equate having a religious back-ground with being a good person. One of the phrases we generally accept is the trio of virtues - faith, hope and charity.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  11.  8
    David Fisher (2012). The Last Time. The Australian Humanist 108 (108):20.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  12.  4
    John Fisher (1984). Entitling. Critical Inquiry 11 (2):286-298.
    For the moment, I assume that we have some rough idea of what “title” is supposed to mean: the large letters on the spine of a book, the words on the center of the first page of a musical score, or the little plate on the museum wall to the right of the painting . Thus examples of titles would be The Taming of the Shrew, “Mapleleaf Rag,” or The Birth of Venus, but that generates a rather complex set of (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  13.  9
    Mark Fisher (2007). Notes and Fragments (Review). Journal of the History of Philosophy 45 (3):502-503.
    Mark Fisher - Notes and Fragments - Journal of the History of Philosophy 45:3 Journal of the History of Philosophy 45.3 502-503 Muse Search Journals This Journal Contents Reviewed by Mark Fisher Pennsylvania State University Immanuel Kant. Notes and Fragments. Edited by Paul Guyer. Translated by Chris Bowman, Paul Guyer, and Frederick Rauscher. The Cambridge Edition of the Works of Immanuel Kant. Cambridge-New York: Cambridge University Press, 2005. Pp. xxx + 663. Cloth, $140.00. The latest volume in the (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  14.  2
    Philip Fisher (1990). Jasper Johns: Strategies for Making and Effacing Art. Critical Inquiry 16 (2):313-354.
    Within the strategy that we call avant-garde there are two sets of tactics, one immediate, the other long term. One set could be called a tactics of short-term attention, and it is this set that has been most often noticed. Shock, surprise, self-promotion, the baiting of middle-class solemnity, outrage, a subversive playfulness, a deliberate frustration of habitual expectations, an apparent difficult or refusal of communication, a banality where profundity and seriousness were earlier the norm: these are a few of the (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  15. Berenice Malka Fisher (2000). No Angel in the Classroom: Teaching Through Feminist Discourse. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
    Taking a fresh look at questions that have long troubled teachers committed to social change, No Angel in the Classroom provides a richly conceptualized and down-to-earth account of feminist teaching in higher education. Long-time feminist educator, Berenice Malka Fisher, gives a nuanced interpretation of second wave feminist consciousness-raising that bridges the gap between feminist activism and the academy. Candid classroom stories bring out the myths embedded in many activist ideals of the 1970s, while Fisher's informed analysis builds on (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  16.  11
    Simon Fisher (1988). Revelatory Positivism?: Barth's Earliest Theology and the Marburg School. Oxford University Press.
    Filling a gap in scholarship on 19th- and 20th-century religious thought, this book discusses the philosophy and theology of the influential Marburg School in Germany before 1914, focusing on the writings of Hermann Cohen, its leader, and on the Ritschlian theologian Wilhelm Herrmann, Karl Barth's teacher. In addition, Fisher examines Barth's earliest writings and clarifies the little-known liberal phase of Barth's theology.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  17.  26
    Robert A. Skipper (2002). The Persistence of the R.A. Fisher-Sewall Wright Controversy. Biology and Philosophy 17 (3):341-367.
    This paper considers recent heated debates led by Jerry A. Coyne andMichael J. Wade on issues stemming from the 1929–1962 R.A. Fisher-Sewall Wrightcontroversy in population genetics. William B. Provine once remarked that theFisher-Wright controversy is central, fundamental, and very influential.Indeed,it is also persistent. The argumentative structure of therecent (1997–2000) debates is analyzed with the aim of eliminating a logicalconflict in them, viz., that the two sides in the debates havedifferent aims and that, as such, they are talking past each (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   16 citations  
  18.  33
    James Tabery (2008). R. A. Fisher, Lancelot Hogben, and the Origin(s) of Genotype-Environment Interaction. Journal of the History of Biology 41 (4):717 - 761.
    This essay examines the origin(s) of genotype-environment interaction, or G×E. "Origin(s)" and not "the origin" because the thesis is that there were actually two distinct concepts of G×E at this beginning: a biometric concept, or \[G \times E_B\] , and a developmental concept, or \[G \times E_D \] . R. A. Fisher, one of the founders of population genetics and the creator of the statistical analysis of variance, introduced the biometric concept as he attempted to resolve one of the (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   8 citations  
  19.  17
    Hayley Clatterbuck (2015). Drift Beyond Wright–Fisher. Synthese 192 (11):3487-3507.
    Several recent arguments by philosophers of biology have challenged the traditional view that evolutionary factors, such as drift and selection, are genuine causes of evolutionary outcomes. In the case of drift, advocates of the statistical theory argue that drift is merely the sampling error inherent in the other stochastic processes of evolution and thus denotes a mathematical, rather than causal, feature of populations. This debate has largely centered around one particular model of drift, the Wright–Fisher model, and this has (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  20.  96
    Shunlong Luo (2002). Maximum Shannon Entropy, Minimum Fisher Information, and an Elementary Game. Foundations of Physics 32 (11):1757-1772.
    We formulate an elementary statistical game which captures the essence of some fundamental quantum experiments such as photon polarization and spin measurement. We explore and compare the significance of the principle of maximum Shannon entropy and the principle of minimum Fisher information in solving such a game. The solution based on the principle of minimum Fisher information coincides with the solution based on an invariance principle, and provides an informational explanation of Malus' law for (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  21.  20
    Anya Plutynski (2006). What Was Fisher's Fundamental Theorem of Natural Selection and What Was It For? Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C 37 (1):59-82.
    Fisher’s ‘fundamental theorem of natural selection’ is notoriously abstract, and, no less notoriously, many take it to be false. In this paper, I explicate the theorem, examine the role that it played in Fisher’s general project for biology, and analyze why it was so very fundamental for Fisher. I defend Ewens (1989) and Lessard (1997) in the view that the theorem is in fact a true theorem if, as Fisher claimed, ‘the terms employed’ are ‘used strictly (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   5 citations  
  22.  11
    Paul Brazier (2014). C. S. Lewis: The Question of Multiple Incarnations. Heythrop Journal 55 (3):391-408.
    Formulated by Aquinas, commented on by post-Copernican philosophers and theologians, analysed in depth by C.S. Lewis, and deliberated by some contemporary writers, the question of multiple incarnations either within humanity or amongst extra-terrestrial sentient species is all too intermittently examined: ‘Can the Christ be incarnated more than once in our reality, or somewhere else in the universe, or another reality?’ In this paper, we examine the debate and the conclusions: that is, Lewis’s position within his philosophical theology and his analogical (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  23.  48
    Gary Bartlett (2014). Internalism and the Snapshot Conception of Phenomenal Experience: A Reply to Fisher. Philosophical Psychology 27 (5):652-664.
    Justin Fisher (2007) has presented a novel argument designed to prove that all forms of mental internalism are false. I aim to show that the argument fails with regard to internalism about phenomenal experiences. The argument tacitly assumes a certain view about the ontology of phenomenal experience, which (inspired by Alva Noe) I call the “snapshot conception of phenomenal experience.” After clarifying what the snapshot conception involves, I present Fisher with a dilemma. If he rejects the snapshot conception, (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  24.  3
    Timothy Pawl (2016). Brian Hebblethwaite's Arguments Against Multiple Incarnations. Religious Studies 52 (1):117-130.
    In this article I present two arguments from Brian Hebblethwaite for the conclusion that multiple incarnations are impossible, as well as the analyses of those arguments provided by three other thinkers: Oliver Crisp, Peter Kevern, and Robin Le Poidevin. I argue that both of Hebblethwaite's arguments are unsound.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  25.  10
    Nancy S. Hall (2007). R. A. Fisher and His Advocacy of Randomization. Journal of the History of Biology 40 (2):295 - 325.
    The requirement of randomization in experimental design was first stated by R. A. Fisher, statistician and geneticist, in 1925 in his book Statistical Methods for Research Workers. Earlier designs were systematic and involved the judgment of the experimenter; this led to possible bias and inaccurate interpretation of the data. Fisher's dictum was that randomization eliminates bias and permits a valid test of significance. Randomization in experimenting had been used by Charles Sanders Peirce in 1885 but the practice was (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  26.  22
    Xavier Donato Rodríguez & Alfonso Arroyo Santos (2012). The Structure of Idealization in Biological Theories: The Case of the Wright-Fisher Model. [REVIEW] Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 43 (1):11-27.
    In this paper we present a new framework of idealization in biology. We characterize idealizations as a network of counterfactual and hypothetical conditionals that can exhibit different “degrees of contingency”. We use this idea to say that, in departing more or less from the actual world, idealizations can serve numerous epistemic, methodological or heuristic purposes within scientific research. We defend that, in part, this structure explains why idealizations, despite being deformations of reality, are so successful in scientific practice. For illustrative (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  27.  2
    Xavier De Donato-Rodríguez & Alfonso Arroyo-Santos (2012). The Structure of Idealization in Biological Theories: The Case of the Wright-Fisher Model. Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 43 (1):11-27.
    In this paper we present a new framework of idealization in biology. We characterize idealizations as a network of counterfactual and hypothetical conditionals that can exhibit different “degrees of contingency”. We use this idea to say that, in departing more or less from the actual world, idealizations can serve numerous epistemic, methodological or heuristic purposes within scientific research. We defend that, in part, this structure explains why idealizations, despite being deformations of reality, are so successful in scientific practice. For illustrative (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  28.  8
    Xavier de Donato Rodríguez & Alfonso Arroyo Santos (2012). The Structure of Idealization in Biological Theories: The Case of the Wright-Fisher Model. [REVIEW] Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 43 (1):11 - 27.
    In this paper we present a new framework of idealization in biology. We characterize idealizations as a network of counterfactual and hypothetical conditionals that can exhibit different "degrees of contingency". We use this idea to say that, in departing more or less from the actual world, idealizations can serve numerous epistemic, methodological or heuristic purposes within scientific research. We defend that, in part, this structure explains why idealizations, despite being deformations of reality, are so successful in scientific practice. For illustrative (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  29.  1
    Eyal Heifetz & Eliahu Cohen (2015). Toward a Thermo-Hydrodynamic Like Description of Schrödinger Equation Via the Madelung Formulation and Fisher Information. Foundations of Physics 45 (11):1514-1525.
    We revisit the analogy suggested by Madelung between a non-relativistic time-dependent quantum particle, to a fluid system which is pseudo-barotropic, irrotational and inviscid. We first discuss the hydrodynamical properties of the Madelung description in general, and extract a pressure like term from the Bohm potential. We show that the existence of a pressure gradient force in the fluid description, does not violate Ehrenfest’s theorem since its expectation value is zero. We also point out that incompressibility of the fluid implies conservation (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  30.  3
    George Bowles (1993). Professor Fisher on Suppositions. Argumentation 7 (3):237-246.
    I first support Alec Fisher's thesis that premises and conclusions in arguments can be unasserted first by arguing in its favor that only it preserves our intuition that it is at least possible that two arguments share the same premises and the same conclusion although not everything that is asserted in the one is also asserted in the other and second by answering two objections that might be raised against it. I then draw from Professor Fisher's thesis the (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  31.  1
    Joachim Schulte & Göran Sundholm (eds.) (1992). Criss-Crossing a Philosophical Landscape: Essays on Wittgensteinian Themes. Dedicated to Brian Mcguinness. Rodopi.
    Essays on Wittgensteinian Themes Dedicated to Brian McGuinness Joachim Schulte, Göran Sundholm. PREFACE For thirty-five years the international community of philosophers have known Brian McGuinness as a major authority on the ...
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  32. Plutynski Anya (2005). Parsimony and the Fisher–Wright Debate. Biology and Philosophy 20 (4):697-713.
    In the past five years, there have been a series of papers in the journal Evolution debating the relative significance of two theories of evolution, a neo-Fisherian and a neo-Wrightian theory, where the neo-Fisherians make explicit appeal to parsimony. My aim in this paper is to determine how we can make sense of such an appeal. One interpretation of parsimony takes it that a theory that contains fewer entities or processes, (however we demarcate these) is more parsimonious. On the account (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  33. Teddy Seidenfeld (1979). Philosophical Problems of Statistical Inference Learning From R. A. Fisher. Monograph Collection (Matt - Pseudo).
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  34. Richard Hall & François van Ortroy (1893). Vie du Bienheureux Martyr Jean Fisher, Cardinal, Évêque de Rochester, Texte Angl. [Of R. Hall] Et Tr. Lat. Du Xvie Siècle, Publ. Et Annotés Par Fr. Van Ortroy. [REVIEW]
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  35. Teddy Seidenfeld (1979). Philosophical Problems of Statistical Inference Learning From R. A. Fisher /Teddy Seidenfeld. --. --. D. Reidel Pub. Co., C1979.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  36.  25
    Margaret Morrison (2002). Modelling Populations: Pearson and Fisher on Mendelism and Biometry. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 53 (1):39-68.
    The debate between the Mendelians and the (largely Darwinian) biometricians has been referred to by R. A. Fisher as ‘one of the most needless controversies in the history of science’ and by David Hull as ‘an explicable embarrassment’. The literature on this topic consists mainly of explaining why the controversy occurred and what factors prevented it from being resolved. Regrettably, little or no mention is made of the issues that figured in its resolution. This paper deals with the latter (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   14 citations  
  37.  22
    Samir Okasha (2008). Fisher's Fundamental Theorem of Natural Selection—a Philosophical Analysis. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 59 (3):319-351.
    This paper provides a philosophical analysis of the ongoing controversy surrounding R.A. Fisher's famous ‘fundamental theorem’ of natural selection. The difference between the ‘traditional’ and ‘modern’ interpretations of the theorem is explained. I argue that proponents of the modern interpretation have captured Fisher's intended meaning correctly and shown that the theorem is mathematically correct, pace the traditional consensus. However, whether the theorem has any real biological significance remains an unresolved issue. I argue that the answer depends on whether (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   6 citations  
  38.  53
    B. Roy Frieden (1999). F-Information, a Unitless Variant of Fisher Information. Foundations of Physics 29 (10):1521-1541.
    A new information matrix [F] with elements F mn = 〈 (y m - a m )(y n - a n) (∂ ln p(y | a)/∂a m ) (∂ ln p(y | a)/∂a n ) 〉 is analyzed. The PDF p(y | a) is the usual likelihood law. [F] differs from the Fisher information matrix by the presence of the first two factors in the given expectation. These factors make F mn unitless, in contrast with the Fisher information. (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  39.  32
    Margaret Morrison (2006). Unification, Explanation and Explaining Unity: The Fisher–Wright Controversy. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 57 (1):233-245.
    I argued that the frameworks and mechanisms that produce unification do not enable us to explain why the unified phenomena behave as they do. That is, we need to look beyond the unifying process for an explanation of these phenomena. Anya Plutynski ([2005]) has called into question my claim about the relationship between unification and explanation as well as my characterization of it in the context of the early synthesis of Mendelism with Darwinian natural selection. In this paper I argue (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  40.  1
    Brian Leftow (2010). Two Trinities: Reply to Hasker: Brian Leftow. Religious Studies 46 (4):441-447.
    William Hasker replies to my arguments against Social Trinitarianism, offers some criticism of my own view, and begins a sketch of another account of the Trinity. I reply with some defence of my own theory and some questions about his.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  41. Keith M. Dowding, Robert E. Goodin, Carole Pateman & Brian Barry (eds.) (2004). Justice and Democracy: Essays for Brian Barry. Cambridge University Press.
    While much has been written about social justice, even more has been written about democracy. Rarely is the relationship between social justice and democracy carefully considered. Does justice require democracy? Will democracy bring justice? This volume brings together leading authors who consider the relationship of democracy and justice. The intrinsic justness of democracy is challenged and the relationship between justice, democracy and the common good examined.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  42.  17
    Samir Okasha (2007). Cultural Inheritance and Fisher's “Fundamental Theorem” of Natural Selection. Biological Theory 2 (3):290-299.
    The idea that natural selection can operate on cultural as well as genetic variation is central to recent theories of cultural evolution. This raises an overarching question: how much of traditional evolutionary theory, which was formulated in population-genetic terms, can survive intact once the possibility of cultural inheritance is taken into account? This question is addressed in relation to R. A. Fisher’s “fundamental theorem” of natural selection. Though Fisher’s theorem may appear to be an essentially genetic result, a (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  43.  4
    B. Norton (1975). Metaphysics and Population Genetics: Karl Pearson and the Background to Fisher's Multi-Factorial Theory of Inheritance. Annals of Science 32 (6):537-553.
    This paper traces the background to R. A. Fisher's multi-factorial theory of inheritance. It is argued that the traditional account is incomplete, and that Karl Pearson's well-known pre-Fisherian objections to the theory were in fact overcome by Pearson himself. It is further argued that Pearson's stated reasons for not accepting his own achievement has to be seen as a rationalization, standing in for deeper-seated metaphysical objections to the Mendelian paradigm of a type not readily discussed in a formal scientific (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   8 citations  
  44.  31
    Michael Devitt (1980). Brian Loar on Singular Terms. Philosophical Studies 37 (3):271 - 280.
    In "the semantics of singular terms," brian loar described and criticized a "causal" theory of reference and offered a new "description" theory. It is argued that the particular causal theory described is not to be found in the papers by donnellan and kripke cited as evidence for it, And is a straw man. Further "prima facie", Loar's new description theory fails to meet kripke's noncircularity condition. Should loar attempt to meet it, His theory is likely to run foul of (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   5 citations  
  45.  65
    Martin Barrett, Ellery Eells, Branden Fitelson & Elliott Sober (1999). Review: Models and Reality-A Review of Brian Skyrms's Evolution of the Social Contract. [REVIEW] Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 59 (1):237 - 241.
    Human beings are peculiar. In laboratory experiments, they often cooperate in one-shot prisoners’ dilemmas, they frequently offer 1/2 and reject low offers in the ultimatum game, and they often bid 1/2 in the game of divide-the-cake All these behaviors are puzzling from the point of view of game theory. The first two are irrational, if utility is measured in a certain way.1 The last isn’t positively irrational, but it is no more rational than other possible actions, since there are infinitely (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  46.  40
    Johannes Lenhard (2006). Models and Statistical Inference: The Controversy Between Fisher and Neyman–Pearson. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 57 (1):69-91.
    The main thesis of the paper is that in the case of modern statistics, the differences between the various concepts of models were the key to its formative controversies. The mathematical theory of statistical inference was mainly developed by Ronald A. Fisher, Jerzy Neyman, and Egon S. Pearson. Fisher on the one side and Neyman–Pearson on the other were involved often in a polemic controversy. The common view is that Neyman and Pearson made Fisher's account more stringent (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  47.  32
    Carl G. Wagner (1991). Simpson's Paradox and the Fisher-Newcomb Problem. Grazer Philosophische Studien 40:185-194.
    It is shown that the Fisher smoking problem and Newcomb's problem are decisiontheoretically identical, each having at its core an identical case of Simpson's paradox for certain probabilities. From this perspective, incorrect solutions to these problems arise from treating them as cases of decisionmaking under risk, while adopting certain global empirical conditional probabilities as the relevant subjective probabihties. The most natural correct solutions employ the methodology of decisionmaking under uncertainty with lottery acts, with certain local empirical conditional probabilities adopted (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  48.  8
    Brian Massumi (2009). Technical Mentality” Revisited: Brian Massumi on Gilbert Simondon. Parrhesia 7:36-45.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  49.  11
    James Moore (2007). R. A. Fisher: A Faith Fit for Eugenics. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C 38 (1):110-135.
    In discussions of ‘religion-and-science’, faith is usually emphasized more than works, scientists’ beliefs more than their deeds. By reversing the priority, a lingering puzzle in the life of Ronald Aylmer Fisher , statistician, eugenicist and founder of the neo-Darwinian synthesis, can be solved. Scholars have struggled to find coherence in Fisher’s simultaneous commitment to Darwinism, Anglican Christianity and eugenics. The problem is addressed by asking what practical mode of faith or faithful mode of practice lent unity to his (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  50. Daniel Breslau (2003). Economics Invents the Economy: Mathematics, Statistics, and Models in the Work of Irving Fisher and Wesley Mitchell. [REVIEW] Theory and Society 32 (3):379-411.
    The “embeddedness” of economic life in social relations has become a productive analytical principle and the basis of a penetrating critique of economic orthodoxy. But this critique raises another important, social and historical question, of how the economy became “disembedded” in the first place – how the multitude of transactions designated (somewhat arbitrarily) as economic were abstracted from the rest of social life and reconstituted as an object, the economy, which behaves according to its own logic. This article investigates the (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
1 — 50 / 1000