Search results for 'Brian Grinder' (try it on Scholar)

1000+ found
Order:
  1.  11
    Sandra L. Christensen & Brian Grinder (2001). Justice and Financial Market Allocation of the Social Costs of Business. Journal of Business Ethics 29 (1-2):105-112.
    Regulation is often applied to business behavior to ensure that the social costs of doing business are included in the cost and pricing structures of the firm. Because the consumer benefits from the transaction that generated the social costs, asking the consumer to bear the burden imposed by the transaction is fair. However, there may be a lack of Justice m the internal and external distribution of the social costs of doing business if consumers are the only party bearing that (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  2.  17
    F. A. Y. Brian (1978). Practical Reasoning, Rationality and the Explanation of Intentional Action. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 8 (1):77–101.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  3.  6
    L. E. E. Brian (1969). Book Reviews. [REVIEW] British Journal of Aesthetics 9 (2).
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  4.  5
    Timothy Pawl (2016). Brian Hebblethwaite's Arguments Against Multiple Incarnations. Religious Studies 52 (1):117-130.
    In this article I present two arguments from Brian Hebblethwaite for the conclusion that multiple incarnations are impossible, as well as the analyses of those arguments provided by three other thinkers: Oliver Crisp, Peter Kevern, and Robin Le Poidevin. I argue that both of Hebblethwaite's arguments are unsound.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  5.  2
    Joachim Schulte & Göran Sundholm (eds.) (1992). Criss-Crossing a Philosophical Landscape: Essays on Wittgensteinian Themes. Dedicated to Brian Mcguinness. Rodopi.
    Essays on Wittgensteinian Themes Dedicated to Brian McGuinness Joachim Schulte, Göran Sundholm. PREFACE For thirty-five years the international community of philosophers have known Brian McGuinness as a major authority on the ...
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  6.  2
    Brian Leftow (2010). Two Trinities: Reply to Hasker: Brian Leftow. Religious Studies 46 (4):441-447.
    William Hasker replies to my arguments against Social Trinitarianism, offers some criticism of my own view, and begins a sketch of another account of the Trinity. I reply with some defence of my own theory and some questions about his.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  7. Keith M. Dowding, Robert E. Goodin, Carole Pateman & Brian Barry (eds.) (2004). Justice and Democracy: Essays for Brian Barry. Cambridge University Press.
    While much has been written about social justice, even more has been written about democracy. Rarely is the relationship between social justice and democracy carefully considered. Does justice require democracy? Will democracy bring justice? This volume brings together leading authors who consider the relationship of democracy and justice. The intrinsic justness of democracy is challenged and the relationship between justice, democracy and the common good examined.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  8.  2
    Brian Onishi (2015). Review of Forrest Clingerman, Brian Treanor, Martin Drenthen and David Utsler , Interpreting Nature: The Emerging Field of Environmental Hermeneutics. [REVIEW] Environmental Values 24 (5):695-697.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  9.  79
    Martin Barrett, Ellery Eells, Branden Fitelson & Elliott Sober (1999). Review: Models and Reality-A Review of Brian Skyrms's Evolution of the Social Contract. [REVIEW] Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 59 (1):237 - 241.
    Human beings are peculiar. In laboratory experiments, they often cooperate in one-shot prisoners’ dilemmas, they frequently offer 1/2 and reject low offers in the ultimatum game, and they often bid 1/2 in the game of divide-the-cake All these behaviors are puzzling from the point of view of game theory. The first two are irrational, if utility is measured in a certain way.1 The last isn’t positively irrational, but it is no more rational than other possible actions, since there are infinitely (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  10.  34
    Michael Devitt (1980). Brian Loar on Singular Terms. Philosophical Studies 37 (3):271 - 280.
    In "the semantics of singular terms," brian loar described and criticized a "causal" theory of reference and offered a new "description" theory. It is argued that the particular causal theory described is not to be found in the papers by donnellan and kripke cited as evidence for it, And is a straw man. Further "prima facie", Loar's new description theory fails to meet kripke's noncircularity condition. Should loar attempt to meet it, His theory is likely to run foul of (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   5 citations  
  11.  14
    Brian Massumi (2009). Technical Mentality” Revisited: Brian Massumi on Gilbert Simondon. Parrhesia 7:36-45.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  12.  21
    Karol Polcyn (2007). Brian Loar on Physicalism and Phenomenal Concepts. Diametros 11:10-39.
    Brian Loar argues that we can account for the conceptual independence of coextensive terms purely psychologically, by appealing to conceptual rather than semantic differences between concepts, and that this leaves room for assuming that phenomenal and physical concepts can be coextensive on a posteriori grounds despite the fact that both sorts of concepts refer directly . I argue that Loar does not remove the mystery of the coextensiveness of those concepts because he does not offer any explanation of why (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  13.  12
    Alan R. Madry & Joel F. Richeimer (1998). The Possibility of Normative Jurisprudence: A Response to Brian Leiter. Legal Theory 4 (2):207-239.
    In a recent article Brian Leiter concluded that a useful normative theory of adjudication is impossible. A normative theory of adjudication would be a theory that, among other things, identified the moral and political norms that judges ought to follow in determining the law for any particular legal dispute. Letter's elegant and subtle argument, stripped to its bones, runs as follows: Philosophers of law regard a correct normative theory of adjudication as being dependent upon an antecedent descriptive theory. The (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  14.  38
    Adam Morton (2006). The Future for Philosophy - Edited by Brian Leiter. [REVIEW] Philosophical Books 47 (4):366-368.
    review of Brian Leiter's collection *The Future for Philosophy*.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  15.  38
    Brian Davies (2006). Review of Thomas Aquinas, Brian Shanley, The Treatise on the Divine Nature, Summa Theologiae I, 1-13. [REVIEW] Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2006 (6).
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  16.  10
    Brian Bany (1999). An Interview With Professor Brian Barry. Cogito 13 (2):77-85.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  17.  9
    Brian Gregor (2011). Niels Jørgen Cappelørn, Alastair Hannay, David Kangas, Bruce H. Kirmmse, George Pattison, Vanessa Rumble, and K. Brian Söderquist, Eds. , Kierkegaard's Journals and Notebooks Volume 3: Notebooks 1-15 . Reviewed By. [REVIEW] Philosophy in Review 31 (2):107-110.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  18.  30
    Brian Boyd (2007). Brian Boyd Responds:. Philosophy and Literature 31 (1):196-199.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  19.  25
    Alex Callinicos (2006). Confronting a World Without Justice: Brian Barry's Why Social Justice Matters. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 9 (3):461-472.
    (2006). Confronting a World without Justice: Brian Barry’s Why Social Justice Matters. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy: Vol. 9, No. 3, pp. 461-472.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  20.  8
    Geoff Hunt, The Patrick O'Brian Novels.
    Patrick O'Brian, the Aubrey-Maturin Series of twenty novels (Norton, 1970-1999). My appreciation written for WIRED magazine: "I re-read this extraordinary series of novels because of the depth of portrayal of the major and minor characters, but also because they teach me so much about what science and technology were like two centuries ago. O'Brian shows you the world-that-was through the eyes of a Tory naval captain (Jack Aubrey), at sea since the age of 12, working his way up (...)
    No categories
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  21.  22
    Michael Bacon (2003). Liberal Universalism: On Brian Barry and Richard Rorty. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 6 (2):41-62.
    At first sight it would seem difficult to find two philosophers as different as Brian Barry and Richard Rorty. It is widely held that the former is one of the most forceful proponents of liberal universalism, whereas the latter is typically viewed as the quintessential relativist. In this essay, different usages of the term univeralism are considered, and it is argued that Rorty's position is much closer to that of Barry than is generally supposed. Indeed, the article concludes by (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  22.  29
    Rainer Kattel (forthcoming). Brian Leiter and Neil Sinhababu (Eds), Nietzsche and Morality. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice.
    Brian Leiter and Neil Sinhababu (eds), Nietzsche and Morality Content Type Journal Article DOI 10.1007/s10677-008-9134-6 Authors Rainer Kattel, Tallinn University of Technology Ehitajate tee 5 19086 Tallinn Estonia Journal Ethical Theory and Moral Practice Online ISSN 1572-8447 Print ISSN 1386-2820.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  23.  28
    Stevan Harnad, First Person Singular: Review Of: Brian Rotman: Becoming Beside Ourselves: Alphabet, Ghosts, Distributed Human Beings. [REVIEW]
    Brian Rotman argues that (one) “mind” and (one) “god” are only conceivable, literally, because of (alphabetic) literacy, which allowed us to designate each of these ghosts as an incorporeal, speaker-independent “I” (or, in the case of infinity, a notional agent that goes on counting forever). I argue that to have a mind is to have the capacity to feel. No one can be sure which organisms feel, hence have minds, but it seems likely that one-celled organisms and plants do (...)
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  24.  7
    Steve On (2006). Brian Barry and the Headscarf Case in France. Contemporary Political Theory 5 (2):176.
    Brian Barry's Culture and Equality is probably the most powerful liberal egalitarian critique of multiculturalism addressing the pathologies of recognizing difference of ethnicity, religion, race, and culture. In this essay, I examine Barry's approach to the law, which underpins his theory of egalitarianism to determine whether it is enough — as Barry thinks it is — to insist on either applying the same law for everyone so that exemptions are foreclosed in general, or repealing the law since the case (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  25.  21
    Joseph M. Rivera (2010). The Call and the Gifted in Christological Perspective: A Consideration of Brian Robinette's Critique of Jean-Luc Marion. Heythrop Journal 51 (6):1053-1060.
    In his recent article, ‘A Gift to Theology? Jean-Luc Marion's ‘Saturated Phenomena’ in Christological Perspective’, Brian Robinette has critiqued Marion's phenomenology for confining theology to a one-sided approach to Christology, one that stresses only the passive, mystical reception of Christ. To correct this imbalance, Robinette brings Marion into dialogue with those more active Christologies or ‘prophetical-ethical’ liberation theologies of Gustavo Gutierrez, Johann Baptist Metz and others that stress a life-praxis focused on confronting evil and suffering. In this essay (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  26.  1
    Brian L. Hebblethwaite (1978). Providence and Divine Action: BRIAN L.HEBBLETHWAITE. Religious Studies 14 (2):223-236.
    In the preface to his book God the Problem , Gordon Kaufman writes ‘Although the notion of God as agent seems presupposed by most contemporary theologians … Austin Farrer has been almost alone in trying to specify carefully and consistently just what this might be understood to mean.’.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  27.  5
    Brian Teare (2013). Brian Teare, From The Empty Form Goes All the Way to Heaven. Journal of Medical Humanities 34 (2):277-281.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  28.  1
    Brian Gregor (2015). Kierkegaard’s Journals and Notebooks, Vol. 6: Journals NB11–NB14. Edited by Niels Jørgen Cappelørn, Alastair Hannay, David Kangas, Bruce H. Kirmmse, George Pattison, Joel D.S. Rasmussen, Vanessa Rumble, and K. Brian Söderquist. [REVIEW] International Philosophical Quarterly 55 (2):254-256.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  29.  4
    Brian Merrilees (1992). David L. Jeffrey and Brian J. Levy, Eds. And Trans., The Anglo-Norman Lyric: An Anthology.(Studies and Texts, 93.) Toronto: Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies, 1990. Paper. Pp. Xiii, 285. $31.50. [REVIEW] Speculum 67 (2):431-433.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  30.  14
    Brian Davies (2006). Review of Brian Hebblethwaite, Philosophical Theology and Christian Doctrine. [REVIEW] Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2006 (1).
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  31.  11
    G. Crowder (2008). Berlin, Value Pluralism and the Common Good: A Reply to Brian Trainor. Philosophy and Social Criticism 34 (8):925-939.
    Brian Trainor argues that the current hostility of political theorists towards the idea of the common good is in part due to the influence of Isaiah Berlin's concept of `value pluralism', or the incommensurability of basic human values. I agree with Trainor's opposition to the `agonistic' interpretation of pluralism, associated with thinkers like Chantal Mouffe. However, it is not the case that the only alternative to the pluralism— agonism thesis is the monist defence of a thick common good advocated (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  32.  11
    Eyal Benvenisti (2009). Comment on Brian Langille: "What is International Labor Law For?". Law and Ethics of Human Rights 3 (1):83-86.
    This comment on Brian Langille's article agrees with Langille's claim that inter-state competition should not be viewed as the main challenge to the global efforts to regulate labor rights. The comment suggests, however, that there is another type of competition that poses a challenge, namely a transnational competition which takes place among sub-state actors. Focusing on this "transnational conflict paradigm," the ILO has the tools to engage domestic constituencies in an effort to promote labor rights within the respective member (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  33.  2
    Brian J. Shanley (1995). Brian Davies, The Thought of Thomas Aquinas. First Paperback Ed. New York and Oxford: Clarendon Press, Oxford University Press, 1993. Paper. Pp. Xvi, 391. $19.95. First Published in 1992. [REVIEW] Speculum 70 (4):895-897.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  34.  2
    Brian Gregor (2012). Niels Jørgen Cappelørn , Alastair Hannay, David Kangas, Bruce H. Kirmmse, George Pattison, Joel D. S. Rasmussen, Vanessa Rumble, & K. Brian Söderquist, Eds., Kierkegaard's Journals and Notebooks Vol 5: Journals NB6—NB10 . Reviewed By. [REVIEW] Philosophy in Review 32 (6):485-488.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  35. William A. Dembski, Addicted to Caricatures: A Response to Brian Charlesworth.
    One prominent evolutionist I know confided in me that he sometimes spends only an hour perusing a book that he has to review. I doubt if Brian Charlesworth spent even that much time with my book No Free Lunch. Charlesworth is a bright guy and could have done better. But no doubt he is also a busy guy. To save time and effort, it's therefore easier to put these crazy intelligent design creationists in their place rather than actually engage (...)
    No categories
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  36.  1
    Brian Zamulinski (2010). Reconciling Reason and Religion: A Response to Peels: Brian Zamulinski. Religious Studies 46 (1):109-113.
    In ‘The ethics of belief and Christian faith as commitment to assumptions’, Rik Peels attacks the views that I advanced in ‘Christianity and the ethics of belief’. Here, I rebut his criticisms of the claim that it is wrong to believe without sufficient evidence, of the contention that Christians are committed to that claim, and of the notion of that faith is not belief but commitment to assumptions in the hope of salvation. My original conclusions still stand.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  37. Brian Davies (1983). Brian O'Shaughnessy: "The Will". [REVIEW] The Thomist 47 (1):161.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  38. Brian Fay (2013). Brian Fay on Philosophy and Temporality From Kant to Critical Theory. By Espen Hammer. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2011. Pp. Ix, 260. [REVIEW] History and Theory 52 (1):91-109.
    Espen Hammer’s exceptionally fine book explores modern temporality, its problems and prospects. Hammer claims that how people experience time is a cultural/historical phenomenon, and that there is a peculiarly modern way of experiencing time as a series of present moments each indefinitely leading to the next in an ordered way. Time as measured by the clock is the paradigmatic instance of this sense of time. In this perspective time is quantifiable and forward-looking, and the present is dominated by the future. (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  39. Alf Ross & Brian Loar (1968). Directives and Norms [Manuscript by Brian Loar]. Monograph Collection (Matt - Pseudo).
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  40. Bertrand Russell & Brian Carr (1975). Bertrand Russell an Introduction; Edited Selections From His Writings [by] Brian Carr. --. Allen and Unwin.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  41. David J. Chalcraft (1992). Reviews : Brian Stock, Listening for the Text: On the Uses of the Past. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1990. X + 197 Pp. Hardback. [REVIEW] History of the Human Sciences 5 (2):141-144.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  42.  94
    Vittorio Bufacchi (2008). Review Article: Why Political Philosophy Matters Reading Brian Barry on Social Justice. European Journal of Political Theory 7 (2):255-264.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  43.  11
    James Pearson, Review of the Book Disagreement by Brian Frances. [REVIEW]
    Review of the book Disagreement by Bryan Frances. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2014.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  44. D. E. Over (1983). Brian Loar, Mind and Meaning. Cambridge Studies in Philosophy. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1981. Xii + 268 Pp. Price- 22.00 (Hardback). [REVIEW] Journal of Semantics 2 (3-4):347-349.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  45.  41
    P. Godfrey-Smith (2012). Signals: Evolution, Learning, and Information, by Brian Skyrms. Mind 120 (480):1288-1297.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  46.  13
    Bruce Langtry (2015). Review of Brian Leftow, God and Necessity. [REVIEW] Sophia 54 (2):227-229.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  47. D. Attwood (1998). Just War and the Common Good: Ius Ad Bellum Principles in 20th Century Papal Thought, by Brian M. Kane. Catholic Scholars Press (London, Eurospan) 1996. 286 Pp. Hb.£ 55.95. ISBN 1-53709-109-X. Pb.£ 39.95. ISBN 1-57309-108-1. [REVIEW] Studies in Christian Ethics 11 (2):159-160.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  48.  72
    Anthony Ashbolt (1990). Reviews : Brian Head and James Walter (Eds), Intellectual Movements and Australian Society (Oxford University Press, 1988). Thesis Eleven 25 (1):162-165.
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  49. Patrick Mcgivern (2002). Brian Ellis, Scientific Essentialism. [REVIEW] Philosophy in Review 22 (4):269-271.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  50.  14
    Matteo Bonotti (forthcoming). Review Of: Brian Leiter, Why Tolerate Religion? [REVIEW] Ethical Theory and Moral Practice:1-3.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
1 — 50 / 1000