Search results for 'By Neil Tennant' (try it on Scholar)

1000+ found
Order:
  1.  4
    Neil Tennant (1983). Evolutionary V. Evolved Ethics: Neil Tennant. Philosophy 58 (225):289-302.
    Kant writes: If … the only aim of Nature regarding some creature possessed of reason and a will were its preservation, its well-being, in a word its happiness, then she would have come to a very bad arrangement in choosing its reason as executor of that aim. For all actions that it had to execute in this her intention, and the whole regulation of its behaviour would have been able to be prescribed to it much more precisely by instinct, and (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  2. Neil Tennant (2015). Introducing Philosophy: God, Mind, World, and Logic. Routledge.
    Written for any readers interested in better harnessing philosophy’s real value, this book covers a broad range of fundamental philosophical problems and certain intellectual techniques for addressing those problems. In Introducing Philosophy: God, Mind, World, and Logic , Neil Tennant helps any student in pursuit of a ‘big picture’ to think independently, question received dogma, and analyse problems incisively. It also connects philosophy to other areas of study at the university, enabling all students to employ the concepts and (...)
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  3.  52
    By Neil Tennant (2005). Rule-Circularity and the Justification of Deduction. Philosophical Quarterly 55 (221):625–648.
    I examine Paul Boghossian's recent attempt to argue for scepticism about logical rules. I argue that certain rule- and proof-theoretic considerations can avert such scepticism. Boghossian's 'Tonk Argument' seeks to justify the rule of tonk-introduction by using the rule itself. The argument is subjected here to more detailed proof-theoretic scrutiny than Boghossian undertook. Its sole axiom, the so-called Meaning Postulate for tonk, is shown to be false or devoid of content. It is also shown that the rules of Disquotation and (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  4.  13
    Neil Tennant (forthcoming). Normalizability, Cut Eliminability and Paradox. Synthese:1-20.
    This is a reply to the considerations advanced by Schroeder-Heister and Tranchini as prima facie problematic for the proof-theoretic criterion of paradoxicality, as originally presented in Tennant and subsequently amended in Tennant. Countering these considerations lends new importance to the parallelized forms of elimination rules in natural deduction.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  5.  89
    Neil Tennant (2002). Victor Vanquished. Analysis 62 (2):135–142.
    The naive anti-realist holds the following principle: (◊K) All truths are knowable. This unrestricted generalization (◊K), as is now well known, falls prey to Fitch’s Paradox (Fitch 1963: 38, Theorem 1). It can be used as the only suspect principle, alongside others that cannot be impugned, to prove quite generally, and constructively, that the set {p, ¬Kp} is inconsistent (Tennant 1997: 261). From this it would follow, intuitionistically, that any proposition that is never actually known to be true (by (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   12 citations  
  6.  50
    Neil Tennant (2010). Williamson's Woes. Synthese 173 (1):9-23.
    This is a reply to Timothy Williamson ’s paper ‘Tennant’s Troubles’. It defends against Williamson ’s objections the anti-realist’s knowability principle based on the author’s ‘local’ restriction strategy involving Cartesian propositions, set out in The Taming of the True. Williamson ’s purported Fitchian reductio, involving the unknown number of books on his table, is analyzed in detail and shown to be fallacious. Williamson ’s attempt to cause problems for the anti-realist by means of a supposed rigid designator generates a (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  7.  32
    Neil Tennant (1997). The Taming of the True. Oxford University Press.
    The Taming of the True poses a broad challenge to realist views of meaning and truth that have been prominent in recent philosophy. Neil Tennant argues compellingly that every truth is knowable, and that an effective logical system can be based on this principle. He lays the foundations for global semantic anti-realism and extends its consequences from the philosophy of mathematics and logic to the theory of meaning, metaphysics, and epistemology.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   65 citations  
  8. Neil Tennant (1997). The Taming of the True. Oxford University Press Uk.
    The Taming of the True poses a broad challenge to the realist views of meaning and truth that have been prominent in recent philosophy. Neil Tennant starts with a careful critical survey of the realism debate, guiding the reader through its complexities; he then presents a sustained defence of the anti-realist view that every truth is knowable in principle, and that grasp of meaning must be able to be made manifest. Sceptical arguments for the indeterminacy or non-factuality of (...)
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   11 citations  
  9. Neil Tennant (2002). The Taming of the True. Clarendon Press.
    The Taming of the True poses a broad challenge to realist views of meaning and truth that have been prominent in recent philosophy. Neil Tennant argues compellingly that every truth is knowable, and that an effective logical system can be based on this principle. He lays the foundations for global semantic anti-realism and extends its consequences from philosophy of mathematics and logic to the theory of meaning, metaphysics, and epistemology.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  10.  16
    Daniel Osherson, Note on an Observation by Neil Tennant.
    Neil Tennant (Tennant, 2005) has offered an important observation about the AGM theory of belief revision (G¨ardenfors, 1988). We attempt to restate and demonstrate his result in a slightly different way. Fix a formal language L that embeds sentential logic. Given K ⊆ L and ϕ ∈ L, K ⊥ ϕ denotes the class of maximally consistent subsets of K that do not imply ϕ. That is, A ∈ K ⊥ ϕ iff A ⊆ K, A |= (...)
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  11.  46
    Neil Tennant (2002). Deflationism and the Gödel Phenomena. Mind 111 (443):551-582.
    consistent and sufficiently strong system of first-order formal arithmetic fails to decide some independent Gödel sentence. We examine consistent first-order extensions of such systems. Our purpose is to discover what is minimally required by way of such extension in order to be able to prove the Gödel sentence in a non-trivial fashion. The extended methods of formal proof must capture the essentials of the so-called ‘semantical argument’ for the truth of the Gödel sentence. We are concerned to show that the (...)
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   18 citations  
  12.  18
    Neil Tennant (2014). Logic, Mathematics, and the A Priori, Part II: Core Logic as Analytic, and as the Basis for Natural Logicism. Philosophia Mathematica 22 (3):321-344.
    We examine the sense in which logic is a priori, and explain how mathematical theories can be dichotomized non-trivially into analytic and synthetic portions. We argue that Core Logic contains exactly the a-priori-because-analytically-valid deductive principles. We introduce the reader to Core Logic by explaining its relationship to other logical systems, and stating its rules of inference. Important metatheorems about Core Logic are reported, and its important features noted. Core Logic can serve as the basis for a foundational program that could (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  13. Neil Tennant (2009). Revamping the Restriction Strategy. In Joe Salerno (ed.), New Essays on the Knowability Paradox. Oxford University Press
    This study continues the anti-realist’s quest for a principled way to avoid Fitch’s paradox. It is proposed that the Cartesian restriction on the anti-realist’s knowability principle ‘ϕ, therefore 3Kϕ’ should be formulated as a consistency requirement not on the premise ϕ of an application of the rule, but rather on the set of assumptions on which the relevant occurrence of ϕ depends. It is stressed, by reference to illustrative proofs, how important it is to have proofs in normal form before (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   7 citations  
  14.  30
    Neil Tennant (2001). Is Every Truth Knowable? Reply to Williamson. Ratio 14 (3):263–280.
    This paper addresses an objection raised by Timothy Williamson to the ‘restriction strategy’ that I proposed, in The Taming of The True, in order to deal with the Fitch paradox. Williamson provides a new version of a Fitch-style argument that purports to show that even the restricted principle of knowability suffers the same fate as the unrestricted one. I show here that the new argument is fallacious. The source of the fallacy is a misunderstanding of the condition used in stating (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   10 citations  
  15.  66
    Neil Tennant (1997). On the Necessary Existence of Numbers. Noûs 31 (3):307-336.
    We examine the arguments on both sides of the recent debate (Hale and Wright v. Field) on the existence, and modal status, of the natural numbers. We formulate precisely, with proper attention to denotational commitments, the analytic conditionals that link talk of numbers with talk of numerosity and with counting. These provide conceptual controls on the concept of number. We argue, against Field, that there is a serious disanalogy between the existence of God and the existence of numbers. We give (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   7 citations  
  16.  64
    Neil Tennant (2010). Review of C. S. Jenkins, Grounding Concepts: An Empirical Basis for Arithmetical Knowledge. [REVIEW] Philosophia Mathematica 18 (3):360-367.
    This book is written so as to be ‘accessible to philosophers without a mathematical background’. The reviewer can assure the reader that this aim is achieved, even if only by focusing throughout on just one example of an arithmetical truth, namely ‘7+5=12’. This example’s familiarity will be reassuring; but its loneliness in this regard will not. Quantified propositions — even propositions of Goldbach type — are below the author’s radar.The author offers ‘a new kind of arithmetical epistemology’, one which ‘respects (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  17.  39
    Neil Tennant (2005). Rule-Circularity and the Justification of Deduction. Philosophical Quarterly 55 (221):625 - 648.
    I examine Paul Boghossian's recent attempt to argue for scepticism about logical rules. I argue that certain rule- and proof-theoretic considerations can avert such scepticism. Boghossian's 'Tonk Argument' seeks to justify the rule of tonk-introduction by using the rule itself. The argument is subjected here to more detailed proof-theoretic scrutiny than Boghossian undertook. Its sole axiom, the so-called Meaning Postulate for tonk, is shown to be false or devoid of content. It is also shown that the rules of Disquotation and (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  18.  12
    Neil Tennant (2006). On the Degeneracy of the Full AGM-Theory of Theory-Revision. Journal of Symbolic Logic 71 (2):661 - 676.
    A general method is provided whereby bizarre revisions of consistent theories with respect to contingent sentences that they refute can be delivered by revision-functions satisfying both the basic and the supplementary postulates of the AGM-theory of theory-revision.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  19.  35
    Neil Tennant (2014). Logic, Mathematics, and the A Priori, Part I: A Problem for Realism. Philosophia Mathematica 22 (3):308-320.
    This is Part I of a two-part study of the foundations of mathematics through the lenses of (i) apriority and analyticity, and (ii) the resources supplied by Core Logic. Here we explain what is meant by apriority, as the notion applies to knowledge and possibly also to truths in general. We distinguish grounds for knowledge from grounds of truth, in light of our recent work on truthmakers. We then examine the role of apriority in the realism/anti-realism debate. We raise a (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  20.  65
    Neil Tennant (2006). A Note on the Irrelevance of Probabilistic Irrelevance. Analysis 66 (289):32–35.
    In his book Bayes or Bust?, John Earman (1992: 63–65) seeks to set out the Bayesian reasoning that would vindicate the pre-theoretic intuition that a theory receives confirmation from having its observational predictions borne out by experience.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  21. Neil Tennant (2008). Carnap, Gödel, and the Analyticity of Arithmetic. Philosophia Mathematica 16 (1):100-112.
    Michael Friedman maintains that Carnap did not fully appreciate the impact of Gödel's first incompleteness theorem on the prospect for a purely syntactic definition of analyticity that would render arithmetic analytically true. This paper argues against this claim. It also challenges a common presumption on the part of defenders of Carnap, in their diagnosis of the force of Gödel's own critique of Carnap in his Gibbs Lecture. The author is grateful to Michael Friedman for valuable comments. Part of the research (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  22.  3
    Neil Tennant (2010). Game Theory and Conventiont. Nordic Journal of Philosophical Logic 6 (1):3-19.
    This paper rebuts criticisms by Hintikka of the author's account of game-theoretic semantics for classical logic. At issue are the role of the axiom of choice in proving the equivalence of the game-theoretic account with the standard truth-theoretic account; the alleged need for quantification over strategies when providing a game-theoretic semantics; and the role of Tarski's Convention T. As a result of the ideas marshalled in response to Hintikka, the author puts forward a new conjecture concerning the relationship among truth, (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  23.  19
    Neil Tennant (1984). Perfect Validity, Entailment and Paraconsistency. Studia Logica 43 (1-2):181 - 200.
    This paper treats entailment as a subrelation of classical consequence and deducibility. Working with a Gentzen set-sequent system, we define an entailment as a substitution instance of a valid sequent all of whose premisses and conclusions are necessary for its classical validity. We also define a sequent Proof as one in which there are no applications of cut or dilution. The main result is that the entailments are exactly the Provable sequents. There are several important corollaries. Every unsatisfiable set is (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   6 citations  
  24.  16
    Neil Tennant (2006). New Foundations for a Relational Theory of Theory-Revision. Journal of Philosophical Logic 35 (5):489 - 528.
    AGM-theory, named after its founders Carlos Alchourrón, Peter Gärdenfors and David Makinson, is the leading contemporary paradigm in the theory of belief-revision. The theory is reformulated here so as to deal with the central relational notions 'J is a contraction of K with respect to A' and 'J is a revision of K with respect to A'. The new theory is based on a principal-case analysis of the domains of definition of the three main kinds of theory-change (expansion, contraction and (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  25.  89
    Neil Tennant (2002). The Emperor's New Concepts. Noûs 36 (16):345-377.
    Christopher Peacocke, in A Study of Concepts, motivates his account of possession conditions for concepts by means of an alleged parallel with the conditions under which numbers are abstracted to give the numerosity of a predicate. There are, however, logical mistakes in Peacocke.
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  26.  74
    Neil Tennant (2008). Belief-Revision, the Ramsey Test, Monotonicity, and the so-Called Impossibility Results. Review of Symbolic Logic 1 (4):402-423.
    Peter G¨ ardenfors proved a theorem purporting to show that it is impossible to adjoin to the AGM -postulates for belief-revision a principle of monotonicity for revisions. The principle of monotonicity in question is implied by the Ramsey test for conditionals. So G¨.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  27.  20
    Neil Tennant (2014). The Logical Structure of Evolutionary Explanation and Prediction: Darwinism's Fundamental Schema. Biology and Philosophy 29 (5):611-655.
    We present a logically detailed case-study of Darwinian evolutionary explanation. Special features of Darwin’s explanatory schema made it an unusual theoretical breakthrough, from the point of view of the philosophy of science. The schema employs no theoretical terms, and puts forward no theoretical hypotheses. Instead, it uses three observational generalizations—Variability, Heritability and Differential Reproduction—along with an innocuous assumption of Causal Efficacy, to derive Adaptive Evolution as a necessary consequence. Adaptive Evolution in turn, with one assumption of scale (‘Deep Time’), implies (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  28.  18
    Benjamin Bewersdorf (2014). Changes of Mind: An Essay on Rational Belief Revision, by Neil Tennant. Mind 123 (489):246-251.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  29.  41
    Neil Tennant (1994). Intuitionistic Mathematics Does Not Needex Falso Quodlibet. Topoi 13 (2):127-133.
    We define a system IR of first-order intuitionistic relevant logic. We show that intuitionistic mathematics (on the assumption that it is consistent) can be relevantized, by virtue of the following metatheorem: any intuitionistic proof of A from a setX of premisses can be converted into a proof in IR of eitherA or absurdity from some subset ofX. Thus IR establishes the same inconsistencies and theorems as intuitionistic logic, and allows one to prove every intuitionistic consequence of any consistent set of (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  30.  33
    Neil Tennant (2008). Introduction. Philosophia Mathematica 16 (1):1-3.
    Christopher Peacocke, in A Study of Concepts, motivates his account of possession conditions for concepts by means of an alleged parallel with the conditions under which numbers are abshacted to give the numerosity of a predicate. There are, however, logical mistakes in Peacocke's treatment of numbers, which undermine his intended analogy. Nevertheless Peacocke's account of possession conditions for concepts is not rendered inadequate simply by virtue of being deprived of the intended analogy and the motivation it was supposed to afford. (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  31.  43
    Neil Tennant (2001). On Turing Machines Knowing Their Own Gödel-Sentences. Philosophia Mathematica 9 (1):72-79.
    Storrs McCall appeals to a particular true but improvable sentence of formal arithmetic to argue, by appeal to its irrefutability, that human minds transcend Turing machines. Metamathematical oversights in McCall's discussion of the Godel phenomena, however, render invalid his philosophical argument for this transcendentalist conclusion.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  32.  31
    W. D. Hart (2008). Book Review: The Taming of the True, by Neil Tennant. [REVIEW] Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 49 (4):447-451.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  33.  32
    Neil Tennant (2003). Frege's Content-Principle and Relevant Deducibility. Journal of Philosophical Logic 32 (3):245-258.
    Given the harmony principle for logical operators, compositionality ought to ensure that harmony should obtain at the level of whole contents. That is, the role of a content qua premise ought to be balanced exactly by its role as a conclusion. Frege's contextual definition of propositional content happens to exploit this balance, and one appeals to the Cut rule to show that the definition is adequate. We show here that Frege's definition remains adequate even when one relevantizes logic by abandoning (...)
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  34. Neil Tennant, §1. Exposition.
    Peacocke argues for a ‘generalized rationalism’, holding that ‘all entitlement has a fundamentally a priori component.’ (2) But his rationalism ‘differs from those of Frege and Gödel, just as theirs differ from that of Leibniz.’ He requires both substantive theories of intentional content and of understanding, and systematic formal theories of referential semantics and truth. We need an externalist theory of content: ‘Only mental states with externally individuated contents can make judgements about the external, mind-independent world rational.’ (123) Purely evidential (...)
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  35.  11
    Neil Tennant (1989). Truth Table Logic, with a Survey of Embeddability Results. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 30 (3):459-484.
    Kalrnaric. We set out a system T, consisting of normal proofs constructed by means of elegantly symmetrical introduction and elimination rules. In the system T there are two requirements, called ( ) and ()), on applications of discharge rules. T is sound and complete for Kalmaric arguments. ( ) requires nonvacuous discharge of assumptions; ()) requires that the assumption discharged be the sole one available of highest degree. We then consider a 'Duhemian' extension T*, obtained simply by dropping the requirement (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  36.  5
    Neil Tennant (1987). Conventional Necessity and the Contingency of Convention. Dialectica 41 (1‐2):79-95.
    SummaryI defend a conventionalist view of logical and mathematical truths against the criticisms of Quine and Stroud. Conventionalism is best formulated by appealing to sense‐conferring rules governing important logical and mathematical expressions. Conventional necessity can be understood as arising from these rules in a way that is immune to Quine's and Stroud's criticisms of the earlier formulation of conventionalism, in which stress was incorrectly laid on axiomatic systems of logic.RésuméJe soutiens, en dépit des critiques de Quine et de Stroud, une (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  37.  17
    Neil Tennant (2001). Game Theory and Conventiont. Nordic Journal of Philosophical Logic 6 (1):3-19.
    This paper rebuts criticisms by Hintikka of the author's account of game-theoretic semantics for classical logic. At issue are (i) the role of the axiom of choice in proving the equivalence of the game-theoretic account with the standard truth-theoretic account; (ii) the alleged need for quantification over strategies when providing a game-theoretic semantics; and (iii) the role of Tarski's Convention T. As a result of the ideas marshalled in response to Hintikka, the author puts forward a new conjecture concerning the (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  38.  1
    W. D. Hart (2008). Book Review: The Taming of the True, by Neil Tennant. [REVIEW] Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 49 (4):447-451.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  39. Alan Weir (1989). Neil Tennant, Anti-Realism, and Logic: Truth as Eternal Reviewed By. Philosophy in Review 9 (7):293-296.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  40.  5
    R. A. Neil (1893). Editions of the Herodas Papyrus Classical Texts From Papyri in the British Museum, Including the Newly Discovered Poems of Herodas, Edited by F. G. Kenyon, M.A. By Order of the Trustees of the British Museum. 1891. HPΩNΔOΓ MIMIAMBOI. Herondas, a First Recension, by William Gunion Rutherford, M.A., LL.D. London: Macmillan & Co. 1891. HPΩDelta;OΓ MIMIAMBOI. Herodas, Facsimile of Papyrus CXXXV. In the British Museum. By Order of the Trustees. 1892. Herondae Mimiambi. Edidit Franciscus Buecheler. Bonnae, 1892. Mk. 2.40. ——: Exemplum Iteratum. 1892. Untersuchungen Zu den Mimiumben des Herondas: Otto von Crusius. Leipzig, 1892. Mk. 6. Herondae Mimiambi. Edidit Otto Crusius. (Bibliotheca Teubneriana) Lipsiae, 1892. Mk. 2.40. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 7 (7):314-318.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  41.  1
    Matthew Tennant (2012). A Moral Climate: The Ethics of Global Warming. By Michael S. Northcott. Pp. 336, London, Darton, Longman and Todd, 2007, £14.95. [REVIEW] Heythrop Journal 53 (5):897-898.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  42.  5
    Matthew Tennant (2008). To Rwanda and Back: Liberation Spirituality and Reconciliation. By Mary Grey. Heythrop Journal 49 (3):526–527.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  43.  94
    Neil Tennant (1987). Anti-Realism and Logic: Truth as Eternal. Oxford University Press.
    Anti-realism is a doctrine about logic, language, and meaning that is based on the work of Wittgenstein and Frege. In this book, Professor Tennant clarifies and develops Dummett's arguments for anti-realism and ultimately advocates a radical reform of our logical practices.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   41 citations  
  44. Neil Tennant (1997). Changing the Theory of Theory Change: Reply to My Critics. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 48 (4):569-586.
    Changing the Theory of Theory Change: Towards a Computational Approach’ (Tennant [1994]; henceforth CTTC) claimed that the AGM postulate of recovery is false, and that AGM contractions of theories can be more than minimally mutilating. It also described an alternative, computational method for contracting theories, called the Staining Algorithm. Makinson [1995] and Hansson and Rott [1995] criticized CTTC's arguments against AGM-theory, and its specific proposals for an alternative, computational approach. This paper replies as comprehensively as space allows.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  45.  1
    Bronwen Neil (2012). Crisis and Wealth in Byzantine Italy: The Libri Pontificales of Rome and Ravenna. Byzantion 82:279-303.
    Using the Liber Pontificalis and Liber Pontificalis ecclesiae Ravennatis, the official records of the churches of Rome and Ravenna, the author surveys the evidence for episcopal involvement in the many crises that impinged on these two important cities and on Byzantine Italy generally in the fifth and sixth centuries. Six categories of crisis are investigated. By a comparison of the two sources Neil examines the defining differences between Roman and Ravennan approaches to crisis management in Byzantine Italy.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  46. F. R. Tennant (1932). Philosophy of the Sciences or, the Relations Between the Departments of Knowledge. Univ. Press.
    Originally published in 1932, this book presents the substance of the Tanner Lectures for 1931–2, which were delivered by the British philosopher and theologian F. R. Tennant at Cambridge University. This book will be of value to anyone with an interest in the philosophy of science and the relationships between academic disciplines.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  47. F. R. Tennant (2012). The Concept of Sin. Cambridge University Press.
    First published in 1912, this book by F. R. Tennant was intended to redress the vague and inconsistent conceptions of sin that were popularly held at the beginning of the twentieth century. Tennant maintained that for any ongoing debate to remain meaningful, it was imperative that definitions of key terms should keep pace with discussion. Therefore his study aimed at providing a clear, logical definition of what sin in Christian doctrine represented, whilst also bringing to bear the importance (...)
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  48. Charles Tennant (2014). Utilitarianism Explained and Exemplified in Moral and Political Government. Cambridge University Press.
    A founder in 1830 of the National Colonization Society, Charles Tennant advocated government support for emigration to Britain's colonies as a means of alleviating poverty at home and boosting the workforce overseas. Briefly representing St Albans in Parliament, he later wrote treatises on contemporary political and financial questions, notably arguing for the abolition of income tax in The People's Blue Book. Also published anonymously, the present work, which appeared in 1864, offers a critique of John Stuart Mill's Utilitarianism. (...) argues that happiness does not consist in utility, but rather in conformity to divine will as described by the Christian faith. Nevertheless, Tennant says, we ought to promote utility, as this is likely to be conducive to happiness. He then applies this view in detail to contemporary problems of government, domestic policy, taxation, colonies, dependencies, and foreign policy. (shrink)
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  49.  48
    Neil Tennant (2012). Cut for Core Logic. Review of Symbolic Logic 5 (3):450-479.
    The motivation for Core Logic is explained. Its system of proof is set out. It is then shown that, although the system has no Cut rule, its relation of deducibility obeys Cut with epistemic gain.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   6 citations  
  50.  93
    Neil Tennant (2005). Deflationism and the Gödel Phenomena: Reply to Ketland. Mind 114 (453):89-96.
    I am not a deflationist. I believe that truth and falsity are substantial. The truth of a proposition consists in its having a constructive proof, or truthmaker. The falsity of a proposition consists in its having a constructive disproof, or falsitymaker. Such proofs and disproofs will need to be given modulo acceptable premisses. The choice of these premisses will depend on the discourse in question.
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   10 citations  
1 — 50 / 1000