4 found
Order:
  1.  37
    D. Walton & C. A. Reed (2005). Argumentation Schemes and Enthymemes. Synthese 145 (3):339 - 370.
    The aim of this investigation is to explore the role of argumentation schemes in enthymeme reconstruction. This aim is pursued by studying selected cases of incomplete arguments in natural language discourse to see what the requirements are for filling in the unstated premises and conclusions in some systematic and useful way. Some of these cases are best handled using deductive tools, while others respond best to an analysis based on defeasible argumentations schemes. The approach is also shown to work reasonably (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   7 citations  
  2.  19
    J. Katzav & C. A. Reed (2004). On Argumentation Schemes and the Natural Classification of Arguments. Argumentation 18 (2):239-259.
    We develop conceptions of arguments and of argument types that will, by serving as the basis for developing a natural classification of arguments, benefit work in artificial intelligence. Focusing only on arguments construed as the semantic entities that are the outcome of processes of reasoning, we outline and clarify our view that an argument is a proposition that represents a fact as both conveying some other fact and as doing so wholly. Further, we outline our view that, with respect to (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  3. D. Walton & C. A. Reed (2005). Argumentation Schemes and Enthymemes. Synthese 145 (3):339-370.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  4. S. Wells & C. A. Reed (2012). A Domain Specific Language for Describing Diverse Systems of Dialogue. Journal of Applied Logic 10 (4):309-329.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography