Search results for 'C. E. Kendall' (try it on Scholar)

1000+ found
Order:
  1.  6
    G. H. E. (1888). Selected Letters of Pliny, with Notes for the Use of Schools by the Late C. E. Prichard, M.A. And E. R. Bernard, M.A. New Edition. 1887. Clarendon Press. 3s. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 2 (07):214-.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  2.  9
    M. P. C. (1962). Book Review:Toward a Reasonable Society. C. E. Ayres. [REVIEW] Ethics 73 (1):66-.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  3.  8
    D. B. C. (1919). Book Review:The Meaning of National Guilds. C. E. Bechhofer, M. B. Reckitt. [REVIEW] Ethics 29 (4):504-.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  4. C. P. E. & Schoolboy Morality (1888). Schoolboy Morality: An Address to Mothers [by E.C.P.].
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  5. William Jones & C. E. (1863). Letters From a Tutor to His Pupils [Ed. By E.C.].
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  6.  6
    C. C. (1922). Notes on the Text of Aeschylus. By E. S. Hoernle, I.C.S., Former Scholar of New College, Oxford. Crown 8vo. Pp. 100. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1921. 4s. 6d. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 36 (7-8):189-.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  7.  5
    D. S. E. (1894). Parallel Verse Extracts Parallel Verse Extracts for Translation Into English and Latin, with Special Prefaces on Idioms and Metres, by J. E. Nixon, M.A., and E. H. C. Smith, M.A. (Macmillan & Co.) 5s. 6d. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 8 (03):122-.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  8.  9
    C. E. Kendall (2000). A Double Dose of Double Effect. Journal of Medical Ethics 26 (3):204-205.
    This paper presents a clinically orientated illustration of the doctrine of double effect. The case of an elderly gentleman with advanced cancer is discussed, with particular emphasis on two dilemmas encountered during the terminal phase of his illness. The author describes how the doctrine of double effect was applied to help the team make some complex management decisions.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  9.  2
    A. M. Isen, K. A. Daubman & G. P. Nowicki (1988). Ingram, R. E., Kendall, PC, Smith, TW, Donnell, C., & Ionan, K. 11987). Cognition and Emotion 3:279-280.
  10.  8
    George Barmpalias & Andrew E. M. Lewis (2006). A C.E. Real That Cannot Be SW-Computed by Any Ω Number. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 47 (2):197-209.
    The strong weak truth table (sw) reducibility was suggested by Downey, Hirschfeldt, and LaForte as a measure of relative randomness, alternative to the Solovay reducibility. It also occurs naturally in proofs in classical computability theory as well as in the recent work of Soare, Nabutovsky, and Weinberger on applications of computability to differential geometry. We study the sw-degrees of c.e. reals and construct a c.e. real which has no random c.e. real (i.e., Ω number) sw-above it.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  11.  12
    M. Arslanov & S. B. Cooper (2004). There is No Low Maximal D.C.E. Degree - Corrigendum. Mathematical Logic Quarterly 50 (6):628.
    We give a corrected proof of an extension of the Robinson Splitting Theorem for the d. c. e. degrees.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  12.  10
    M. Arslanov, S. B. Cooper & A. Li (2000). There is No Low Maximal D.C.E. Degree. Mathematical Logic Quarterly 46 (3):409-416.
    We show that for any computably enumerable set A and any equation image set L, if L is low and equation image, then there is a c.e. splitting equation image such that equation image. In Particular, if L is low and n-c.e., then equation image is n-c.e. and hence there is no low maximal n-c.e. degree.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  13.  5
    Q. Lei, L. Hong & D. Decheng (2000). A Splitting with Infimum in the D-C. E. Degrees. Mathematical Logic Quarterly 46 (1):53-76.
    In this paper we prove that any c. e. degree is splittable with an c. e. infimum over any lesser c. e. degree in the class of d-c. e. degrees.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  14.  19
    Serikzhan A. Badaev & Steffen Lempp (2009). A Decomposition of the Rogers Semilattice of a Family of D.C.E. Sets. Journal of Symbolic Logic 74 (2):618-640.
    Khutoretskii's Theorem states that the Rogers semilattice of any family of c.e. sets has either at most one or infinitely many elements. A lemma in the inductive step of the proof shows that no Rogers semilattice can be partitioned into a principal ideal and a principal filter. We show that such a partitioning is possible for some family of d.c.e. sets. In fact, we construct a family of c.e. sets which, when viewed as a family of d.c.e. sets, has (up (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  15.  12
    George Barmpalias & Andrew E. M. Lewis (2006). The Hypersimple-Free C.E. WTT Degrees Are Dense in the C.E. WTT Degrees. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 47 (3):361-370.
    We show that in the c.e. weak truth table degrees if b < c then there is an a which contains no hypersimple set and b < a < c. We also show that for every w < c in the c.e. wtt degrees such that w is hypersimple, there is a hypersimple a such that w < a < c. On the other hand, we know that there are intervals which contain no hypersimple set.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  16.  2
    Liang Yu & Decheng Ding (2004). There Is No SW-Complete C.E. Real. Journal of Symbolic Logic 69 (4):1163 - 1170.
    We prove that there is no sw-complete c.e. real, negatively answering a question in [6].
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  17.  1
    Liang Yu & Yue Yang (2005). On the Definable Ideal Generated by Nonbounding C.E. Degrees. Journal of Symbolic Logic 70 (1):252 - 270.
    Let [NB]₁ denote the ideal generated by nonbounding c.e. degrees and NCup the ideal of noncuppable c.e. degrees. We show that both [NB]₁ ∪ NCup and the ideal generated by nonbounding and noncuppable degrees are new, in the sense that they are different from M, [NB]₁ and NCup—the only three known definable ideals so far.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  18.  9
    Guohua Wu (2004). Bi-Isolation in the D.C.E. Degrees. Journal of Symbolic Logic 69 (2):409 - 420.
    In this paper, we study the bi-isolation phenomena in the d.c.e. degrees and prove that there are c.e. degrees c₁ < c₂ and a d.c.e. degree d ∈ (c₁, c₂) such that (c₁, d) and (d, c₂) contain no c.e. degrees. Thus, the c.e. degrees between c₁ and c₂ are all incomparable with d. We also show that there are d.c.e. degrees d₁ < d₂ such that (d₁, d₂) contains a unique c.e. degree.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  19.  14
    Wei Wang & Decheng Ding (2007). On the Definable Ideal Generated by the Plus Cupping C.E. Degrees. Archive for Mathematical Logic 46 (3-4):321-346.
    In this paper, we will prove that the plus cupping degrees generate a definable ideal on c.e. degrees different from other ones known so far, thus answering a question asked by Li and Yang (Proceedings of the 7th and the 8th Asian Logic Conferences. World Scientific Press, Singapore, 2003).
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  20.  14
    Liang Yu & Rod Downey (2004). There Are No Maximal Low D.C.E.~Degrees. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 45 (3):147-159.
    We prove that there is no maximal low d.c.e degree.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  21.  5
    Denis R. Hirschfeldt (2001). Degree Spectra of Intrinsically C.E. Relations. Journal of Symbolic Logic 66 (2):441-469.
    We show that for every c.e. degree a > 0 there exists an intrinsically c.e. relation on the domain of a computable structure whose degree spectrum is {0, a}. This result can be extended in two directions. First we show that for every uniformly c.e. collection of sets S there exists an intrinsically c.e. relation on the domain of a computable structure whose degree spectrum is the set of degrees of elements of S. Then we show that if α ∈ (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  22.  11
    Timothy H. McNicholl (2001). On the Convergence of Query-Bounded Computations and Logical Closure Properties of C.E. Sets. Journal of Symbolic Logic 66 (4):1543-1560.
    Call a set A n-correctable if every set Turing reducible to A via a Turing machine that on any input makes at most n queries is Turing reducible to A via a Turing machine that on any input makes at most n-queries and on any input halts no matter what answers are given to its queries. We show that if a c.e. set A is n-correctable for some n ≥ 2, then it is n-correctable for all n. We show that (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  23.  9
    Rod Downey, Guohua Wu & Xizhong Zheng (2004). Degrees of D. C. E. Reals. Mathematical Logic Quarterly 50 (4‐5):345-350.
    A real α is called a c. e. real if it is the halting probability of a prefix free Turing machine. Equivalently, α is c. e. if it is left computable in the sense that L = {q ∈ ℚ : q ≤ α} is a computably enumerable set. The natural field formed by the c. e. reals turns out to be the field formed by the collection of the d. c. e. reals, which are of the form α—β, where (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  24.  8
    Noam Greenberg (2011). A Random Set Which Only Computes Strongly Jump-Traceable C.E. Sets. Journal of Symbolic Logic 76 (2):700 - 718.
    We prove that there is a ${\mathrm{\Delta }}_{2}^{0}$ , 1-random set Y such that every computably enumerable set which is computable from Y is strongly jump-traceable. We also show that for every order function h there is an ω-c.e. random set Y such that every computably enumerable set which is computable from Y is h-jump-traceable. This establishes a correspondence between rates of jump-traceability and computability from ω-c.e. random sets.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  25.  8
    David I. Waddington (2013). Recovering a Forgotten Pioneer of Science Studies: C. E. Ayres' Deweyan Critique of Science and Technology. Education and Culture 29 (2):159-179.
    In 1926, C. E. Ayres, a young assistant editor of The New Republic, had completed a draft of his first book, Science: The False Messiah. His publishers, Bobbs-Merrill, were enthusiastic but also somewhat worried—the book, which was a blistering critique of the public understanding of science, was engagingly written and eminently readable, but it was also provocative. Bobbs-Merrill were concerned that Ayres’ “very saucy” approach might damage sales, especially given that he was a complete unknown as far as the general (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  26.  12
    L. S. B. MacCoull (1998). The Anaximander Saying in its Sixth-Century (C. E.) Context. Philosophy and Theology 11 (1):85-96.
    The famous early fragment (B1 D-K) of Anaximander, Greek thinker of the sixth century B.C.E., was transmitted to us by Byzantine Alexandrian authors of the sixth century C.E.: the pagan Simplicius in his commentary on Aristotle’s Physics, and the Monophysite Christian to whose earlier Physics commentary Simplicius was replying, John Philoponus. When these commentators were writing, the Mediterranean world was polarized by the Monophysite-Chalcedonian theological controversy. First Philoponus adduced some of Anaximander’s words in his argument for a single principle of (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  27.  2
    Donka Markus (2000). Performing the Book: The Recital of Epic in First-Century C.E. Rome. Classical Antiquity 19 (1):138-179.
    The detrimental effect of the public recital on the quality of epic production in the first century is a stock theme both in ancient and in modern literary criticism. While previous studies on the epic recital emphasize its negative effects, or aim at its reconstruction as social reality, I focus on its conflicting representations by the ancients themselves and the lessons that we can learn from them. The voices of critics and defenders reveal anxieties about who controls the prestigious high (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  28.  17
    S. Barry Cooper & Angsheng Li (2002). Splitting and Nonsplitting, II: A $Low_2$ C.E. Degree Above Which 0' is Not Splittable. Journal of Symbolic Logic 67 (4):1391-1430.
    It is shown that there exists a low2 Harrington non-splitting base-that is, a low2 computably enumerable (c.e.) degree a such that for any c.e. degrees x, y, if $0' = x \vee y$ , then either $0' = x \vee a$ or $0' = y \vee a$ . Contrary to prior expectations, the standard Harrington non-splitting construction is incompatible with the $low_{2}-ness$ requirements to be satisfied, and the proof given involves new techniques with potentially wider application.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  29.  3
    Evan J. Griffiths (2005). Completely Mitotic C.E. Degrees and Non-Jump Inversion. Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 132 (2-3):181-207.
    A completely mitotic computably enumerable degree is a c.e. degree in which every c.e. set is mitotic, or equivalently in which every c.e. set is autoreducible. There are known to be low, low2, and high completely mitotic degrees, though the degrees containing non-mitotic sets are dense in the c.e. degrees. We show that there exists an upper cone of c.e. degrees each of which contains a non-mitotic set, and that the completely mitotic c.e. degrees are nowhere dense in the c.e. (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  30.  2
    C. E. M. Yates (1975). Review: G. Kreisel, R. O. Gandy, C. E. M. Yates, Some Reasons for Generalizing Recursion Theory. [REVIEW] Journal of Symbolic Logic 40 (2):230-232.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  31.  2
    Matthew B. Giorgi (2010). A High C.E. Degree Which is Not the Join of Two Minimal Degrees. Journal of Symbolic Logic 75 (4):1339-1358.
    We construct a high c.e. degree which is not the join of two minimal degrees and so refute Posner's conjecture that every high c.e. degree is the join of two minimal degrees. Additionally, the proof shows that there is a high c.e. degree a such that for any splitting of a into degrees b and c one of these degrees bounds a 1-generic degree.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  32.  1
    I. Sh Kalimullin (2007). Elementary Differences Between the (2p)-C. E. And the (2p + 1)-C. E. Enumeration Degrees. Journal of Symbolic Logic 72 (1):277 - 284.
    It is proved that the (2p)-c. e. e-degrees are not elementarily equivalent to the (2p + 1)-c. e. e-degrees for each nonzero p ∈ ω. It follows that m-c. e. e-degrees are not elementarily equivalent to the n-c. e. e-degrees if 1 < m < n.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  33. C. E. Bredlau (1969). Review: J. C. E. Dekker, Good Choice Sets; J. C. E. Dekker, The Recursive Equivalence Type of a Class of Sets. [REVIEW] Journal of Symbolic Logic 34 (3):518-519.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  34. C. E. Bredlau (1969). Review: J. C. E. Dekker, Regressive Isols. [REVIEW] Journal of Symbolic Logic 34 (3):519-519.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  35. C. E. M. Joad (1952). The Recovery of Belief a Restatement of Christian Philosophy /by C. E. M. Joad. --. Faber and Faber.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  36.  12
    S. Bartsch O'Gorman, S. M. Goldberg, E. Paratore, N. P. Miller, P. V. Jones, D. S. Levene, R. Martin, R. Syme, J. Ginsburg & C. Pelling (2012). Jakob Andersson. Kingship in the Early Mesopotamian Onomasticon 2800–2200 B. C. E. Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis. Studia Semitica Upsaliensia, 28. Up-Psala: Uppsala University Library, 2012. Pp. Xxxix, 440. SEK 392 (Pb.). ISBN 978-91-554-8270-1. [REVIEW] Classical World: A Quarterly Journal on Antiquity 106 (1):149-154.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  37.  6
    E. C. Marchant (1892). Graves's Thucydides. Book V The Fifth Book of Thucydides, Edited with Notes by C. E. Graves, M.A. Macmillan. 1891. Pp. Ix. 276. 3s. 6d. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 6 (09):389-390.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  38. E. C. Jones (1917). Robinson, C. E.: The Days of Alkibiades. Classical World: A Quarterly Journal on Antiquity 11:127-128.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  39. I. Sh Kalimullin (2002). Splitting Properties of N-C.E. Enumeration Degrees. Journal of Symbolic Logic 67 (2):537-546.
    It is proved that if 1 $\langle \mathscr{D}_{2n}, \leq, P\rangle$ and $\langle \mathscr{D}_{2n}, \leq, P\rangle$ are not elementary equivalent where P is the predicate P(a) = "a is a Π 0 1 e-degree".
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  40.  3
    C. E. W. Steel (1999). C. J. Classen (trans. P. Landi): Diritto, retorica, politica. La strategia retorica di Cicerone (Collezioni di testi e di studi). Pp. 396. Bologna: Il Mulino, 1998. Paper, L. 52,000. ISBN: 88-15-05803-. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 49 (02):574-.
    Translate
      Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  41.  21
    Rosangela Barcaro (2007). Il dogma che non c'è [An imaginary dogma]. Liberal 7 (40):104-113.
    I criteri neurologici per accertare il decesso, da impiegare in alternativa a quelli cardiorespiratori se il paziente ha subìto lesioni cerebrali e si trova collegato alle apparecchiature per la ventilazione artificiale, sono entrati nell’uso comune della pratica medica occidentale da circa quarant’anni ed il consenso di cui essi godono nella comunità scientifica sembra, a prima vista, essere ancora oggi molto solido. Si diceva a prima vista, perché se si esamina con attenzione la letteratura dal 1992 ad oggi, si possono scoprire (...)
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  42.  76
    Maurizio Ferraris & Achille C. Varzi (2003). Che cosa c’è e che cos’è. Nous. Postille Su Pensieri 1:81–101.
    A philosophical exchange broadly inspired by the characters of Berkeley’s Three Dialogues. Hylas is the realist philosopher: the view he stands up for reflects a robust metaphysic that is reassuringly close to common sense, grounded on the twofold persuasion that the world comes structured into entities of various kinds and at various levels and that it is the task of philosophy, if not of science generally, to “bring to light” that structure. Philonous, by contrast, is the anti-realist philosopher (though not (...)
    Translate
      Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  43.  8
    Donald C. Haggis (2001). Citadel to City-State: The Transformation of Greece, 1200-700 B.C.E. (Review). American Journal of Philology 122 (1):131-135.
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  44.  4
    E. H. Blakeney (1920). Caesar's Gallic War (IV. 20–38, and V.). Partly in the Original, and Partly in Translation. Edited by R. W. Livingstone and C. E. Freeman. Oxford University Press: 1919. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 34 (1-2):47-.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  45.  9
    Guillermo E. Rosado Haddock (2010). La relevancia de Carnap: Estudio critico Del libro el programa de Carnap. Ramón Cirera, Andoni Ibarra Y Thomas Mormann, (eds.). C.e.L.c.: Barcelona, 1996, 324pp. [REVIEW] Principia 10 (2):209-235.
    Translate
      Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  46.  5
    J. E. Sandys (1921). C. E. Graves. (1839–1920): A. W. Spratt (1842–1920). The Classical Review 35 (1-2):43-44.
    No categories
    Translate
      Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  47.  7
    E. H. Blakeney (1927). Sophocles, Philoctetes. Abridged and Edited with Notes by C. E. Laurence, M.A. (Bell's Shorter Classics.) 2s. The Classical Review 41 (02):85-86.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  48.  6
    E. Harrison (1937). Neue Fragmente des Aischylos und Sophokles. Von C.-E. Fritsch Pp. 63. Hamburg: Hans Christian, 1936. Paper. The Classical Review 51 (01):38-.
    No categories
    Translate
      Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  49.  14
    E. W. Gray (1974). C.E.R.P.2 A. H. M. Jones: The Cities of the Eastern Roman Provinces. Second Edition. Pp. Xvii+595; 9 Maps. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1971. Cloth, £7·50. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 24 (02):271-273.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  50.  6
    Fabrizio Desideri (2008). L'immagine Che C'è. Aisthesis. Pratiche, Linguaggi E Saperi Dell’Estetico 1 (2).
    No categories
    Translate
      Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
1 — 50 / 1000