You are accessing PhilPapers from Open University (UK), an institution that is not subscribed to PhilPapers. Starting on July 1, 2014, we ask institutions that grant philosophy degrees and are based in high-GDP countries to contribute to PhilPapers' maintenance and development through a subscription. See this page for details. Please show your support by contacting your librarian.
48 found
Sort by:
Disambiguations:
Colin Farrelly [44]Colin Patrick Farrelly [2]C. Farrelly [2]
  1. Colin Farrelly, Preparing for Our Enhanced Future.
    (forthcoming) Journal of Medical Licensure and Discipline. Rapid advances in human genetics raise the prospect that one day we may be able to develop genetic enhancements to promote a diverse range of phenotypes (e.g. health, intelligence, behaviour, etc.). Perhaps the biggest challenge that genetic enhancements pose for medical practitioners is that they will compel us to re-think a good deal of the conventional wisdom of the status quo. Radical enhancements are likely to have this affect for a variety of reasons. (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Colin Farrelly, Discussion.
    In this article I critically examine Adam Moore's claim that the threshold for overriding intangible property rights and privacy rights is higher, in relation to genetic enhancement techniques and sensitive personal information, than is commonly suggested. I argue that Moore fails to see how important advances in genetic research are to social justice. Once this point is emphasised one sees that the issue of how formidable overriding these rights are is open to much debate. There are strong reasons, on grounds (...)
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Colin Farrelly, Dualism, Incentives and the Demands of Rawlsian Justice.
    In “Institutions and the Demands of Justice,” Liam Murphy ~1999! makes a distinction between two approaches to normative political theory. He labels these two positions “dualism” and “monism.” The former maintains that “the two practical problems of institutional design and personal conduct require, at the fundamental level, two different kinds of practical principle” ~1999: 254!. The most influential proponent of dualism is John Rawls. In A Theory of Justice Rawls defends his theory of “justice as fairness,” which recognizes a division (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Colin Farrelly, Distributive Justice and Genetics.
    What will the demands of distributive justice be in the postgenetic revolutionary world? Will genetic inheritance be regarded as socially distributed goods? This may seem a more reasonable position to assert as biotechnology progresses further toward human genetic manipulation.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Colin Farrelly, Genetics.
    . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (...)
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Colin Farrelly, Introduction.
    their children? Society faces a diverse range of policy a reality than it is today? I do not intend to put forth a conoptions as it begins to grapple with the regulation of new clusive answer to this question but rather examine three human genetic technologies. From the issues of gene..
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Colin Farrelly, Justice in Ideal Theory: A Refutation.
    Political philosophers have recently begun to take seriously methodological questions concerning what a theoretical examination of political ideals (e.g. justice) is suppose to accomplish and how effective theorising in ideal theory is in securing those aims. Andrew Mason (2004) and G.A. Cohen (2003), for example, believe that the fundamental principles of justice are logically independent of issues of feasibility and questions about human nature. Their position contrasts sharply with political theorists like John Dunn (1990) and Joseph Carens (2000) who believe (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Colin Farrelly, Making Deliberative Democracy a More Practical Political Ideal.
    Deliberative democrats conceive of the democratic process as a transformative process, one that requires citizens to participate in authentic deliberation with others rather than engaging in the strategic behaviour characteristic of existing democratic practices. Current practices often pit factions of society against one another in a struggle to win or retain political power. The moralized conception of democracy defended by deliberative democrats is one that emphasizes the importance of being open-minded, reasonable and accommodating. These civic virtues are necessary if we (...)
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. Colin Farrelly, Neutrality, Toleration and Reasonable Agreement.
    It is widely agreed, claims John Horton, “that the core of the concept of toleration is the refusal, where one has the power to do so, to prohibit or seriously interfere with conduct one finds objectionable”.1 Liberals champion toleration as one of the main political virtues of a just society. The tolerant society is one which protects a diverse array of fundamental freedoms ranging from freedom of conscience and religion to freedom of expression and freedom of association. Secure in the (...)
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. Colin Farrelly, Taxation and Distributive Justice.
    Distributive justice concerns the fair distribution of the benefits and burdens of social cooperation. Opposition to higher rates of taxation, or even existing levels of taxation, are often made on grounds that such taxes are unfair burdens. This fairness argument can be given a number of further, more specific, formulations. Libertarians like Robert Nozick, for example, argue that taxation of income is unfair because it violates individual rights. Libertarians invoke an entitlement argument which presumes that the appropriate baseline of property (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. Colin Farrelly, Three of My Favourite Books.
    If I had to live on a desert island and could only bring three books with me, what three books would they be? That is a tough decision! The last thirty years has witnessed a real boom in normative political theory/philosophy. But if I had to choose just three books to take with me to read on a desert island they would be the three books noted below. I think each of these books are engaging projects and each has made (...)
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. Colin Farrelly (forthcoming). Deliberative Democracy and Nanotechnology. Nanoethics: The Ethical and Social Implications of Nanotechnology.
  13. Colin Farrelly (2013). Commentary on Part 3: International Political and Economic Structures. Les Ateliers de l'Éthique / the Ethics Forum 8 (2):41-52.
    Mathias Risse’s On Global Justice is a unique and important contribution to the growing literature on global justice. Risse’s approach to a variety of topics, ranging from domestic justice and common ownership of the earth, to immigration, human rights, climate change, and labour rights, is one that conceives of global justice as a philosophical problem. In this commentary I focus on a number of reservations I have about approaching global justice as a philosophical rather than an inherently practical problem. To (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. Colin Farrelly (2013). Empirical Ethics and the Duty to Extend the “Biological Warranty Period”. Social Philosophy and Policy 30 (1-2):480-503.
    The world's aging populations face novel health challenges never experienced before in human history. The moral landscape thus needs to adapt to reflect this novel empirical reality. In this paper I take for granted one basic moral principle advanced by Peter Singer and explore the implications that empirical considerations from demography, evolutionary biology, and biogerontology have for the way we conceive of fulfilling this principle at the operational level. After bringing to the fore a number of considerations that Singer ignores, (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. Colin Farrelly (2013). Normative Theorizing About Genetics. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 22 (4):408-419.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. Colin Farrelly (2011). Patriarchy and Historical Materialism. Hypatia 26 (1):1-21.
    Why does the world have the pattern of patriarchy it currently possesses? Why have patriarchal practices and institutions evolved and changed in the ways they have tended to over time in human societies? This paper explores these general questions by integrating a feminist analysis of patriarchy with the central insights of the functionalist interpretation of historical materialism advanced by G. A. Cohen. The paper has two central aspirations: first, to help narrow the divide between analytical Marxism and feminism by redressing (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. Colin Farrelly (2010). Equality and the Duty to Retard Human Ageing. Bioethics 24 (8):384-394.
    Where does the aspiration to retard human ageing fit in the ‘big picture’ of medical necessities and the requirements of just healthcare? Is there a duty to retard human ageing? And if so, how much should we invest in the basic science that studies the biology of ageing and could lead to interventions that modify the biological processes of human ageing? I consider two prominent accounts of equality and just healthcare – Norman Daniels's application of the principle of fair equality (...)
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. C. Farrelly (2009). Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis, Reproductive Freedom, and Deliberative Democracy. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 34 (2):135-154.
    In this paper I argue that the account of deliberative democracy advanced by Amy Gutmann and Dennis Thompson (1996, 2004) is a useful normative theory that can help enhance our deliberations about public policy in morally pluralistic societies. More specifically, I illustrate how the prescriptions of deliberative democracy can be applied to the issue of regulating non-medical uses of pre-implantation genetic diagnosis (PGD), such as gender selection. Deliberative democracy does not aim to win a philosophical debate among rival first-order theories, (...)
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. Colin Farrelly (2009). Deliberative Democracy and the Institutions of Judicial Review. Social Theory and Practice 35 (2):327-331.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. Alister Browne, Quentin Eichbaum, Stefan Eriksson, Colin Farrelly, Joel Frader, Matti Häyry & Gert Helgesson (2008). Y. Michael Barilan, MD, is a Physician in the Department of Internal Medicine at Meir Hospital, Tel Aviv, Israel. Michael Boylan, Ph. D., is Professor in the Department of Philosophy, Mary-Mount University, Arlington, Virginia. [REVIEW] Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 17:1-3.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. Colin Farrelly (2008). Aging Research: Priorities and Aggregation. Public Health Ethics 1 (3):258-267.
    Department of Political Studies, Queen's University, 99 University Avenue, Kingston, Ontario, Canada, K7L 3N6. Email: farrelly{at}queensu.ca ' + u + '@' + d + ' '//--> Abstract Should we invest more public funding in basic aging research that could lead to medical interventions that permit us to safely and effectively retard human aging? In this paper I make the case for answering in the affirmative. I examine, and critique, what I call the Fairness Objection to making aging research a greater (...)
    Direct download (11 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  22. C. Farrelly (2008). The Case for Re-Thinking Incest Laws. Journal of Medical Ethics 34 (9):e11-e11.
  23. Colin Farrelly (2007). Civic Liberalism and the 'Dialogical Model'of Judicial Review. In Colin Patrick Farrelly & Lawrence B. Solum (eds.), Virtue Jurisprudence. Palgrave Macmillan. 489 - 531.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  24. Colin Farrelly (2007). Genetic Justice Must Track Genetic Complexity. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 17 (01):45-53.
    Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics. What values and principles should inform the regulation of new human genetic technologies (e.g. gene therapy)? To adequately answer this question we need an account of genetic justice. That is, an account of what constitutes a fair distribution of genetic endowments that influence our expected life-time acquisition of natural primary goods (health and vigor, intelligence and imagination). These are goods that every rational person has an interest in (Rawls, 1971). The decisions we now make regarding (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  25. Colin Farrelly (2007). Gene Patents and Justice. Journal of Value Inquiry 41 (2-4):147-163.
  26. Colin Farrelly (2007). Virtue Ethics and Prenatal Genetic Enhancement. Studies in Ethics, Law, and Technology 1 (1).
    In this paper I argue that the virtue ethics tradition can enhance the moral discourse on the ethics of prenatal genetic enhancements in distinctive and valuable ways. Virtue ethics prescribes we adopt a much more provisional stance on the issue of the moral permissibility of prenatal genetic enhancements. A stance that places great care on differentiating between the different stakes involved with developing different phenotypes in our children and the different possible means (environmental vs. genetic manipulation) available to parents for (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  27. Colin Patrick Farrelly & Lawrence Solum (eds.) (2007). Virtue Jurisprudence. Palgrave Macmillan.
    This book is the first authoritative text on virtue jurisprudence - the belief that the final end of law is not to maximize preference satisfaction or protect certain rights and privileges, but to promote human flourishing. Scholars of law, philosophy and politics illustrate here the value of the virtue ethics tradition to modern legal theory.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  28. Colin Farrelly & Lawrence B. Solum (2007). An Introduction to Aretaic Theories of Law. In Colin Patrick Farrelly & Lawrence Solum (eds.), Virtue Jurisprudence. Palgrave Macmillan.
  29. Colin Farrelly (2005). Book Review: Making Deliberative Democracy a More Practical Political Ideal. [REVIEW] European Journal of Political Theory 4 (2):200-208.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  30. Colin Farrelly (2005). Historical Materialism and Supervenience. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 35 (4):420-446.
    In this article I put forth a new interpretation of historical materialism titled the supervenient interpretation . Drawing on the insights of analytical Marxism and utilizing the concept of supervenience, I advance two central claims. First, that Marx's synchronic materialism maintains that the superstructure supervenes naturally on the economic structure. Second, that diachronic materialism maintains that the relations of production supervene naturally on the forces of production. Taken together, these two theses help bring to the fore the central tenets of (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  31. Colin Farrelly (2005). Justice in the Risk Society. Contemporary Political Theory 4 (3):353-355.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  32. Colin Patrick Farrelly (2005). Justice in the Genetically Transformed Society. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 15 (1):91-99.
    : This paper explores some of the challenges raised by human genetic interventions for debates about distributive justice, focusing on the challenges that face prioritarian theories of justice and their relation to the argument advanced by Ronald Lindsay elsewhere in this issue of the Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal. Also examined are the implications of germ-line genetic enhancements for intergenerational justice, and an argument is given against Fritz Allhoff's conclusion, found in this issue as well, that such enhancements are morally (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  33. Colin Farrelly (2004). Genes and Equality. Journal of Medical Ethics 30 (6):587-592.
    What we think about equality as a value will influence how we think genetic interventions should be regulated. In this paper I utilise the taxonomy of equality put forth by Derek Parfit and apply this to the issue of genetic interventions. I argue that Telic Egalitarianism is untenable and that Deontic Egalitarianism collapses into the Priority View. The Priority View maintains that it is morally more important to benefit those who are worse off. Once this precision has been given to (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  34. Colin Farrelly (2004). Making Deliberative Democracy a More Practical Ideal. European Journal of Political Theory 4 (2):200-208.
  35. Colin Farrelly (2004). Russell Hardin, Indeterminacy and Society Reviewed By. Philosophy in Review 24 (1):27-29.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  36. Colin Farrelly (2004). The Genetic Difference Principle. American Journal of Bioethics 4 (2):21 – 28.
    In the newly emerging debates about genetics and justice three distinct principles have begun to emerge concerning what the distributive aim of genetic interventions should be. These principles are: genetic equality, a genetic decent minimum, and the genetic difference principle. In this paper, I examine the rationale of each of these principles and argue that genetic equality and a genetic decent minimum are ill-equipped to tackle what I call the currency problem and the problem of weight. The genetic difference principle (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  37. Colin Farrelly (2003). A Challenge to Brink's Metaphysical Egoism. Res Publica 9 (3):243-256.
    Those who subscribe to a prudential conception of practical reason do not believe that there is a conflict between other-regarding and self-regarding norms as the former are held to be founded on the latter. Moral conduct, they maintain, is always rationally justifiable. The reasons we should fulfil the demands of other-regarding norms are the same as those we have for fulfilling self-regarding norms. David Brink has put forth an interesting and novel account of this approach to practical reason which he (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  38. Colin Farrelly (2002). Genes and Social Justice: A Rawlsian Reply to Moore. Bioethics 16 (1):72–83.
    In this article I critically examine Adam Moore’s claim that the threshold for overriding intangible property rights and privacy rights is higher, in relation to genetic enhancement techniques and sensitive personal information, than is commonly suggested. I argue that Moore fails to see how important advances in genetic research are to social justice. Once this point is emphasised one sees that the issue of how formidable overriding these rights are is open to much debate. There are strong reasons, on grounds (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  39. Colin Farrelly (2002). Genetic Intervention and the New Frontiers of Justice. Dialogue 41 (01):139-.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  40. Colin Farrelly (2002). Kant and Modern Political Philosophy. Mind 111 (443):662-664.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  41. Colin Farrelly (2002). Review: Kant and Modern Political Philosophy. [REVIEW] Mind 111 (443):662-664.
  42. Colin Farrelly (2001). John Rawls, Justice as Fairness: A Restatement Reviewed By. Philosophy in Review 21 (6):437-439.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  43. Colin Farrelly (1999). Justice and a Citizens' Basic Income. Journal of Applied Philosophy 16 (3):283–296.
    Is it possible for a society with a market economy to be just? Unlike Marxists, egalitarian liberals believe that there are some conceivable circumstances where such a society could fulfil the requirements of social justice. A market society need not be exploitative. One proposal that has recently received much attention among political theorists is the suggestion that citizens should receive a basic income. Philippe Van Parijs's Real Freedom for All: What (if anything) can justify capitalism? presents one of the most (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  44. Colin Farrelly (1999). Public Reason, Neutrality and Civic Virtues. Ratio Juris 12 (1):11-25.
  45. Colin Farrelly (1998). Democracy's Discontent. Cogito 12 (1):80-81.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  46. Colin Farrelly (1998). Philosophy, Law and Morality. Cogito 12 (2):103-108.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  47. Colin Farrelly, Does Rawls Support the Procedural Republic? A Procedural Republic? A Critical Response to Critical Response to Sandel's Democracy's Discontent.
    In Michael Sandel's latest book entitled ican republicanism, Aristotle, and Hegel, com- Democracy's Discontent (1996), he argues munitarians are critical of the individualistic that the prevailing public philosophy (what he methodology liberalism employs. Such a methcalls the procedural republic) that informs..
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation