9 found
Sort by:
Disambiguations:
Christian Gamborg [5]C. Gamborg [4]
  1. C. Gamborg, K. Millar, O. Shortall & P. Sandøe (2012). Bioenergy and Land Use: Framing the Ethical Debate. [REVIEW] Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 25 (6):909-925.
    Increasingly, ethical concerns are being raised regarding bioenergy production. However, the ethical issues often do not stand out very clearly. The aim of the present paper is to improve on this situation by analyzing the bioenergy discussion from the perspective of land use. From this perspective, bioenergy production may give rise to ethical problems because it competes with other forms of land use. This may generate ethical problems mainly for two reasons. First, bioenergy production may compete, directly or indirectly, with (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. M. Gjerris, C. Gamborg, H. Röcklinsberg & R. Anthony (2011). The Price of Responsibility: Ethics of Animal Husbandry in a Time of Climate Change. [REVIEW] Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 24 (4):331-350.
    This paper examines the challenges that climate change raises for animal agriculture and discusses the contributions that may come from a virtue ethics based approach. Two scenarios of the future role of animals in farming are set forth and discussed in terms of their ethical implications. The paper argues that when trying to tackle both climate and animal welfare issues in farming, proposals that call for a reorientation of our ethics and technology must first and foremost consider the values that (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Karsten Klint Jensen, Christian Gamborg & Peter Sandøe (2011). The Social Dimension of Pluralism: Democratic Procedures and Substantial Constraints. Ethics, Policy and Environment 14 (3):313 - 327.
    Ethics, Policy & Environment, Volume 14, Issue 3, Page 313-327, October 2011.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Karsten Jensen, Ellen-Marie Forsberg, Christian Gamborg, Kate Millar & Peter Sandøe (2011). Facilitating Ethical Reflection Among Scientists Using the Ethical Matrix. Science and Engineering Ethics 17 (3):425-445.
    Several studies have indicated that scientists are likely to have an outlook on both facts and values that are different to that of lay people in important ways. This is one significant reason it is currently believed that in order for scientists to exercise a reliable ethical reflection about their research it is necessary for them to engage in dialogue with other stakeholders. This paper reports on an exercise to encourage a group of scientists to reflect on ethical issues without (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Christian Gamborg, Bart Gremmen, Stine B. Christiansen & Peter Sandøe (2010). De-Domestication: Ethics at the Intersection of Landscape Restoration and Animal Welfare. Environmental Values 19 (1):57 - 78.
    De-domestication is the deliberate establishment of a population of domesticated animals or plants in the wild. In time, the population should be able to reproduce, becoming self-sustainable and incorporating 'wild' animals. Often de-domestication is part of a larger nature restoration scheme, aimed at creating landscapes anew, or re-creating former habitats . De-domestication is taken up in this paper because it both engages and raises questions about the major norms governing animals and nature. The debate here concerns whether animals undergoing de-domestication (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. I. Anna S. Olsson, Christian Gamborg & Peter Sandøe (2006). Taking Ethics Into Account in Farm Animal Breeding: What Can the Breeding Companies Achieve? [REVIEW] Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 19 (1):37-46.
    Animal welfare and the ethical issues it raises have been discussed intensively for a couple of decades. The emphasis has been on the direct effects of housing and husbandry, but more attention is now being given to problems originating in selective breeding. European attempts to adjust animal welfare legislation to deal with these problems have been largely unsuccessful, but the fact that selective breeding can introduce welfare problems continues to place an ethical responsibility on the animal breeding industry. Since breeding (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. C. Gamborg & P. Sandøe (2004). Beavers and Biodiversity: The Ethics of Restoration Ecology. In Markku Oksanen & Juhani Pietarinen (eds.), Philosophy and Biodiversity. Cambridge University Press.
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Christian Gamborg & P. Sandøe (2004). Beaver and Biodiversity: The Ethics of Ecological Restoration. In Markku Oksanen & Juhani Pietarinen (eds.), Philosophy and Biodiversity. Cambridge University Press.
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. C. Gamborg (2000). Paul Wolvekamp Et Al.(Eds) Forests for the Future. Environmental Values 9 (4):541-542.
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation