4 found
Sort by:
  1. Valerie Gray Hardcastle & C. Matthew Stewart (2005). Localization in the Brain and Other Illusions. In Andrew Brook (ed.), Cognition and the Brain. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Valerie Gray Hardcastle & C. Matthew Stewart (2004). Neuroscience and the Art of Single-Cell Recordings. Biology and Philosophy 18 (1):195-208.
    This article examines how scientists move from physical measurementsto actual observation of single-cell recordings in the brain. We highlight how easy it is to change the fundamental nature of ourobservations using accepted methodological techniques for manipulatingraw data. Collecting single-cell data is thoroughly pragmatic. Weconclude that there is no deep or interesting difference betweenaccounting for observations by measurements and accounting forobservations by theories.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Valerie Gray Hardcastle & C. Matthew Stewart (2002). What Do Brain Data Really Show? Philosophy of Science 69 (3):572-582.
    There is a bias in neuroscience toward localizing and modularizing brain functions. Single cell recording, imaging studies, and the study of neurological deficits all feed into the Gallian view that different brain areas do different things and the things being done are confined to particular processing streams. At the same time, there is a growing sentiment that brains probably don’t work like that after all; it is better to conceive of them as fundamentally distributed units, multi‐tasking at every level. This (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Valerie Gray Hardcastle & C. Matthew Stewart (2001). Theory Structure in Neuroscience. In Peter K. Machamer, Peter McLaughlin & Rick Grush (eds.), Theory and Method in the Neurosciences. University of Pittsburgh Press
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation