Search results for 'Cambridge Platonism' (try it on Scholar)

1000+ found
Sort by:
  1. By Eric B. Baum Cambridge (2004). Charles Taylor. Contemporary Philosophy in Focus. By Ruth Abbey, Editor. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004. Pp. Xi, 220. Right, Wrong and Science: The Ethical Dimensions of the Techno-Scientific Enterprise. Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities, Vol. 81. By Evandro Agazzi. Edited by Craig Dilworth. Atlantic Highlands. [REVIEW] Philosophical Review 113 (2).score: 180.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Michael B. Gill (2010). From Cambridge Platonism to Scottish Sentimentalism. Journal of Scottish Philosophy 8 (1):13-31.score: 164.0
    The Cambridge Platonists were a group of religious thinkers who attended and taught at Cambridge from the 1640s until the 1660s. The four most important of them were Benjamin Whichcote, John Smith, Ralph Cudworth, and Henry More. The most prominent sentimentalist moral philosophers of the Scottish Enlightenment – Hutcheson, Hume, and Adam Smith – knew of the works of the Cambridge Platonists. But the Scottish sentimentalists typically referred to the Cambridge Platonists only briefly and in passing. (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. John Russell Roberts (2012). Whichcote and the Cambridge Platonists on Human Nature: An Interpretation and Defense. Oxford Studies in Early Modern Philosophy VI.score: 160.0
    Draft version of essay. ABSTRACT: Benjamin Whichcote developed a distinctive account of human nature centered on our moral psychology. He believed that this view of human nature, which forms the foundation of “Cambridge Platonism,” showed that the demands of reason and faith are not merely compatible but dynamically supportive of one another. I develop an interpretation of this oft-neglected and widely misunderstood account of human nature and defend its viability against a key objection.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. John Henry (1986). A Cambridge Platonist's Materialism: Henry More and the Concept of Soul. Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes 49:172-195.score: 150.0
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Benjamin Carter (2006). Cambridge Platonist Spirituality. Faith and Philosophy 23 (3):361-363.score: 150.0
  6. Jasper Reid (2004). Review of Robert Crocker, Henry More, 1614-1687: A Biography of the Cambridge Platonist. [REVIEW] Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2004 (9).score: 150.0
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. David Leech (2002). &Quot;plato and Deep Plotin&Quot;: Cambridge Platonism, Platonicall Triads, and More's Reflections on Nature. Dionysius 20:179-198.score: 150.0
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Henry G. Van Leeuwen (1964). Henry More, the Rational Theology of a Cambridge Platonist (Review). Journal of the History of Philosophy 2 (1):100-104.score: 150.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. C. A. Patrides (1980). The Cambridge Platonists. Cambridge University Press.score: 128.0
    This volume contains the selected discourses of four seventeenth-century philosophers, carefully chosen to illustrate the tenets characteristic of the influential movement known as Cambridge Platonism. Fundamental to their beliefs is the statement most clearly voiced by Benjamin Whichcote, their leader by common consent, that the spiritual is not opposed to the rational, nor Grace to nature. Religion is based on reason, even in the presence of 'mystery'. Free will and Grace are not mutually exclusive. The editor's comprehensive introduction (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. Jonathan Barnes (1986). The Fourth Academy Harold Tarrant: Scepticism or Platonism? The Philosophy of the Fourth Academy. (Cambridge Classical Studies.) Pp. Ix+182. Cambridge University Press, 1985. £19.50. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 36 (01):75-77.score: 120.0
  11. Alexei V. Zadorojnyi (2001). Trails of Scepticism J. Opsomer: In Search of the Truth. Academic Tendencies in Middle Platonism . Pp. 332. Brussels: Verhandelingen van de Koninklijke Academie Voor Wetenschappen, Letteren En Schone Kunsten van België, 1998. Paper, Euro 35 (Approx.). ISBN: 90-6569-666-0. M. A. Wlodarczyk: Pyrrhonian Inquiry . Pp. X + 72. Cambridge: The Cambridge Philological Society, 2000. Paper. ISBN: 0-906014-24-. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 51 (02):295-.score: 120.0
  12. George Zografidis (2013). Siniossoglou N. Radical Platonism in Byzantium: Illumination and Utopia in Gemistos Plethon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011. Pp. Xvi + 454. £70. 9781107013032. [REVIEW] Journal of Hellenic Studies 133:306-307.score: 120.0
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. G. C. Field (1939). Platonism Ancient and Modern. By Paul Shorey. Pp. Vi+259. (Sather Classical Lectures, Vol. 14.) Berkeley: University of California Press (Cambridge: University Press), 1938. Cloth, Us. 6d. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 53 (5-6):217-.score: 120.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. W. Hamilton (1938). The Middle Platonism R. E. Witt: Albinus and the History of Middle Platonism. Pp. Xii + 147. (Cambridge Classical Studies, III; Also Serving as Transactions of the Cambridge Philological Society, VII.) Cambridge: University Press, 1937. Cloth, 7s. 6d. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 52 (01):17-.score: 120.0
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. M. R. Wright (1995). Plato I J. Moravcsik: Plato and Platonism. Plato's Conception of Appearance and Reality in Ontology, Epistemology and Ethics, and Modern Echoes. (Issues in Ancient Philosophy, 1.) Pp. X+342. Oxford, Cambridge, MA: Blackwell, 1992. Cased, £40.00. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 45 (02):282-284.score: 120.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. Marie V. Williams (1912). The Vitality of Platonism and Other Essays The Vitality of Platonism and Other Essays. By James Adam, Late Fellow and and Senior Tutor of Emmanuel College, Cambridge. Edited by His Wife, Adela Marion Adam, 1 Vol. 8vo. Pp. 242. Cambridge: University Press, 1911. 7s. 6d. Net. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 26 (07):224-225.score: 120.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. Renford Bambrough (1960). The Transmission of Platonism Pierre Courcelle, W. K. C. Guthrie, Olof Gigon, H. I. Marrou, W. Theiler, J. H. Waszink, Richard Walzer: Recherches Sur la Tradition Platonicienne. (Fondation Hardt: Entretiens Sur l'Antiquité Classique, Tome Iii.) Pp. 242. Vandœuvres, Geneva: Fondation Hardt (Cambridge: Heffer), 1958. Cloth, £2 Net. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 10 (01):29-31.score: 120.0
  18. Marianne Djuth (2012). Brian Dobell, Augustine's Intellectual Conversion: The Journey From Platonism to Christianity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009. Pp. Xvii, 250. $86. ISBN: 9780521513395. [REVIEW] Speculum 87 (2):540-542.score: 120.0
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. M. Wright (1996). A. Baldwin, S. Hutton (Edd.): Platonism and the English Imagination. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994. The Classical Review 46 (1):147-149.score: 120.0
  20. John Russell Roberts, Innate Ideas Without Abstract Ideas: An Essay on Berkeley's Platonism.score: 96.0
    Draft. Berkeley denied the existence of abstract ideas and any faculty of abstraction. At the same time, however, he embraced innate ideas and a faculty of pure intellect. This paper attempts to reconcile the tension between these commitments by offering an interpretation of Berkeley's Platonism.
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. Robert L. Armstrong (1969). Cambridge Platonists and Locke on Innate Ideas. Journal of the History of Ideas 30:191-205.score: 96.0
    The cambridge platonists exemplify the fear that newtonian natural philosophy subverts the status of traditional moral and religious beliefs, Which are strongly supported by the innate idea doctrine since it justifies them independently of the senses and the material universe. Isaac barrow, Friend and teacher of newton, Also employs the doctrine approbatively to support his metaphysics as a science of basic principles that constitute the foundation of natural science. Locke's rejection of the doctrine is analyzed and it is suggested (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  22. Frederick J. Powicke (1926/2006). The Cambridge Platonists: A Study. Martino Pub..score: 96.0
    Some characteristics of the Cambridge Platonists -- Benjamin Whichcote (1609-1683) -- John Smith (1616-1652) -- Ralph Cudworth (1617-1685) -- Nathaniel Culverwel (1618?-1651) -- Henry More (1614-1687) -- Peter Sterry (d. 1672).
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  23. Frederick J. Powicke (1971/1970). The Cambridge Platonists. [Hamden, Conn.]Archon Books.score: 96.0
    Prologue.--Some characteristics of the Cambridge Platonists.--Benjamin Whichcote (1609-1683)--John Smith (1616-1652)--Ralph Cudworth (1617-1685)--Nathaniel Culverwel (1618?-1651)--Henry More (1614-1687)--Peter Sterry (d. 1672)--Epilogue.
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  24. Wesley Erdelack (2011). Antivoluntarism and the Birth of Autonomy. Journal of Religious Ethics 39 (4):651-679.score: 90.0
    Traditionalist and radical orthodox critiques of the Enlightenment assert that the modern discourse on moral self-government constitutes a radical break with the theocentric model of morality which preceded it. Against this view, this paper argues that the conceptions of autonomy emerged from the effort to reconcile commitments within the Christian tradition. Through an analysis of the moral thought of the Cambridge Platonist Ralph Cudworth, this paper contends that distinctively Christian theological concerns concerning moral accountability to God and the character (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  25. Ben Lazare Mijuskovic (1974). The Achilles of Rationalist Arguments: The Simplicity, Unity, and Identity of Thought and Soul From the Cambridge Platonists to Kant: A Study in the History of an Argument. Martinus Nijhoff.score: 84.0
    INTRODUCTION TO THE ARGUMENT AND ITS HISTORY PRIOR TO THE AND CENTURIES In the history of ideas, there is an argument that has been used repeatedly, ...
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  26. Eugene Munger Austin (1935). The Ethics of the Cambridge Platonists. Philadelphia.score: 84.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  27. John John De Boer (1931). The Theory of Knowledge of the Cambridge Platonists. Madras, Methodist Publishing House.score: 84.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  28. Geoffrey Philip Henry Pawson (1930). The Cambridge Platonists and Their Place in Religious Thought. London, Society for Promoting Christian Knowledge.score: 84.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  29. Ruth Ap Roberts (forthcoming). Arnold and Cambridge Platonists. Clio.score: 72.0
    Matthew arnold maintains in the nineteenth century the renaissance school of the cambridge platonists. for them, reason and religion are by no means at odds: reason is in fact "the candle of the lord." for matthew arnold in "literature and dogma", christianity will prevail only by being shorn of its supernaturalist elements and set on its true rational ground. ernst cassirer has shown how the cambridge platonists bridge the gap between the italian renaissance and the german humanists of (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  30. Douglas Hedley (2012). Forms of Reflection, Imagination, and the Love of Wisdom. Metaphilosophy 43 (1-2):112-124.score: 60.0
    This article reflects upon the relationship between philosophy and theology. It further considers the persisting relevance of the specifically Hellenic inheritance of philosophy as contemplation and the Delphic exhortation, “Know thyself!” It concludes with reflections upon the role of imagination in relation to the philosophical idea of God as the supreme and transcendent causal principle of the physical cosmos.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  31. J. H. Muirhead (1927). The Cambridge Platonists (I). Mind 36 (142):158-178.score: 60.0
    Direct download (10 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  32. J. H. Muirhead (1927). The Cambridge Platonists (II). Mind 36 (143):326-341.score: 60.0
    Direct download (10 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  33. Sterling P. Lamprecht (1926). Innate Ideas in the Cambridge Platonists. Philosophical Review 35 (6):553-573.score: 60.0
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  34. S. F. (1999). G. A. J. Rogers, J. M. Vienne and Y. C. Zarka (Eds.) The Cambridge Platonists in Philosophical Context: Politics, Metaphysics and Religion. (International Archives of the History of Ideas). (Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1997). Pp. XIV+249. NLG 250.00, £89.00 Hbk. [REVIEW] Religious Studies 35 (1):113-116.score: 60.0
  35. Marjorie Nicolson (1930). George Keith and the Cambridge Platonists. Philosophical Review 39 (1):36-55.score: 60.0
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  36. Gerald R. Cragg (ed.) (1968/1985). The Cambridge Platonists. University Press of America.score: 60.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  37. Jennifer A. Herdt (2001). The Rise of Sympathy and the Question of Divine Suffering. Journal of Religious Ethics 29 (3):367 - 399.score: 58.0
    Seventeenth-century Cambridge Platonist Ralph Cudworth, writing just at the time when the concept of sympathy was moving from the realm of magic to that of ethics, argued that God must be understood as having a vital sympathy with suffering human beings. Yet while Cudworth invoked sympathy in an attempt to capture God's intimate relation with creation, in fact, it served as a principle of mediation that tended either to collapse God into the world or to distance God from the (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  38. Douglas Hedley & Sarah Hutton (eds.) (2008). Platonism and the Origins of Modernity: The Platonic Tradition and the Rise of Modern Philosophy. Springer.score: 56.0
    International Archives of the History of Ideas Archives internationales d'histoire des idées, Vol. 196. -/- Introduction, S. Hutton; Nicholas of Cusa (1401-64): Platonism at the Dawn of Modernity, D. Moran; At Variance: Marsilio Ficino Platonism And Heresy, M.J.B. Allen; Going Naked into the Shrine:Herbert, Plotinus and the Consructive Metaphor, S.R.L.Clark; Commenius, Light Metaphysics and Educational Reform, J. Rohls (Translated by A. Wörn and D. Leech); Robert Fludd’s Kabbalistic Cosmos, W. Schmidt-Biggeman; Reconciling Theory and Fact:The Problem of ‘Other Faiths’ (...)
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  39. Paul Redding, Mind of God, Point of View of Man, or Spirit of the World? Platonism and Organicism in the Thought of Kant and Hegel.score: 54.0
    In his account of Plato’s ideas in the first book of the “Transcendental Dialectic”, “On the concepts of pure reason”, Kant, in describing how for Plato ideas were “archetypes of things themselves”, adds that these ideas “flowed from the highest reason, through which human reason partakes in them”.1 Later, in the section of the Transcendental Dialectic treating the “ideals of pure reason”, he again attributes to Plato the notion of a “divine mind” within which the “ideas” exist. An “ideal”, Kant (...)
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  40. Sarah Hutton (2001). Cambridge Platonists. In Edward N. Zalta (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.score: 50.0
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  41. Jeffrey Edwards (2000). The Cambridge Platonists in Philosophical Context. Review of Metaphysics 53 (3):727-728.score: 50.0
  42. W. F. S. M. (1999). G. A. J. Rogers, J. M. Vienne and Y. C. Zarka (Eds.) The Cambridge Platonists in Philosophical Context: Politics, Metaphysics and Religion. (International Archives of the History of Ideas). (Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1997). Pp. Xiv+249. NLG 250.00, £89.00 Hbk. [REVIEW] Religious Studies 35 (1):113-116.score: 50.0
  43. Michael J. Langford (1972). Gerald R. Cragg (Editor). The Cambridge Platonists. Pp. Xiii + 451. (New York: Oxford University Press, 1968.) £3·60. [REVIEW] Religious Studies 8 (2):181.score: 50.0
  44. A. Babolin (1983). Science and Religious Belief Among the Cambridge Platonists. Rivista di Filosofia Neo-Scolastica 75 (1):76-86.score: 50.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  45. Big Bang (2003). Biology 78, 79; Biological Complexity 73, 133; Function 88, 266" Blind Watchmaker" Hypothesis 133 Buddhism 204 Cambridge Platonists 81, 88. [REVIEW] In Paul K. Moser & Paul Copan (eds.), The Rationality of Theism. Routledge. 78--80.score: 50.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  46. Yannis Constantinidès (2011). Makers and Heirs of the Enlightenment. The Cambridge Platonists Mirrored by Joseph de Maistre / Philippe Barthelet ; Maistre's Rousseaus / Carolina Armenteros ; Two Great Enemies of the Enlightenment : Joseph de Maistre and Schopenhauer. In Carolina Armenteros & Richard Lebrun (eds.), Joseph de Maistre and the Legacy of Enlightenment. Voltaire Foundation.score: 50.0
  47. E. M. Curley (1971). The Cambridge Platonists. Philosophical Studies 20:368-369.score: 50.0
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  48. N. Fairlamb (2005). GAJ Rogers, JM Vienne and YC Zarka: The Cambridge Platonists in Philosophical Context. Politics, Metaphysics and Religion. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 13 (3):580.score: 50.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  49. Alan Gabbey (1993). “A Disease Incurable”: Scepticism and the Cambridge Platonists. In Richard H. Popkin & Arie Johan Vanderjagt (eds.), Scepticism and Irreligion in the Seventeenth and Eighteenth Centuries. E.J. Brill.score: 50.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  50. F. I. G. Rawlins (1954). The Cambridge Platonists. Nature 174 (4428):475.score: 50.0
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
1 — 50 / 1000