Search results for 'Cambridge Platonists Congresses' (try it on Scholar)

1000+ found
Order:
  1.  4
    C. A. Patrides (1980). The Cambridge Platonists. Cambridge University Press.
    This volume contains the selected discourses of four seventeenth-century philosophers, carefully chosen to illustrate the tenets characteristic of the influential movement known as Cambridge Platonism. Fundamental to their beliefs is the statement most clearly voiced by Benjamin Whichcote, their leader by common consent, that the spiritual is not opposed to the rational, nor Grace to nature. Religion is based on reason, even in the presence of 'mystery'. Free will and Grace are not mutually exclusive. The editor's comprehensive (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  2.  2
    Frederick J. Powicke (1926/2006). The Cambridge Platonists: A Study. Martino Pub..
    Some characteristics of the Cambridge Platonists -- Benjamin Whichcote (1609-1683) -- John Smith (1616-1652) -- Ralph Cudworth (1617-1685) -- Nathaniel Culverwel (1618?-1651) -- Henry More (1614-1687) -- Peter Sterry (d. 1672).
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  3.  1
    Frederick J. Powicke (1971/1970). The Cambridge Platonists. [Hamden, Conn.]Archon Books.
    Prologue.--Some characteristics of the Cambridge Platonists.--Benjamin Whichcote (1609-1683)--John Smith (1616-1652)--Ralph Cudworth (1617-1685)--Nathaniel Culverwel (1618?-1651)--Henry More (1614-1687)--Peter Sterry (d. 1672)--Epilogue.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  4.  13
    Richard W. F. Kroll, Richard Ashcraft & Perez Zagorin (eds.) (1992). Philosophy, Science, and Religion in England, 1640-1700. Cambridge University Press.
    This collection of essays looks at the distinctively English intellectual, social and political phenomenon of Latitudinarianism, which emerged during the Civil War and Interregnum and came into its own after the Restoration, becoming a virtual orthodoxy after 1688. Dividing into two parts, it first examines the importance of the Cambridge Platonists, who sought to embrace the newest philosophical and scientific movements within Church of England orthodoxy, and then moves into the later seventeenth century, from the Restoration onwards, culminating (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  5. G. A. J. Rogers, Jean-Michel Vienne & Yves Charles Zarka (1997). The Cambridge Platonists in Philosophical Context Politics, Metaphysics, and Religion.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  6. Eugene Munger Austin (1935). The Ethics of the Cambridge Platonists. Philadelphia.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  7. John John De Boer (1931). The Theory of Knowledge of the Cambridge Platonists. Madras, Methodist Publishing House.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  8.  27
    Ben Lazare Mijuskovic (1974). The Achilles of Rationalist Arguments: The Simplicity, Unity, and Identity of Thought and Soul From the Cambridge Platonists to Kant: A Study in the History of an Argument. Martinus Nijhoff.
    INTRODUCTION TO THE ARGUMENT AND ITS HISTORY PRIOR TO THE AND CENTURIES In the history of ideas, there is an argument that has been used repeatedly, ...
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  9. Geoffrey Philip Henry Pawson (1930). The Cambridge Platonists and Their Place in Religious Thought. London, Society for Promoting Christian Knowledge.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  10.  2
    By Eric B. Baum Cambridge (2004). Charles Taylor. Contemporary Philosophy in Focus. By Ruth Abbey, Editor. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004. Pp. Xi, 220. Right, Wrong and Science: The Ethical Dimensions of the Techno-Scientific Enterprise. Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities, Vol. 81. By Evandro Agazzi. Edited by Craig Dilworth. Atlantic Highlands. [REVIEW] Philosophical Review 113 (2).
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  11.  5
    Robert L. Armstrong (1969). Cambridge Platonists and Locke on Innate Ideas. Journal of the History of Ideas 30 (2):191-205.
    The cambridge platonists exemplify the fear that newtonian natural philosophy subverts the status of traditional moral and religious beliefs, Which are strongly supported by the innate idea doctrine since it justifies them independently of the senses and the material universe. Isaac barrow, Friend and teacher of newton, Also employs the doctrine approbatively to support his metaphysics as a science of basic principles that constitute the foundation of natural science. Locke's rejection of the doctrine is analyzed and it is (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  12.  6
    Ruth Ap Roberts (forthcoming). Arnold and Cambridge Platonists. Clio.
    Matthew arnold maintains in the nineteenth century the renaissance school of the cambridge platonists. for them, reason and religion are by no means at odds: reason is in fact "the candle of the lord." for matthew arnold in "literature and dogma", christianity will prevail only by being shorn of its supernaturalist elements and set on its true rational ground. ernst cassirer has shown how the cambridge platonists bridge the gap between the italian renaissance and the german (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  13. John Russell Roberts (2012). Whichcote and the Cambridge Platonists on Human Nature: An Interpretation and Defense. Oxford Studies in Early Modern Philosophy VI.
    Draft version of essay. ABSTRACT: Benjamin Whichcote developed a distinctive account of human nature centered on our moral psychology. He believed that this view of human nature, which forms the foundation of “Cambridge Platonism,” showed that the demands of reason and faith are not merely compatible but dynamically supportive of one another. I develop an interpretation of this oft-neglected and widely misunderstood account of human nature and defend its viability against a key objection.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  14.  17
    E. A. Burtt (1928). The Cambridge Platonists. [REVIEW] Journal of Philosophy 25 (24):668-669.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  15. Rudolf De Smet & Karin Verelst (2001). Newton's Scholium Generale: The Platonic and Stoic Legacy — Philo, Justus Lipsius and the Cambridge Platonists. History of Science 39 (123):30.
  16.  55
    J. H. Muirhead (1927). The Cambridge Platonists (I). Mind 36 (142):158-178.
    Direct download (10 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  17.  7
    Dominic Scott, Reason, Recollection and the Cambridge Platonists.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  18.  40
    J. H. Muirhead (1927). The Cambridge Platonists (II). Mind 36 (143):326-341.
    Direct download (11 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  19.  2
    R. L. Colie (1959). Light and Enlightenment: A Study of the Cambridge Platonists and the Dutch Arminians. Philosophical Review 68 (1):131-132.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  20.  4
    E. M. Curley (1971). The Cambridge Platonists. Philosophical Studies 20:368-369.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  21. Gerald R. Cragg (ed.) (1968/1985). The Cambridge Platonists. University Press of America.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  22.  11
    Jeffrey Edwards (2000). The Cambridge Platonists in Philosophical Context. Review of Metaphysics 53 (3):727-728.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  23.  13
    Sterling P. Lamprecht (1926). Innate Ideas in the Cambridge Platonists. Philosophical Review 35 (6):553-573.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  24. Alan Gabbey (1993). “A Disease Incurable”: Scepticism and the Cambridge Platonists. In Richard H. Popkin & Arie Johan Vanderjagt (eds.), Scepticism and Irreligion in the Seventeenth and Eighteenth Centuries. E.J. Brill
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  25.  4
    W. F. S. M. (1999). G. A. J. Rogers, J. M. Vienne and Y. C. Zarka (Eds.) The Cambridge Platonists in Philosophical Context: Politics, Metaphysics and Religion. (International Archives of the History of Ideas). (Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1997). Pp. Xiv+249. NLG 250.00, £89.00 Hbk. [REVIEW] Religious Studies 35 (1):113-116.
  26.  7
    Sarah Hutton (2001). Cambridge Platonists. In Edward N. Zalta (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  27.  2
    Michael J. Langford (1972). Gerald R. Cragg . The Cambridge Platonists. Pp. Xiii + 451. £3·60. [REVIEW] Religious Studies 8 (2):181.
  28.  2
    Marjorie Nicolson (1930). George Keith and the Cambridge Platonists. Philosophical Review 39 (1):36-55.
  29.  2
    S. F. (1999). G. A. J. Rogers, J. M. Vienne and Y. C. Zarka (Eds.) The Cambridge Platonists in Philosophical Context: Politics, Metaphysics and Religion. (International Archives of the History of Ideas). (Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1997). Pp. XIV+249. NLG 250.00, £89.00 Hbk. [REVIEW] Religious Studies 35 (1):113-116.
  30. A. Babolin (1983). Science and Religious Belief Among the Cambridge Platonists. Rivista di Filosofia Neo-Scolastica 75 (1):76-86.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  31. Big Bang (2003). ""Biology 78, 79; Biological Complexity 73, 133; Function 88, 266" Blind Watchmaker" Hypothesis 133 Buddhism 204 Cambridge Platonists 81, 88. [REVIEW] In Paul K. Moser & Paul Copan (eds.), The Rationality of Theism. Routledge 78--80.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  32. Ernest Trafford Campagnac, Nathanael Culverwill, John Smith & Benjamin Whichcote (1901). The Cambridge Platonists Being Selections From the Writings of Benjamin Whichcote, John Smith and Nathanael Culverwel, with Introduction. Clarendon Press.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  33. Yannis Constantinidès (2011). Makers and Heirs of the Enlightenment. The Cambridge Platonists Mirrored by Joseph de Maistre / Philippe Barthelet ; Maistre's Rousseaus / Carolina Armenteros ; Two Great Enemies of the Enlightenment : Joseph de Maistre and Schopenhauer. In Carolina Armenteros & Richard Lebrun (eds.), Joseph de Maistre and the Legacy of Enlightenment. Voltaire Foundation
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  34. N. Fairlamb (2005). GAJ Rogers, JM Vienne and YC Zarka: The Cambridge Platonists in Philosophical Context. Politics, Metaphysics and Religion. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 13 (3):580.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  35. W. R. Inge (1926). F. J. Powicke, The Cambridge Platonists. [REVIEW] Hibbert Journal 25:382.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  36. Ben Lazare Mijuskovic (1972). The Simplicity, Unity, and Identity of Thought and Soul From the Cambridge Platonists to Kant: A Study in the History of an Argument. Dissertation, University of California, San Diego
  37. Pauline Phemister & Justin Smith (2007). Leibniz and the Cambridge Platonists in the Debate Over Plastic Natures. In Phemister Pauline & Brown Stuart (eds.), Leibniz and the English-Speaking World. Springer 95-110.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  38. F. I. G. Rawlins (1954). The Cambridge Platonists. Nature 174 (4428):475.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  39. G. B. R. (1919). The Neo-Platonists. By Thomas Whittaker. (Second Edition). One Volume. 8vo. Pp. Xv + 318. Cambridge: University Press, 1918. 23s Net. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 33 (7-8):164-.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  40. Ernst Cassirer (1932). Die Platonische Renaissance in England Und Die Schule von Cambridge. Teubner.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  41. Ernst Cassirer, Friederike Plaga & Claus Rosenkranz (2002). Individuum Und Kosmos in der Philosophie der Renaissance Die Platonische Renaissance in England Und Die Schule von Cambridge.
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  42. Mario Micheletti (2011). I Platonici di Cambridge: Il Pensiero Etico E Religioso. Morcelliana.
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  43. Luisa Simonutti (ed.) (2007). Forme Del Neoplatonismo: Dall'eredità Ficiniana Ai Platonici di Cambridge: Atti Del Convegno, Firenze, 25-27 Ottobre 2001. [REVIEW] L.S. Olschki.
  44.  10
    Jennifer A. Herdt (2001). The Rise of Sympathy and the Question of Divine Suffering. Journal of Religious Ethics 29 (3):367 - 399.
    Seventeenth-century Cambridge Platonist Ralph Cudworth, writing just at the time when the concept of sympathy was moving from the realm of magic to that of ethics, argued that God must be understood as having a vital sympathy with suffering human beings. Yet while Cudworth invoked sympathy in an attempt to capture God's intimate relation with creation, in fact, it served as a principle of mediation that tended either to collapse God into the world or to distance God from (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  45.  44
    Michael B. Gill (2010). From Cambridge Platonism to Scottish Sentimentalism. Journal of Scottish Philosophy 8 (1):13-31.
    The Cambridge Platonists were a group of religious thinkers who attended and taught at Cambridge from the 1640s until the 1660s. The four most important of them were Benjamin Whichcote, John Smith, Ralph Cudworth, and Henry More. The most prominent sentimentalist moral philosophers of the Scottish Enlightenment – Hutcheson, Hume, and Adam Smith – knew of the works of the Cambridge Platonists. But the Scottish sentimentalists typically referred to the Cambridge Platonists only briefly (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  46. Marjorie Hope Nicolson (ed.) (1992). The Conway Letters: The Correspondence of Anne, Viscountess Conway, Henry More, and Their Friends, 1642-1684. Clarendon Press.
    A scholarly edition of letters by Anne, Viscountess Conway, Henry More, and their friends. The edition presents an authoritative text, together with an introduction, commentary notes, and scholarly apparatus.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  47.  9
    Ralph Cudworth (1678/1978). The True Intellectual System of the Universe, 1678. Garland Pub..
  48.  17
    Ernst Cassirer (1953/1970). The Platonic Renaissance in England. New York,Gordian Press.
  49. William Cecil De Pauley (1937/1970). The Candle of the Lord. Freeport, N.Y.,Books for Libraries Press.
    Benjamin Whichcote.--Benjamin Whichcote and Jeremy Taylor.--John Smith.--Ralph Cudworth.--Henry More.--Richard Cumberland.--Nathanael Culverwel.--George Rust.--Edward Stillingfleet.--Additional notes: John Calvin.--Lancelot Andrewes: Excerpt on the candle of the Lord.--William Laud: Excerpt on Scripture.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  50.  6
    Author unknown, Ralph Cudworth. Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
1 — 50 / 1000