Search results for 'Capabilities approach' (try it on Scholar)

1000+ found
Order:
  1. Alexander Bertland (2009). Virtue Ethics in Business and the Capabilities Approach. Journal of Business Ethics 84 (1):25 - 32.
    Recently, Amartya Sen and Martha Nussbaum have developed the capabilities approach to provide a model for understanding the effectiveness of programs to help the developing nations. The approach holds that human beings are fundamentally free and have a sense of human dignity. Therefore, institutions need to help people enhance this dignity by providing them with the opportunity to develop their capabilities freely. I argue that this approach may help support business ethics based on virtue. Since (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   19 citations  
  2.  53
    Cecile Renouard (2011). Corporate Social Responsibility, Utilitarianism, and the Capabilities Approach. Journal of Business Ethics 98 (1):85 - 97.
    This article explores the possible convergence between the capabilities approach and utilitarianism to specify CSR. It defends the idea that this key issue is related to the anthropological perspective that underpins both theories and demonstrates that a relational conception of individual freedoms and rights present in both traditions gives adequate criteria for CSR toward the company's stakeholders. I therefore defend "relational capability" as a means of providing a common paradigm, a shared vision of a core component of human (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   8 citations  
  3.  70
    Ramona Ilea (2008). Nussbaum's Capabilities Approach and Nonhuman Animals: Theory and Public Policy. Journal of Social Philosophy 39 (4):547-563.
    In this paper, I assess Martha Nussbaum's application of the capabilities approach to non-human animals for both its philosophical merits and its potential to affect public policy. I argue that there are currently three main philosophical problems with the theory that need further attention. After discussing these problems, I show how focusing on factory farming would enable Nussbaum to demonstrate the philosophical merits of the capabilities approach as well as to suggest more powerful and effectives changes (...)
    Direct download (10 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  4.  4
    Michael J. Selgelid (2016). Capabilities and Incapabilities of the Capabilities Approach to Health Justice. Bioethics 30 (1):25-33.
    This first part of this article critiques Sridhar Venkatapuram's conception of health as a capability. It argues that Venkatapuram relies on the problematic concept of dignity, implies that those who are unhealthy lack lives worthy of dignity, sets a low bar for health, appeals to metaphysically problematic thresholds, fails to draw clear connections between appealed-to capabilities and health, and downplays the importance/relevance of health functioning. It concludes by questioning whether justice entitlements should pertain to the capability for health versus (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  5.  4
    Caroline Harnacke (2013). Disability and Capability: Exploring the Usefulness of Martha Nussbaum's Capabilities Approach for the UN Disability Rights Convention. Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 41 (4):768-780.
    I explore the usefulness of Martha Nussbaum's capabilities approach in regard to the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD). The CRPD aims at empowering people with disabilities by granting them a number of civil and political, but also economic, social and cultural rights. Implementing the CRPD will clearly be politically challenging and also very expensive for states. Thus, questions might arise as to whether the requirements set in the CRPD can be justified from an (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  6.  5
    Karin Nordström & Joe Goossens (2016). Personalized Nutrition and Social Justice: Ethical Considerations Within Four Future Scenarios Applying the Perspective of Nussbaum’s Capabilities Approach. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 29 (1):5-22.
    The idea of personalized nutrition is to give tailored dietary advice based on personal health-related data, i.e. phenotoype, genotype, or lifestyle. PN may be seen as part of a general trend towards personalised health care and currently various types of business models are already offering such services in the market. This paper explores ethical issues of PN by examining how PN services within the contextual environment of four future scenarios about health and nutrition in Europe might affect aspects of social (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  7.  26
    Martha Nussbaum (2000). Women and Human Development: The Capabilities Approach. Cambridge University Press.
    Only a broad concern for functioning and capability can do justice to the complex interrelationships between human striving and its material and social context. IV. CENTRAL HUMAN CAPABILITIES The most interesting worries about ...
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   193 citations  
  8.  38
    Paul Formosa & Catriona Mackenzie (2014). Nussbaum, Kant, and the Capabilities Approach to Dignity. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 17 (5):875-892.
    The concept of dignity plays a foundational role in the more recent versions of Martha Nussbaum’s capabilities theory. However, despite its centrality to her theory, Nussbaum’s conception of dignity remains under-theorised. In this paper we critically examine the role that dignity plays in Nussbaum’s theory by, first, developing an account of the concept of dignity and introducing a distinction between two types of dignity, status dignity and achievement dignity. Next, drawing on this account, we analyse Nussbaum’s conception of dignity (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  9.  7
    Daniel Crescenzo (2012). The Problem of Predator-Prey Relations and Predator Flourishing in Nussbaum's Capabilities Approach to Justice. Environmental Ethics 34 (2):177-197.
    According to Martha Nussbaum, treating animals justly is a matter of guaranteeing each individual those capabilities up to a minimum threshold that are essential for flourishing as a member of a particular species. Nussbaum’s basic theoretical framework is acceptable; however, a capability which Nussbaum thinks is not essential for the flourishing, the oppor­tunity to kill as a part of exercising predatory instinct, may in fact be essential for predator flourishing. Nussbaum ought to be concerned with the possibility that this (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  10. Elizabeth Anderson, Justifying the Capabilities Approach to Justice.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  11.  8
    Vikki A. Entwistle & Ian S. Watt (2013). Treating Patients as Persons: A Capabilities Approach to Support Delivery of Person-Centered Care. American Journal of Bioethics 13 (8):29-39.
    Health services internationally struggle to ensure health care is ?person-centered? (or similar). In part, this is because there are many interpretations of ?person-centered care? (and near synonyms), some of which seem unrealistic for some patients or situations and obscure the intrinsic value of patients? experiences of health care delivery. The general concern behind calls for person-centered care is an ethical one: Patients should be ?treated as persons.? We made novel use of insights from the capabilities approach to characterize (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   15 citations  
  12.  36
    Linda Barclay (2012). Natural Deficiency or Social Oppression? The Capabilities Approach to Justice for People with Disabilities. Journal of Moral Philosophy 9 (4):500-520.
    Theories of distributive justice are often criticised for either excluding people with disabilities from the domain of justice altogether, or casting them as deficient in personal attributes. I argue that the capabilities approach to justice is largely immune to these flaws. It has the conceptual resources to locate most of the causes of disadvantage in the interaction between a person and her environment and in doing so can characterise the disadvantages of disability in a way that avoids the (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  13.  38
    Colleen Murphy & Paolo Gardoni (2008). The Acceptability and the Tolerability of Societal Risks: A Capabilities-Based Approach. Science and Engineering Ethics 14 (1):77-92.
    In this paper, we present a Capabilities -based Approach to the acceptability and the tolerability of risks posed by natural and man-made hazards. We argue that judgments about the acceptability and/or tolerability of such risks should be based on an evaluation of the likely societal impact of potential hazards, defined in terms of the expected changes in the capabilities of individuals. Capabilities refer to the functionings, or valuable doings and beings, individuals are able to achieve given (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  14.  11
    Wouter Peeters, Jo Dirix & Sigrid Sterckx (2015). Towards an Integration of the Ecological Space Paradigm and the Capabilities Approach. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 28 (3):479-496.
    In order to develop a model of equitable and sustainable distribution, this paper advocates integrating the ecological space paradigm and the capabilities approach. As the currency of distribution, this account proposes a hybrid of capabilities and ecological space. Although the goal of distributive justice should be to secure and promote people’s capabilities now and in the future, doing so requires acknowledging that these capabilities are dependent on the biophysical preconditions as well as inculcating the ethos (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  15. Elizabeth Cripps (2010). Saving the Polar Bear, Saving the World: Can the Capabilities Approach Do Justice to Humans, Animals and Ecosystems? [REVIEW] Res Publica 16 (1):1-22.
    Martha Nussbaum has expanded the capabilities approach to defend positive duties of justice to individuals who fall below Rawls’ standard for fully cooperating members of society, including sentient nonhuman animals. Building on this, David Schlosberg has defended the extension of capabilities justice not only to individual animals but also to entire species and ecosystems. This is an attractive vision: a happy marriage of social, environmental and ecological justice, which also respects the claims of individual animals. This paper (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  16.  38
    Colleen Murphy & Paolo Gardoni (2007). Determining Public Policy and Resource Allocation Priorities for Mitigating Natural Hazards: A Capabilities-Based Approach. Science and Engineering Ethics 13 (4):489-504.
    This paper proposes a Capabilities -based Approach to guide hazard mitigation efforts. First, a discussion is provided of the criteria that should be met by an adequate framework for formulating public policy and allocating resources. This paper shows why a common decision-aiding tool, Cost-benefit Analysis, fails to fulfill such criteria. A Capabilities -based Approach to hazard mitigation is then presented, drawing on the framework originally developed in the context of development economics and policy. The focus of (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  17.  21
    Melanie Walker (2003). Framing Social Justice in Education: What Does the 'Capabilities' Approach Offer? British Journal of Educational Studies 51 (2):168 - 187.
    This paper develops a framework for conceptualising social justice in education, drawing particularly on Martha Nussbaum's (2000) capabilities approach. The practical case for consideration is that of widening participation and pedagogical implications in higher (university) education in England. While the paper supports the value and usefulness of Nussbaum's list of ten capabilities for developing a more radical and challenging language and practice for higher education pedagogies, it also argues that her approach is limited. Other ways of (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  18. Christopher A. Riddle & Jerome E. Bickenbach (2014). Disability and Justice: The Capabilities Approach in Practice. Lexington Books.
    Disability & Justice: The Capabilities Approach in Practice is an interdisciplinary examination of the practical application of the capabilities approach viewed through the lens of the experience of disability. Careful and critical examination of vital foundational concepts is undertaken prior to contextualizing the experience of disability and how we might begin to promote an inclusive society through an application of the capabilities approach.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  19.  44
    Luara Ferracioli & Rosa Terlazzo (2014). Educating for Autonomy: Liberalism and Autonomy in the Capabilities Approach. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 17 (3):443-455.
    Martha Nussbaum grounds her version of the capabilities approach in political liberalism. In this paper, we argue that the capabilities approach, insofar as it genuinely values the things that persons can actually do and be, must be grounded in a hybrid account of liberalism: in order to show respect for adults, its justification must be political; in order to show respect for children, however, its implementation must include a commitment to comprehensive autonomy, one that ensures that (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  20.  33
    J. Felix Lozano, Alejandra Boni, Jordi Peris & Andrés Hueso (2012). Competencies in Higher Education: A Critical Analysis From the Capabilities Approach. Journal of Philosophy of Education 46 (1):132-147.
    With the creation of the European Higher Education Area, universities are undergoing a significant transformation that is leading towards a new teaching and learning paradigm. The competencies approach has a key role in this process. But we believe that the competence approach has a number of limitations and weaknesses that can be overcome and supplanted by the capabilities approach. In this article our objective is twofold: first, make a critical analysis of the concept of competence as (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  21.  14
    Raymond Anthony (2009). Farming Animals and the Capabilities Approach: Understanding Roles and Responsibilities Through Narrative Ethics. Society and Animals 17 (3):257-278.
    In the Proceedings that emerged from the Second International Workshop on the Assessment of Animal Welfare at Farm and Group Level, Sandoe, Christiansen, & Appleby challenged participants to ponder four fundamental questions:a. What is the baseline standard for morally acceptable animal welfare?b. What is a good animal life?c. What farming purposes are legitimate?d. What kinds of compromises are acceptable in a less-than-perfect world?Continued reflection on those questions warrants examination of the shape of our modern agricultural ethic. It also calls for (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  22.  5
    Joshua Schulz (2016). The Capabilities Approach and Catholic Social Teaching: An Engagement. Journal of Global Ethics 12 (1):29-47.
    ABSTRACTThis essay brings Martha Nussbaum's politically liberal version of the Capabilities Approach to human development into critical dialogue with the Catholic Social Tradition. Like CST, Nussbaum's focus on embodiment, dependence and dignity entails a social use of property which privileges marginalized people, and both theories explain the underdevelopment of central human capabilities in social rather than exclusively material terms. Whereas CST is metaphysically and theologically ‘thick', however, CA is ‘thin’: its proponents positively eschew metaphysical commitments, believing a (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  23.  68
    Thom Brooks, The Capabilities Approach, Religious Practices, and the Importance of Recognition.
    When can ever be justified in banning a religious practice? This paper focusses on Martha Nussbaum's capabilities approach. Certain religious practices create a clash between capabilities where the capability to religious belief and expression is in conflict with the capability of equal status and nondiscrimination. One example of such a clash is the case of polygamy. Nussbaum argues that there may be circumstances where polygamy may be acceptable. On the contrary, I argue that the capabilities (...) cannot justify polygamy in any circumstance. Her approach rules out polygamy, but may not rule out all non-monogamous relationships, such as polyamory. Finally, I conclude that the capabilities approach would benefit from a more robust understanding of recognition. (shrink)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  24.  28
    Veronica Vasterling (2008). Martha Nussbaum's Capabilities Approach. Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 50:823-835.
    Throughout the 1990-ies Nussbaum, in collaboration with others, has elaborated and argued for a list of human capabilities which specifies necessary conditions of human flourishing. The capabilities approach has been enormously influential in putting issues of global development and justice, and especially justice for women, on the philosophical and political agenda. Moreover, many international agencies and institutions, including the United Nations Development Program, have started to make use of this approach. Despite of its obvious good intentions (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  25.  21
    Yuko Kamishima (2008). Can Nussbaum's Capabilities Approach Be a Foundation of Politically Liberal Theory of Justice? Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 50:293-298.
    With our state-guaranteed or internationally recognized human rights, liberalism is rather a common basis of political discussion today. John Rawls’s theory of justice, which set a framework for liberal theory of justice in the last decades of the twentieth century, is notably contractarian. Martha Nussbaum, although claiming to be a neo-Aristotelian, argues that her capabilities approach (hereafter CA) can upgrade the liberal theory of justice, particularly that of political liberalism, to deal with unsolved problems of justice, namely, disability, (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  26.  23
    Katy Fulfer (2013). The Capabilities Approach to Justice and the Flourishing of Nonsentient Life. Ethics and the Environment 18 (1):19-38.
    According to Martha Nussbaum’s capabilities approach (CA) to justice, a (liberal) society is just if it provides people with the means to actualize basic capabilities that are necessary for a dignified human life. In Frontiers of Justice, Nussbaum (2006) expands the CA to include sentient nonhuman animals in the sphere of justice (as opposed, for instance, to the sphere of compassion). As it does for humans, justice requires that sentient creatures have the ability to access capabilities (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  27.  4
    Pablo Martínez Becerra (2015). The «capabilities approach» Martha Nussbaum face the problem of animal ethics. Veritas 33 (33):71-87.
    En este artículo se estudia el enfoque de las capacidades de Martha Nussbaum como un intento de fundamentar la inclusión de los anima les no humanos dentro de la dimensión cívica de los derechos. En esta perspectiva se pretende establecer ciertos «deberes directos de justicia» para los seres sentientes, poseedores de cierta complejidad, que el Estado debe cautelar y procurar como un mínimo exigido. Tras analizar esta propuesta, se desarrollan algunas de las críticas originadas por la «ética animal» defendida por (...)
    No categories
    Translate
      Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  28.  11
    Caroline Harnacke (2013). Disability and Capability: Exploring the Usefulness of Martha Nussbaum's Capabilities Approach for the UN Disability Rights Convention. Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 41 (4):768-780.
    I explore the usefulness of Martha Nussbaum's capabilities approach in regard to the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD). The CRPD aims at empowering people with disabilities by granting them a number of civil and political, but also economic, social and cultural rights. Implementing the CRPD will clearly be politically challenging and also very expensive for states. Thus, questions might arise as to whether the requirements set in the CRPD can be justified from an (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  29.  11
    R. Terlazzo (2009). Progressive Politics: Liberalism, Humanism, and Feminism in Nussbaum's Capabilities Approach. South African Journal of Philosophy 28 (2):234-245.
    A purely theoretical analysis of Martha Nussbaum’s basis of the capabilities approach in feminist (rather than more broadly liberal humanist) justice yields a philosophical project that may appear inconsistent, if not incoherent. However, I suggest in this paper that when the reader considers the project’s very concrete aims, there surfaces an intelligible reason for the apparent incongruities between her feminist and liberal commitments. Since even a capabilities approach rooted in feminist justice is itself radical and must (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  30.  27
    J. Thompson (2002). Women and Human Development: The Capabilities Approach. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 80 (1):111 – 113.
    Book Information Women and Human Development: The Capabilities Approach. By Martha C. Nussbaum. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge/New York. 2000. Pp. xxi + 312.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  31.  7
    Iris Domselaar (2009). Nussbaum's Capabilities Approach: In Need of a Moral Epistemology? Netherlands Journal of Legal Philosophy 3:186-201.
    Although Nussbaum’s “Capabilities Approach” clearly expresses a commitment to objectivity, this article argues that this commitment is rather ambiguous due to the conception of public reason it endorses. In particular, the CA cannot account for an objective justification of public reason, given certain characteristics of public reason. As a result, the CA jeopardizes the substantive aim it has set itself: to provide an objective justification for public choices regarding human capabilities and their specifications.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  32. Christopher A. Riddle & Jerome E. Bickenbach (2016). Disability and Justice: The Capabilities Approach in Practice. Lexington Books.
    Disability & Justice: The Capabilities Approach in Practice is an interdisciplinary examination of the practical application of the capabilities approach viewed through the lens of the experience of disability. Careful and critical examination of vital foundational concepts is undertaken prior to contextualizing the experience of disability and how we might begin to promote an inclusive society through an application of the capabilities approach.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  33.  20
    Yingqin Zheng & Bernd Carsten Stahl (2011). Technology, Capabilities and Critical Perspectives: What Can Critical Theory Contribute to Sen's Capability Approach? [REVIEW] Ethics and Information Technology 13 (2):69-80.
    This paper explores what insights can be drawn from critical theory to enrich and strengthen Sen’s capability approach in relation to technology and human development. The two theories share some important commonalities: both are concerned with the pursuit of “a good life”; both are normative theories rooted in ethics and meant to make a difference, and both are interested in democracy. The paper provides a brief overview of both schools of thought and their applications to technology and human development. (...)
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  34.  1
    Sheela Saravanan (2015). Global Justice, Capabilities Approach and Commercial Surrogacy in India. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 18 (3):295-307.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  35.  11
    Robert F. Garnett (2009). Liberal Learning as Freedom: A Capabilities Approach to Undergraduate Education. Studies in Philosophy and Education 28 (5):437-447.
  36. Urszula Lisowska (2015). VULNERABILITY AS A PERCEPTUAL CATEGORY – MARTHA NUSSBAUM's CAPABILITIES APPROACH FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF POLITICAL AESTHETICS. Hybris. Revista de Filosofía (28):116-140.
    VULNERABILITY AS A PERCEPTUAL CATEGORY – MARTHA NUSSBAUM’S CAPABILITIES APPROACH FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF POLITICAL AESTHETICS The aim of the paper is to draw politico-aesthetic consequences from Martha Nussbaum’s capabilities approach. It is argued that this can be achieved by focusing on the notion of vulnerability implied by the idea of capabilities. The recognition of the vulnerability of the human good inspires a new model of practical rationality based on perception. This idea, in turn, explores (...)
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  37.  23
    Eranda Jayawickreme & James O. Pawelski (2012). Positivity and the Capabilities Approach. Philosophical Psychology 26 (3):383-400.
    We evaluate the suitability of Nussbaum's substantive account of capabilities in light of conceptual and empirical work that has shown that positivity is widely valued and pursued as an end by many people, and evidence that positive outcomes, even economic ones, are often caused by well-being rather than the other way around. While Nussbaum sees positive emotions as incidental to the experience of well-being, we argue that the experience of such mental states is partly constitutive of flourishing.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  38.  2
    Shatema Threadcraft (2015). ‘Movement’ Justice and the Capabilities Approach Resources, Social Environments and Social Attitudes in Black Urban Space. Philosophy and Social Criticism 41 (1):55-60.
    The capability approach described by Amartya Sen illustrates the multiple aspects of injustice in such fields as racially motivated sexual harassment or segregation in urban space. In response to Sen’s pointing out that we should focus not simply on institutions but also on the social realizations they engender, the article illustrates the function of the natural and social environments for racial groups in affecting the distribution of resources necessary to secure justice.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  39.  17
    Melanie Walker (2006). Higher Education Pedagogies: A Capabilities Approach. Open University Press.
    This book sets out to generate new ways of reflecting ethically about the purposes and values of contemporary higher education in relation to agency, learning, public values and democratic life, and the pedagogies which support these.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   10 citations  
  40. Martha C. Nussbaum (2000). Women and Human Development: The Capabilities Approach. Cambridge University Press.
    In this major book Martha Nussbaum, one of the most innovative and influential philosophical voices of our time, proposes a kind of feminism that is genuinely international, argues for an ethical underpinning to all thought about development planning and public policy, and dramatically moves beyond the abstractions of economists and philosophers to embed thought about justice in the concrete reality of the struggles of poor women. Nussbaum argues that international political and economic thought must be sensitive to gender difference as (...)
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   9 citations  
  41. Phillip McReynolds (2002). Nussbaum's Capabilities Approach: A Pragmatist Critique. [REVIEW] Journal of Speculative Philosophy 16 (2):142 - 150.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  42.  6
    Jesús Conill (2013). The Philosophical Foundations of the Capabilities Approach. In Christopher Luetege (ed.), Handbook of the Philosophical Foundations of Business Ethics. Springer 661--674.
  43.  3
    Rebecca Leah Levine (2013). Disabling the Patient by Incorporating the Capabilities Approach Into Person-Centered Care. American Journal of Bioethics 13 (8):55-56.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  44.  1
    Laura Capitaine, Guido Pennings & Sigrid Sterckx (2013). Why Jecker's Capabilities Approach to Age-Based Rationing Is Incapable of Containing Health Care Costs. American Journal of Bioethics 13 (8):22-23.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  45.  19
    Martha Nussbaum (2011). The Capabilities Approach and Ethical Cosmopolitanism: The Challenge of Political Liberalism1. In Maria Rovisco & Magdalena Nowicka (eds.), The Ashgate Research Companion to Cosmopolitanism. Ashgate 403.
  46. Suzanne van de Vathorst, Dick Willems & Marie-Louise Essink-Bot (2013). The Contribution of the Capabilities Approach to Reconciling Culturally Competent Care and Nondiscrimination. American Journal of Bioethics 13 (8):47-48.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  47.  3
    A. J. Pritchard (2012). Health, Power, Justice and Truth. Review of Venkatapuram, S. Health Justice: An Argument From the Capabilities Approach. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 18 (5):1116-1118.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  48.  60
    Anne Phillips (2002). Martha C. Nussbaum, Women and Human Development: The Capabilities Approach:Women and Human Development: The Capabilities Approach. Ethics 112 (2):398-403.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  49.  1
    Thom Brooks (2014). A New Problem with the Capabilities Approach. The Harvard Review of Philosophy 20:100-106.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  50.  6
    Kacey Warren (2015). Does Nussbaum’s Capabilities Approach Support Political Surrogacy? Social Philosophy Today 31:111-125.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
1 — 50 / 1000