22 found
Sort by:
  1. Carl F. Cranor (2007). Towards a Non-Consequentialist Approach to Acceptable Risks. In Tim Lewens (ed.), Risk: Philosophical Perspectives. Routledge. 36--53.
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Carl F. Cranor (2007). The Use of Empirical Evidence to Assess and Critique Judicial Decisions. Midwest Studies in Philosophy 31 (1):1–24.
    No categories
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Carl F. Cranor (2005). The Science Veil Over Tort Law Policy: How Should Scientific Evidence Be Utilized in Toxic Tort Law? [REVIEW] Law and Philosophy 24 (2):139 - 210.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Carl F. Cranor (2004). Toward Understanding Aspects of the Precautionary Principle. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 29 (3):259 – 279.
    The idea of a precautionary principle (or precautionary principles) is beginning to come to the wider attention of the environmental community, governmental agencies, regulatory agencies, and the regulated community. Different precautionary principles have not been specified in detail, and, of course, this is difficult to do. Yet some specification must be done in order to understand it better and, if it is to be used for specific action-guidance, to implement it. Moreover, it is important to understand more about the principle, (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Carl F. Cranor (2001). Learning From the Law to Address Uncertainty in the Precautionary Principle. Science and Engineering Ethics 7 (3):313-326.
    Environmentalists have advocated the Precautionary Principle (PP) to help guide public and private decisions about the environment. By contrast, industry and its spokesmen have opposed this. There is not one principle, but many that have been recommended for this purpose. Despite the attractiveness of a core idea in all versions of the principle—that decision-makers should take some precautionary steps to ensure that threats of serious and irreversible damage to the environment and public health do not materialize into harm—even one of (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Carl F. Cranor (2001). Oliver A. Johnson, 1923-2000. Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association 75 (2):116 - 118.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Carl F. Cranor (2000). Kenneth R. Foster and Peter W. Huber, Judging Science: Scientific Knowledge and the Federal Courts:Judging Science: Scientific Knowledge and the Federal Courts. Ethics 110 (4):829-832.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Carl F. Cranor (1999). Empirically and Institutionally Rich Legal and Moral Philosophy. Midwest Studies in Philosophy 23 (1):286–311.
    No categories
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. Carl F. Cranor (1998). Howard Margolis, Dealing with Risk: Why the Public and the Experts Disagree on Environmental Issues:Dealing with Risk: Why the Public and the Experts Disagree on Environmental Issues. Ethics 108 (4):830-833.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. Carl F. Cranor (1997). A Philosophy of Risk Assessment and the Law: A Case Study of the Role of Philosophy in Public Policy. [REVIEW] Philosophical Studies 85 (2-3):135-162.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. Carl F. Cranor (1995). Learning From the Law for Regulatory Science. Law and Philosophy 14 (1):115 - 145.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. Carl F. Cranor (1993). Regulating Toxic Substances: A Philosophy of Science and the Law. Oxford University Press, Usa.
    In this book, Carl Cranor utilizes material from ethics, philosophy of law, epidemiology, tort law, regulatory law, and risk assessment to argue that the evidentiary standards for science used in the law to control toxics ought to be ...
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. Carl F. Cranor (1990). Book Review:The Importance of What We Care About: Philosophical Essays. Harry G. Frankfurt. [REVIEW] Ethics 100 (4):886-.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. Carl F. Cranor (1990). Some Moral Issues in Risk Assessment. Ethics 101 (1):123-143.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. Carl F. Cranor (1988). Some Public Policy Problems with the Science of Carcinogen Risk Assessment. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1988:467 - 488.
    Government agencies and private risk assessors use (quasi) scientific risk assessment procedures to try to estimate or predict risk to human health or the environment that might result from exposure to toxic substances in order to take steps to prevent such risks from arising or to eliminate the risks if they already exist. In this paper I discuss several ways in which the "science" of carcinogen risk assessment differs from ordinary scientific enterprises. I also consider several ways in which normative (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. Carl F. Cranor (1986). Book Review:Philosophical Dimensions of Privacy: An Anthology. Ferdinand D. Schoeman. [REVIEW] Ethics 96 (3):643-.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. Carl F. Cranor (1985). Collective and Individual Duties to Protect the Environment. Journal of Applied Philosophy 2 (2):243-259.
    Direct download (10 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. Carl F. Cranor (1985). Joint Causation, Torts, and Regulatory Law in Workplace Health Protections. International Journal of Applied Philosophy 2 (4):59-84.
  19. Carl F. Cranor (1983). Bibliographical Essay / the Hart‐Devlin Debate. Criminal Justice Ethics 2 (1):59-65.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. Carl F. Cranor (1983). On Respecting Human Beings as Persons. Journal of Value Inquiry 17 (2):103-117.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. Carl F. Cranor (1982). Limitations on Respect-for-Persons Theories. Tulane Studies in Philosophy 31:45-60.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  22. Carl F. Cranor (1979). Legal Moralism Reconsidered. Ethics 89 (2):147-164.
    In section i, I sketch the main arguments to date for legal moralism, And show the ways in which they are unpersuasive. In sections ii and iii, I sketch and evaluate a seemingly compelling argument, Dependent on the concept of wrongful conduct, For the weak thesis that the immorality of conduct is a reason, But not a sufficient reason for making it illegal. Despite the apparent persuasiveness of this argument, The particular conclusions of the legal moralist, That various non-Harmful immoralities (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation