261 found
Order:
Disambiguations:
Carl G. Hempel [251]Carl Gustav Hempel [10]
  1.  53
    Carl Gustav Hempel (1965). Aspects of Scientific Explanation. In Philosophy and Phenomenological Research. Free Press 504.
  2. Carl G. Hempel (1942). The Function of General Laws in History. Journal of Philosophy 39 (2):35-48.
    The classic logical positivist account of historical explanation, putting forward what is variously called the "regularity interpretation" (#Gardiner, The Nature of Historical Explanation), the "covering law model" (#Dray, Laws and Explanation in History), or the "deductive model" (Michael #Scriven, "Truisms as Grounds for Historical Explanations"). See also #Danto, Narration and Knowledge, for further criticisms of the model. Hempel formalizes historical explanation as involving (a) statements of determining (initial and boundary) conditions for the event to be explained, and (b) statements of (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   49 citations  
  3. Carl G. Hempel (1966). Philosophy of Natural Science. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.,Prentice-Hall.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   211 citations  
  4. Carl G. Hempel & Paul Oppenheim (1948). Studies in the Logic of Explanation. Philosophy of Science 15 (2):135-175.
  5. Carl G. Hempel (1945). Studies in the Logic of Confirmation (I.). Mind 54 (213):1-26.
    Direct download (11 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   88 citations  
  6. Carl G. Hempel (1945). Studies in the Logic of Confirmation (II.). Mind 54 (214):97-121.
    Direct download (10 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   46 citations  
  7.  44
    Carl G. Hempel (1980). The Logical Analysis of Psychology. In Ned Block (ed.), Readings in Philosophy of Psychology. Cambridge: Harvard University Press 1--14.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   20 citations  
  8. Carl G. Hempel (1935). On the Logical Positivists' Theory of Truth. Analysis 2 (4):49 - 59.
  9. Carl G. Hempel, Donald Davidson & Nicholas Rescher (eds.) (1970). Essays in Honor of Carl G. Hempel. Dordrecht,D. Reidel.
    Reminiscences of Peter, by P. Oppenheim.--Natural kinds, by W. V. Quine.--Inductive independence and the paradoxes of confirmation, by J. Hintikka.--Partial entailment as a basis for inductive logic, by W. C. Salmon.--Are there non-deductive logics?, by W. Sellars.--Statistical explanation vs. statistical inference, by R. C. Jeffre--Newcomb's problem and two principles of choice, by R. Nozick.--The meaning of time, by A. Grünbaum.--Lawfulness as mind-dependent, by N. Rescher.--Events and their descriptions: some considerations, by J. Kim.--The individuation of events, by D. Davidson.--On properties, by (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   36 citations  
  10.  24
    Carl Gustav Hempel (1964). Fundamentals of Concept Formation in Empirical Science. University of Chicago Press.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   38 citations  
  11.  70
    Carl G. Hempel (1988). Provisoes: A Problem Concerning the Inferential Function of Scientific Theories. [REVIEW] Erkenntnis 28 (2):147 - 164.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   18 citations  
  12.  49
    Carl G. Hempel (1960). Inductive Inconsistencies. Synthese 12 (4):439-69.
  13.  64
    Carl G. Hempel (1980). Comments on Goodman's Ways of Worldmaking. Synthese 45 (2):193 - 199.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   23 citations  
  14.  97
    Carl G. Hempel (1968). Maximal Specificity and Lawlikeness in Probabilistic Explanation. Philosophy of Science 35 (2):116-133.
    The article is a reappraisal of the requirement of maximal specificity (RMS) proposed by the author as a means of avoiding "ambiguity" in probabilistic explanation. The author argues that RMS is not, as he had held in one earlier publication, a rough substitute for the requirement of total evidence, but is independent of it and has quite a different rationale. A group of recent objections to RMS is answered by stressing that the statistical generalizations invoked in probabilistic explanations must be (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   16 citations  
  15. Carl G. Hempel & Paul Oppenheim (1948). Reply to David L. Miller's Comments. Philosophy of Science 15 (4):350-352.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  16.  85
    Carl G. Hempel (1935). Some Remarks on `Facts' and Propositions. Analysis 2 (6):93-96.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   7 citations  
  17. Carl G. Hempel (1958). The Theoretician's Dilemma: A Study in the Logic of Theory Construction. Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science 2:173-226.
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   21 citations  
  18.  63
    Carl G. Hempel (1981). Turns in the Evolution of the Problem of Induction. Synthese 46 (3):389 - 404.
  19.  34
    Carl G. Hempel & Paul Oppenheim (1945). A Definition of "Degree of Confirmation". Philosophy of Science 12 (2):98-115.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   27 citations  
  20.  35
    Carl G. Hempel (1943). A Purely Syntactical Definition of Confirmation. Journal of Symbolic Logic 8 (4):122-143.
  21. Carl G. Hempel (1965). Science and Human Values. In Aspects of Scientific Explanation and Other Essays in the Philosophy of Science. The Free Press 81-96.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   22 citations  
  22.  61
    Carl G. Hempel (1936). Some Remarks on Empiricism. Analysis 3 (3):33 - 40.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  23.  77
    Carl G. Hempel (1964). On the Nature of Mathematical Truth. In P. Benacerraf H. Putnam (ed.), Philosophy of Mathematics. Prentice-Hall 366--81.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   5 citations  
  24.  66
    Carl G. Hempel (1967). The White Shoe: No Red Herring. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 18 (3):239-240.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   6 citations  
  25.  81
    Carl G. Hempel (1983). Kuhn and Salmon on Rationality and Theory Choice. Journal of Philosophy 80 (10):570-572.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  26.  39
    Carl G. Hempel (1961). Rational Action. Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association 35:5 - 23.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   8 citations  
  27.  90
    Carl G. Hempel (2001). The Philosophy of Carl G. Hempel: Studies in Science, Explanation, and Rationality. Oxford University Press.
    Editor James Fetzer presents an analytical and historical introduction and a comprehensive bibliography together with selections of many of Carl G. Hempel's most important studies to give students and scholars an ideal opportunity to appreciate the enduring contributions of one of the most influential philosophers of science of the 20th century.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  28. Carl G. Hempel, Jaakko Hintikka, Gerald Holton, Peter Galison, Antonia Soulez & Nancy Cartwright (1993). Scientific Philosophy: Origins and Developments. Springer Netherlands.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   6 citations  
  29.  2
    Leopold Lowenheim, S. C. Kleene, Paul Bernays, Saunders MacLane, Ernest Nagel, Albert Wohlstetter, J. C. C. McKinsey, Charles A. Baylis, Carl G. Hempel & C. H. Langford (2013). The Journal of Symbolic Logic Publishes Original Scholarly Work in Symbolic Logic. Founded in 1936, It has Become the Leading Research Journal in the Field. The Journal Aims to Represent Logic Broadly, Including its Connections with Mathematics and Philosophy as Well as Newer Aspects Related to Computer Science and Linguistics. [REVIEW] Journal of Symbolic Logic 43 (44).
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  30.  8
    Carl G. Hempel (1949). Theory of Experimental Inference. [REVIEW] Journal of Philosophy 46 (17):557-561.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  31. Carl G. Hempel (1950). Problems and Changes in the Empiricist Criterion of Meaning. 11 Rev. Intern. De Philos 41 (11):41-63.
    The fundamental tenet of modern empiricism is the view that all non-analytic knowledge is based on experience. Let us call this thesis the principle of empiricism. [1] Contemporary logical empiricism has added [2] to it the maxim that a sentence makes a cognitively meaningful assertion, and thus can be said to be either true or false, only if it is either (1) analytic or self-contradictory or (2) capable, at least in principle, of experiential test. According to this so-called empiricist criterion (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   10 citations  
  32.  15
    Carl G. Hempel (1983). Valuation and Objectivity in Science. In R. Cohen & L. Laudan (eds.), Physics, Philosophy, and Psychoanalysis. D. Reidel 73--100.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  33.  26
    Carl G. Hempel (1991). Hans Reichenbach Remembered. Erkenntnis 35 (1-3):5 - 10.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   5 citations  
  34.  7
    Carl G. Hempel & Nelson Goodman (1956). Philosophy and Analysis. Journal of Symbolic Logic 21 (1):78-82.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  35.  45
    Carl G. Hempel (2000). Selected Philosophical Essays. Cambridge University Press.
    Carl Gustav Hempel (1905-1997) was one of the preeminent figures in the philosophical movement of logical empiricism. He was a member of both the Berlin and Vienna circles, fled Germany in 1934 and finally settled in the US where he taught for many years in New York, Princeton, and Pittsburgh. The essays in this collection come from the early and late periods of Hempel's career and chart his intellectual odyssey from a rigorous commitment to logical positivism in the 1930s (when (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  36.  4
    Hans Reichenbach, Carl G. Hempel & Gustav Bergmann (1952). The Verifiability Theory of Meaning. Journal of Symbolic Logic 17 (2):134-136.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   7 citations  
  37.  25
    Carl G. Hempel (1968). On a Claim by Skyrms Concerning Lawlikeness and Confirmation. Philosophy of Science 35 (3):274-278.
  38.  37
    Carl G. Hempel (1939). Vagueness and Logic. Philosophy of Science 6 (2):163-180.
    As is rather generally admitted today, the terms of our language in scientific as well as in everyday use, are not completely precise, but exhibit a more or less high degree of vagueness. It is the purpose of this paper to examine the consequences of this circumstance for a series of questions which belong to the field of logic. First of all, the meaning and the logical status of the concept of vagueness will be analyzed; then we will try to (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   5 citations  
  39.  32
    Carl G. Hempel (1973). Rudolf Carnap, Logical Empiricist. Synthese 25 (3-4):256 - 268.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  40.  25
    Carl G. Hempel (1975). The Old and the New 'Erkenntnis'. Erkenntnis 9 (1):1 - 4.
    In this first issue of the new Erkenntnis, it seems fitting to recall at least briefly the character and the main achievements of its distinguished namesake and predecessor. The old Erkenntnis came into existence when Hans Reichenbach and Rudolf Carnap assumed the editorship of the Annalen der Philosophie and gave the journal its new title and its characteristic orientation; the first issue appeared in 1930. The journal was backed by the Gesellschaft f r Empirische Philosophie in Berlin, in which Reichenbach, (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  41.  1
    Carl G. Hempel (1952). Carnap Rudolf. Wahrheit Und Bewährung. Actes du Congrès International de Philosophie Scientifique, IV Induction Et Probabilité, Actualités Scientifiques Et Industrielles 391, Hermann & Cie, Paris 1936, Pp. 18–23. [REVIEW] Journal of Symbolic Logic 17 (2):139.
    Translate
      Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  42. Carl G. Hempel (2009). Scientific Inquiry. In Steven M. Cahn (ed.), Exploring Philosophy: An Introductory Anthology. Oxford University Press
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  43.  27
    Carl G. Hempel (1992). In Memoriam Wolfgang Stegmüller. Erkenntnis 36 (1):5 - 1.
    No categories
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  44.  28
    Carl G. Hempel (1946). A Note on the Parodoxes of Confirmation. Mind 55 (217):79-82.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  45.  23
    Herbert Feigl, Carl G. Hempel, Richard C. Jeffrey, W. V. Quine, A. Shimony, Yehoshua Bar-Hillel, Herbert G. Bohnert, Robert S. Cohen, Charles Hartshorne, David Kaplan, Charles Morris, Maria Reichenbach & Wolfgang Stegmüller (1970). Homage to Rudolf Carnap. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1970.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  46.  6
    Carl G. Hempel (1953). Foundations of the Unity of Science. Volume II, No. 7: Fundamentals of Concept Formation in Empirical Science. Philosophical Review 62 (3):473-475.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  47.  28
    Carl G. Hempel (1953). Reflections on Nelson Goodman's: The Structure of Appearance. Philosophical Review 62 (1):108-116.
  48.  9
    Carl Gustav Hempel (1982). Schlick und Neurath. Grazer Philosophische Studien 16:1-18.
    Schlick schreibt der empirischen Erkenntnis ein unerschütterliches Fundament zu: es bestehe aus "Konstatierungen", d.h. Aussagen, die unmittelbar Erfahrenes ausdrücken und durch die alle empirischen Aussagen hypothetisch-deduktiv überprüfbar sein müssen. Neuraths Auffassung dagegen war diese: (1) Aussagen können logisch nicht durch Vergleich mit "Erfahrungstatsachen" beurteüt werden, sondern nur durch Prüfung ihres Zusammenpassens mit anderen, bereits akzeptierten Aussagen; (2) der Empkismus verlangt, daß die letzteren "Protokollsätze" enthalten müssen, die (etwa von experimentierenden Wissenschaftlern) dkekt akzeptiert wurden; (3) jeder akzeptierte Satz, selbst ein Protokollsatz, (...)
    Translate
      Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  49.  30
    Carl G. Hempel (1966). On Russell's Phenomenological Constructionism. Journal of Philosophy 63 (21):668-670.
    No categories
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  50.  27
    Carl G. Hempel (1950). A Note on Semantic Realism. Philosophy of Science 17 (2):169-173.
1 — 50 / 261