90 found
Order:
  1.  34
    Carl Mitcham (1994). Thinking Through Technology: The Path Between Engineering and Philosophy. University of Chicago Press.
    What does it mean to think about technology philosophically? Why try? These are the issues that Carl Mitcham addresses in this work, a comprehensive, critical introduction to the philosophy of technology and a discussion of its sources and uses. Tracing the changing meaning of "technology" from ancient times to our own, Mitcham identifies the most important traditions of critical analysis of technology: the engineering approach, which assumes the centrality of technology in human life and the humanities approach, which is concerned (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   40 citations  
  2. Robert Frodeman, Julie Thompson Klein & Carl Mitcham (eds.) (2010). The Oxford Handbook of Interdisciplinarity. OUP Oxford.
    Taking stock of interdisciplinarity as it nears its century mark, the Oxford Handbook of Interdisciplinarity constitutes a major new reference work on the topic of interdisciplinarity, a concept of growing academic and societal importance.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   8 citations  
  3.  13
    Carl Mitcham (2003). Co-Responsibility for Research Integrity. Science and Engineering Ethics 9 (2):273-290.
    To enlarge the discussion of scientific responsibility for research integrity, this paper offers two historico-philosophical observations. First, in the broad history of ideas, modern ethics replaces social role responsibility with appeals to abstract principles; by contrast, discussions within the scientific community of responsibility for research integrity constitute a rediscovery of the continuing vitality of role responsibility. This is a rediscovery from which philosophy itself may benefit. Second, within the context of scientists’ concerns, the idea of role responsibility has undergone significant (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   8 citations  
  4.  58
    Carl Mitcham (2009). A Philosophical Inadequacy of Engineering. The Monist 92 (3):339-356.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  5.  32
    Gary Lee Downey, Juan C. Lucena & Carl Mitcham (2007). Engineering Ethics and Identity: Emerging Initiatives in Comparative Perspective. [REVIEW] Science and Engineering Ethics 13 (4):463-487.
    This article describes and accounts for variable interests in engineering ethics in France, Germany, and Japan by locating recent initiatives in relation to the evolving identities of engineers. A key issue in ethics education for engineers concerns the relationship between the identity of the engineer and the responsibilities of engineering work. This relationship has varied significantly over time and from place to place around the world. One methodological strategy for sorting out similarities and differences in engineers’ identities is to ask (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  6.  33
    Carl Mitcham & Robert Frodeman (2004). New Directions in the Philosophy of Science: Toward a Philosophy of Science Policy. Philosophy Today 48 (5):3-15.
    This is the introduction to a special, guest-edited issue of Philosophy Today. It lays out the extent to which the philosophy of science has ignored science policy and argues that policy issues deserve attention in parallel with epistemological ones. It further reviews the historical development of science policy in the United States since World War II, identifies some recent contributions to critical reflection on basic science policy assumptions, and outlines a set of issues to be addressed by any comprehensive philosophy (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  7.  21
    Carl Mitcham (2002). Do Artifacts Have Dual Natures? Two Points of Commentary on the Delft Project. Techne 6 (2):93-95.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  8.  90
    Carl Mitcham (1998). The Importance of Philosophy to Engineering. Teorema: International Journal of Philosophy 17 (3):27-47.
    Philosophy has not paid sufficient attention to engineering. Nevertheless, engineers should not use this as an excuse to ignore philosophy. The argument here is that philosophy is important to engineering for at least three reasons. First, philosophy is necessary so that engineers may understand and defend themselves against philosophical criticisms. In fact, there is a tradition of engineering philosophy that is largely overlooked, even by engineers. Second, philosophy, especially ethics, is necessary to help engineers deal with professional ethical problems. A (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  9.  1
    Skylar Zilliox, Jessica Smith & Carl Mitcham (forthcoming). Teaching the Ethics of Science and Engineering Through Humanities and Social Science in Advance. Teaching Ethics.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  10.  19
    Anne Balsamo & Carl Mitcham (2010). Interdisciplinarity in Ethics and the Ethics of Interdisciplinarity. In Julie Thompson Klein & Carl Mitcham (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Interdisciplinarity. OUP Oxford 259.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  11.  8
    Carl Mitcham (2006). In Qualified Praise of the Leon Kass Council On Bioethics. Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology 10 (1):7-15.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  12.  63
    Carl Mitcham & Arthur B. Sacks (2001). “Nature and Human Values” at the Colorado School of Mines. Science and Engineering Ethics 7 (1):129-136.
  13.  10
    Carl Mitcham (1995). Computers, Information and Ethics: A Review of Issues and Literature. [REVIEW] Science and Engineering Ethics 1 (2):113-132.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  14.  21
    Albert Borgmann & Carl Mitcham (1987). The Question of Heidegger and Technology. Philosophy Today 31 (2):98-99.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  15.  14
    Carl Mitcham & Alois Huning (eds.) (1985). Philosophy and Technology II: Information Technology and Computers in Theory and Practice. Reidel.
    INTRODUCTION: INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND COMPUTERS AS THEMES IN THE PHILOSOPHY OF TECHNOLOGY Philosophical interest in computers and information technology ...
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  16.  10
    Carl Mitcham (1995). Notes Toward a Philosophy of Meta-Technology. Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology 1 (1/2):13-17.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  17.  7
    Guibo Xue & Carl Mitcham (forthcoming). Rethinking the Philosophy of Science and Technology in China in Advance. Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  18.  26
    Carl Mitcham & Jessica Smith Rolston (2013). Energy Constraints. Science and Engineering Ethics 19 (2):313-319.
    Building on research in anthropology and philosophy, one can make a distinction between type I and type II energy ethics as a framework for advancing public debate about energy. Type I holds energy production and use as a fundamental good and is grounded in the assumption that increases in energy production and consumption result in increases in human wellbeing. Conversely, type II questions the linear relationship between energy production and progress by examining questions of equity and human happiness. The type (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  19.  6
    Carl Mitcham (2002). Do Artifacts Have Dual Natures? Two Points of Commentary on the Delft Project. Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology 6 (2):93-95.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  20.  16
    Carl Mitcham (1996). Ethics, Standards, Diversity. Professional Ethics 5 (1/2):167-177.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  21.  1
    Carl Mitcham & Elaine E. Englehardt (forthcoming). Ethics Across the Curriculum: Prospects for Broader Teaching and Learning in Research and Engineering Ethics. Science and Engineering Ethics:1-28.
    The movements to teach the responsible conduct of research and engineering ethics at technological universities are often unacknowledged aspects of the ethics across the curriculum movement and could benefit from explicit alliances with it. Remarkably, however, not nearly as much scholarly attention has been devoted to EAC as to RCR or to engineering ethics, and RCR and engineering ethics educational efforts are not always presented as facets of EAC. The emergence of EAC efforts at two different institutions—the Illinois Institute of (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  22.  29
    Carl Mitcham (2006). In Qualified Praise of the Leon Kass Council On Bioethics. Techne 10 (1):7-15.
    This paper argues the distinctiveness of the President’s Council on Bioethics, as chaired by Leon Kass. The argument proceeds by seeking to place the Council in proper historical and philosophical perspective and considering the implications of some of its work. Sections one and two provide simplified descriptions of the historical background against which the Council emerged and the character of the Council itself, respectively. Section three then considers three basic issues raised by the work of the Council that are of (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  23. Carl Mitcham & Robert Mackey (1973). Bibliography of the Philosophy of Technology. Monograph Collection (Matt - Pseudo).
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  24. Carl Mitcham (1972). Philosophy and Technology. New York,Free Press.
  25.  41
    Andoni Alonso & Carl Mitcham (2004). Software Libre 2004. Ethics and Information Technology 6 (1):65-67.
  26.  15
    Carl Mitcham (1985). What is the Philosophy of Technology? International Philosophical Quarterly 25 (1):73-88.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  27.  13
    Carl Mitcham (1986). Etica Medica [Medical Ethics]. Business and Professional Ethics Journal 5 (1):87-89.
  28.  35
    Carl Mitcham (2009). Convivial Software: An End-User Perspective on Free and Open Source Software. [REVIEW] Ethics and Information Technology 11 (4):299-310.
    The free and open source software (Foss) movement deserves to be placed in an historico-ethical perspective that emphasizes the end user. Such an emphasis is able to enhance and support the Foss movement by arguing the ways it is heir to a tradition of professional ethical idealism and potentially related to important issues in the history of science, technology, and society relations. The focus on software from an end-user’s perspective also leads to the concept of program conviviality. From a non-technical (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  29.  33
    Carl Mitcham (1990). Ethics in Bioengineering. Journal of Business Ethics 9 (3):227 - 231.
    Bioengineering, as the decisive extension of engineering action to human life itself, constitutes a fundamental enlargement of the technical realm, and calls for a commensurate expansion of ethical reflection. In fact, the engineering profession has been actively pursuing the development of new ethical codes, and the promotion of ethics by bioengineers both in the United States and on the international level deserves philosophical recognition and support.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  30.  29
    Carl Mitcham & James A. Lynch (2001). Politics at a Technological Distance. Ethics and Information Technology 3 (3):235-236.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  31.  15
    Carl Mitcham & Robert Mackey (eds.) (1983). Philosophy and Technology: Readings in the Philosophical Problems of Technology. Collier Macmillan.
  32.  27
    Kathryn Weaver & Carl Mitcham (2008). Nursing Concept Analysis in North America: State of the Art. Nursing Philosophy 9 (3):180-194.
    Abstract The strength of a discipline is reflected in the development of a set of concepts relevant to its practice domain. As an evolving professional discipline, nursing requires further development in this respect. Over the past two decades in North America there have emerged three different approaches to concept analysis in nursing scholarship: Wilsonian-derived, evolutionary, and pragmatic utility. The present paper compares and contrasts these three methods of concept in terms of purpose, procedures, philosophical underpinnings, limitations, guidance for researchers, and (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  33.  7
    Jessica Smith Rolston, Skylar Huzyk Zilliox, Corinne Packard, Carl Mitcham & Brian Zaharatos (2014). Nanoethics and Policy Education: A Case Study of Social Science Coursework and Student Engagement with Emerging Technologies. NanoEthics 8 (3):217-225.
    The article analyzes the integration of a module on nanotechnology, ethics, and policy into a required second-year social science course at a technological university. It investigates not simply the effectiveness of student learning about the technical aspects of nanotechnology but about how issues explored in an interdisciplinary social science course might influence student opinions about the potential of nanotechnology to benefit the developing world. The authors find a correlation between student opinions about the risks and benefits of nanotechnology for the (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  34.  23
    Carl Mitcham (2002). After the Genie is Out of the Bottle, What Then? Science and Engineering Ethics 8 (4):603-606.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  35.  10
    Carl Mitcham (1989). The Rationality of Science. New Scholasticism 63 (1):106-111.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  36.  19
    Leonard Waks & Carl Mitcham (1995). Rethinking Technology. Science and Engineering Ethics 1 (1):88-90.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  37.  12
    Carl Mitcham (1996). The Philosophical Challenge of Technology. Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 70:45-58.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  38. Carl Mitcham (1989). Jean-Yves Goffi, La Philosophie de la Technique Reviewed By. Philosophy in Review 9 (1):10-13.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  39.  5
    Robert Frodeman & Carl Mitcham (2004). New Directions in the Philosophy of Science. Philosophy Today 48 (Supplement):3-15.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  40.  4
    Carl Mitcham & Robert Mackey (1971). Jacques Ellul and the Technological Society. Philosophy Today 15 (2):102-121.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  41. Carl Mitcham (1987). A. Pablo Iannone, Ed., Contemporary Moral Controversies in Technology Reviewed By. Philosophy in Review 7 (8):311-313.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  42.  7
    Janice M. Morse, Carl Mitcham & Wim J. van Der Steen (1998). Compathy or Physical Empathy: Implications for the Caregiver Relationship. Journal of Medical Humanities 19 (1):51-65.
    In this article a case is made for the importance of a previously overlooked phenomenon, physical empathy orcompathy,defined as the physical manifestation of caregiver distress that occurs in the presence of a patient in physical pain or distress. According to the similarity of a caregiver's response to the original symptoms, there can be four types of compathetic response: identical, initiated, transferred, and converted. Controlling for the compathetic response may involve narrowing one's focus and/or changing caregiver attitudes. Finally, we argue that (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  43.  5
    Carl Mitcham (1973). Calder on Democracy and Technology. International Philosophical Quarterly 13 (2):277-286.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  44.  2
    Carl Mitcham & Robert Frodeman (1999). Bringing Philosophy Down to Earth. Hastings Center Report 29 (3):47-48.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  45.  1
    Carl Mitcham (1986). Applied Ethics in Latin America. [REVIEW] Business and Professional Ethics Journal 5 (1):87 - 89.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  46. Carl Mitcham (1989). Jean Schneider and Monique Leger-Orine, Eds., Frontiers and Space Conquest: The Philosopher's Touchstone/Frontières Et Conquête Spatiale: La Philosophie À l'Epreuve Reviewed By. Philosophy in Review 9 (8):333-335.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  47. Laurel Bosshart & Carl Mitcham (1999). Jintai Jikken and Unit 731.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  48. Adam Briggle & Carl Mitcham (2012). Ethics and Science: An Introduction. Cambridge University Press.
    Who owns your genes? What does climate science imply for policy? Do corporations conduct honest research? Should we teach intelligent design? Humans are creating a new world through science. The kind of world we are creating will not simply be decided by expanding scientific knowledge, but will depend on views about good and bad, right and wrong. These visions, in turn, depend on critical thinking, cogent argument and informed judgement. In this book, Adam Briggle and Carl Mitcham help readers to (...)
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  49. Paul T. Durbin & Carl Mitcham (1978). Research in Philosophy & Technology an Annual Compilation of Research. Monograph Collection (Matt - Pseudo).
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  50. Paul T. Durbin & Carl Mitcham (1979). Research in Philosophy & Technology. Monograph Collection (Matt - Pseudo).
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
1 — 50 / 90