70 found
Order:
See also:
Profile: Carla Bagnoli (University of Modena)
  1. Carla Bagnoli, Constructivism in Metaethics. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
    Constructivism in ethics is the view that insofar as there are normative truths, for example, truths about what we ought to do, they are in some sense determined by an idealized process of rational deliberation, choice, or agreement. As a “first-order moral account”--an account of which moral principles are correct-- constructivism is the view that the moral principles we ought to accept or follow are the ones that agents would agree to or endorse were they to engage in a hypothetical (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  2. Carla Bagnoli (ed.) (2013). Constructivism in Ethics. Cambridge University Press.
    Are there such things as moral truths? How do we know what we should do? And does it matter? Constructivism states that moral truths are neither invented nor discovered, but rather are constructed by rational agents in order to solve practical problems. While constructivism has become the focus of many philosophical debates in normative ethics, meta-ethics and action theory, its importance is still to be fully appreciated. These new essays written by leading scholars define and assess this new approach in (...)
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  3.  15
    Carla Bagnoli (forthcoming). Defeaters and Practical Knowledge. Synthese:1-21.
    This paper situates the problem of defeaters in a larger debate about the source of normative authority. It argues in favour of a constructivist account of defeasibility, which appeals to the justificatory role of normative principles. The argument builds upon the critique of two recent attempts to deal with defeasibility: first, a particularist account, which disposes of moral principles on the ground that reasons are holistic; and second, a proceduralist view, which addresses the problem of defeaters by distinguishing between provisional (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  4.  89
    Carla Bagnoli (2005). Humanitarian Intervention as a Perfect Duty. A Kantian Argument". Nomos 47:117-148.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  5. Carla Bagnoli (2007). Respect and Membership in the Moral Community. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 10 (2):113 - 128.
    Some philosophers object that Kant's respect cannot express mutual recognition because it is an attitude owed to persons in virtue of an abstract notion of autonomy and invite us to integrate the vocabulary of respect with other persons-concepts or to replace it with a social conception of recognition. This paper argues for a dialogical interpretation of respect as the key-mode of recognition of membership in the moral community. This interpretation highlights the relational and practical nature of respect, and accounts for (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  6.  71
    Carla Bagnoli (ed.) (2011). Morality and the Emotions. Oxford University Press.
    What is their relation to practical rationality? Are they roots of our identity or threats to our autonomy? This volume is born out of the conviction that philosophy provides a distinctive approach to these problems.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  7. Carla Bagnoli (2002). Moral Constructivism: A Phenomenological Argument. Topoi 21 (1-2):125-138.
  8.  62
    Carla Bagnoli (2015). Moral Objectivity: A Kantian Illusion? Journal of Value Inquiry 49 (1-2):31-45.
    Some moral claims strike us as objective. It is often argued that this shows morality to be objective. Moral experience – broadly construed – is invoked as the strongest argument for moral realism, the thesis that there are moral facts or properties.See e.g. Jonathan Dancy, “Two conceptions of Moral Realism,” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 60 : 167–187. Realists, however, cannot appropriate the argument from moral experience. In fact, constructivists argue that to validate the ways we experience the objectivity of (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  9. Carla Bagnoli (2003). Respect and Loving Attention. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 33 (4):483-516.
    On Kant's view, the feeling of respect is the mark of moral agency, and is peculiar to us, animals endowed with reason. Unlike any other feeling, respect originates in the contemplation of the moral law, that is, the idea of lawful activity. This idea works as a constraint on our deliberation by discounting the pretenses of our natural desires and demoting our selfish maxims. We experience its workings in the guise of respect. Respect shows that from the agent's subjective perspective, (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  10. Carla Bagnoli (2000). Value in the Guise of Regret. Philosophical Explorations 3 (2):169 – 187.
    According to a widely accepted philosophical model, agent-regret is practically significant and appropriate when the agent committed a mistake, or she faced a conflict of obligations. I argue that this account misunderstands moral phenomenology because it does not adequately characterize the object of agent-regret. I suggest that the object of agent-regret should be defined in terms of valuable unchosen alternatives supported by reasons. This model captures the phenomenological varieties of regret and explains its practical significance for the agent. My contention (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  11.  5
    Carla Bagnoli (2016). Rooted in the Past, Hooked in the Present: Vulnerability to Contingency and Immunity to Regret. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 92 (3):763-770.
    The perspective of deliberative choice is constitutively from here. This simple truth carries significant implications for our agency and integrity, some of which are the focus of Wallace's thought-provoking essay. Wallace is concerned with the discrepancy between our present attachments and the rational justification of past decisions, which threatens our personal and moral integrity. In what follows, I raise some questions about Wallace's claim that attachments make us immune to regret and, ultimately, about his account of the impact of contingency (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  12. Carla Bagnoli (2011). On Stephen Engstrom, The Form of Practical Knowledge. [REVIEW] Iris 3 (6):191-203.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  13.  21
    Carla Bagnoli (2015). A Philosophy to Live By: Engaging Iris Murdoch, by Maria Antonaccio. Mind 124 (495):894-898.
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  14.  98
    Carla Bagnoli (2012). Morality as Practical Knowledge. Analytic Philosophy 53 (1):61-70.
    In his original essay, The Form of Practical Knowledge, Stephen Engstrom argues for placing Kant’s ethics in the tradition of practical cognitivism. My remarks are intended to highlight the merits of his interpretation in contrast to intuitionism and constructivism, understood as ways of appropriating Kant’s legacy. In particular, I will focus on two issues: first, the special character of practical knowledge—as opposed to theoretical knowledge and craft expertise; and second, the apparent tension between the demands of morality and the requirements (...)
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  15. Carla Bagnoli (2013). Constructivism About Practical Knowledge. In Constructivism in Ethics. Cambridge University Press 153-182.
    It is largely agreed that if constructivism contributes anything to meta-ethics it is by proposing that we understand ethical objectivity “in terms of a suitably constructed point of view that all can accept” (Rawls 1980/1999: 307). Constructivists defend this “practical” conception of objectivity in contrast to the realist or “ontological” conception of objectivity, understood as an accurate representation of an independent metaphysical order. Because of their objectivist but not realist commitments, Kantian constructivists place their theory “somewhere in the space between (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  16. Carla Bagnoli (2007). The Authority of Reflection. Theoria: Revista de Teoría, Historia y Fundamentos de la Ciencia 22 (1):43-52.
    This paper examines Moran’s argument for the special authority of the first-person, which revolves around the Self/Other asymmetry and grounds dichotomies such as the practical vs. theoretical, activity vs. passivity, and justificatory vs. explanatory reasons. These dichotomies qualify the self-reflective person as an agent, interested in justifying her actions from a deliberative stance. The Other is pictured as a spectator interested in explaining action from a theoretical stance. The self-reflective knower has authority over her own mental states, while the Spectator (...)
    Direct download (10 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  17.  25
    Carla Bagnoli (2007). L'autorita' Della Morale. Feltrinelli.
    Capitolo I Il rispetto e l'ideale morale 1.1. Angeli, bruti e agenti 1.2. Il rispetto dell'altro 1.3. Il rispetto di sé 1.4. Auto−riflessione e auto−legislazione 1.5. Autonomia e individualità 1.6. Il rispetto e l'attenzione 1.7. Il rispetto e l'amore.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  18.  70
    Carla Bagnoli (2012). Self-Deception: A Constructivist Account. Humana.Mente 20:93-116.
    This paper takes a constitutivist approach to self-deception, and argues that this phenomenon should be evaluated under several dimensions of rationality. The constitutivist approach has the merit of explaining the selective nature of self-deception as well as its being subject to moral sanction. Self-deception is a pragmatic strategy for maintaining the stability of the self, hence continuous with other rational activities of self-constitution. However, its success is limited, and it costs are high: it protects the agent’s self by undermining the (...)
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  19.  36
    Carla Bagnoli (2014). Starting Points: Kantian Constructivism Reassessed. Ratio Juris 27 (3):311-329.
    G. A. Cohen and J. Raz object that Constructivism is incoherent because it crucially deploys unconstructed elements in the structure of justification. This paper offers a response on behalf of constructivism, by reassessing the role of such unconstructed elements. First, it argues that a shared conception of rational agency works as a starting point for the justification, but it does not play a foundational role. Second, it accounts for the unconstructed norms that constrains the activity of construction as constitutive norms. (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  20.  84
    Carla Bagnoli (2009). Review of Christine M. Korsgaard, The Constitution of Agency: Essays on Practical Reason and Moral Psychology. [REVIEW] Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2009 (6).
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  21.  16
    Kate Abramson, Larry Arnhart, Carla Bagnoli, Martin Bell, Theodore Benditt, Christopher Berry, Deborah Boyle, John Bricke, Justin Broackes & Janet Broughton (2004). Hume Studies Referees, 2003–2004. Hume Studies 30 (2):443-445.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  22.  96
    Carla Bagnoli (2011). The Exploration of Moral Life. In Iris Murdoch, philosopher. Oxford University Press
    The most distinctive feature of Murdoch's philosophical project is her attempt to reclaim the exploration of moral life as a legitimate topic of philosophical investigation. In contrast to the predominant focus on action and decision, she argues that “what we require is a renewed sense of the difficulty and complexity of the moral life and the opacity of persons. We need more concepts in terms of which to picture the substance of our being” (AD 293).1 I shall argue that to (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  23.  12
    Carla Bagnoli (2011). Emotions and the Categorical Authority of Moral Reason. In Morality and the Emotions. Oxford University Press 62.
  24.  87
    Carla Bagnoli (2006). The Alleged Paradox of Moral Perfection. In Elvio Baccarini (ed.), Rationality in Belief and Action,. Rijeka
    Some contemporary philosophers, notably B. Williams and S. Wolf, argue that moral perfection is not just an unsustainable ideal, but also an unreasonable one in that it thwarts and demotes all the various elements that contribute to personal well-being. More importantly, moral perfection seems to imply the denial of an identifiable personal self; hence the paradox of moral perfection. I argue that this alleged paradox arises because of a misunderstanding of the role of moral ideals, of their overridingness, and of (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  25.  75
    Carla Bagnoli (2000). Blackburn Sulla Questione Normativa”. Iride: Filosofia e Discussione Pubblica 30: 8-14.
    Se è un difetto della ragione essere incapaci di adottare certi mezzi, allo stesso modo è un difetto della ragione essere incapaci di adottare certi fini, dicono i kantiani. Secondo Blackburn questa tesi non-strumentalista deve la sua apparente validità ad una fallacia modale. Dal condizionale «Se si adotta il fine X, è necessario adottare il mezzo Y», si deriva il conseguente «Si deve adottare il mezzo Y», ci si interroga sulla natura del modale che occorre nel conseguente, poi si ricostruisce (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  26.  20
    Kate Abramson, Donald Ainslie, Lilli Alanen, Julia Annas, Margaret Atherton, Carla Bagnoli, Donald Baxter, Martin Bell, Richard Bett & Colin Bird (2006). Hume Studies Referees, 2005-2006. Hume Studies 32 (2):391-393.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  27.  21
    Larry Arnhart, Carla Bagnoli, Christopher Berry, Deborah Boyle, Janet Broughton, Stephen Buckle, Dario Castiglione, Kenneth Clatterbaugh, Phillip D. Cummins & Daniel Flage (2004). Hume Studies Referees, 2003-2004. Hume Studies 30 (2):443-445.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  28.  52
    Carla Bagnoli (2001). Rawls on the Objectivity of Practical Reason. Croatian Journal of Philosophy 1 (3):307-329.
    This article argues that Rawls’ history of ethics importantly contributes to the advancement of ethical theory, in that it correctly situates Kantian constructivism as an alternative to both sentimentalism and rational Intuitionism, and calls attention to the standards of objectivity in ethics. The author shows that by suggesting that both Intuitionist and Humean doctrines face the charge of heteronomy, Rawls appearsto adopt a Kantian conception of practical reason. Furthermore, Rawls follows Kant in assuming that ethical objectivity can be vindicated only (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  29.  81
    Carla Bagnoli (2009). The Appeal of Kantian Intuitionism. European Journal of Philosophy 17 (1):152-158.
  30.  24
    Carla Bagnoli (2014). Morality as Compromise Vs. Morality as a Constraint. International Journal of Applied Philosophy 28 (1):159-169.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  31.  75
    Carla Bagnoli (2009). The Mafioso Case: Autonomy and Self-Respect. [REVIEW] Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 12 (5):477 - 493.
    This article argues that immoralists do not fully enjoy autonomous agency because they are not capable of engaging in the proper form of practical reflection, which requires relating to others as having equal standing. An adequate diagnosis of the immoralist’s failure of agential authority requires a relational account of reflexivity and autonomy. This account has the distinctive merit of identifying the cost of disregarding moral obligations and of showing how immoralists may become susceptible to practical reason. The compelling quality of (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  32.  12
    Carla Bagnoli (2013). Respect and Obligation: The Scope of Kant’s Constructivism. In Margit Ruffing, Claudio La Rocca, Alfredo Ferrarin & Stefano Bacin (eds.), Kant Und Die Philosophie in Weltbürgerlicher Absicht: Akten des Xi. Kant-Kongresses 2010. De Gruyter 29-40.
  33.  20
    Donald Ainslie, Carla Bagnoli, Donald Baxter, Tom Beauchamp, Helen Beebee, Martin Bell, Deborah Boyle, John Bricke, Deborah Brown & Dorothy Coleman (2008). Hume Studies Referees, 2007–2008. Hume Studies 34 (2):323-324.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  34.  24
    Carla Bagnoli (2009). The Autonomy of Morality. Philosophical Review 118 (4):536-540.
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  35.  59
    Carla Bagnoli (2000). La Pretesa di Oggettività in Etica. In Gabriele Usberti (ed.), Modelli di oggettività. Bompiani
    Sembra esserci almeno un punto di accordo tra i filosofi morali: i giudizi etici, così come li usiamo nelle nostre conversazioni quotidiane, condividono una certa aspirazione all’oggettività. Vi è invece un disaccordo piuttosto acerbo rispetto alla questione se questa aspirazione sia giustificata o non sia invece una mera pretesa. Il disaccordo filosofico riguarda, cioè, la questione se i giudizi etici debbano e possano aspirare all’oggettività. Ma ancor più fondamentale è il disaccordo rispetto ai criteri con cui valutare se questa aspirazione (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  36. Carla Bagnoli (2009). Review of Charles Larmore The Autonomy of Morality. [REVIEW] Philosophical Review 118 (4):536-540.
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  37.  27
    Carla Bagnoli (2013). Counting Without Numbers: A Non‐Aggregative Account of the Puzzle of Altruism. Journal of Social Philosophy 44 (2):124-126.
  38.  5
    Carla Bagnoli (2015). Review: David Archard, Monique Deveaux, Neil Manson, and Daniel Weinstock, Eds., Reading Onora O’Neill. [REVIEW] Ethics 125 (4):1184-1189.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  39.  6
    Carla Bagnoli (2015). Archard, David; Deveaux, Monique; Manson, Neil; and Weinstock, Daniel, Eds.Reading Onora O’Neill.New York: Routledge, 2013. Pp. 250. $44.95. [REVIEW] Ethics 125 (4):1184-1189.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  40.  52
    Carla Bagnoli (2007). Phenomenology of the Aftermath: Ethical Theory and the Intelligibility of Moral Experience. In Sergio Tenenbaum (ed.), Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities. Kluwer 185-212.
  41.  43
    Carla Bagnoli (2007). Deliberare, Comparare, Misurare. Ragion Pratica: Rivista semestrale 26:65-80.
    © Carla Bagnoli DELIBERARE, COMPARARE, MISURARE É opinione ampiamente condivisa che l’incommensurabilità e la commensurabilità sono ipotesi sulla natura del valore che pongono delle condizioni pesanti sulla deliberazione e sulla nostra capacità di compiere scelte ragionate. Pragmatisti e pluralisti si sono adoperati ad argomentare che la commensurabilità non è un requisito necessario alla scelta razionale. In questo articolo sosterrò che vi è un argomento ancora più radicale di quello pluralista e pragmatista secondo il quale la commensurabilità, così come l’incommensurabilità, non (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  42. Carla Bagnoli (2011). “Moral Perception and Knowledge by Principles”. In Jill Hernandez (ed.), New Intuitionism. Continuum 84.
  43. Carla Bagnoli (2009). R. Mordacci, Ragioni Personali. Saggio sulla normatività morale. Epistemologia 32 (2):330.
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  44. Carla Bagnoli (2012). “Kant’s Contribution to Moral Epistemology”. Paradigmi 1:69-79.
  45.  34
    Carla Bagnoli & Gabriele Usberti (2002). Introduction. Topoi 21 (1-2):1-10.
    The articles of this volume address only some aspects of Nozick's philosophy: his conception of argument, knowledge, rationality, and identity. In examining Nozick's approach to these topics, one has to take issue, ultimately, with his peculiar conception of philosophy whose manifesto appears at the outset of Philosophical Explanations and is echoed in the introduction to philosophical method of Invariances . To transform philosophy into a science or build an impeccable deductive system was not Nozick's dream. He thought of philosophy as (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  46.  40
    Carla Bagnoli (2006). Breaking Ties: The Significance of Choice in Symmetrical Moral Dilemmas. Dialectica 60 (2):157–170.
    In symmetrical moral dilemmas, the agent faces a choice between two incompatible actions, which are equally justified on the basis of the same value. These cases are generally discounted as spurious or irrelevant on the assumption that, when there is no failure of commensurability, choice between symmetrical requirements is indifferent and can be determined by randomization. Alternatively, this article argues that the appeal to randomization allows the agent to overcome a deliberative impasse, but it does not really resolve the moral (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  47.  17
    Carla Bagnoli (2011). On Stephen Engstrom, The Form of Practical Knowledge. Iris 3 (6):191-203.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  48.  31
    Carla Bagnoli (2004). Introduction. Croatian Journal of Philosophy 4 (3):311-316.
    This volume collects articles in realism, anti-realism, and constructivism.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  49.  10
    Carla Bagnoli (2007). Premessa. Iride: Filosofia e Discussione Pubblica 20 (1):63-66.
    No categories
    Translate
      Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  50.  2
    Carla Bagnoli (2009). The Mafioso Case: Autonomy and Self-Respect. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 12 (5):477-493.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
1 — 50 / 70