8 found
Sort by:
See also:
Profile: Carol Hay (University of Massachusetts, Lowell)
  1. Carol Hay (2014). Integrity. International Journal of Applied Philosophy 28 (1):71-88.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Carol Hay (2013). Kantianism, Liberalism, and Feminism: Resisting Oppression. Palgrave Macmillan.
    This is a book about the harms of oppression, and about addressing these harms using the resources of liberalism and Kantianism. Its central thesis is that people who are oppressed are bound by the duty of self-respect to resist their own oppression. In it, I defend certain core ideals of the liberal tradition—specifically, the fundamental importance of autonomy and rationality, the intrinsic and inalienable dignity of the individual, and the duty of self-respect—making the case that these ideals are pivotal in (...)
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Carol Hay (2012). Consonances Between Liberalism and Pragmatism. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 48 (2):141-168.
    This paper is an attempt to identify certain consonances between contemporary liberalism and classical pragmatism. I identify four of the most trenchant criticisms of classical liberalism presented by pragmatist figures such as James, Peirce, Dewey, Addams, and Hocking: that liberalism overemphasizes negative liberty, that it is overly individualistic, that its pluralism is suspect, that it is overly abstract. I then argue that these deficits of liberalism in its historical incarnations are being addressed by contemporary liberals. Contemporary liberals, I show, have (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Carol Hay (2012). Justice and Objectivity for Pragmatists: Cosmopolitanism in the Work of Martha Nussbaum and Jane Addams. The Pluralist 7 (3):86-95.
    The goal of this paper is to argue that pragmatists interested in social justice ought to be committed to certain objective transcultural ethical ideals. In particular, I argue that we need an objective moral account of what counts as harm and flourishing for human beings. Pragmatists are usually characterized as rejecting the tenability of, or the need for, such objective standards. Instead, the question of whether a person's life is going well or badly is supposed to be answered by appealing (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Carol Hay (2012). Respect-Worthiness and Dignity. Dialogue 51 (4):587-612.
    In this paper I consider the possibility that failing to fulfill the Kantian obligation to protect one’s rational nature might actually vitiate future instances of this obligation. I respond to this dilemma by defending a novel interpretation of Kant’s views on the relation between the value we have and the respect we are owed. I argue, contra the received view among Kant scholars, that the feature in virtue of which someone has unconditional and incomparable value is not the same feature (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Steven Levine, Carol Hay, Aaron Wilson, Aaron Massecar, Dina Mendonça, Joseph Margolis, Emil Višv̌ovský, Scott F. Aikin, Kory Spencer Sorrell & Fernando Zalamea (2012). Brandom's Pragmatism Brandom's Pragmatism (Pp. 125-140). Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 48 (2).
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Carol Hay (2011). The Obligation to Resist Oppression. Journal of Social Philosophy 42 (1):21-45.
    In this paper I argue that, in addition to having an obligation to resist the oppression of others, people have an obligation to themselves to resist their own oppression. This obligation to oneself, I argue, is grounded in a Kantian duty of self-respect.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Carol Hay (2005). Whether to Ignore Them and Spin: Moral Obligations to Resist Sexual Harassment. Hypatia 20 (4):94-108.
    : In this essay, I consider the question of whether women have an obligation to confront men who sexually harass them. A reluctance to be guilty of blaming the victims of harassment, coupled with other normative considerations that tell in favor of the unfairness of this sort of obligation, might make us think that women never have an obligation to confront their harassers. But I argue that women do have this obligation, and it is not overridden by many of the (...)
    Direct download (11 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation