Search results for 'Cartesianism' (try it on Scholar)

  1.  4
    To Cartesianism (1995). Vincent Carraud. In Roger Ariew & Marjorie Glicksman Grene (eds.), Descartes and His Contemporaries: Meditations, Objections, and Replies. University of Chicago Press 110.
    No categories
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  2.  2
    of Arnauld'S. Cartesianism (1995). Steven Nadler. In Roger Ariew & Marjorie Glicksman Grene (eds.), Descartes and His Contemporaries: Meditations, Objections, and Replies. University of Chicago Press
    No categories
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  3. Bradley Rives (2009). Concept Cartesianism, Concept Pragmatism, and Frege Cases. Philosophical Studies 144 (2):211 - 238.
    This paper concerns the dialectal role of Frege Cases in the debate between Concept Cartesians and Concept Pragmatists. I take as a starting point Christopher Peacocke’s argument that, unlike Cartesianism, his ‘Fregean’ Pragmatism can account for facts about the rationality and epistemic status of certain judgments. I argue that since this argument presupposes that the rationality of thoughts turn on their content, it is thus question-begging against Cartesians, who claim that issues about rationality turn on the form, not the (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  4.  47
    Michael Esfeld (1999). Holism in Cartesianism and in Today's Philosophy of Physics. Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 30 (1):17-36.
    The aim of this paper is to contribute to a more balanced judgement than the widespread impression that the changes which are called for in today's philosophy of physics and which centre around the concept of holism amount to a rupture with the framework of Cartesian philosophy of physics. I argue that this framework includes a sort of holism: As a result of the identification of matter with space, any physical property can be instantiated only if there is the whole (...)
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  5.  6
    Joona Taipale (2015). Beyond Cartesianism: Body-Perception and the Immediacy of Empathy. Continental Philosophy Review 48 (2):161-178.
    The current debates dealing with empathy, social cognition, and the problem of other minds widely accept the assumption that, whereas we can directly perceive the other’s body, certain additional mental operations are needed in order to access the contents of the other’s mind. Body-perception has, in other words, been understood as something that merely mediates our experience of other minds and requires no philosophical analysis in itself. The available accounts have accordingly seen their main task as pinpointing the operations and (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  6.  13
    Philippe Gagnon (2015). Cartesianism, the Embodied Mind, and the Future of Cognitive Research. In Dirk Evers, Michael Fuller, Anne Runehov & Knut-Willy Sæther (eds.), Do Emotions Shape the World? Biennial Yearbook of the European Society for the Study of Science and Theology 2015-2016. "Studies in Science and Theology" Vol. 15. Martin-Luther-Universität 225-244.
    In his oft-cited book Descartes' Error, Antonio Damasio claims that Descartes is responsible for having stifled the development of modern neurobiological science, in particular as regards the objective study of the physical and physiological bases for emotive and socially-conditioned cognition. Most of Damasio’s book would stand without reference to Descartes, so it is intriguing to ask why he launched this attack. What seems to fuel such claims is a desire for a more holistic understanding of the mind, the brain and (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  7.  13
    Harrison Hall (1979). Intersubjective Phenomenology and Husserl's Cartesianism. Man and World 12 (1):13-20.
    Once Husserl has constituted the other ego in the "Fifth Meditation," he is able to add to his phenomenology the overall dimension of intersubjectivi- ty. Objects are no longer constituted simply as systematic correlates of my actual (presented) and po.ssible (appresented) perspectival views of them, but as correlates of the actual and possibly actual views of an open community of transcendental subjects to which I belong--that is, as co,rrelates of my actual (presented) view and the actual and possibly actual (appresented) (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  8.  4
    Giovanni Gellera (2013). The Philosophy of Robert Forbes: A Scottish Scholastic Response to Cartesianism. Journal of Scottish Philosophy 11 (2):191-211.
    In the second half of the seventeenth century, philosophy teaching in the Scottish universities gradually moved from scholasticism to Cartesianism. Robert Forbes, regent at Marischal College and King's College, Aberdeen, was a strenuous opponent of Descartes. The analysis of the philosophy of Forbes and of his teacher Patrick Gordon sheds light on the relationship between Scottish Reformed scholasticism and the reception of Descartes in Scotland.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  9.  9
    Tad M. Schmaltz (2002). Radical Cartesianism: The French Reception of Descartes. Cambridge University Press.
    This is the first book-length study of two of Descartes's most innovative successors, Robert Desgabets and Pierre-Sylvain Regis, and of their highly original contributions to Cartesianism. The focus of the book is an analysis of radical doctrines in the work of these thinkers that derive from arguments in Descartes: on the creation of eternal truths, on the intentionality of ideas, and on the soul-body union. As well as relating their work to that of fellow Cartesians such as Malebranche and (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   5 citations  
  10. Sebastian Luft (2004). Husserl's Theory of the Phenomenological Reduction: Between Life-World and Cartesianism. Research in Phenomenology 34 (1):198-234.
    on points that remain especially crucial, i.e., the concept of the natural attitude, the ways into the reduction (and their systematics), and finally the question of the “meaning of the reduction.” Indeed, in the reading attempted here, this final question leads to two, not necessarily related, focal points: a Cartesian and a Life-world tendency. It is my claim that in following these two paths, Husserl was consistent in pursuing two evident leads in his philosophical enterprise; however, he was at the (...)
    Direct download (10 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  11.  15
    Han Thomas Adriaenssen (2014). The Radical Cartesianism of Robert Desgabets and the Scholastic Heritage. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 23 (1):46-68.
    Robert Desgabets has been described as a ‘radical Cartesian’. Drawing conclusions from Descartes's thought that Descartes himself had failed to see, Desgabets treated Cartesianism as a work in progress that awaited further enrichment and development. But, as scholars have recognized, Desgabets's writings also betray a significant indebtedness to scholastic tradition. In presenting his philosophy, Desgabets often appeals to traditional notions, breathing new life into scholastic concepts and ideas. This paper investigates what we are to make of the scholastic vestiges (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  12.  13
    Andrea Staiti (2015). On Husserl’s Alleged Cartesianism and Conjunctivism: A Critical Reply to Claude Romano. Husserl Studies 31 (2):123-141.
    In this paper I criticize Claude Romano’s recent characterization of Husserl’s phenomenology as a form of Cartesianism. Contra Romano, Husserl is not committed to the view that since individual things in the world are dubitable, then the world as a whole is dubitable. On the contrary, for Husserl doubt is a merely transitional phenomenon which can only characterize a temporary span of experience. Similarly, illusion is not a mode of experience in its own right but a retrospective way of (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  13.  27
    Leslie MacAvoy (2001). Overturning Cartesianism and the Hermeneutics of Suspicion: Rethinking Dreyfus on Heidegger. Inquiry 44 (4):455 – 480.
    This essay critically engages Dreyfus's widely read interpretation of Heidegger's Being and Time . It argues that Dreyfus's reading is rooted in two primary claims or interpretative principles. The first - the Cartesianism thesis - indicates that Heidegger's objective in Being and Time is to overturn Cartesianism. The second - the hermeneutics of suspicion thesis - claims that Division II is supposed to suspect and throw into question the results of the Division I analysis. These theses contribute to (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  14.  15
    Steven Nadler (1988). Cartesianism and Port-Royal. The Monist 71 (4):573-584.
    Contrary to what appears to be popular belief, Port-Royal was not a bastion of cartesianism. In fact, Of all the port-Royalists of the seventeenth century, Only arnauld can be considered a cartesian in any interesting sense. Most of the others associated with the order were hostile to the new philosophy and actively campaigned against it, Believing it to pose a threat to piety and "true" religion. This can be seen by examining the writings of de sacy, Du vaucel, And (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  15.  8
    Vincent Carraud (1987). The Relevance of Cartesianism. Royal Institute of Philosophy Lectures 21:69-81.
    A philosophy need not be afraid of being out-of-date. Any true philosophy, untimely as soon as it is published, necessarily remains so, thus necessarily remains relevant. This is the case of Descartes' philosophy. But in the case of Cartesianism, there is more to it: Descartes' philosophy goes in quest of the decisive, the principle, the very first Beginning. And the philosophy in quest of the Beginning is, indeed, a radical and original philosophy: what keeps its interest to Descartes' project (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  16.  4
    Steven Nadler (1988). Cartesianism and Port-Royal in Descartes and His Contemporaries. The Monist 71 (4):573-584.
    CONTRARY TO WHAT APPEARS TO BE POPULAR BELIEF, PORT-ROYAL WAS NOT A BASTION OF CARTESIANISM. IN FACT, OF ALL THE PORT-ROYALISTS OF THE SEVENTEENTH CENTURY, ONLY ARNAULD CAN BE CONSIDERED A CARTESIAN IN ANY INTERESTING SENSE. MOST OF THE OTHERS ASSOCIATED WITH THE ORDER WERE HOSTILE TO THE NEW PHILOSOPHY AND ACTIVELY CAMPAIGNED AGAINST IT, BELIEVING IT TO POSE A THREAT TO PIETY AND "TRUE" RELIGION. THIS CAN BE SEEN BY EXAMINING THE WRITINGS OF DE SACY, DU VAUCEL, AND (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  17.  1
    Bijoy Boruah (1996). Recalcitrant Quasi-Cartesianism in Recent Philosophy of Mind. Indian Philosophical Quarterly 23 (1-2):141.
    Contemporary quasi-Cartesianism about mental phenomena is the view of the perspectival nature of consciousness and the inscrutability of phenomenal experience, both being first-person-centered. It adverts to the insusceptibility of mental phenomena to third-person-centered, scientific description and explanation, but does not sympathize with the ontology of substance dualism. This view finds its clearest manifestation in contemporary agnostic naturalism.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  18. Thomas M. Lennon, John M. Nicholas & John W. Davis (1984). Problems of Cartesianism. Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 174 (4):471-474.
    The typical Cartesian collection contains papers which treat the problems arising out of Descartes's philosophy as though they and it appeared for the first time in a recent journal. The approach of this collection is quite different. The eight contributors concentrate on problems faced by Cartesianism which are of historical significance. Without denigrating the importance of the technique of exploiting the texts in a manner that appeals to contemporary philosophical interests, the contributors show how Cartesianism was shaped over (...)
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  19. Tad M. Schmaltz (2007). Radical Cartesianism: The French Reception of Descartes. Cambridge University Press.
    This is a book-length study of two of Descartes's most innovative successors, Robert Desgabets and Pierre-Sylvain Regis, and of their highly original contributions to Cartesianism. The focus of the book is an analysis of radical doctrines in the work of these thinkers that derive from arguments in Descartes: on the creation of eternal truths, on the intentionality of ideas, and on the soul-body union. As well as relating their work to that of fellow Cartesians such as Malebranche and Arnauld, (...)
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  20. Tad M. Schmaltz (2005). Radical Cartesianism: The French Reception of Descartes. Cambridge University Press.
    This is a book-length study of two of Descartes's most innovative successors, Robert Desgabets and Pierre-Sylvain Regis, and of their highly original contributions to Cartesianism. The focus of the book is an analysis of radical doctrines in the work of these thinkers that derive from arguments in Descartes: on the creation of eternal truths, on the intentionality of ideas, and on the soul-body union. As well as relating their work to that of fellow Cartesians such as Malebranche and Arnauld, (...)
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  21. Tad M. Schmaltz (2009). Radical Cartesianism: The French Reception of Descartes. Cambridge University Press.
    This is a book-length study of two of Descartes's most innovative successors, Robert Desgabets and Pierre-Sylvain Regis, and of their highly original contributions to Cartesianism. The focus of the book is an analysis of radical doctrines in the work of these thinkers that derive from arguments in Descartes: on the creation of eternal truths, on the intentionality of ideas, and on the soul-body union. As well as relating their work to that of fellow Cartesians such as Malebranche and Arnauld, (...)
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  22.  4
    Susan R. Bordo (1987). The Flight to Objectivity: Essays on Cartesianism and Culture. State University of New York Press.
    The Flight to Objectivity offers a new reading of Descartes' Meditations informed by cultural history, psychoanalytic and cognitive psychology, and feminist thought.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   48 citations  
  23.  78
    Gregory Stoutenburg (2015). Cartesianism, Neo-Reidianism, and the A Priori: Reply to Pust. Logos and Episteme (2).
    Joel Pust has recently challenged the Thomas Reid-inspired argument against the reliability of the a priori defended by Alvin Plantinga, Nicholas Wolterstorff, William Alston, and Michael Bergmann. The Reidian argument alleges that the Cartesian insistence on the primacy of a priori rationality and subjective sensory experience as the foundations of epistemic justification is unwarranted because the same kind of global skeptical scenario that Cartesians recognize as challenging the legitimacy of perceptual beliefs about the external world also undermine the reliability of (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  24.  75
    L. Roth (1923). Spinoza and Cartesianism (II). Mind 32 (126):160-178.
    Direct download (11 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  25.  83
    R. Matthew Shockey (2012). Heidegger's Descartes and Heidegger's Cartesianism. European Journal of Philosophy 20 (2):285-311.
    Abstract: Heidegger's Sein und Zeit (SZ) is commonly viewed as one of the 20th century's great anti-Cartesian works, usually because of its attack on the epistemology-driven dualism and mentalism of modern philosophy of mind or its apparent effort to ‘de-center the subject’ in order to privilege being or sociality over the individual. Most who stress one or other of these anti-Cartesian aspects of SZ, however, pay little attention to Heidegger's own direct engagement with Descartes, apart from the compressed discussion in (...)
    Direct download (10 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  26. L. Roth (1923). Spinoza and Cartesianism (I.). Mind 32 (125):12-37.
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  27. Edward Slowik (1998). Cartesianism and the Kinematics of Mechanisms: Or, How to Find Fixed Reference Frames in a Cartesian Space-Time. Noûs 32 (3):364-385.
    In De gravitatione, Newton contends that Descartes' physics is fundamentally untenable since the "fixed" spatial landmarks required to ground the concept of inertial motion cannot be secured in the constantly changing Cartesian plenum. Likewise, it is has often been alleged that the collision rules in Descartes' Principles of Philosophy undermine the "relational" view of space and motion advanced in this text. This paper attempts to meet these challenges by investigating the theory of connected gears (or "kinematics of mechanisms") for a (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  28.  14
    Emmanuel Faye (2005). The Cartesianism of Desgabets and Arnauld and the Problem of the Eternal Truths. Oxford Studies in Early Modern Philosophy 2:193-209.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  29.  39
    Steven Crowell (2002). The Cartesianism of Phenomenology. Continental Philosophy Review 35 (4):433-454.
  30.  11
    Jean-Michel Roy (2015). Anti-Cartesianism and Anti-Brentanism: The Problem of Anti-Representationalist Intentionalism. Southern Journal of Philosophy 53:90-125.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  31.  99
    Michael Murray (2006). Neo-Cartesianism and the Problem of Animal Suffering. Faith and Philosophy 23 (2):169-190.
    The existence and extent of animal suffering provides grounds for a serious evidential challenge to theism. In the wake of the Darwinian revolution, this strain of natural atheology has taken on substantially greater significance. In this essay we argue that there are at least four neo-Cartesian views on the nature of animal minds which would serve to deflect this evidential challenge.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  32. John Haugeland (2004). Social Cartesianism. In Richard Schantz (ed.), The Externalist Challenge. De Gruyter
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  33.  34
    David Carr (1973). The "Fifth Meditation" and Husserl's Cartesianism. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 34 (1):14-35.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   5 citations  
  34.  25
    Kenneth R. Westphal (2007). Kant's Anti-Cartesianism. Dialogue 46 (04):709-.
  35. Steven M. Nadler (ed.) (1992). Causation in Early Modern Philosophy: Cartesianism, Occasionalism, and Preestablished Harmony. Penn State University Press.
    Three general accounts of causation stand out in early modern philosophy: Cartesian interactionism, occasionalism, and Leibniz's preestablished harmony. The contributors to this volume examine these theories in their philosophical and historical context. They address them both as a means for answering specific questions regarding causal relations and in their relation to one another, in particular, comparing occasionalism and the preestablished harmony as responses to Descartes's metaphysics and physics and the Cartesian account of causation. Philosophers discussed include Descartes, Gassendi, Malebranche, Arnauld, (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  36.  2
    David Golumbia (2015). The Language of Science and the Science of Language: Chomsky’s Cartesianism. Diacritics 43 (1):38-62.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  37.  8
    Matthew Kisner (2003). Radical Cartesianism. Review of Metaphysics 57 (2):439-441.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  38.  61
    Nigel J. T. Thomas, Coding Dualism: Conscious Thought Without Cartesianism or Computationalism.
    The principal temptation toward substance dualisms, or otherwise incorporating a question begging homunculus into our psychologies, arises not from the problem of consciousness in general, nor from the problem of intentionality, but from the question of our awareness and understanding of our own mental contents, and the control of the deliberate, conscious thinking in which we employ them. Dennett has called this "Hume's problem". Cognitivist philosophers have generally either denied the experiential reality of thought, as did the Behaviorists, or have (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  39.  36
    Glenn Ross (2006). Neo-Cartesianism and the Problem of Animal Suffering. Faith and Philosophy 23 (2):169-190.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  40.  3
    Steph Marston (2016). Spinoza and Dutch Cartesianism: Philosophy and Theology By Alexander X. Douglas Oxford University Press, 2015, Pp. 184 Pages ISBN 978-0-19-873250-1. [REVIEW] Philosophy 91 (1):136-139.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  41.  6
    Richard A. Watson (1991). The Flight to Objectivity: Essays on Cartesianism and Culture. Journal of the History of Philosophy 29 (1):127-129.
  42.  15
    Celia Amorós, Ana Uriarte & Linda López McAlister (1994). Cartesianism and Feminism. What Reason Has Forgotten; Reasons for Forgetting. Hypatia 9 (1):147 - 163.
    This paper recovers and pays homage to the arguments in support of the equality of the sexes developed by the Seventeenth Century Cartesian philosopher François Poullain de la Barre (1647-1723).
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  43. Paul Lodge (2004). Leibniz's Close Encounter with Cartesianism in the Correspondence with De Volder. In Leibniz and His Correspondents. Cambridge, Uk ;Cambridge University Press 162--192.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  44. C. B. Martin (1984). The New Cartesianism. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 65 (3):236.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  45.  4
    Jeff Coulter (1997). Neural Cartesianism. Comments on the Epistemology of the Cognitive Sciences. In David Martel Johnson & Christina E. Erneling (eds.), The Future of the Cognitive Revolution. Oxford University Press 293--301.
  46.  6
    John J. Conley (2004). Radical Cartesianism. International Philosophical Quarterly 44 (1):115-116.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  47.  30
    Terry S. Kasely (1997). The Method of the Geometer: A New Angle on Husserl's Cartesianism. [REVIEW] Husserl Studies 13 (2):141-154.
  48.  2
    Bradley Rives (2009). Concept Cartesianism, Concept Pragmatism, and Frege Cases. Philosophical Studies 144 (2):211-238.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  49.  8
    Tad M. Schmaltz (1995). Malebranche's Cartesianism and Lockean Colors. History of Philosophy Quarterly 12 (4):387-403.
  50.  10
    Georges Rey (2013). L4 The Possibility of a Naturalistic Cartesianism Regarding Intuitions and Introspection. In Matthew C. Haug (ed.), Philosophical Methodology: The Armchair or the Laboratory? Routledge 243.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  51. Nothing found.