25 found
Sort by:
Disambiguations:
Catherine Hundleby [18]Catherine E. Hundleby [7]
See also:
Profile: Catherine Elisabeth Hundleby (University of Windsor)
  1.  64 DLs
    Catherine Hundleby (2006). Beyond Epistemology: A Pragmatist Approach to Feminist Science Studies Sharyn Clough Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 2003, Viii + 166 Pp., $65.00, $24.95 Paper. [REVIEW] Dialogue 45 (04):782-.
  2.  48 DLs
    Catherine E. Hundleby, Feminist Perspectives on Argumentation. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3.  39 DLs
    Catherine E. Hundleby (2011). Sexual Solipsism: Philosophical Essays on Pornography and Objectification. By Rae Langton. Hypatia 26 (1):224-227.
  4.  37 DLs
    Catherine Hundleby (2006). Beyond Epistemology: A Pragmatist Approach to Feminist Science Studies. Dialogue 45 (4):782-784.
  5.  25 DLs
    Catherine Hundleby (2005). The Epistemological Evaluation of Oppositional Secrets. Hypatia 20 (4):44-58.
    : Although political values guide people who take advice from standpoint epistemologies in deciding whether to reveal secrets used to resist oppression, these decisions can also be understood and evaluated in purely cognitive or epistemological terms. When political considerations direct us to preserve a secret, the cognitive value progressively diminishes because the view of the world projected by the secret is increasingly vulnerable.
    Direct download (12 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6.  18 DLs
    Catherine Hundleby (2008). Scandalous Knowledge: Science, Truth, and the Human (Review). Hypatia 23 (4):pp. 233-237.
  7.  14 DLs
    Catherine Hundleby (2002). The Open End: Social Naturalism, Feminist Values and the Integrity of Epistemology. Social Epistemology 16 (3):251 – 265.
  8.  9 DLs
    Catherine Hundleby (2013). Aggression, Politeness, and Abstract Adversaries. Informal Logic 33 (2):238-262.
    Trudy Govier argues in The Philosophy of Argument that adversariality in argumentation can be kept to a necessary minimum. On her ac-count, politeness can limit the ancillary adversariality of hostile culture but a degree of logical opposition will remain part of argumentation, and perhaps all reasoning. Argumentation cannot be purified by politeness in the way she hopes, nor does reasoning even in the discursive context of argumentation demand opposition. Such hopes assume an idealized politeness free from gender, and reasoners with (...)
    Direct download (15 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9.  9 DLs
    Catherine Hundleby (2008). Scandalous Knowledge: Science, Truth, and the Humanby Barbara Herrnstein Smith. Hypatia 23 (4):233-237.
  10.  4 DLs
    Catherine Hundleby (2010). The Authority of the Fallacies Approach to Argument Evaluation. Informal Logic 30 (3):279-308.
    Popular textbook treatments of the fallacies approach to argument evaluation employ the Adversary Method identified by Janice Moulton (1983) that takes the goal of argumentation to be the defeat of other arguments and that narrows the terms of discourse in order to facilitate such defeat. My analysis of the textbooks shows that the Adversary Method operates as a Kuhnian paradigm in philosophy, and demonstrates that the popular fallacies pedagogy is authoritarian in being unresponsive to the scholarly developments in informal logic (...)
    Direct download (16 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11.  2 DLs
    Phyllis Rooney & Catherine E. Hundleby (2010). Introduction: Reasoning for Change. Informal Logic 30 (3).
    This special issue of Informal Logic brings together two important areas of philosophy that have shown significant development in the last three decades: informal logic and feminist philosophy. A significant innovation they both share is new thinking about practices of argumentation and related practices of reasoning. Feminist theorizing supporting social and political change foregrounds “reasoning for change” in a way that draws attention to the contextual and rhetorical dimensions of argument and thus connects with significant developments in informal logic.
    Direct download (14 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12.  2 DLs
    Catherine Hundleby (2003). Miriam Solomon, Social Empiricism Reviewed By. Philosophy in Review 23 (6):404-407.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13.  1 DLs
    Catherine Hundleby & Phyllis A. Rooney (2010). Just Reason. Studies in Social Justice 4 (1):1-6.
  14.  1 DLs
    Catherine Hundleby (2001). Nancy CM Hartsock, The Feminist Standpoint Revisited and Other Essays Reviewed By. Philosophy in Review 21 (4):261-263.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15.  0 DLs
    Catherine E. Hundleby, Commentary on Kloster.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16.  0 DLs
    Catherine E. Hundleby, The Need for Rhetorical Listening to Ground Scientific Objectivity.
    Recent work in feminist and postcolonial rhetoric demonstrates various meanings of silence . Listening rhetorically in order to comprehend silences is particularly difficult in scientific contexts, I argue, because the common ground for scientific discourse assumes a culture of disclosure. Rhetorical listening is also important to science because listening accounts for silence as well as disclosure, and so maximizes the diversity in recognized perspectives that provides scientific objectivity.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17.  0 DLs
    Catherine Hundleby (2001). Feminist Standpoint Theory as a Form of Naturalist Epistemology. Dissertation, The University of Western Ontario (Canada)
    In this dissertation I argue that naturalist epistemology would benefit if it were recognized to include feminist standpoint theory, a theory of knowledge that is based on the feminist critiques of science. Naturalists such as W. O. Quine argue that normative epistemology can be developed on the basis of science. However, they have mostly rested content with descriptions of how knowledge seems to work. Naturalists need to evaluate our epistemic practices against competing alternatives if they are to justify our knowledge (...)
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18.  0 DLs
    Begona Carrascal & Catherine E. Hundleby, Authority Arguments in Academic Contexts in Social Studies and Humanities.
    In academic contexts the appeal to authority is a quite common but seldom tested argument, either because we accept the authority without questioning it, or because we look for alternative experts or reasons to support a different point of view. But, by putting ourselves side by side an already accepted authority, we often rhetorically manoeuvre to displace the burden of the proof to avoid the fear to present our opinions and to allow face saving.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19.  0 DLs
    Catherine Hundleby (2006). No Title Available: Dialogue. Dialogue 45 (4):782-784.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20.  0 DLs
    Catherine Hundleby & Claudio Duran, Androcentrism as a Fallacy of Argumentation.
    The deep operation of androcentrism in scientific argumentation demands recognition as a form of fallacy. On Walton’s account, fallacies are serious mistakes in argumentation that employ presumptions acceptable in other circumstances. There are only isolated cases in which androcentric pre-sumptions are acceptable, and I argue that androcentrism affects an overarching theme of generalization in science rather than an isolated scheme. Androcentrism is related to other ways of treating privileged people as exemplary humans, whose negative impact on processes of argumentation can (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21.  0 DLs
    Catherine Hundleby (2001). Nancy C.M. Hartsock, The Feminist Standpoint Revisited and Other Essays. [REVIEW] Philosophy in Review 21:261-263.
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  22.  0 DLs
    Catherine Hundleby, Feminist Empiricism.
  23.  0 DLs
    Catherine Hundleby (2003). Miriam Solomon, Social Empiricism. [REVIEW] Philosophy in Review 23:404-407.
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  24.  0 DLs
    Catherine Hundleby, Silence and the Limitations of Contextual Objectivity.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  25.  0 DLs
    Catherine E. Hundleby, Fallacy Forward: Situating Fallacy Theory.
    I will situate the fallacies approach to reasoning with the aim of making it more relevant to contemporary life and thus intellectually significant and valuable as a method for teaching reasoning. This entails a revision that will relegate some of the traditional fallacies to the realm of history and introduce more recently recognized problems in reasoning. Some newly recognized problems that demand attention are revealed by contemporary science studies, which reveal at least two tenacious problems in reasoning that I will (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation