8 found
Sort by:
Catherine Kemp [9]Catherine Elaine Kemp [1]
See also:
  1. Catherine Kemp (2014). The Real 'Letter to Arbuthnot'? A Motive For Hume's Probability Theory in an Early Modern Design Argument. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 22 (3):468-491.
    John Arbuthnot's celebrated but flawed paper in the Philosophical Transactions of 1711?12 is a philosophically and historically plausible target of Hume's probability theory. Arbuthnot argues for providential design rather than chance as a cause of the annual birth ratio, and the paper was championed as a successful extension of the new calculations of the value of wagers in games of chance to wagers about natural and social phenomena. Arbuthnot replaces the earlier anti-Epicurean notion of chance with the equiprobability assumption of (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
    My bibliography  
    Export citation  
  2. Catherine Kemp (2010). Legal Theory, and Judicial Restraint. Philosophical Inquiry 32 (3-4):118-120.
  3. Catherine Kemp (2007). Contrariety in Hume. Rivista di Storia Della Filosofia 62 (3):55-64.
    My bibliography  
    Export citation  
  4. Catherine Kemp (2007). Thomas Reid's Theory of Perception. Hume Studies 33 (2):339-344.
  5. Catherine Kemp (2005). Book Review: Anne Jaap Jacobson. Feminist Interpretations of David Hume. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press, 2000. [REVIEW] Hypatia 20 (1):206-209.
  6. Catherine Kemp (2004). Our Ideas in Experience: Hume's Examples in ' of Scepticism with Regard to the Senses'. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 12 (3):445 – 470.
  7. Catherine Kemp (2000). Two Meanings of the Term "Idea": Acts and Contents in Hume's Treatise. Journal of the History of Ideas 61 (4):675-690.
  8. Catherine Kemp (2000). The Innateness Charge: Conception and Belief for Reid and Hume. Reid Studies 3 (2):43.