Search results for 'Catholijn Jonker' (try it on Scholar)

15 found
Sort by:
  1. Fred Boogerd, Frank Bruggeman, Catholijn Jonker, Huib Looren de Jong, Allard Tamminga, Jan Treur, Hans Westerhoff & Wouter Wijngaards (2002). Inter-Level Relations in Computer Science, Biology, and Psychology. Philosophical Psychology 15 (4):463–471.score: 120.0
    Investigations into inter-level relations in computer science, biology and psychology call for an *empirical* turn in the philosophy of mind. Rather than concentrate on *a priori* discussions of inter-level relations between 'completed' sciences, a case is made for the actual study of the way inter-level relations grow out of the developing sciences. Thus, philosophical inquiries will be made more relevant to the sciences, and, more importantly, philosophical accounts of inter-level relations will be testable by confronting them with what really happens (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Catholijn M. Jonker, Jan Treur & Wouter C. A. Wijngaards (2002). Reductionist and Anti-Reductionist Perspectives on Dynamics. Philosophical Psychology 15 (4):381 – 409.score: 120.0
    In this paper, reduction and its pragmatics are discussed in light of the development in computer science of languages to describe processes. The design of higher-level description languages within computer science has had the aim of allowing for description of the dynamics of processes in the (physical) world on a higher level avoiding all (physical) details of these processes. The higher description levels developed have dramatically increased the complexity of applications that came within reach. The pragmatic attitude of a (scientific) (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Joeri Engelfriet, Catholijn M. Jonker & Jan Treur (2002). Compositional Verification of Multi-Agent Systems in Temporal Multi-Epistemic Logic. Journal of Logic, Language and Information 11 (2):195-225.score: 120.0
    Compositional verification aims at managing the complexity of theverification process by exploiting compositionality of the systemarchitecture. In this paper we explore the use of a temporal epistemiclogic to formalize the process of verification of compositionalmulti-agent systems. The specification of a system, its properties andtheir proofs are of a compositional nature, and are formalized within acompositional temporal logic: Temporal Multi-Epistemic Logic. It isshown that compositional proofs are valid under certain conditions.Moreover, the possibility of incorporating default persistence ofinformation in a system, is (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Alina Pommeranz, Christian Detweiler, Pascal Wiggers & Catholijn Jonker (2012). Elicitation of Situated Values: Need for Tools to Help Stakeholders and Designers to Reflect and Communicate. Ethics and Information Technology 14 (4):285-303.score: 120.0
    Explicitly considering human values in the design process of socio-technical systems has become a responsibility of designers. It is, however, challenging to design for values because (1) relevant values must be identified and communicated between all stakeholders and designers and (2) stakeholders’ values differ and trade-offs must be made. We focus on the first aspect, which requires elicitation of stakeholders’ situated values , i.e. values relevant to a specific real life context. Available techniques to elicit knowledge and requirements from stakeholders (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Jacqueline Cramer, Jan Jonker & Angela van der Heijden (2004). Making Sense of Corporate Social Responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics 55 (2):215 - 222.score: 30.0
    This paper provides preliminary insights into the process of sense-making and developing meaning with regard to corporate social responsibility (CSR) within 18 Dutch companies. It is based upon a research project carried out within the framework of the Dutch National Research Programme on CSR. The paper questions how change agents promoting CSR within these companies made sense of the meaning of CSR. How did they use language (and other instruments) to stimulate and underpin the contextual essence of CSR? Why did (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Jacqueline Cramer, Angela van der Heijden & Jan Jonker (2006). Corporate Social Responsibility: Making Sense Through Thinking and Acting. Business Ethics 15 (4):380–389.score: 30.0
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. A. Jonker (1987). The Origin of the Human Mind: A Speculation on the Emergence of Language and Human Consciousness. Acta Biotheoretica 36 (3):129-77.score: 30.0
    The study of human evolution has attracted scientists of various disciplines, judging by the attendance of the conferences devoted to it, and by the publications concerned. In the course of years I became amazed about the seeming absence of a synthesis of the available information. This article presents an attempt to combine some results of the various publications.The study of human evolution has become particularly focussed on the emergence of language and human consciousness with respect to the social behaviour and (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. T. Bosse, C. Jonker & J. Treur (2008). Formalisation of Damasio's Theory of Emotion, Feeling and Core Consciousness. Consciousness and Cognition 17 (1):94-113.score: 30.0
  9. Khaled El Emam, Elizabeth Jonker, Ester Moher & Luk Arbuckle (2013). A Review of Evidence on Consent Bias in Research. [REVIEW] American Journal of Bioethics 13 (4):42 - 44.score: 30.0
    (2013). A Review of Evidence on Consent Bias in Research. The American Journal of Bioethics: Vol. 13, No. 4, pp. 42-44. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2013.767958.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. J. McKenzie Alexander (2000). Evolutionary Explanations of Distributive Justice. Philosophy of Science 67 (3):490-516.score: 3.0
    Evolutionary game theoretic accounts of justice attempt to explain our willingness to follow certain principles of justice by appealing to robustness properties possessed by those principles. Skyrms (1996) offers one sketch of how such an account might go for divide-the-dollar, the simplest version of the Nash bargaining game, using the replicator dynamics of Taylor and Jonker (1978). In a recent article, D'Arms et al. (1998) criticize his account and describe a model which, they allege, undermines his theory. I sketch (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. Brian Skyrms (1992). Chaos in Game Dynamics. Journal of Logic, Language and Information 1 (2).score: 3.0
    Two examples demonstrate the possibility of extremely complicated non-convergent behavior in evolutionary game dynamics. For the Taylor-Jonker flow, the stable orbits for three strategies were investigated by Zeeman. Chaos does not occur with three strategies. This papers presents numerical evidence that chaotic dynamics on a strange attractor does occur with four strategies. Thus phenomenon is closely related to known examples of complicated behavior in Lotka-Volterra ecological models.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. Brian Skyrms (1992). Chaos and the Explanatory Significance of Equilibrium: Strange Attractors in Evolutionary Game Dynamics. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1992:374 - 394.score: 3.0
    This paper discusses the explanatory significance of the equilibrium concept in the context of an example of extremely complicated dynamical behavior. In particular, numerical evidence is presented for the existence of chaotic dynamics on a "strange attractor" in the evolutionary game dynamics introduced by Taylor and Jonker [also known as the "replicator dynamics"]. This phenomenon is present already in four strategy evolutionary games where the dynamics takes place in a simplex in three dimensional space-the lowest number of dimensions (...)
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. P. W. Duff (1939). Christianity and the Roman Law of Concubinage and Divorce E. J. Jonkers: Invloed van Het Christendom Op de Romeinsche Wetgeving Betreffende Het Concubinaat En de Echtscheiding. Pp. Viii+224. Wageningen: H. Veenman & Zonen, 1938. Stiff Paper, F. 4.90. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 53 (5-6):213-.score: 3.0
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. Dirk-Martin Grube & Peter Jonkers (eds.) (2008). Religions Challenged by Contingency: Theological and Philosophical Approaches to the Problem of Contingency. Brill.score: 1.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. Peter Jonkers & Ruud Welten (eds.) (2005). God in France: Eight Contemporary French Thinkers on God. Peeters.score: 1.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation