Search results for 'Charles Cooper' (try it on Scholar)

1000+ found
Order:
  1.  11
    Charles Cooper (ed.) (1972). Science, Technology and Development. London,F. Cass.
    Science, Technology and Production in the Underdeveloped Countries: An Introduction By Charles Cooper* The uncritical notion that it would be easy to orient ...
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  2.  21
    N. Timothy, Charles R. Plott, A. U. Zarazaga, E. Carlos, Increase Suburban Income Growth, Russell W. Cooper, Third Federal Reserve District A. U. Mester, J. Loretta, Bank Closure A. U. Mailath & J. George (1993). Caltech Social Science Working Paper. Inquiry 1994:10.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  3.  18
    Andrew Abbott, Philippe Bourgois, Teresa Chataway, Daniel Chirot, Frederick Cooper, Brian Donovan, Mauro Guillen, Gary Hamilton, Douglas Harper & Charles Hirschman (2000). Acknowledgment of External Reviewers for 1999. Theory and Society 29 (149):149-150.
  4.  14
    John Charles Cooper (1992). The Philosophy of John Scottus Eriugena. Idealistic Studies 22 (3):232-234.
  5.  1
    Glen M. Cooper, Charles Burnett & Danielle Jacquart (1998). Constantine the African and ʿAlī Ibn Al-ʿAbbās Al-Maǧūsī: The Pantegni and Related TextsConstantine the African and Ali Ibn Al-Abbas Al-Magusi: The Pantegni and Related Texts. Journal of the American Oriental Society 118 (3):411.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  6.  2
    Nicholas Asher, Graciela De Pierris, Paul Gomberg, Robert E. Goodin, Charles W. Mills, Jordan Howard Sobel, Andrew Levine, Frank Cunningham, W. J. Waluchow & Wesley Cooper (1989). Tp [\ Canadian (Q\ JJJournal of£| Philosophy. Philosophy 19 (3).
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  7. John Charles Cooper (1972). A New Kind of Man. Philadelphia,Westminster Press.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  8. Charles R. Embry & Barry Cooper (eds.) (2005). Philosophy, Literature, and Politics: Essays Honoring Ellis Sandoz. University of Missouri.
    The essays in this collection honor Professor Ellis Sandoz, Hermann Moyse Jr. Distinguished Professor of Political Science, Louisiana State University, and founding director of the Eric Voegelin Institute for American Renaissance Studies, an institute located at Louisiana State University and devoted to research and publication in the fields of political philosophy, constitutional law, and Voegelin studies. Without the tireless leadership—both academic and economic—of Ellis Sandoz, who was one of Eric Voegelin’s early students and his first American doctoral candidate at the (...)
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  9. Jorge J. E. Gracia, William Cooper, Francis M. Myers, Iván Jaksić, Donald L. Schmidt & Charles Schofield (1989). Latin American philosophy in the twentieth century. Man, values and the search for philosophical identity, 1 vol. Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 179 (4):611-612.
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  10. Rudzani Makhado, Martin Potgieter, Wilmien Luus-Powell, Susan Cooper, Charles Oppong, Grzegorz Kopij, Charles Mutisi & Shimane Makhabu (2016). Tragelaphus Strepsicerosbrowse During the Dry Season in the Mopani Veld of Limpopo Province, South Africa. Transactions of the Royal Society of South Africa 71 (1):17-21.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  11. Charles J. Vierck & Brian Y. Cooper (1980). Contextual Determinants of Pain Reactions. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3 (2):314.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  12. David Charles (1999). Aristotle on Well-Being and Intellectual Contemplation: David Charles. Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 73 (1):205–223.
    [David Charles] Aristotle, it appears, sometimes identifies well-being (eudaimonia) with one activity (intellectual contemplation), sometimes with several, including ethical virtue. I argue that this appearance is misleading. In the Nicomachean Ethics, intellectual contemplation is the central case of human well-being, but is not identical with it. Ethically virtuous activity is included in human well-being because it is an analogue of intellectual contemplation. This structure allows Aristotle to hold that while ethically virtuous activity is valuable in its own right, the (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  13. Wesley Cooper (2002). The Unity of William James's Thought. Vanderbilt University Press.
    Wesley Cooper opposes the traditional view of William Jamesís philosophy which dismissed it as fragmented or merely popular, arguing instead that there is a systematic philosophy to be found in James's writings. His doctrine of pure experience is the binding thread that links his earlier psychological theorizing to his later epistemological, religious, and pragmatic concerns.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  14.  1
    David E. Cooper (1997). Wittgenstein, Heidegger and Humility: David E. Cooper. Philosophy 72 (279):105-123.
    In 1929, doubtless to the discomfort of his logical positivist host Moritz Schlick, Wittgenstein remarked, ‘To be sure, I can understand what Heidegger means by Being and Angst ’ . I return to what Heidegger meant and Wittgenstein could understand later. I begin with that remark because it has had an instructive career. When the passage which it prefaced was first published in 1965, the editors left it out—presumably to protect a hero of ‘analytic’ philosophy from being compromised by an (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  15.  5
    David E. Cooper (1984). Metaphors We Live By: David E. Cooper. Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 18:43-58.
    Aside from aperçus of Kant, Nietzsche, and of course, Aristotle, metaphor has not, until recently, received its due. The dominant view has been Hobbes': metaphors are an ‘abuse’ of language, less dangerous than ordinary equivocation only because they ‘profess their inconstancy’.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  16.  3
    Keith J. Cooper (1985). Scientific Method and the Appraisal of Religion: KEITH J. COOPER. Religious Studies 21 (3):319-329.
    In looking for criteria by which to assess religious conceptual systems, many philosophers have turned for help to scientific methodology. Perhaps this is because they felt philosophers of science were themselves looking in the right epistemological direction, and had a viable way of describing what they saw. Richard Swinburne has provided a strong, sustained treatment of the application of scientific method to religious truth claims, in The Existence of God . He there makes use of what he sees as ‘the (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  17.  14
    Sébastien Charles (2002). Berkeley's Principles and Dialogues. Background Source Materials Charles J. McCracken Et Ian C. Tipton Collection «Cambridge Philosophical Texts in Context» Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2000, X, 300 P. [REVIEW] Dialogue 41 (04):807-.
  18.  4
    Tom Cooper (1995). A Conference Report Worth Reading: A Report Review by Tom Cooper. Journal of Mass Media Ethics 10 (3):188 – 190.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  19.  2
    Wesley Cooper (2007). Review: The Cambridge Companion to Peirce. [REVIEW] Review of Metaphysics 60 (4):875-878.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  20. David Charles (1999). I–David Charles. Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 73 (1):205-223.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  21. S. Charles (forthcoming). Session of the Charles S. Peirce Society. Semiotics.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  22. Robert Kay Guan Chia & Robert Cooper (1998). In the Realm of Organisation Essays for Robert Cooper.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  23. Thomas Cooper & Udo Thiel (2001). Philosophical Writings of Thomas Cooper. Monograph Collection (Matt - Pseudo).
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  24. David E. Cooper (1983). The Free Man: David E. Cooper. Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 15:131-145.
    Not long after the historian, Seeley, had defined ‘perfect liberty’ as ‘the absence of all government’, Oscar Wilde wrote that a man can be totally free even in that granite embodiment of governmental constraint, prison. Ten years after Mill's famous defence of civil freedoms, On Liberty , Richard Wagner declaimed: I'll put up with everything—police, soldiers, muzzling of the press, limits on parliament… Freedom of the spiriti is the only thing for men to be proud of and which raises them (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  25. David E. Cooper (1995). Technology: Liberation or Enslavement?: David E. Cooper. Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 38:7-18.
    The week, twenty-five years ago, of the Apollo spacecraft's return visit to the moon was described by Richard Nixon as the greatest since the Creation. Across the Atlantic, a French Academician judged the same event to matter less than the discovery of a lost etching by Daumier. Attitudes to technological achievement, then, differ. And they always have. Chuang-Tzu, over 2,000 years ago, relates an exchange between a Confucian passer-by and a Taoist gardener watering vegetables with a bucket drawn from a (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  26.  13
    Maurice Platnauer (1953). The Latin Hexameter Charles Gordon Cooper: An Introduction to the Latin Hexameter. Pp. Ix + 70. Melbourne and London: Macmillan, 1952. Limp Cloth, 7s. 6d. Net. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 3 (3-4):167-168.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  27.  21
    Charles Duffy (1950). James Fenimore Cooper. Thought: A Journal of Philosophy 25 (1):175-175.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  28.  9
    Richard M. Gale (2004). The Still Divided Self of William James: A Response to Pawelski and Cooper. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 40 (1):153 - 170.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  29. Patrick Shade (1995). Ron L. Cooper, "Heidegger and Whitehead: A Phenomenological Examination Into the Intelligibility of Experience". [REVIEW] Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 31 (1):246.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  30. Douglas R. Anderson & Charles S. Peirce (1995). Strands of System the Philosophy of Charles Peirce. Monograph Collection (Matt - Pseudo).
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   6 citations  
  31. Kenneth Laine Ketner (1998). His Glassy Essence: An Autobiography of Charles Sanders Peirce. Vanderbilt University Press.
    Charles Sanders Peirce , the most important and influential of the classical American philosophers, is credited as the inventor of the philosophical school of pragmatism. The scope and significance of his work have had a lasting effect not only in several fields of philosophy but also in mathematics, the history and philosophy of science, and the theory of signs, as well as in literary and cultural studies. Largely obscure until after his death, Peirce's life has long been a subject (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   5 citations  
  32.  14
    Charles Blattberg (2006). Modern Social Imaginaries Charles Taylor Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2004, 215 Pp., $18.95 Paper. [REVIEW] Dialogue 45 (1):183.
    Review of Charles Taylor's book, Modern Social Imaginaries.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  33. Charles S. Peirce & Kenneth Laine Ketner (1977). Charles Sanders Peirce Complete Published Works, Including Selected Secondary Materials : Microfiche Collection. Johnson Associates.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  34. Arto Laitinen (2002). Charles Taylor and Paul Ricoeur on Self-Interpretations and Narrative Identity. In Rauno Huttunen, Hannu Heikkinen & Leena Syrjälä (eds.), Narrative Research. Voices of Teachers and Philosophers. SoPhi 57-71.
    In this chapter I discuss Charles Taylor's and Paul Ricoeur's theories of narrative identity and narratives as a central form of self-interpretation. Both Taylor and Ricoeur think that self-identity is a matter of culturally and socially mediated self-definitions, which are practically relevant for one's orientation in life. First, I will go through various characterisations that Ricoeur gives of his theory, and try to show to what extent they also apply to Taylor's theory. Then, I will analyse more closely (...) Taylor's, and in section three, Paul Ricoeur's views on narrative identity. (shrink)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  35. Arto Laitinen (2004). A Critique of Charles Taylor's Notions of “Moral Sources” and “Constitutive Goods”. In Jussi Kotkavirta & Michael Quante (eds.), Moral Realism. Acta Philosophica Fennica 73-104.
    In this paper I argue that moral realism does not, pace Charles Taylor, need “moral sources” or “constitutive goods”, and adding these concepts distorts the basic insights of what can be called “cultural” moral realism.1 Yet the ideas of “moral topography” or “moral space” as well as the idea of “ontological background pictures” are valid, if separated from those notions. What does Taylor mean by these notions?
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  36. Arto Laitinen (2003). Charles Taylor and Nicholas H. Smith on Human Constants and Transcendental Arguments. A Review. [REVIEW] SATS: Northern European Journal of Philosophy 4 (2):191-201.
    In the introduction to his Philosophical Papers 1&2 Charles Taylor assures us that his work, while encompassing a range of issues, follows a single, tightly knit agenda. He claims that the central questions concern "philosophical anthropology". Taylor's work on these questions has been presented piecemeal, in the form of articles and papers, and the student has had to imagine what a systematic monograph by Taylor on philosophical anthropology would look like. Neither Hegel, Sources of the Self, Ethics of Authenticity, (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  37. Arto Laitinen (2001). Today and Tomorrow: Review of Charles Taylor by Ruth Abbey. [REVIEW] Radical Philosophy 30:108.
    The Philosophy Now series promises to combine rigorous analysis with authoritative expositions. Ruth Abbey’s book lives up to this demand by being a clear, reliable and more than up-to-date introduction to Charles Taylor ’s philosophy. Although it is an introductory book, the amount of footnotes and references ought to please those who want to study the original texts more closely. Abbey’s book is structured thematically: morality, selfhood, politics and epistemology get 50 pages each. The focus is on the internal (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  38.  17
    Carl R. Hausman (1993). Charles S. Peirce's Evolutionary Philosophy. Cambridge University Press.
    In this systematic introduction to the philosophy of Charles S. Peirce, the author focuses on four of Peirce's fundamental conceptions: pragmatism and Peirce's development of it into what he called 'pragmaticism'; his theory of signs; his phenomenology; and his theory that continuity is of prime importance for philosophy. He argues that at the centre of Peirce's philosophical project is a unique form of metaphysical realism, whereby continuity and evolutionary change are both necessary for our understanding of experience. In his (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   17 citations  
  39.  6
    Joseph Brent (1993). Charles Sanders Peirce: A Life. History and Philosophy of Logic 14 (2):531-538.
    Charles Sanders Peirce was born in September 1839 and died five months before the guns of August 1914. He is perhaps the most important mind the United States has ever produced. He made significant contributions throughout his life as a mathematician, astronomer, chemist, geodesist, surveyor, cartographer, metrologist, engineer, and inventor. He was a psychologist, a philologist, a lexicographer, a historian of science, a lifelong student of medicine, and, above all, a philosopher, whose special fields were logic and semiotics. He (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   26 citations  
  40.  6
    Sandra B. Rosenthal (1994). Charles Peirce's Pragmatic Pluralism. State University of New York Press.
    This work runs counter to the traditional interpretations of Peirce's philosophy by eliciting an inherent strand of pragmatic pluralism that is embedded in the very core of his thought and that weaves his various doctrines into a systematic ...
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   8 citations  
  41. Jaime Nubiola (2000). The Spanish Mathematician Ventura Reyes Prósper and His Connections with Charles S. Peirce and Christine Ladd-Franklin. Arisbe. The Peirce Gateway.
    In this paper the relations between the almost unknown Spanish mathematician Ventura Reyes Prósper (1863-1922) with Charles S. Peirce and Christine Ladd-Franklin are described. Two brief papers from Reyes Prósper published in El Progreso Matemático 12 (20 December 1891), pp. 297-300, and 18 (15 June 1892) pp. 170-173 on Ladd-Franklin, and on Peirce and Mitchell, respectively, are translated for first time into English and included at the end of the paper.
    Translate
      Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  42.  8
    Andrew T. W. Hung (2013). Tu Wei-Ming and Charles Taylor on Embodied Moral Reasoning. Philosophy, Culture, and Traditions 3:199-216.
    This paper compares the idea of embodied reasoning by Confucian Tu Wei-Ming and Canadian philosopher Charles Taylor. They have similar concerns about the problems of secular modernity, that is, the domination of instrumental reason and disembodied rationality. Both of them suggest that we have to explore a kind of embodied moral reasoning. I show that their theories of embodiment have many similarities: the body is an instrument for our moral knowledge and self-understanding; such knowledge is inevitably a kind of (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  43. Charles S. Peirce & Victoria Welby (1977). Semiotic and Significs the Correspondence Between Charles S. Peirce and Lady Victoria Welby. Monograph Collection (Matt - Pseudo).
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   8 citations  
  44.  2
    Gerard Deledalle (2001). Charles S. Peirce's Philosophy of Signs: Essays in Comparative Semiotics. Indiana University Press.
    [Note: Picture of Peirce available] Charles S. Peirce’s Philosophy of Signs Essays in Comparative Semiotics Gérard Deledalle Peirce’s semiotics and metaphysics compared to the thought of other leading philosophers. "This is essential reading for anyone who wants to find common ground between the best of American semiotics and better-known European theories. Deledalle has done more than anyone else to introduce Peirce to European audiences, and now he sends Peirce home with some new flare."—Nathan Houser, Director, Peirce Edition Project (...) S. Peirce’s Philosophy of Signs examines Peirce’s philosophy and semiotic thought from a European perspective, comparing the American’s unique views with a wide variety of work by thinkers from the ancients to moderns. Parts I and II deal with the philosophical paradigms which are at the root of Peirce’s new theory of signs, pragmatic and social. The main concepts analyzed are those of "sign" and "semiosis" and their respective trichotomies; formally in the case of "sign," in time in the case of semiosis. Part III is devoted to comparing Peirce’s theory of semiotics as a form of logic to the work of other philosophers, including Bertrand Russell, Wittgenstein, Frege, Philodemus, Lady Welby, Saussure, Morris, Jakobson, and Marshall McLuhan. Part IV compares Peirce’s "scientific metaphysics" with European metaphysics. Gérard Deledalle holds the Doctorate in Philosophy from the Sorbonne. A research scholar at Columbia University and Attaché at the Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Paris, he has also been Professor of Philosophy and Head of the Philosophy Department of the universities of Tunis, Perpignan, and Libreville. In 1990 he received the Herbert W. Schneider Award "for distinguished contributions to the understanding and development of American philosophy. In 2001, he was appointed vice-president of the Charles S. Peirce Society. Contents Introduction—Peirce Compared: Directions for Use Part I—Semeiotic as Philosophy Peirce’s New Philosophical Paradigms Peirce’s Philosophy of Semeiotic Peirce’s First Pragmatic Papers The Postscriptum of 1893 Part II—Semeiotic as Semiotics Sign: Semiosis and Representamen—Semiosis and Time Sign: The Concept and Its Use—Reading as Translation Part III—Comparative Semiotics Semiotics and Logic: A Reply to Jerzy Pelc Semeiotic and Greek Logic: Peirce and Philodemus Semeiotic and Significs: Peirce and Lady Welby Semeiotic and Semiology: Peirce and Saussure Semeiotic and Semiotics: Peirce and Morris Semeiotic and Linguistics: Peirce and Jakobson Semeiotic and Communication: Peirce and McLuhan Semeiotic and Epistemology: Peirce, Frege, and Wittgenstein Part IV—Comparative Metaphysics Gnoseology—Perceiving and Knowing: Peirce, Wittgenstein, and Gestalttheorie Ontology—Transcendentals "of" or "without" Being: Peirce versus Aristotle and Thomas Aquinas Cosmology—Chaos and Chance within Order and Continuity: Peirce between Plato and Darwin Theology—The Reality of God: Peirce’s Triune God and the Church’s Trinity Conclusion—Peirce: A Lateral View. (shrink)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  45.  57
    John F. Boler (1963). Charles Peirce and Scholastic Realism. Seattle, University of Washington Press.
    IN 1903, commenting on an article he had written more than thirty years before, Charles Peirce said that he had changed his mind on many issues at least a half-dozen times but had "never been able to think differently on that question of nominalism and realism" (1.20). For anyone acquainted with Peirce's writings, this remark alone could justify a study of "that question.".
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   9 citations  
  46.  9
    Ian Hunter (2011). Charles Taylor's A Secular Age and Secularization in Early Modern Germany. Modern Intellectual History 8 (3):621-646.
    In this essay I discuss the historical adequacy of Charles Taylor's philosophical history of secularization, as presented in his A Secular Age . I do so by situating it in relation to the contextual historiography of secularization in early modern Europe, with a particular focus on developments in the German Empire. Considering how profoundly conceptions of secularization have been bound to competing religious and political programmes, we must begin our discussion by entertaining the possibility that modern philosophical and historiographic (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  47.  99
    Matthew Walhout (2010). Looking to Charles Taylor and Joseph Rouse for Best Practices in Science and Religion. Zygon 45 (3):558-574.
    People discussing science and religion usually frame their conversations in terms of essentialist assumptions about science, assumptions requiring the existence (but not the specification) of criteria according to which science can be distinguished from other forms of inquiry. However, criteria functioning at a level of generality appropriate to such discussions may not exist at all. Essentialist assumptions may be avoided if science is understood within a broader context of human practices. In a philosophy of practices, to label a practice as (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  48.  66
    Hailey Huget (2012). Forgiveness, Reconciliation, and Accountability: A Critique of Charles Griswold's Forgiveness Paradigm. Philosophia 40 (2):337-355.
    Abstract In this paper I analyze and critique Charles Griswold’s work Forgiveness: A Philosophical Exploration. Griswold’s theory of forgiveness is structured around the notion that human frailty, imperfection, and susceptibility to unfortunate circumstances are cornerstones of the human experience. While Griswold’s paradigm of forgiveness is compelling on the whole, I argue that this “human frailty thesis” creates unintentional and problematic consequences that undermine major goals of his paradigm. In particular, the human frailty thesis undermines Griswold’s requirement that forgiveness hold (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  49.  70
    James Doyle (2010). Socrates and Gorgias. Phronesis 55 (1):1-25.
    In this paper I try to solve some problems concerning the interpretation of Socrates' conversation with Gorgias about the nature of rhetoric in Plato's Gorgias (448e6-461b2). I begin by clarifying what, ethically, is at stake in the conversation (section 2). In the main body of the paper (sections 3-6) I address the question of what we are to understand Gorgias as believing about the nature of rhetoric: I criticise accounts given by Charles Kahn and John Cooper, and suggest (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  50.  34
    Piers J. Hale (2013). Monkeys Into Men and Men Into Monkeys: Chance and Contingency in the Evolution of Man, Mind and Morals in Charles Kingsley's Water Babies. [REVIEW] Journal of the History of Biology 46 (4):551-597.
    The nineteenth century theologian, author and poet Charles Kingsley was a notable populariser of Darwinian evolution. He championed Darwin’s cause and that of honesty in science for more than a decade from 1859 to 1871. Kingsley’s interpretation of evolution shaped his theology, his politics and his views on race. The relationship between men and apes set the context for Kingsley’s consideration of these issues. Having defended Darwin for a decade in 1871 Kingsley was dismayed to read Darwin’s account of (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
1 — 50 / 1000