Search results for 'Charles Cooper' (try it on Scholar)

1000+ found
Sort by:
  1. Charles Cooper (ed.) (1972/1973). Science, Technology and Development. London,F. Cass.score: 540.0
    Science, Technology and Production in the Underdeveloped Countries: An Introduction By Charles Cooper* The uncritical notion that it would be easy to orient ...
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. John Charles Cooper (1992). The Philosophy of John Scottus Eriugena. Idealistic Studies 22 (3):232-234.score: 240.0
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Nicholas Asher, Graciela De Pierris, Paul Gomberg, Robert E. Goodin, Charles W. Mills, Jordan Howard Sobel, Andrew Levine, Frank Cunningham, W. J. Waluchow & Wesley Cooper (1989). Tp [\ Canadian (Q\ JJJournal of£| Philosophy. Philosophy 19 (3).score: 240.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Andrew Abbott, Philippe Bourgois, Teresa Chataway, Daniel Chirot, Frederick Cooper, Brian Donovan, Mauro Guillen, Gary Hamilton, Douglas Harper & Charles Hirschman (2000). Acknowledgment of External Reviewers for 1999. Theory and Society 29 (149).score: 240.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. John Charles Cooper (1972). A New Kind of Man. Philadelphia,Westminster Press.score: 240.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. N. Timothy, Charles R. Plott, A. U. Zarazaga, E. Carlos, Increase Suburban Income Growth, Russell W. Cooper, Third Federal Reserve District A. U. Mester, J. Loretta, Bank Closure A. U. Mailath & J. George (1993). Caltech Social Science Working Paper. Inquiry 1994:10.score: 240.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Charles J. Vierck & Brian Y. Cooper (1980). Contextual Determinants of Pain Reactions. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3 (2):314.score: 240.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. David Charles (1999). Aristotle on Well-Being and Intellectual Contemplation: David Charles. Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 73 (1):205–223.score: 210.0
    [David Charles] Aristotle, it appears, sometimes identifies well-being (eudaimonia) with one activity (intellectual contemplation), sometimes with several, including ethical virtue. I argue that this appearance is misleading. In the Nicomachean Ethics, intellectual contemplation is the central case of human well-being, but is not identical with it. Ethically virtuous activity is included in human well-being because it is an analogue of intellectual contemplation. This structure allows Aristotle to hold that while ethically virtuous activity is valuable in its own right, the (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. Sébastien Charles (2002). Berkeley's Principles and Dialogues. Background Source Materials Charles J. McCracken Et Ian C. Tipton Collection «Cambridge Philosophical Texts in Context» Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2000, X, 300 P. [REVIEW] Dialogue 41 (04):807-.score: 180.0
  10. Tom Cooper (1995). A Conference Report Worth Reading: A Report Review by Tom Cooper. Journal of Mass Media Ethics 10 (3):188 – 190.score: 180.0
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. Wesley Cooper (2007). Review: The Cambridge Companion to Peirce. [REVIEW] Review of Metaphysics 60 (4):875-878.score: 180.0
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. S. Charles (forthcoming). Session of the Charles S. Peirce Society. Semiotics.score: 180.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. Peter H. Klopfer (1981). Nocturnal Prosimians Nocturnal Malagasy Primates: Ecology, Physiology, and Behavior P. Charles-Dominique H. M. Cooper A. Hladik C. M. Hladik E. Pages G. F. Pariente A. Petter-Rousseaux J. J. Petter A. Schilling. [REVIEW] Bioscience 31 (7):532-532.score: 120.0
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. Maurice Platnauer (1953). The Latin Hexameter Charles Gordon Cooper: An Introduction to the Latin Hexameter. Pp. Ix + 70. Melbourne and London: Macmillan, 1952. Limp Cloth, 7s. 6d. Net. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 3 (3-4):167-168.score: 120.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. Richard M. Gale (2004). The Still Divided Self of William James: A Response to Pawelski and Cooper. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 40 (1):153 - 170.score: 36.0
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. Charles Duffy (1950). James Fenimore Cooper. Thought 25 (1):175-175.score: 36.0
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. Charles Blattberg (2006). Modern Social Imaginaries Charles Taylor Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2004, 215 Pp., $18.95 Paper. [REVIEW] Dialogue 45 (01):183-.score: 27.0
    Review of Charles Taylor's book, Modern Social Imaginaries.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. Jaime Nubiola, The Spanish Mathematician Ventura Reyes Prósper and His Connections with Charles S. Peirce and Christine Ladd-Franklin. Arisbe. The Peirce Gateway.score: 24.0
    In this paper the relations between the almost unknown Spanish mathematician Ventura Reyes Prósper (1863-1922) with Charles S. Peirce and Christine Ladd-Franklin are described. Two brief papers from Reyes Prósper published in El Progreso Matemático 12 (20 December 1891), pp. 297-300, and 18 (15 June 1892) pp. 170-173 on Ladd-Franklin, and on Peirce and Mitchell, respectively, are translated for first time into English and included at the end of the paper.
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. Hailey Huget (2012). Forgiveness, Reconciliation, and Accountability: A Critique of Charles Griswold's Forgiveness Paradigm. Philosophia 40 (2):337-355.score: 24.0
    Abstract In this paper I analyze and critique Charles Griswold’s work Forgiveness: A Philosophical Exploration. Griswold’s theory of forgiveness is structured around the notion that human frailty, imperfection, and susceptibility to unfortunate circumstances are cornerstones of the human experience. While Griswold’s paradigm of forgiveness is compelling on the whole, I argue that this “human frailty thesis” creates unintentional and problematic consequences that undermine major goals of his paradigm. In particular, the human frailty thesis undermines Griswold’s requirement that forgiveness hold (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. James G. Lennox & Robert Bolton (eds.) (2010). Being, Nature, and Life in Aristotle: Essays in Honor of Allan Gotthelf. Cambridge University Press.score: 24.0
    Machine generated contents note: Introduction; 1. Teleology, Platonic and Aristotelian David Sedley; 2. Biology and metaphysics in Aristotle Robert Bolton; 3. The unity and purpose of On the Parts of Animals I James G. Lennox; 4. An Aristotelian puzzle about definition: Metaphysics Z.12 Alan Code; 5. Unity of definition in Metaphysics H.6 and Z.12 Mary Louise Gill; 6. Definition in Aristotle's Posterior Analytics Pierre Pellegrin; 7. Male and female in Aristotle's Generation of Animals Aryeh Kosman; 8. Metaphysics Θ. 7 and (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. James Doyle (2010). Socrates and Gorgias. Phronesis 55 (1):1-25.score: 24.0
    In this paper I try to solve some problems concerning the interpretation of Socrates' conversation with Gorgias about the nature of rhetoric in Plato's Gorgias (448e6-461b2). I begin by clarifying what, ethically, is at stake in the conversation (section 2). In the main body of the paper (sections 3-6) I address the question of what we are to understand Gorgias as believing about the nature of rhetoric: I criticise accounts given by Charles Kahn and John Cooper, and suggest (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  22. Ruth Abbey (2002). Pluralism in Practice: The Political Thought of Charles Taylor. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 5 (3):98-123.score: 24.0
    This review article outlines some of the major contributions made to political theory by Charles Taylor. It focuses on his relationship to liberalism, his contribution to the understanding of democracy and his analysis of the politics of recognition. Several lines of critique of Taylor's thought on these issues are also explored. Some reflections on Taylor's style of theorising about politics are offered, and the question of whether he is a conservative or critical theorist is examined.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  23. Lindsay Judson & V. Karasmanēs (eds.) (2006). Remembering Socrates: Philosophical Essays. Oxford University Press.score: 24.0
    Lindsay Judson and Vassilis Karasmanis present a selection of philosophical papers by an outstanding international team of scholars, assessing the legacy and continuing relevance of Socrates's thought 2,400 years after his death. The topics of the papers include Socratic method; the notion of definition; Socrates's intellectualist conception of ethics; famous arguments in the Euthyphro and Crito; and aspects of the later portrayal and reception of Socrates as a philosophical and ethical exemplar, by Plato, the Sceptics, and in the early Christian (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  24. Matthew Walhout (2010). Looking to Charles Taylor and Joseph Rouse for Best Practices in Science and Religion. Zygon 45 (3):558-574.score: 24.0
    People discussing science and religion usually frame their conversations in terms of essentialist assumptions about science, assumptions requiring the existence (but not the specification) of criteria according to which science can be distinguished from other forms of inquiry. However, criteria functioning at a level of generality appropriate to such discussions may not exist at all. Essentialist assumptions may be avoided if science is understood within a broader context of human practices. In a philosophy of practices, to label a practice as (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  25. John F. Boler (1963). Charles Peirce and Scholastic Realism. Seattle, University of Washington Press.score: 24.0
    IN 1903, commenting on an article he had written more than thirty years before, Charles Peirce said that he had changed his mind on many issues at least a half-dozen times but had "never been able to think differently on that question of nominalism and realism" (1.20). For anyone acquainted with Peirce's writings, this remark alone could justify a study of "that question.".
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  26. Piers J. Hale (2013). Monkeys Into Men and Men Into Monkeys: Chance and Contingency in the Evolution of Man, Mind and Morals in Charles Kingsley's Water Babies. [REVIEW] Journal of the History of Biology 46 (4):551-597.score: 24.0
    The nineteenth century theologian, author and poet Charles Kingsley was a notable populariser of Darwinian evolution. He championed Darwin’s cause and that of honesty in science for more than a decade from 1859 to 1871. Kingsley’s interpretation of evolution shaped his theology, his politics and his views on race. The relationship between men and apes set the context for Kingsley’s consideration of these issues. Having defended Darwin for a decade in 1871 Kingsley was dismayed to read Darwin’s account of (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  27. Matthew Lister (forthcoming). Four Entries for the Rawls Lexicon: Charles Beitz, H.L.A. Hart, Citizen, Sovereignty. In Jon Mandle & David Reidy (eds.), The Rawls Lexicon. Cambridge University Press.score: 24.0
    These are for entries for the forthcoming _Rawls Lexicon_, edited by Jon Mandle and David Reidy, on H.L.A. Hart, Charles Beitz, Sovereignty, and Citizen.
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  28. Peter Woodford (2012). Specters of the Nineteenth Century: Charles Taylor and the Problem of Historicism. [REVIEW] Journal of Religious Ethics 40 (1):171-192.score: 24.0
    This paper identifies and analyzes the problem of historicism in Charles Taylor's work overall, but with particular emphasis on his most recent publication, A Secular Age. I circumscribe the problem of historicism through reference to the nineteenth-century German philosophical tradition in which it developed, in particular in the thought of Wilhelm Dilthey. I then trace the structural similarities between the notions of history to be found in the thought of Taylor and Dilthey and how these structural similarities raise worries (...)
    Direct download (10 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  29. Rossella Fabbrichesi & Susanna Marietti (eds.) (2006). Semiotics and Philosophy in Charles Saunders Peirce. Cambridge Scholars Press.score: 24.0
    The subject of this book is the thought of the American pragmatist and founder of semiotics, Charles Sanders Peirce. The book collects the papers presented to the International Conference Semiotics and Philosophy in C.S. Peirce (Milan, April 2005), together with some additional new contributions by well-known Peirce scholars, bearing witness to the vigour of Peircean scholarship in Italy and also hosting some of the most significant international voices on this topic. The book is introduced by the two editors and (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  30. Kei Hiruta (2006). What Pluralism, Why Pluralism, and How? A Response to Charles Ess. Ethics and Information Technology 8 (4):227-236.score: 24.0
    In this critical response to Charles Ess’ ‚Ethical Pluralism and Global Information Ethics’ presented in this Special Issue of Ethics and Information Technology, it is firstly argued that his account of pros hen pluralism can be more accurately reformulated as a three layered doctrine by separating one acceptance of diversity at a cultural level and another at an ethical theoretic level. Following this clarificatory section, the next section considers Ess’ political and sociological reasons for the necessity and desirability of (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  31. James E. Broyles (1965). Charles S. Peirce and the Concept of Indubitable Belief. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 1 (2):77-89.score: 24.0
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  32. Juan Carlos D'Amico (2012). Gattinara et la « monarchie impériale » de Charles Quint. Entre millénarisme, translatio imperii et droits du Saint-Empire. Astérion. Philosophie, Histoire des Idées, Pensée Politique 10 (10).score: 24.0
    Spreading the universal monarchy myth in the early 16th century was closely linked to the magnitude of the territories controlled by Charles V. For the imperial chancellor Mercurino Gattinara, universal and messianic ideas, which were integrated into the symbolism of the Empire, were to legitimate a policy that aimed at giving a more rational structure to Charles’ territories and at securing a prominent influence for the Habsburg family in the whole of Europe. Gattinara imagined a kind of supranational (...)
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  33. Keith A. Wilson (2014). Review of Charles Travis, Perception: Essays After Frege. [REVIEW] Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2014 (April).score: 24.0
    Charles Travis’s new collection on perception brings together eleven of his previously published essays on this topic, some of which are substantially revised, plus one new essay. The intentionally ambiguous subtitle hints at the author’s endorsement of Fregean anti-psychologism, though influences from Wittgenstein and Austin are equally apparent. The work centres around two major questions in the philosophy of mind and perception. First, Travis argues against the view that perceptual experience, as distinct from perceptual judgement or belief, is representational, (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  34. Gustavo Caponi, Claude Bernard, Charles Darwin y los dos modos fundamentales de interrogar lo viviente.score: 24.0
    Research in modern biology has largely been developed according to two main ways of inquiry, as they were outlined by Charles Darwin and Claude Bernard. Each stands for a specific approach to the living corresponding to two different methodological rules: the principle of natural selection and the principle of causation.
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  35. Timo Kajamies & Krister Talvinen (2010). LADESMAN, Charles. Skepticism: The Central Issues. Principia 8 (1).score: 24.0
    Review: LADESMAN, Charles. Skepticism: The Central Issues. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers, 2002. Pp. x + 210.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  36. James R. Jackson & William C. Kimler (1999). Taxonomy and the Personal Equation: The Historical Fates of Charles Girard and Louis Agassiz. [REVIEW] Journal of the History of Biology 32 (3):509 - 555.score: 24.0
    The reputations of scientists among their contemporaries depend not only on accomplishment, but also on interactions affected by influence and personality. The historical lore of most fields of scientific endeavor preserve these reputations, often through the identification of founders, innovators, and prolific workers whose contributions are considered fundamental to progress in the field. Historians frequently rely on the historical lore of scientists to guide their studies of the development of ideas, exhibiting justifiable caution in reassessing reputations in the light of (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  37. Martin Amrein & Kärin Nickelsen (2008). The Gentleman and the Rogue: The Collaboration Between Charles Darwin and Carl Vogt. [REVIEW] Journal of the History of Biology 41 (2):237 - 266.score: 24.0
    This paper investigates the relationship between the eminent 19th-century naturalists Charles Darwin and Carl Vogt. On two separate occasions, Vogt asked Darwin for permission to translate some of the latter’s books into German, and in both cases Darwin refused. It has generally been assumed that Darwin turned down Vogt as a translator because of the latter’s reputation as a radical libertine who was extremely outspoken in his defence of scientific materialism and atheism. However, this explanation does not fit the (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  38. Ruth Abbey (2011). Another Philosopher-Citizen : The Political Philosophy of Charles Taylor. In Catherine H. Zuckert (ed.), Political Philosophy in the Twentieth Century: Authors and Arguments. Cambridge University Press.score: 24.0
    This chapter briefly reviews the link between Charles Taylor's life and work. It then discusses his position on the role of science in understanding human behavior. It concludes by considering the relationship between theory and practice in Taylor's thought.
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  39. Jaime Nubiola, Walker Percy and Charles S. Peirce: Abduction and Language. Homepage des Arbeitskreises für Abduktionsforschung.score: 21.0
    The American novelist Walker Percy (1916-90) considered himself a "thief of Peirce", because he found in the views of C.S. Peirce, the founder of pragmatism, an alternative approach to prevailing reductionist theories in order to understand what we human beings are and what the peculiar nature of our linguistic activity is. -/- This paper describes, quoting widely from Percy, how abduction is the spontaneous activity of our reason by which we couple meanings and experience in our linguistic expressions. This coupling (...)
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  40. Charles H. Pence, Charles Darwin and Sir John F. W. Herschel: Nineteenth-Century Science and its Methodology.score: 21.0
    In this essay, I review the relationship between Charles Darwin's methodology and the philosophy of science of Sir John F. W. Herschel. Darwin's exposure to Herschel's philosophy was, I argue, significant. Further, when we construct an appropriate reading of Herschel's philosophy of science (a surprisingly difficult feat), we can see that Darwin's three-part argument in the Origin is crafted in order to strictly adhere to Herschel's methodological guidelines.
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  41. Noam A. Chomsky & Jerrold J. Katz (1975). On Innateness: A Reply to Cooper. Philosophical Review 84 (January):70-87.score: 21.0
  42. David McPherson & Charles Taylor (2012). Re-Enchanting the World: An Interview with Charles Taylor. Philosophy and Theology 24 (2):275-294.score: 21.0
    This interview with Charles Taylor explores a central concern throughout his work, viz., his concern to confront the challenges presented by the process of ‘disenchantment’ in the modern world. It focuses especially on what is involved in seeking a kind of ‘re-enchantment.' A key issue that is discussed is the relationship of Taylor’s theism to his effort of seeking re-enchantment. Some other related issues that are explored pertain to questions surrounding Taylor’s argument against the standard secularization thesis that views (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  43. H. G. Callaway (1996). Review: Carl R. Hausman, Charles S. Peirce's Evolutionary Philosophy. [REVIEW] Dialectica 50 (No. 2):153-161.score: 21.0
    Carl Hausman is a former editor of The Journal of Speculative Philosophy, a revival of one of the first American philosophy journals, where Peirce published some of his early work; and Hausman has devoted a good deal of his career to Peirce scholarship. He interprets Peirce’s thought “as a fallibilistic foundationalism that affirms a unique realism according to which what is real is a dynamic, evolving extramental condition.” The theme is an interesting one partly in view of the many recent (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  44. Robert F. Almeder (1971). The Idealism of Charles S. Peirce. Journal of the History of Philosophy 9 (4):477-484.score: 21.0
    ELSEWHERE WE HAVE ARGUED that Peirce's later thought manifests a commitment to the thesis that there is a world of physical objects whose existence and properties are neither logically nor causally dependent upon the noetic act of any number of finite minds. 1 In other words, we have argued that Peirce's later thought satisfies the definition of metaphysical realism as classically defined. 2 There are, however, a number of texts which might be cited to support the claim that, for Peirce, (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  45. Karl-Otto Apel (1981/1995). Charles S. Peirce: From Pragmatism to Pragmaticism. Humanities Press.score: 21.0
  46. Charles Darwin (1975). Charles Darwin's Natural Selection: Being the Second Part of His Big Species Book Written From 1856 to 1858. Cambridge University Press.score: 21.0
    Charles Darwin's On the Origin of Species is unquestionably one of the chief landmarks in biology. The Origin (as it is widely known) was literally only an abstract of the manuscript Darwin had originally intended to complete and publish as the formal presentation of his views on evolution. Compared with the Origin, his original long manuscript work on Natural Selection, which is presented here and made available for the first time in printed form, has more abundant examples and illustrations (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  47. Greg Moses (2013). Charles Sanders Peirce and a Religious Metaphysics of Natureby Leon Niemoczynski, And: God and the World of Signs: Trinity, Evolution, and the Metaphysical Semiotics of C. S. Peirce by Andrew Robinson (Review). Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 49 (1):120-122.score: 21.0
    In the beginning came Firstness along with icons that could represent it to an awakening dreamer. In his 2011 monograph on Charles Sanders Peirce and a Religious Metaphysics of Nature, Leon J. Niemoczynski develops a critical appreciation of Peircean Firstness that arises from “the depths of experience” as “the living ground of will, power, and potential” (15). Explicitly attuned to Robert Corrington’s “ecstatic naturalism,” Niemoczynski works his way through Peirce to Schelling in order to de-theologize the reader’s understanding of (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  48. Robert F. Almeder (1984). Review: The Writings of Charles S. Peirce: A Chronological Edition, Vol. I 1857-1866. [REVIEW] Journal of the History of Philosophy 22 (4):494-497.score: 21.0
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  49. Charles Hartshorne (1973). Charles Peirce and Quantum Mechanics. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 9 (4):191 - 201.score: 21.0
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  50. Bernard Yack (2005). Charles Taylor, Modern Social Imaginaries:Modern Social Imaginaries. Ethics 115 (3):629-633.score: 21.0
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
1 — 50 / 1000