7 found
Sort by:
  1. Charles Arthur Willard (2002). Tindale, Christopher W.(2000). Acts of Arguing: A Rhetorical Model of Argument. Argumentation 16 (4):505-506.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Charles Arthur Willard (1994). Editor's Introduction. Argumentation 8 (2):103-110.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Charles Arthur Willard (1992). Field Theory: A Cartesian Meditation. In William L. Benoit, Dale Hample & Pamela J. Benoit (eds.), Readings in Argumentation. Foris Publications. 437.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Charles Arthur Willard (1991). Adaptation to Context. Argumentation 5 (1):91-107.
    Argument theorists often stress the idea of adaptation to context as an alternative to seeing argument as linked propositions. But adaptation is not a clear idea. It is in fact a complicated puzzle. Though many aspects of this puzzle are obscure, one clear conclusion is that the question-answer pair is not a good way to conceptualize adaptation to situation.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Charles Arthur Willard (1990). Authority. Informal Logic 12 (1).
    Direct download (13 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Charles Willard (1988). The Business of Ethics. Social Epistemology 2 (2):163 – 170.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Sven Andersson, Elazar Barkan, Kenneth Caneva, Randall Collins, Stephen Downes, Henry Etzkowitz, Steve Fuller, David Gorman, Frederick Grinnell, David Hollinger, Anne Holmquest & Charles Willard (1987). Responses to 'Pathologies of Science'. Social Epistemology 1 (3):249-281.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation