5 found
Order:
See also:
Profile: Cheryl Misak (University of Toronto)
  1.  6
    Cheryl J. Misak, Douglas B. White & Robert D. Truog (2016). Medically Inappropriate or Futile Treatment: Deliberation and Justification. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 41 (1):90-114.
    This paper reframes the futility debate, moving away from the question “Who decides when to end what is considered to be a medically inappropriate or futile treatment?” and toward the question “How can society make policy that will best account for the multitude of values and conflicts involved in such decision-making?” It offers a pragmatist moral epistemology that provides us with a clear justification of why it is important to take best standards, norms, and physician judgment seriously and a clear (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  2. Cheryl J. Misak (2004). Making Disagreement Matter: Pragmatism and Deliberative Democracy. Journal of Speculative Philosophy 18 (1):9 - 22.
  3.  6
    Cheryl J. Misak (2010). Narrative Evidence and Evidence‐Based Medicine. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 16 (2):392-397.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  4. Cheryl J. Misak (2001). Pragmatism. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 37 (3):416-427.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  5. Cheryl J. Misak (2006). Scientific Realism, Anti-Realism, and Empiricism. In John R. Shook & Joseph Margolis (eds.), A Companion to Pragmatism. Blackwell Pub.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography