Search results for 'Chiasms: Merleau-ponty' (try it on Scholar)

1000+ found
Order:
  1. Fred Evans & Leonard Lawlor (eds.) (2000). Chiasms Merleau-Ponty's Notion of Flesh. Monograph Collection (Matt - Pseudo).
    Leading scholars explore the later thought of Merleau-Ponty and its central role in the modernism-postmodernism debate.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  2. Fred Evans & Leonard Lawlor (eds.) (2000). Chiasms: Merleau-Ponty's Notion of Flesh. State University of New York Press.
    _Leading scholars explore the later thought of Merleau-Ponty and its central role in the modernism-postmodernism debate._.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  3.  19
    Kym Maclaren (2003). Chiasms: Merleau-Ponty's Notion of Flesh, Edited by Fred Evans and Leonard Lawlor (Review). Journal of Speculative Philosophy 17 (2):148-152.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  4.  2
    Cristina Ionescu, Mãdãlina Diaconu, Janko Lozar, Victor Popescu, Viorel Nita, Stefan Nicolae & Cristian Ciocan (2003). Charles E. Scott, Susan M. Schoenbohm, Daniela Vallega-Neu, Alejandro Vallega (Eds.), Companion to Heidegger's Contributions to PhilosophyGernot BÖHME, Aisthetik. Vorlesungen Über Ästhetik Als Allgemeine WahrnehmungslehreDean Komel, Osnutja K Filozofski in Kulturni HermenevtikiMarc Richir, L'institution de L'Idéalité. Des Schématismes phénoménologiquesFred Evans & Leonard Lawlor (Eds.), Chiasms. Merleau-Ponty's Notion of FleshUdo TIETZ, Ontologie Und Dialektik. Heidegger Und Adorno Über Das Sein, Das Nichtidentische, Die Synthesis Und Die KopulaEtienne Feron, Phénoménologie de la Mort. Sur les Traces de Levinas. [REVIEW] Studia Phaenomenologica 3 (1):277-307.
    Translate
      Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  5. Sean D. Kelly (2005). Seeing Things in Merleau-Ponty. In C. Tarman (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Merleau-Ponty. Cambridge 74-110.
    The passage above comes from the opening pages of Merleau-Ponty’s essay on Edmund Husserl. It proposes a risky interpretive principle. The main feature of this principle is that the seminal aspects of a thinker’s work are so close to him that he is incapable of articulating them himself. Nevertheless, these aspects pervade the work, give it its style, its sense and its direction, and therefore belong to it essentially. As Martin Heidegger writes, in a passage quoted by Merleau-Ponty: (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   18 citations  
  6.  19
    Helen Fielding (1999). Lacan and Merleau-Ponty on Intersubjectivity. In Dorothea Olkowski James Morley (ed.), Merleau-Ponty, Interiority and Exteriority, Psychic Life and the World.
    This paper considers the relation between Merleau-Ponty and Lacan in terms of vision and intersubjectivity.
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  7. Jack Reynolds & Jon Roffe (forthcoming). Neither-Nor: Merleau-Ponty's Ontology in "The Intertwining/The Chiasm". In Understanding Merleau-Ponty, Understanding Modernism.
    Jean-Paul Sartre's moving eulogy for Merleau-Ponty on his death was entitled "Merleau-Ponty vivant" – Merleau-Ponty lives. And it is indeed difficult to deny that Merleau-Ponty’s thought remains a live and enduring part of the contemporary philosophical scene, in a manner that could not be said for his more famous contemporary. Despite the enduring significance of Merleau-Ponty and the voluminous writings about his work, the book that was intended to be his magnum opus, The Visible and (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  8.  90
    B. Scot Rousse (2016). Merleau-Ponty and Carroll on the Power of Movies. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 24 (1):45-73.
    Movies have a striking aesthetic power: they can draw us in and induce a peculiar mode of involvement in their images – they absorb us. While absorbed in a movie, we lose track both of the passage of time and of the fact that we are sitting in a dark room with other people watching the play of light upon a screen. What is the source of the power of movies? Noël Carroll, who cites Maurice Merleau-Ponty as an influence (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  9. Dylan Trigg (2014). The Role of the Earth in Merleau-Ponty’s Archaeological Phenomenology. Chiasmi International 16:255-273.
    This paper argues that the concept of the Earth plays a pivotal role in Merleau-Ponty’s thinking in two ways. First, the concept assumes a special importance in terms of Merleau-Ponty’s relation to Husserl via the fragment known as “The Earth Does Not Move.” Two, from this fragment, the Earth marks a key theme around which Merleau-Ponty’s late philosophy revolves. In particular, it is with the concept of the Earth that Merleau-Ponty will develop his archaeologically oriented phenomenology. (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  10.  38
    Joel Krueger (2013). Merleau-Ponty on Shared Emotions and the Joint Ownership Thesis. Continental Philosophy Review 46 (4):509-531.
    In “The Child’s Relations with Others,” Merleau-Ponty argues that certain early experiences are jointly owned in that they are numerically single experiences that are nevertheless given to more than one subject (e.g., the infant and caregiver). Call this the “joint ownership thesis” (JT). Drawing upon both Merleau-Ponty’s phenomenological analysis, as well as studies of exogenous attention and mutual affect regulation in developmental psychology, I motivate the plausibility of JT. I argue that the phenomenological structure of some early infant–caregiver (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   20 citations  
  11. John T. Sanders (1994). Merleau-Ponty on Meaning, Materiality, and Structure. Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology 25 (1):96-100.
    Against David Schenck's interpretation, I argue that it is not absolutely clear that Merleau-Ponty ever meant to replace what Schenck refers to as the "unity of meanings" interpretation of "structure" with a "material meanings" interpretation. A particular problem-setting -- for example, an attempt to understand the "truth in naturalism" or the "truth in dualism" -- may very well require a particular mode of expression. I argue that the mode of expression chosen by Merleau-Ponty for these purposes, while unfortunate (...)
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  12. Alia Al-Saji (2009). A Phenomenology of Critical-Ethical Vision: Merleau-Ponty, Bergson, and the Question of Seeing Differently. Chiasmi International 11:375-398.
    Drawing on Merleau-Ponty’s “Eye and Mind” and Bergson’s Matière et mémoire and “La perception du changement,” I ask what resources are available in vision for interrupting objectifying habits of seeing. While both Bergson and Merleau-Ponty locate the possibility of seeing differently in the figure of the painter, I develop by means of their texts, and in dialogue with Iris Marion Young’s work, a more general phenomenology of hesitation that grounds what I am calling “critical-ethical vision.” Hesitation, I argue, (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  13.  13
    Dylan Trigg (2016). “The Indestructible, the Barbaric Principle”: The Role of Schelling in Merleau-Ponty’s Psychoanalysis. Continental Philosophy Review 49 (2):203-221.
    The aim of this paper is to examine Merleau-Ponty’s idea of a “psychoanalysis of Nature”. My thesis is that in order to understand the creation of a Merleau-Pontean psychoanalysis, we need to ultimately understand the place of Schelling in Merleau-Ponty’s late thought. Through his dialogue with Schelling, Merleau-Ponty will be able to formulate not only a psychoanalysis of Nature, but also fulfil the ultimate task of phenomenology itself; namely, of identifying “what resists phenomenology—natural being, the ‘barbarous’ source (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  14. Jack Reynolds & Jon Roffe (2006). Deleuze and Merleau-Ponty: Immanence, Univocity and Phenomenology. Journal of the British Society of Phenomenology 37 (3):228-51.
    This paper will seek firstly to understand Deleuze’s main challenges to phenomenology, particularly as they are expressed in The Logic of Sense and What is Philosophy?, although reference will also be made to Pure Immanence and Difference and Repetition. We will then turn to a discussion of one of the few passages in which Deleuze directly engages with Merleau-Ponty, which occurs in the chapter on art in What is Philosophy? In this text, he and Guattari offer a critique of (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  15. Noah Moss Brender (2013). Sense-Making and Symmetry-Breaking: Merleau-Ponty, Cognitive Science, and Dynamic Systems Theory. Symposium: The Canadian Journal of Continental Philosophy 17 (2):247-273.
    From his earliest work forward, phenomenologist Maurice Merleau-Ponty attempted to develop a new ontology of nature that would avoid the antinomies of realism and idealism by showing that nature has its own intrinsic sense which is prior to reflection. The key to this new ontology was the concept of form, which he appropriated from Gestalt psychology. However, Merleau-Ponty struggled to give a positive characterization of the phenomenon of form which would clarify its ontological status. Evan Thompson has recently (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  16.  8
    Sara Heinämaa (2003). Toward a Phenomenology of Sexual Difference: Husserl, Merleau-Ponty, Beauvoir. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
    Sara HeinSmaa rediscovers neglected passages of Le Duexi_me Sexe in her quest to follow Simone de Beauvoir's line of thinking. She finds the masterpiece to be grounded in the work of Husserl and Merleau-Ponty.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   23 citations  
  17. J. C. Berendzen (2013). Disjunctivism and Perceptual Knowledge in Merleau-Ponty and McDowell. Res Philosophica 91 (3):1-26.
    On the face of it, Maurice Merleau-Ponty’s views bear a strong resemblance to contemporary disjunctivist theories of perception, especially John McDowell’s epistemological disjunctivism. Like McDowell , Merleau-Ponty seems to be a direct realist about perception and holds that veridical and illusory perceptions are distinct. This paper furthers this comparison. Furthermore, it is argued that elements of Merleau-Ponty’s thought provide a stronger case for McDowell’s kind of epistemological view than McDowell himself provides. Merleau-Ponty’s early thought can be (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  18. Bryan Smyth (2010). Heroism and History in Merleau-Ponty's Existential Phenomenology. Continental Philosophy Review 43 (2):167-191.
    Whereas Phenomenology of Perception concludes with a puzzling turn to “heroism,” this article examines the short essay “Man, the Hero” as a source of insight into Merleau-Ponty’s thought in the early postwar period. In this essay, Merleau-Ponty presented a conception of heroism through which he expressed the attitude toward post-Hegelian philosophy of history that underwrote his efforts to reform Marxism along existential lines. Analyzing this conception of heroism by unpacking the implicit contrasts with Kojève, Aron, Caillois, and Bataille, (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  19. Rasmus Thybo Jensen (2013). Merleau-Ponty and the Transcendental Problem of Bodily Agency. In Rasmus Thybo Jensen Dermot Moran (ed.), The Phenomenology of Embodied Subjectivity, Contributions to Phenomenology 71. 43-61.
    I argue that we find the articulation of a problem concerning bodily agency in the early works of the Merleau-Ponty which he explicates as analogous to what he explicitly calls the problem of perception. The problem of perception is the problem of seeing how we can have the object given in person through it perspectival appearances. The problem concerning bodily agency is the problem of seeing how our bodily movements can be the direct manifestation of a person’s intentions in (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  20. Robert Greenleaf Brice & Patrick L. Bourgeois (2012). Naturalism Reconsidered: Wittgenstein and Merleau-Ponty. Philosophy Today 56 (1):78-83.
    While naturalism is used in positive senses by the tradition of analytical philosophy, with Ludwig Wittgenstein its best example, and by the tradition of phenomenology, with Maurice Merleau-Ponty its best exemplar, it also has an extremely negative sense on both of these fronts. Hence, both Merleau-Ponty and Wittgenstein in their basic thrusts adamantly reject reductionistic naturalism. Although Merleau-Ponty’s phenomenology rejects the naturalism Husserl rejects, he early on found a place for the “truth of naturalism.” In a parallel (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  21. William Wilkerson (2010). Time and Ambiguity: Reassessing Merleau-Ponty on Sartrean Freedom. Journal of the History of Philosophy 48 (2):pp. 207-234.
    Argues that standard interpretations of Merleau-Ponty's criticisms of Sartrean freedom fail and presents an alternative interpretation that argues that the fundamental issue concerns their different theories of time.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  22. Sean Dorrance Kelly (2002). Merleau–Ponty on the Body. Ratio 15 (4):376–391.
    The French philosopher Maurice Merleau-Ponty claims that there are two distinct ways in which we can understand the place of an object when we are visually apprehending it. The first involves an intentional relation to the object that is essentially cognitive or can serve as the input to cognitive processes; the second irreducibly involves a bodily set or preparation to deal with the object. Because of its essential bodily component, Merleau-Ponty calls this second kind of understanding ‘motor intentional’. (...)
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   9 citations  
  23. John T. Sanders, From Perception to Metaphysics: Reflections on Berkeley and Merleau-Ponty.
    George Berkeley's apparently strange view – that nothing exists without a mind except for minds themselves – is notorious. Also well known, and equally perplexing at a superficial level, is his insistence that his doctrine is no more than what is consistent with common sense. It was every bit as crucial for Berkeley that it be demonstrated that the colors are really in the tulip, as that there is nothing that is neither a mind nor something perceived by a mind. (...)
    Translate
      Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  24.  27
    Donald A. Landes (2015). Between Sensibility and Understanding: Kant and Merleau-Ponty and the Critique of Reason. Journal of Speculative Philosophy 29 (3):335-345.
    Whether explicitly or implicitly, Kant's critical project weighs heavily upon Merleau-Ponty's Phenomenology of Perception. This article argues that we can understand Merleau-Ponty's text as a phenomenological rewriting of the Critique of Pure Reason from within the paradoxical structures of lived experience, effectively merging Kant's Transcendental Aesthetic and Transcendental Analytic. Although he was influenced by Husserl's and Heidegger's interpretations of Kant's first version of the Transcendental Deduction, Merleau-Ponty develops a unique position between Kant, Husserl, and Heidegger via an (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  25.  4
    Kasper Levin (2016). Aesthetic Movements of Embodied Minds: Between Merleau-Ponty and Deleuze. Continental Philosophy Review 49 (2):181-202.
    Animating Maurice Merleau-Ponty’s phenomenological idea of the body as a pre-reflective organizing principle in perception, consciousness and language has become a productive and popular endeavor within philosophy of mind during the last two decades. In this context Merleau-Ponty’s descriptions of an embodied mind has played a central role in the attempts to naturalize phenomenological insights in relation to cognitive science and neuropsychological research. In this dialogue the central role of art and aesthetics in phenomenology has been neglected or (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  26. Alia Al-Saji (2007). The Temporality of Life: Merleau-Ponty, Bergson, and the Immemorial Past. Southern Journal of Philosophy 45 (2):177-206.
    Borrowing conceptual tools from Bergson, this essay asks after the shift in the temporality of life from Merleau-Ponty’s Phénoménologie de la perception to his later works. Although the Phénoménologie conceives life in terms of the field of presence of bodily action, later texts point to a life of invisible and immemorial dimensionality. By reconsidering Bergson, but also thereby revising his reading of Husserl, Merleau-Ponty develops a nonserial theory of time in the later works, one that acknowledges the verticality (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  27. Helen A. Fielding (2011). Multiple Moving Perceptions of the Real: Arendt, Merleau-Ponty, and Truitt. Hypatia 26 (3):518-534.
    This paper explores the ethical insights provided by Anne Truitt's minimalist sculptures, as viewed through the phenomenological lenses of Hannah Arendt's investigations into the co-constitution of reality and Maurice Merleau-Ponty's investigations into perception. Artworks in their material presence can lay out new ways of relating and perceiving. Truitt's works accomplish this task by revealing the interactive motion of our embodied relations and how material objects can actually help to ground our reality and hence human potentiality. Merleau-Ponty shows how (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  28.  17
    Donald A. Landes (2013). Merleau-Ponty and the Paradoxes of Expression. Bloomsbury.
    Winner of the 2014 Edward Goodwin Ballard Award for an Outstanding Book in Phenomenology, awarded by the Center for Advance Research in Phenomenology. -/- Merleau-Ponty and the Paradoxes of Expression offers a comprehensive reading of the philosophical work of Maurice Merleau-Ponty, a central figure in 20th-century continental philosophy. -/- By establishing that the paradoxical logic of expression is Merleau-Ponty's fundamental philosophical gesture, this book ties together his diverse work on perception, language, aesthetics, politics and history in order (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  29.  52
    Stuart J. Murray & Dave Holmes (2013). Toward a Critical Ethical Reflexivity: Phenomenology and Language in Maurice Merleau‐Ponty. Bioethics 27 (6):341-347.
    Working within the tradition of continental philosophy, this article argues in favour of a phenomenological understanding of language as a crucial component of bioethical inquiry. The authors challenge the ‘commonsense’ view of language, in which thinking appears as prior to speaking, and speech the straightforward vehicle of pre-existing thoughts. Drawing on Maurice Merleau-Ponty's (1908–1961) phenomenology of language, the authors claim that thinking takes place in and through the spoken word, in and through embodied language. This view resituates bioethics as (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  30.  40
    Carl B. Sachs (2014). Discursive and Somatic Intentionality: Merleau-Ponty Contra 'McDowell or Sellars'. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 22 (2):199-227.
    Here I show that Sellars’ radicalization of the Kantian distinction between concepts and intuitions is vulnerable to a challenge grounded in Merleau-Ponty’s phenomenology of embodiment. Sellars argues that Kant’s concept of ‘intuition’ is ambiguous between singular demonstrative phrases and sense-impressions. In light of the critique of the Myth of the Given, Sellars argues, in the ‘Myth of Jones’, that sense-impression are theoretical posits. I argue that Merleau-Ponty offers a way of understanding perceptual activity which successfully avoids both the (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  31.  80
    Rudolph Bauer (2012). Merleau Ponty and the Body as the Medium of the Field. Transmission 4.
    This paper focuses on Merleau Ponty understanding that the body is the medium of the field of awareness.
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  32. Alia Al-Saji (2008). "A Past Which has Never Been Present": Bergsonian Dimensions in Merleau-Ponty's Theory of the Prepersonal. Research in Phenomenology 38 (1):41-71.
    Merleau-Ponty's reference to "a past which has never been present" at the end of "Le sentir" challenges the typical framework of the Phenomenology of Perception, with its primacy of perception and bodily field of presence. In light of this "original past," I propose a re-reading of the prepersonal as ground of perception that precedes the dichotomies of subject-object and activity-passivity. Merleau-Ponty searches in the Phenomenology for language to describe this ground, borrowing from multiple registers (notably Bergson, but also (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  33.  7
    Stephen Watson (2016). “Philosophy is Also an Architecture of Signs”: On Merleau-Ponty and Cavaillès. Research in Phenomenology 46 (1):35-53.
    _ Source: _Volume 46, Issue 1, pp 35 - 53 In a letter written at the end of July 1930, Jean Cavaillès singled out two of his successful students at the _Ecole Normale_, Merleau-Ponty and Lautman, “full of interest in the philosophy of mathematics”. While both would play an important role in French philosophy in the coming decades, one almost never thinks of their names together. Indeed, only rarely do we think of Merleau-Ponty and Cavaillès together. This paper (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  34.  75
    Steven M. Rosen (2013). Bridging the “Two Cultures”: Merleau-Ponty and the Crisis in Modern Physics. Cosmos and History: The Journal of Natural and Social Philosophy 9 (2):1-12.
    This paper brings to light the significance of Merleau-Ponty’s thinking for contemporary physics. The point of departure is his 1956–57 Collège de France lectures on Nature, coupled with his reflections on the crisis in modern physics appearing in THE VISIBLE AND THE INVISIBLE. Developments in theoretical physics after his death are then explored and a deepening of the crisis is disclosed. The upshot is that physics’ intractable problems of uncertainty and subject-object interaction can only be addressed by shifting its (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  35.  73
    Shiloh Whitney (2012). Affects, Images and Childlike Perception: Self-Other Difference in Merleau-Ponty's Sorbonne Lectures. Phaenex 7 (2):185-211.
    I begin by reviewing recent research by Merleau-Ponty scholars opposing aspects of the critique of Merleau-Ponty made by Meltzoff and colleagues based on their studies of neonate imitation. I conclude the need for reopening the case for infant self-other indistinction, starting with a re-examination of Merleau-Ponty’s notion of indistinction in the Sorbonne lectures, and attending especially to the role of affect and to the non-exclusivity of self-other distinction and indistinction. In undertaking that study, I discover the importance (...)
    Direct download (14 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  36.  76
    Rasmus Thybo Jensen (2013). Merleau-Ponty and McDowell on the Transparency of the Mind. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 21 (3):470-492.
    McDowell and Merleau-Ponty share a critical attitude towards a certain Cartesian picture of the mind. According to the picture in question nothing which properly belongs to subjectivity can be hidden to the subject herself. Nevertheless there is a striking asymmetry in how the two philosophers portray the problematic consequences of such a picture. They can seem to offer exact opposite views of these consequences, which, given the almost identical characterization of the transparency claim, is puzzling. I argue that a (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  37. Alia Al-Saji (2009). An Absence That Counts in the World: Merleau-Ponty’s Later Philosophy of Time in Light of Bernet’s 'Einleitung'. Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology 40 (2):207-227.
    This paper examines Maurice Merleau-Ponty’s later philosophy of time in light of his critique and reconceptualization of Edmund Husserl’s early time-analyses. Drawing on The Visible and the Invisible and lecture courses, I elaborate Merleau-Ponty’s re-reading of Husserl’s time-analyses through the lens of Rudolf Bernet’s “Einleitung” to this work. My question is twofold: what becomes of the central Husserlian concepts of present and retention in Merleau-Ponty’s later work, and how do Husserl’s elisions, especially of the problem of forgetting, (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  38.  7
    Ron Morstyn (2015). Merleau-Ponty’s “Nightmare” and the Rise of Cognitive Behavior Therapy as a Turning Away From the Truth of Traumatic Adversity. Chiasmi International 17:177-186.
    Cognitive Behavioural Therapy (CBT), is a therapy based on cognitive manipulation which denies the existence of ontological truth. Merleau-Ponty warned of such a development which he labelled a “decadent psychoanalysis.” Merleau-Ponty believed in the existence of ontological truth, not as a matter of cognitive representation nor as something that can be designated by positive indices such as those of psychometric measures or statistical analysis, but as an ontological dimension of the pre-cognitive world. Openness to this pre-reflective truth differentiates (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  39. Galen A. Johnson (ed.) (1993). The Merleau-Ponty Aesthetics Reader: Philosophy and Painting. Northwestern University Press.
    PART INTRODUCTIONS TO MERLEAU- PONTY'S PHI LOSOPH Y OF PAI NTI NG Galen A. Johnson ...
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   15 citations  
  40.  22
    Sara Heinämaa (2015). Anonymity and Personhood: Merleau-Ponty’s Account of the Subject of Perception. Continental Philosophy Review 48 (2):123-142.
    Several commentators have argued that with his concept of anonymity Merleau-Ponty breaks away from classical Husserlian phenomenology that is methodologically tied to the first person perspective. Many contemporary commentators see Merleau-Ponty’s discourse on anonymity as a break away from Husserl’s framework that is seen as hopelessly subjectivistic and solipsistic. Some judge and reproach it as a disastrous misunderstanding that leads to a confusion of philosophical and empirical concerns. Both parties agree that Merleau-Ponty’s concepts of anonymity mark a (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  41.  23
    Marcus Sacrini (2011). Merleau-Ponty’s Transcendental Project. Meta 3 (2):311-334.
    In this paper, I argue that Merleau-Ponty reformulates traditional transcendental philosophy in the sense of showing that the a priori conditions of experience cannot be separated from the concrete experiences. In the first section, I revisit Kant and Husserl, to show how these authors delimit the transcendental conditions as a formal domain independent from any concrete experience. Then I reconstruct the argumentative move through which Merleau-Ponty rejects this formal delimitation of the transcendental sphere and reintroduces it as inseparable (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  42. David Morris, Andrew Robinson & Catherine Duchastel, Concordance of Merleau-Ponty's Phenomenology of Perception.
    This is a concordance of page numbers in the following editions of Merleau-Ponty's Phenomenology of Perception: English editions prior to the Routledge Classics 2002; Routledge Classics edition, with the new pagination; the French edition from Gallimard, prior to 2005; the 2e edition from Gallimard, 2005, with new pagination.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  43.  6
    Frank Chouraqui (2016). Merleau-Ponty and the Order of the Earth. Research in Phenomenology 46 (1):54-69.
    _ Source: _Volume 46, Issue 1, pp 54 - 69 In this essay, I reconstruct Merleau-Ponty’s implicit critique of Husserl in his lectures on Husserl’s concept of the earth as _Boden_ or ground. Against Husserl, Merleau-Ponty regards the earth seen as pure _Boden_ as an idealization. He emphasizes the ontological necessity for the earth as _Boden_ to always hypostasize itself into the Copernican concept of earth as object. In turn, Merleau-Ponty builds this necessity into an essential feature (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  44.  3
    Susan Bredlau (forthcoming). On Perception and Trust: Merleau-Ponty and the Emotional Significance of Our Relations with Others. Continental Philosophy Review:1-14.
    Our perception of the world and our relationships with other people are not, I argue, distinct activities. Focusing, first, on Merleau-Ponty’s description in the Phenomenology of Perception of his playful interaction with an infant, and, second, on contemporary research on the phenomena referred to as neonate imitation, joint attention, and mutual gaze, I argue that perception can be a collaborative endeavor. Moreover, this collaborative endeavor, which is definitive of both infant and adult perception, entails trust; our trust in others (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  45.  51
    Dylan Trigg (2011). The Return of the New Flesh: Body Memory in David Cronenberg and Merleau-Ponty. Film-Philosophy 15 (1):82-99.
    From the “psychoplasmic” offspring in The Brood (1979) to the tattooed encodings in Eastern Promises (2007), David Cronenberg presents a compelling vision of embodiment, which challenges traditional accounts of personal identity and obliges us to ask how human beings persist through different times, places, and bodily states while retaining their sameness. Traditionally, the response to this question has emphasised the importance of cognitive memory in securing the continuity of consciousness. But what has been underplayed in this debate is the question (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  46.  89
    J. C. Berendzen (2010). Coping Without Foundations: On Dreyfus's Use of Merleau-Ponty. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 18 (5):629-649.
    Hubert Dreyfus has recently invoked the work of Maurice Merleau? Ponty in criticizing the?Myth of the Mental?. In criticizing that supposed myth, Dreyfus argues for a kind of foundationalism that takes embodied coping to be a self?sufficient layer of human experience that supports our?higher? mental activities. In turn, Merleau? Ponty?s phenomenology is found, in Dreyfus?s recent writings, to corroborate this foundationalism. While Merleau? Ponty would agree with many of Dreyfus?s points, this paper argues that he would not, in fact, agree (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  47.  82
    Silvia Stoller (2010). Expressivity and Performativity: Merleau-Ponty and Butler. [REVIEW] Continental Philosophy Review 43 (1):97-110.
    Until now post-structuralism and phenomenology are widely regarded as opposites. Contrary to this opinion, I am arguing that they have a lot in common. In order to make my argument, I concentrate on Judith Butler’s poststructuralist concept of performativity to confront it with Maurice Merleau-Ponty’s phenomenological concept of expressivity. While Butler claims that phenomenological theories of expression are in danger of essentialism and thus must be replaced by non-essentialist theories of performativity, I hold that Merleau-Ponty’s concept of expressivity (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  48.  51
    Rudolph Bauer (2012). Phenomenology of the Essence and Appearance in Merleau Ponty. Transmission 6.
    This paper focuses on the phenomenology of essence and appearance in Merleau Ponty.
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  49.  56
    Jack Reynolds (2004). Possible and Impossible, Self and Other, and the Reversibility of Merleau-Ponty and Derrida. Philosophy Today 48 (1):35-49.
    This essay examines some of Derrida’s most famous ‘possible-impossible’ aporias, including his discussions of giving, hospitality, forgiveness, and mourning. He argues that the condition of the possibility of such themes is also, and at once, the condition of their impossibility. In order to reveal the shared logic upon which these aporias rely, and also to raise some questions about their persuasive efficacy, it will be argued that of the two polarities evoked by each of his possible-impossible aporias, the ‘impossible’ term (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  50.  8
    Brock A. Bahler (2015). Merleau-Ponty on Children and Childhood. Childhood and Philosophy 11 (22):203-221.
    Maurice Merleau-Ponty not only published in the fields of phenomenology, aesthetics, politics, and linguistics, but he also lectured as professor of child psychology, which resulted in several texts specifically devoted to the child. Most notably are the works “The Child’s Relations to Others,” Consciousness and the Acquisition of Language, and Child Psychology and Pedagogy: The Sorbonne Lectures, 1949–1952. And yet the question of the child occurs throughout his entire corpus. Thus, it is quite difficult to limit Merleau-Ponty’s philosophy (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
1 — 50 / 1000