16 found
Order:
Disambiguations:
Chris Degeling [16]Christopher Degeling [2]
  1.  11
    Melanie Rock & Chris Degeling (2013). Public Health Ethics and a Status for Pets as Person-Things. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 10 (4):485-495.
    Within the field of medical ethics, discussions related to public health have mainly concentrated on issues that are closely tied to research and practice involving technologies and professional services, including vaccination, screening, and insurance coverage. Broader determinants of population health have received less attention, although this situation is rapidly changing. Against this backdrop, our specific contribution to the literature on ethics and law vis-à-vis promoting population health is to open up the ubiquitous presence of pets within cities and towns for (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  2.  3
    Chris Degeling, Jane Johnson & Christopher Mayes (2015). Impure Politics and Pure Science: Efficacious Ebola Medications Are Only a Palliation and Not a Cure for Structural Disadvantage. American Journal of Bioethics 15 (4):43-45.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  3.  1
    Ross Upshur, Ian Kerridge, Wendy Lipworth, Christopher Mayes & Chris Degeling (2015). The Political and Ethical Challenge of Multi-Drug Resistant Tuberculosis. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 12 (1):107-113.
    This article critically examines current responses to multi-drug resistant tuberculosis and argues that bioethics needs to be willing to engage in a more radical critique of the problem than is currently offered. In particular, we need to focus not simply on market-driven models of innovation and anti-microbial solutions to emergent and re-emergent infections such as TB. The global community also needs to address poverty and the structural factors that entrench inequalities—thus moving beyond the orthodox medical/public health frame of reference.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  4.  7
    Chris Degeling, Ian Kerridge & Melanie Rock (2013). What to Think of Canine Obesity? Emerging Challenges to Our Understanding of Human–Animal Health Relationships. Social Epistemology 27 (1):90 - 104.
    (2013). What to Think of Canine Obesity? Emerging Challenges to Our Understanding of Human–Animal Health Relationships. Social Epistemology: Vol. 27, No. 1, pp. 90-104. doi: 10.1080/02691728.2012.760662.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  5.  2
    Chris Degeling, Zohar Lederman & Melanie Rock (forthcoming). Culling and the Common Good: Re-Evaluating Harms and Benefits Under the One Health Paradigm. Public Health Ethics:phw019.
    One Health is a novel paradigm that recognizes that human and non-human animal health is interlinked through our shared environment. Increasingly prominent in public health responses to zoonoses, OH differs from traditional approaches to animal-borne infectious risks, because it also aims to promote the health of animals and ecological systems. Despite the widespread adoption of OH, culling remains a key component of institutional responses to the risks of zoonoses. Using the threats posed by highly pathogenic avian influenza viruses to human (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  6.  7
    Chris Degeling (2010). Cutting a Bone to Heal a Ligament: Idealized Animals and Orthopaedics. [REVIEW] Medicine Studies 2 (2):101-119.
    Developments in biomedical science continue to transform our understanding of concepts such as health and disease. The creation of this expertise has also had a substantive role in changing the veterinary approach to animal diseases. Traditionally, companion animal veterinarians modelled their practices on developments in the diagnosis and treatment of human patients. As science and technology have realigned the boundaries between normalcy, intra-species variation and pathology in particular domains of expertise such as orthopaedic surgery, these patterns of knowledge translation have (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  7.  7
    Chris Degeling & Jane Johnson (2015). Citizens, Consumers and Animals: What Role Do Experts Assign to Public Values in Establishing Animal Welfare Standards? Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 28 (5):961-976.
    The public can influence animal welfare law and regulation. However what constitutes ‘the public’ is not a straightforward matter. A variety of different publics have an interest in animal use and this has implications for the governance of animal welfare. This article presents an ethnographic content analysis of how the concept of a public is mobilized in animal welfare journals from 2003 to 2012. The study was undertaken to explore how experts in the discipline define and regard the role of (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  8.  7
    Rob Irvine, Chris Degeling & Ian Kerridge (2013). Bioethics and Nonhuman Animals. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 10 (4):435-440.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  9.  6
    Chris Degeling (2009). The Rise of The Medical Research Council and The Politics of Control. Metascience 18 (3):437-441.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  10.  1
    Paul H. Mason & Chris Degeling (2016). Beyond Biomedicine: Relationships and Care in Tuberculosis Prevention. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 13 (1):31-34.
    With attention to the experiences, agency, and rights of tuberculosis patients, this symposium on TB and ethics brings together a range of different voices from the social sciences and humanities. To develop fresh insights and new approaches to TB care and prevention, it is important to incorporate diverse perspectives from outside the strictly biomedical model. In the articles presented in this issue of the Journal of Bioethical Inquiry, clinical experience is married with historical and cultural context, ethical concerns are brought (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  11.  12
    Chris Degeling, Cynthia Townley & Wendy Rogers (2011). Understanding Corporate Responsibility: Culture and Complicity. American Journal of Bioethics 11 (9):18-20.
    The American Journal of Bioethics, Volume 11, Issue 9, Page 18-20, September 2011.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  12.  9
    Wendy Rogers, Christopher Degeling & Cynthia Townley (2014). Equity Under the Knife: Justice and Evidence in Surgery. Bioethics 28 (3):119-126.
    Surgery is an increasingly common and expensive mode of medical intervention. The ethical dimensions of the surgeon-patient relationship, including respect for personal autonomy and informed consent, are much discussed; but broader equity issues have not received the same attention. This paper extends the understanding of surgical ethics by considering the nature of evidence in surgery and its relationship to a just provision of healthcare for individuals and their populations.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  13.  8
    Rob Irvine, Chris Degeling & Ian Kerridge (2012). Uncanny Animals: Thinking Differently About Ethics and the Animal–Human Relationship. American Journal of Bioethics 12 (9):30-32.
    The American Journal of Bioethics, Volume 12, Issue 9, Page 30-32, September 2012.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  14.  3
    Jane Johnson & Christopher Degeling (2011). Animals-as-Patients: Improving the Practice of Animal Experimentation. Between the Species 15 (1):4.
    In this paper we propose a new way of conceptualizing animals in experimentation – the animal-as-patient. Construing and treating animals as patients offers a way of successfully addressing some of the entrenched epistemological and ethical problems within a practice of animal experimentation directed to human clinical benefit. This approach is grounded in an epistemological insight and builds on work with so-called ‘pet models’. It relies upon the occurrence and characterization of analogous human and nonhuman animal diseases, where, if certain criteria (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  15.  4
    Chris Degeling & Jane Johnson (2009). Underdetermined Interests: Scientific 'Goods' and Animal Welfare. American Journal of Bioethics 9 (12):64-66.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  16.  1
    Chris Degeling & Jane Johnson (2009). Lost in Translation: Gaps in Reasoning for Primate Stroke. American Journal of Bioethics 9 (5):23-25.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography