12 found
Order:
See also:
Profile: Christian Coons (Bowling Green State University)
  1. Christian Coons (2011). How to Prove That Some Acts Are Wrong (Without Using Substantive Moral Premises). Philosophical Studies 155 (1):83–98.
    I first argue that there are many true claims of the form: x-ing would be morally required, if anything is. I then explain why the following conditional-type is true: If x-ing would be morally required, if anything is, then x-ing is actually morally required. These results allow us to construct valid proofs for the existence of some substantive moral facts—proofs that some particular acts really are morally required. Most importantly, none of my argumentation presupposes any substantive moral claim; I use (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   5 citations  
  2. Christian Coons & Michael Weber (eds.) (2013). Paternalism: Theory and Practice. Cambridge University Press.
    Is it allowable for your government, or anyone else, to influence or coerce you 'for your own sake'? This is a question about paternalism, or interference with a person's liberty or autonomy with the intention of promoting their good or averting harm, which has created considerable controversy at least since John Stuart Mill's On Liberty. Mill famously decried paternalism of any kind, whether carried out by private individuals or the state. In this volume of new essays, leading moral, political and (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  3.  27
    Christian Coons (2014). Hope for Fools: Four Proposals for Meeting Temkin's Challenge. Analysis 74 (2):292-306.
  4. Christian Coons (forthcoming). The Best Expression of Welfarism. In Mark C. Timmons (ed.), Oxford Studies in Normative Ethics. Oxford University Press
  5. Christian Coons & Noah Levin (2011). The Dead Donor Rule, Voluntary Active Euthanasia, and Capital Punishment. Bioethics 25 (5):236-243.
    We argue that the dead donor rule, which states that multiple vital organs should only be taken from dead patients, is justified neither in principle nor in practice. We use a thought experiment and a guiding assumption in the literature about the justification of moral principles to undermine the theoretical justification for the rule. We then offer two real world analogues to this thought experiment, voluntary active euthanasia and capital punishment, and argue that the moral permissibility of terminating any patient (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  6. Christian Coons & David Faraci (2010). First-Personal Authority and the Normativity of Rationality. Philosophia 38 (4):733-740.
    In “Vindicating the Normativity of Rationality,” Nicholas Southwood proposes that rational requirements are best understood as demands of one’s “first-personal standpoint.” Southwood argues that this view can “explain the normativity or reason-giving force” of rationality by showing that they “are the kinds of thing that are, by their very nature, normative.” We argue that the proposal fails on three counts: First, we explain why demands of one’s first-personal standpoint cannot be both reason-giving and resemble requirements of rationality. Second, the proposal (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  7.  41
    Christian Coons (2012). Toni Rønnow-Rasmussen, Personal Value. [REVIEW] Ethics 123 (1):183-188.
  8.  45
    Christian Coons (2001). Wellman's “Reductive” Justifications for Redistributive Policies That Favor Compatriots. Ethics 111 (4):782-788.
  9. Christian Coons (2011). How to Prove That Some Acts Are Wrong. Philosophical Studies 155 (1):83-98.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  10.  8
    Christian Coons & Michael Weber (eds.) (2014). Manipulation: Theory and Practice. OUP Usa.
    A great deal of scholarly attention has been paid to coercion. Less attention has been paid to what might be a more pervasive form of influence: manipulation. The essays in this volume address this relative imbalance by focusing on manipulation, examining its nature, moral status, and its significance in personal and social life.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  11. Christian Coons & Michael Weber (eds.) (2014). Manipulation: Theory and Practice. Oxford University Press Usa.
    In all groups -- from couples to nation-states -- people influence one another. Much of this influence is benign, for example giving advice to friends or serving as role models for our children and students. Some forms of influence, however, are clearly morally suspect, such as threats of violence and blackmail. A great deal of attention has been paid to one form of morally suspect influence, namely coercion. Less attention has been paid to what might be a more pervasive form (...)
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  12. Christian Coons & Michael Weber (eds.) (2016). The Ethics of Self-Defense. Oxford University Press Usa.
    The fifteen new essays collected in this volume address questions concerning the ethics of self-defense, most centrally when and to what extent the use of defensive force, especially lethal force, can be justified. Scholarly interest in this topic reflects public concern stemming from controversial cases of the use of force by police, and military force exercised in the name of defending against transnational terrorism. The contributors pay special attention to determining when a threat is liable to defensive harm, though doubts (...)
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography