6 found
Order:
  1.  63
    Christopher C. Knight (2009). Theistic Naturalism and "Special" Divine Providence. Zygon 44 (3):533-542.
    Although naturalistic perspectives are an important component of their accounts of divine action, most participants in the current dialogue between science and theology eschew a purely naturalistic model. They believe that certain events of divine providence require a special mode of divine action, over and above that inherent in naturalistic processes. The analogy of human providential action suggests, however, that a strong theistic naturalism can account for these events. This model does not depend on a particular notion of God's relationship (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  2.  1
    Christopher C. Knight (2016). The Synoptic Problem: Some Methodological Considerations and a New Hypothesis. Heythrop Journal 57 (4):n/a-n/a.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  3.  2
    Christopher C. Knight (2005). Divine Action: A Neo-Byzantine Model. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 58 (3):181-199.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  4.  32
    Christopher C. Knight (2005). Divine Action: A Neo-Byzantine Model. [REVIEW] International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 58 (3):181 - 199.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  5.  5
    Christopher C. Knight (2014). Science and Orthodox Christianity: Some Historical Perspectives. Metascience 23 (3):561-564.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  6.  4
    Christopher C. Knight (2013). Natural Theology and the Eastern Orthodox Tradition. In J. H. Brooke, F. Watts & R. R. Manning (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Natural Theology. Oxford Up 213.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography