8 found
Sort by:
See also:
  1. Christopher Knapp (2009). Species Inegalitarianism as a Matter of Principle. Journal of Applied Philosophy 26 (2):174-189.
    Most critics of species egalitarianism point to its counter-intuitive implications in particular cases. But this argumentative strategy is vulnerable to the response that our intuitions should give way in the face of arguments showing that species egalitarianism is required by our deepest, most fundamental moral principles. In this article, I develop an argument against deontological versions of species egalitarianism on its own terms. Appealing to the fundamental moral ideal of proportionality, I show that deontological species egalitarianism is morally objectionable as (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Christopher Knapp (2007). Assessing Grading. Public Affairs Quarterly 21 (3):275-294.
    This paper begins with a description of common grading practices at universities in the U.S., and analyzes the unfairness, injustice, and harm they produce. It then proposes a solution to these problems in the form of an alternative grading system: institutions should adopt a grading system that assesses students’ performance relative to the performance of their peers. That is, institutions should abolish the practice of attempting to assign grades that correspond to an absolute standard of intrinsic merit. Instead, our evaluation (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Christopher Knapp (2007). Equality and Proportionality. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 37 (2):179-201.
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Christopher Knapp (2007). On Disgust. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 74 (2):523–526.
    No categories
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Christopher Knapp (2007). Trading Quality for Quantity. Journal of Philosophical Research 32 (1):211-233.
    This paper deals with problems that vagueness raises for choices involving evaluative tradeoffs. I focus on a species of such choices, which I call ‘qualitative barrier cases.’ These are cases in which a qualitatively significant tradeoff in one evaluative dimension for a given improvement in another dimension could not make an option better all things considered, but a merely quantitative tradeoff for the given improvement might. Trouble arises, however, when one of the options constitutes a borderline case of an evaluative (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Christopher Knapp (2004). When Hard Choices Become Easy. American Journal of Philosophy 41 (4):232-330.
    By analyzing cases in which we must choose between options whose values are not precisely comparable, this paper presents the case for the existence of a previously unrecognized class of practical reasons – reasons that arise from how the value of an option compares to the values of the alternatives. Several implications of these comparative value-based reasons are discussed – including the context-dependence of one option’s being ‘rationally preferable to’ an alternative, and the fact that, even when the values of (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Christopher Knapp (2003). De-Moralizing Disgustingness. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 66 (2):253–278.
    Understanding disgustingness is philosophically important partly because claims about disgustingness play a prominent role in moral discourse and practice. It is also important because disgustingness has been used to illustrate the promise of "neo-sentimentalism." Recently developed by moral philosophers such as David Wiggins, John McDowell, Simon Blackburn, Justin D'Arms and Dan Jacobson, neo-sentimentalism holds that for a thing to be disgusting is for it to be "appropriate" to respond to it with disgust. In this paper, I argue that from what (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation