Search results for 'Chrysostomos Mantzavinos' (try it on Scholar)

67 found
Order:
  1. Richard de Blacquière-Clarkson (2006). Chrysostomos Mantzavinos, Naturalistic Hermeneutics Reviewed by. Philosophy in Review 26 (6):431-433.
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  2.  20
    C. Mantzavinos (2005). Naturalistic Hermeneutics. Cambridge University Press.
    Naturalistic Hermeneutics proposes the position of the unity of the scientific method and defends it against the claim to autonomy of the human sciences. Mantzavinos shows how materials that are 'meaningful', more specifically human actions and texts, can be adequately dealt with by the hypothetico-deductive method, the standard method used in the natural sciences. The hermeneutic method is not an alternative method aimed at the understanding and the interpretation of human actions and texts, but it is the same as (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  3.  3
    C. Mantzavinos (2001). Individuals, Institutions, and Markets. Cambridge University Press.
    Individuals, Institutions, and Markets offers a theory of how the institutional framework of a society emerges and how markets within institutions work. The book shows that both social institutions, defined as the rules of the game, and exchange processes can be analyzed along a common theoretical structure. Mantzavinos' proposal is that a problem solving model of individual behavior inspired by the cognitive sciences provides such a unifying theoretical structure. Integrating the latest scholarship in economics, sociology, political science, law, and (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  4.  3
    C. Mantzavinos (2016). Explanatory Pluralism. Cambridge University Press.
    Explaining phenomena is one of the main activities in which scientists engage. This book proposes a new philosophical theory of scientific explanation by developing and defending the position of explanatory pluralism with the help of the notion of 'explanatory games'. Mantzavinos provides a descriptive account of the explanatory activity of scientists in different domains and shows how they differ from commonsensical explanations offered in everyday life by ordinary people and also from explanations offered in religious contexts. He also shows (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  5. C. Mantzavinos (2012). Herméneutique Naturaliste. Presses de l' Université Paris-Sorbonne.
    Ce livre montre qu'il est possible de défendre la position selon laquelle les actions humaines ont un sens, et en même temps la position que les actions humaines et tous les éléments qui ont un sens peuvent être appréhendés scientifiquement à partir de la méthode prévalant dans les sciences naturelles. Il adopte une position originale et radicale : la thèse qu'il n'y a pas de différence méthodologique fondamentale entre les sciences naturelles d'un côté, les sciences sociales et les humanités de (...)
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  6. C. Mantzavinos (2013). Explanatory Games. Journal of Philosophy (November 2013):606-632.
  7.  76
    C. Mantzavinos (2015). Scientific Explanation. In International Encyclopedia of Social and Behavioral Sciences. Elsevier 302-307.
    There are three main approaches to scientific explanation in the philosophical literature. The unification approach claims that science explains by fitting the particular facts and events within a general theoretical framework. The mechanistic approach claims that science explains by identifying mechanisms. According to the manipulationist approach an explanation ought to be such that it can be used to answer a “what-if-things-had-been-different question.” The article examines whether these three approaches are compatible or not in the case of the social sciences, and (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  8.  80
    C. Mantzavinos (2006). The Institutional-Evolutionary Antitrust Model. European Journal of Law and Economics 22.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  9.  55
    C. Mantzavinos (2007). Interpreting the Rules of the Game. In Christoph Engel Firtz Strack (ed.), The Impact of Court Procedure on the Psychology of Judicial Decision-Making. Nomos
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  10.  74
    C. Mantzavinos (2010). Federalism and Individual Liberty. Constitutional Political Economy 21.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  11.  38
    C. Mantzavinos (2006). The Role of Definitions in Institutional Analysis. In Frank Daumann, C. Mantzavinos & Stefan Okruch (eds.), Wettbewerb im Gesundheitswesen. Konzeptionen und Felder ordnungsökonomischen Denkens.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  12.  5
    C. Mantzavinos (2004). Learning, Institutions, and Economic Performance. Perspectives on Politics 2.
  13.  37
    C. Mantzavinos (2003). Beyond Homo Oeconomicus and Homo Sociologicus. In Raymond Boudon Cherkaoui Mohamed (ed.), The European Tradition in Qualitative Research. 421-426.
  14.  2
    C. Mantzavinos (2015). The Plurality of Explanatory Games. In Gianluca Manzo (ed.), Theories and Social Mechanisms. 325-335.
  15.  26
    C. Mantzavinos (2014). On the Legitimacy of Intervention. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics 170 (1).
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  16.  20
    C. Mantzavinos (2013). Le Cercle Herméneutique. De Quel Type de Problème S'Agit-il? L' Année Sociologique 63.
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  17.  24
    C. Mantzavinos (2009). A Note on Methodological Individualism. In Mohamed Cherkaoui Peter Hamilton (ed.), Raymond Boudon. A Life in Sociology.
  18.  26
    C. Mantzavinos (2012). The Ethical Project. A Dialogue. Analyse & Kritik 34 (1):21-38.
    In this dialogue the position of Pragmatic Naturalism as defended in Philip Kitcher’s The Ethical Project is presented and criticized. The approach is developed dialectically by the two interlocutors and a series of critical points are debated. The dialogical form is intended to honor the main objective in The Ethical Project: to establish an ongoing conversation on ways to improve moral conceptions and processes, which grow naturally out of the very conditions of human life.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  19.  3
    C. Mantzavinos (2005). Das Institutionenökonomisch-Evolutionäre Wettbewerbsleitbild. Jahrbücher für Nationalökonomie Und Statistik 225.
  20.  17
    C. Mantzavinos (2006). Comment on Nancy Cartwright's 'Against the System'. In Christoph Engel Lorraine Daston (ed.), Is There Value in Inconsistency? 57-62.
  21.  16
    C. Mantzavinos, Douglass North & Syed Shariq (2009). Apprentissage, Institutions, et Performance Économique. L'Année Sociologique 59 (2).
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  22.  41
    C. Mantzavinos (2012). Explanations of Meaningful Actions. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 42 (2):224-238.
    There is a long tradition in philosophy and the social sciences that emphasizes the meaningfulness of human action. This tradition doubts or even negates the possibility of causal explanations of human action precisely on the basis that human actions have meaning. This article provides an argument in favor of methodological naturalism in the social sciences. It grants the main argument of the Interpretivists, that is, that human actions are meaningful, but it shows how a transformation of a "nexus of meaning" (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  23.  15
    C. Mantzavinos (2000). Kommentar zu Herrmann Sauter, Menschenrechte und Menschenrechtsstandards im Globalisierungsprozess. Jahrbuch für Neue Politische Ökonomie 19.
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  24.  15
    C. Mantzavinos (2001). Comment on Ekkehart Schlicht's 'Aestheticism in the Theory of Custom'. Journal des Economistes Et des Etudes Humaines 11.
  25.  16
    C. Mantzavinos (2010). Der Beitrag Erich Hoppmanns. In Viktor Vanberg (ed.), Evolution und Freiheitlicher Wettbewerb. Erich Hoppmann und die aktuelle Diskussion.
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  26.  13
    C. Mantzavinos (2011). Institutions. In Ian Jarvie Jesús Zamora-Bonilla (ed.), The SAGE Handbook of the Philosophy of Science.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  27.  18
    C. Mantzavinos (2008). Was für ein Problem ist der hermeneutische Zirkel? Analyse & Kritik 30 (2):601-612.
    The hermeneutic circle serves as a standard argument for all those who raise a claim to the autonomy of the human sciences. The proponents of an alternative methodology for the human sciences present the hermeneutic circle either as an ontological problem or as a specific methodological problem in the social sciences and the humanities. In this paper I would like to check the soundness of this argument. I will start with listing and shortly sketching out three variations of the problem. (...)
    Translate
      Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  28.  11
    C. Mantzavinos (2011). Federalism and Individual Liberty: A Rejoinder. Constitutional Political Economy 22.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  29.  10
    C. Mantzavinos (1994). Positive und normative Wettbewerbstheorie: der Versuch einer Systematisierung. In Alfred E. Ott (ed.), Probleme der Unvollkommenen Konkurrenz. 65-73.
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  30.  17
    C. Mantzavinos (2009). What Kind of Problem is the Hermeneutic Circle? In Chrysostomos Mantzavinos (ed.), Philosophy of the Social Sciences: Philosophical Theory and Scientific Practice. Cambridge University Press 299.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  31.  11
    C. Mantzavinos (2007). Zur Verteidigung des Institutionenökonomisch-Evolutionären Wettberbsleitbildes. ORDO 58.
  32.  7
    C. Mantzavinos (2012). Föderalismus und Individuelle Freiheit. In Harald Enke Adolf Wagner (ed.), Zur Zukunft des Wettbewerbs.
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  33.  12
    C. Mantzavinos, Douglass C. North & Syed Shariq (2005). Lernen, Institutionen und Wirtschaftsleistung. Analyse & Kritik 27 (2):320-337.
    This article provides a broad overview of the interplay among cognition, belief systems and institutions, fleshing out a position best characterized as 'cognitive institutionalism'. We argue that a deeper understanding of institutions, emergence, their working properties and their effect on economic performance should start with the analysis of cognitive processes. Exploring the nature of individual and collective learning the article suggests that the issue is not whether agents are perfectly or boundedly rational, but rather how human beings actually reason and (...)
    No categories
    Translate
      Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  34.  1
    C. Mantzavinos (2009). Introduction. In Chrysostomos Mantzavinos (ed.), Philosophy of the Social Sciences: Philosophical Theory and Scientific Practice. Cambridge University Press
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  35.  7
    C. Mantzavinos (2014). Text Interpretation as a Scientific Activity. Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 45 (1):45-58.
    One way to show that text interpretation can be treated as a scientific problem is to show that the standards that are currently used in the natural sciences when dealing with problems not involving meaningful material can also be successfully employed in the case of text interpretation. These standards involve intersubjective intelligibility, testability with the use of evidence, rational argumentation, and making methodological decisions aiming at the attainment of truth, accuracy, simplicity and other epistemic values. In the case of text (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  36.  14
    C. Mantzavinos (2013). Faye's Naturalistic Reconstruction of the Humanities. Metascience 22 (1):105-110.
    No categories
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  37.  4
    C. Mantzavinos (2008). How to Explain Meaningful Actions. Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 46:53-61.
    There is a long tradition in the philosophy of the social sciences that emphasizes the meaningfulness of human action. This tradition doubts or even negates the possibility of causal explanations of human action precisely on the basis that human actions have meaning. This paper provides an argument in favour of methodological naturalism in the social sciences. It grants the main argument of the Interpretivists, i.e. that human actions are meaningful, but it shows how a transformation of a “nexus of meaning” (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  38. Frank Daumann, C. Mantzavinos & Stefan Okruch (eds.) (2006). Wettbewerb Im Gesundheitswesen. Konzeptionen Und Felder Ordnungsökonomischen Denkens.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  39. C. Mantzavinos (1992). Contestable Markets, das Neoklassische Marktmodell und die Wettbewerbstheorie. Jahrbücher für Nationalökonomie Und Statistik 209.
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  40. C. Mantzavinos (1999). Carl Menger und die Wettbewerbstheorie. Jahrbücher für Nationalökonomie Und Statistik 219.
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  41. C. Mantzavinos (2009). Epilogue. In Chrysostomos Mantzavinos (ed.), Philosophy of the Social Sciences. Cambridge University Press 111-113.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  42. C. Mantzavinos (2013). Explanatory Games. Journal of Philosophy 110 (11):606-632.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  43.  1
    C. Mantzavinos (2008). Individus, Institutions et Marchés. Presses Universitaires de France.
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  44.  4
    C. Mantzavinos (2007). Individuen, Institutionen und Märkte. Mohr Siebeck.
    Translate
      Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  45.  5
    C. Mantzavinos (2006). Naturalistische Hermeneutik. Mohr Siebeck.
    The central thesis is, thus, that there is no fundamental methodological difference between natural sciences, social sciences and humanities. The English edition of this work was published by Cambridge University Press.
    Translate
      Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  46. C. Mantzavinos (2008). On Don Ross's Defense of Neoclassical Economics. Journal of Economic Methodology 15 (3).
  47.  30
    C. Mantzavinos (ed.) (2009). Philosophy of the Social Sciences: Philosophical Theory and Scientific Practice. Cambridge University Press.
    This volume is a unique contribution to the philosophy of the social sciences, presenting the results of cutting-edge philosophers' research alongside critical discussions by practicing social scientists. The book is motivated by the view that the philosophy of the social sciences cannot ignore the specific scientific practices according to which social scientific work is being conducted, and that it will be valuable only if it evolves in constant interaction with theoretical developments in the social sciences. With its unique format guaranteeing (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  48. C. Mantzavinos (1994). Wettbewerbstheorie. Duncker & Humblot.
  49.  90
    Michiru Nagatsu (2011). Philosophy of the Social Sciences: Philosophical Theory and Scientific Practice, Edited by C. Mantzavinos. Cambridge University Press, 2009. Ix + 333 Pages. [REVIEW] Economics and Philosophy 27 (1):75-83.
  50.  6
    Gerhard Podskalsky (2006). Johannes Chrysostomos und Byzanz. Augustinianum 46 (1):157-167.
    No categories
    Translate
      Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
1 — 50 / 67