Search results for 'Chrysostomos Mantzavinos' (try it on Scholar)

30 found
Sort by:
  1. C. Mantzavinos (2005). Naturalistic Hermeneutics. Cambridge University Press.score: 300.0
    Naturalistic Hermeneutics proposes the position of the unity of the scientific method and defends it against the claim to autonomy of the human sciences. Mantzavinos shows how materials that are 'meaningful', more specifically human actions and texts, can be adequately dealt with by the hypothetico-deductive method, the standard method used in the natural sciences. The hermeneutic method is not an alternative method aimed at the understanding and the interpretation of human actions and texts, but it is the same as (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. C. Mantzavinos (ed.) (2009). Philosophy of the Social Sciences: Philosophical Theory and Scientific Practice. Cambridge University Press.score: 240.0
    This volume is a unique contribution to the philosophy of the social sciences, presenting the results of cutting-edge philosophers' research alongside critical discussions by practicing social scientists. The book is motivated by the view that the philosophy of the social sciences cannot ignore the specific scientific practices according to which social scientific work is being conducted, and that it will be valuable only if it evolves in constant interaction with theoretical developments in the social sciences. With its unique format guaranteeing (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. C. Mantzavinos (2006). Naturalistische Hermeneutik. Mohr Siebeck.score: 240.0
    The central thesis is, thus, that there is no fundamental methodological difference between natural sciences, social sciences and humanities. The English edition of this work was published by Cambridge University Press.
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Richard de Blacquière-Clarkson (2006). Chrysostomos Mantzavinos, Naturalistic Hermeneutics Reviewed by. Philosophy in Review 26 (6):431-433.score: 150.0
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. C. Mantzavinos (2012). Explanations of Meaningful Actions. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 42 (2):224-238.score: 30.0
    There is a long tradition in philosophy and the social sciences that emphasizes the meaningfulness of human action. This tradition doubts or even negates the possibility of causal explanations of human action precisely on the basis that human actions have meaning. This article provides an argument in favor of methodological naturalism in the social sciences. It grants the main argument of the Interpretivists, that is, that human actions are meaningful, but it shows how a transformation of a "nexus of meaning" (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. C. Mantzavinos (2009). What Kind of Problem is the Hermeneutic Circle? In Chrysostomos Mantzavinos (ed.), Philosophy of the Social Sciences: Philosophical Theory and Scientific Practice. Cambridge University Press. 299.score: 30.0
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. C. Mantzavinos (2013). Faye's Naturalistic Reconstruction of the Humanities. Metascience 22 (1):105-110.score: 30.0
    No categories
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. C. Mantzavinos (2008). How to Explain Meaningful Actions. Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 46:53-61.score: 30.0
    There is a long tradition in the philosophy of the social sciences that emphasizes the meaningfulness of human action. This tradition doubts or even negates the possibility of causal explanations of human action precisely on the basis that human actions have meaning. This paper provides an argument in favour of methodological naturalism in the social sciences. It grants the main argument of the Interpretivists, i.e. that human actions are meaningful, but it shows how a transformation of a “nexus of meaning” (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. C. Mantzavinos, Douglass C. North & Syed Shariq (2005). Lernen, Institutionen und Wirtschaftsleistung. Analyse and Kritik 27:320-337.score: 30.0
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. C. Mantzavinos (2008). Was für ein Problem ist der hermeneutische Zirkel? Analyse and Kritik 30 (2).score: 30.0
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. C. Mantzavinos (2009). Epilogue. In Chrysostomos Mantzavinos (ed.), Philosophy of the Social Sciences: Philosophical Theory and Scientific Practice. Cambridge University Press.score: 30.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. C. Mantzavinos (2009). Introduction. In Chrysostomos Mantzavinos (ed.), Philosophy of the Social Sciences: Philosophical Theory and Scientific Practice. Cambridge University Press.score: 30.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. C. Mantzavinos (forthcoming). Text Interpretation as a Scientific Activity. Journal for General Philosophy of Science:1-14.score: 30.0
    One way to show that text interpretation can be treated as a scientific problem is to show that the standards that are currently used in the natural sciences when dealing with problems not involving meaningful material can also be successfully employed in the case of text interpretation. These standards involve (but are not confined to) intersubjective intelligibility, testability with the use of evidence, rational argumentation, and making methodological decisions aiming at the attainment of truth, accuracy, simplicity and other epistemic values. (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. Michiru Nagatsu (2011). Philosophy of the Social Sciences: Philosophical Theory and Scientific Practice, Edited by C. Mantzavinos. Cambridge University Press, 2009. Ix + 333 Pages. [REVIEW] Economics and Philosophy 27 (1):75-83.score: 15.0
  15. Bradford Mccall (2009). C. Mantzavinos: Naturalistic hermeneutics. [REVIEW] Minds and Machines 19 (2):273-274.score: 15.0
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. Paul A. Roth (2006). Review of C. Mantzavinos, Naturalistic Hermeneutics. [REVIEW] Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2006 (2).score: 15.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. Warren Schmaus (2010). Review of C. Mantzavinos, Philosophy of the Social Sciences: Philosophical Theory and Scientific Practice. [REVIEW] Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2010 (6).score: 15.0
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. Richard S. Briggs (2009). Understanding Hermeneutics. By Lawrence K. Schmidt Naturalistic Hermeneutics. By C. Mantzavinos Hermeneutics at the Crossroads. Edited by Kevin J. Vanhoozer, James K.A. Smith & Bruce Ellis Benson Issues in Interpretation Theory (Marquette Studies in Philosophy 49). Edited by Pol Vandevelde. [REVIEW] Heythrop Journal 50 (1):117-118.score: 15.0
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. Rosalinde Kearsley (2010). Roman Bithynia (T.) Bekker-Nielsen Urban Life and Local Politics in Roman Bithynia. The Small World of Dion Chrysostomos. (Black Sea Studies 7.) Pp. 211, Ills, Maps. Aarhus: Aarhus University Press, 2008. Cased, £26.95, €37.95, US$40. ISBN: 978-87-7934-350-. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 60 (02):393-395.score: 15.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. H. Chadwick (1962). Hermann Josef Frings: Medizin und Arzt bet den griechischen Kirchenvätern bis Chrysostomos. (Bonn diss.) Pp. 129. Bonn: privately printed, 1959. Stiff paper. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 12 (02):170-.score: 15.0
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. W. H. C. Frend (1992). Ursula Hagedorn, Dieter Hagedorn (edd., trs.): Johannes Chrysostomos, Kommentar zu Hiob. (Patristische Texte und Studien, 35.) Pp. xliii + 323 (text double). Berlin and New York: EDe Gruyter, 1990. DM 284. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 42 (01):187-188.score: 15.0
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  22. H. Chadwick (1970). Theodoros Nikolaou: Der Neid bei Johannes Chrysostomos unter Berücksichtigung der griechischen Philosophie. Pp. 110. Bonn: Bouvier, 1969. Stiff paper, DM. 19.80. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 20 (02):245-.score: 15.0
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  23. Gerhard Podskalsky (2006). Johannes Chrysostomos und Byzanz. Augustinianum 46 (1):157-167.score: 15.0
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  24. Karl Praechter (1892). II. Dion Chrysostomos Als Quelle Julians. Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 5 (1):42-51.score: 15.0
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  25. A. Rhoby (2005). Johannes Chrysostomos Und Theodosios Zygomalas. Byzantion 75:507-511.score: 15.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  26. Heinz-Günther Nesselrath (2009). Dio von Prus: Der Philosoph Und Sein Bild. Mohr Siebeck.score: 3.0
    This volume presents some discourses (or. 54, 55, 70, 71 and 72) written by the orator and philosopher Dio of Prusa (about 40 - after 111 AD), who was also called Chrysostomos ("Golden Mouth"). Of these texts there have never been detailed commentaries up to now. They draw an image of the philosopher not as an abstract thinker but as a new Odysseus, Heracles, but also as a new Socrates or Diogenes, who purposely interferes in people's affairs and by (...)
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  27. R. M. D. & Chrysostomos Papadopoulos (1935). Oi Neomartures. Journal of Hellenic Studies 55:112.score: 3.0
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  28. W. M. & Chrysostomos Papadopoulos (1929). Ἡ Ἐκκλησία Κύπρου Ἐπὶ Τουρκοκρατίας (1571-1878)H Ekklhsia Kuprou Epi Tourkokratias (1571-1878). Journal of Hellenic Studies 49:297.score: 3.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  29. W. M. & Chrysostomos Papadopoulos (1935). O Larisshs-Trikkhs Dionusios B' o 'Filosofos,' o xleuastikws epiklhqeis 'Skullosofos.'. Journal of Hellenic Studies 55:111.score: 3.0
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  30. W. M., Woldemar Graf Uxkull-Gyllenband, Georg Misch, Humbert Wolfe & Chrysostomos Papadopoulos (1928). Plutarch und die griechische BiographieDer Weg in die PhilosophieOthers AbideἩἘκκλησία Ἀθηνω̑νHEkklhsia Aqhnwn. Journal of Hellenic Studies 48:279.score: 3.0
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation