6 found
Sort by:
Disambiguations:
Claudia Emerson [4]Claudia I. Emerson [2]
  1. Donald J. Willison, Nancy Ondrusek, Angus Dawson, Claudia Emerson, Lorraine E. Ferris, Raphael Saginur, Heather Sampson & Ross Upshur (2014). What Makes Public Health Studies Ethical? Dissolving the Boundary Between Research and Practice. BMC Medical Ethics 15 (1):61.
    The generation of evidence is integral to the work of public health and health service providers. Traditionally, ethics has been addressed differently in research projects, compared with other forms of evidence generation, such as quality improvement, program evaluation, and surveillance, with review of non-research activities falling outside the purview of the research ethics board. However, the boundaries between research and these other evaluative activities are not distinct. Efforts to delineate a boundary – whether on grounds of primary purpose, temporality, underlying (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Claudia I. Emerson, Peter A. Singer & Ross Eg Upshur (2011). Access and Use of Human Tissues From the Developing World: Ethical Challenges and a Way Forward Using a Tissue Trust. BMC Medical Ethics 12 (1):2.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Claudia Emerson, Ross Upshur & Abdallah Daar (2009). Empirical Bioethics Research in the Developing World: When the 'Is' is Close to an 'Ought'. American Journal of Bioethics 9 (6):101-103.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Elaine Gibson, Kevin Brazil, Michael D. Coughlin, Claudia Emerson, Francois Fournier, Lisa Schwartz, Karen V. Szala-Meneok, Karen M. Weisbaum & Donald J. Willison (2008). Who's Minding the Shop? The Role of Canadian Research Ethics Boards in the Creation and Uses of Registries and Biobanks. BMC Medical Ethics 9 (1):17-.
    BackgroundThe amount of research utilizing health information has increased dramatically over the last ten years. Many institutions have extensive biobank holdings collected over a number of years for clinical and teaching purposes, but are uncertain as to the proper circumstances in which to permit research uses of these samples. Research Ethics Boards (REBs) in Canada and elsewhere in the world are grappling with these issues, but lack clear guidance regarding their role in the creation of and access to registries and (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Donald J. Willison, Claudia Emerson, Karen V. Szala-Meneok, Elaine Gibson, Lisa Schwartz, Karen M. Weisbaum, François Fournier, Kevin Brazil & Michael D. Coughlin (2008). Access to Medical Records for Research Purposes: Varying Perceptions Across Research Ethics Boards. Journal of Medical Ethics 34 (4):308-314.
    Introduction: Variation across research ethics boards in conditions placed on access to medical records for research purposes raises concerns around negative impacts on research quality and on human subject protection, including privacy.Aim: To study variation in REB consent requirements for retrospective chart review and who may have access to the medical record for data abstraction.Methods: Thirty 90-min face-to-face interviews were conducted with REB chairs and administrators affiliated with faculties of medicine in Canadian universities, using structured questions around a case study (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Claudia I. Emerson & Abdallah S. Daar (2007). Defining Conscience and Acting Conscientiously. American Journal of Bioethics 7 (12):19 – 21.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation